Leaderboard

To be honest, on a personal level as I don't have kids whose future I should be worried about, I don't give a shit what Finland will look like in the year 2100 if we are an Islamic republic or a member-state of a European caliphate but as most people of my age do have kids their silence really confuses me. The direction we are heading towards is really doom and yet nobody speaks out. Our MSM, universities etc have done a wonderful job brainwashing people into believing that what is going on today is inevitable and for people's own good.

Indeed, some people here in Finland say that we must get rid of the EU in order to restore sanity but unfortunately the problem is far wider than that. I wish it were so simple as that but it isn't Take Norway or Canada. Neither are in the EU but both are infected with the same cultural-marxist disease as any EU-country. I hate tin-foil hat theories but what is going on is too consistent to be co-incidental. Here in Europe there is clearly going on the implementation of the Coudenhove-Kalergi-plan which aims to destroy all the nation-states and build a European superstate.

You give mankind a lot more credit than it deserves. While it is true that someone, or some group must define what becomes the motivation for our idiotic behaviour, there are dozens, nay...HUNDREDS of competing philosophies, and nobody is sure which one will gain traction and followers - since nobody seems to know with certainty how human nature is evolving. It was easy in the days before that bugger Gutenberg screwed up communications and took control of information away from the religious networks, and today with the interweb giving just every man-Jack easy access to all of the (right or wrong) information, I can not imagine how anyone could predict what lie is going to catch on. Once one does, though, there is enough inertia that 7 billion people get dragged down really stupid roads by the success of some truly stupid idea.

About a dozen Moroccans were involved in the mass murders in Spain last week. Now police in Finland have arrested more Moroccans. Which brings to my mind the question of why all these Moroccans are in Europe in the first place. Why are they not returned to Morocco? And why are they murdering people in Europe? The liberal narrative with regard to refugees is one of hand-wringing guilt that we are so much better off than they are combined with a desperate need to prove how much they love diversity and hate racism. So the definition of what constitutes a 'refugee' continually expands in order to assuage western liberals' sense of ideological guilt. Canada, like Europe accepts tens of thousands of so-called refugees each year who are nothing of the sort. They're simply poor migrants, most from the Middle East and North Africa. Even if we know they're not refugees we're too busy wringing our hands and too guilty to actually get rid of them. The Germans and Swedes say they will get rid of migrants who are not legitimate but no one believes that. The first task of a government is to, in essence, protect the people, to keep the barbarians from getting over the wall, so to speak. We are the first generation which has put in place a political class without much interest in protecting the people. Indeed, who are more than willing to accept a certain number of casualties in pursuit of their diversity agenda and to assuage their self-loathing and guilt. The European people overwhelmingly disapprove of how their governments are handling the migrants, but, as in Canada, the liberal press heaps scorn and abuse on anyone who questions the government on this issue, accusing them of racism and heartlessness while streaming cheery pictures of happy, smiling refugees (and ignoring the sullen, violent ones). But make no mistake, those people who died in Spain, and in Finland were murdered by Muslim terrorists, but the Finnish and Spanish governments were complicit in their deaths. The government of Finland and Spain most certainly knew that the more Muslims you bring in the higher the certainty of terrorist incidents killing some of their people. They simply did not care. Any more than Canada's government, which knows terrorism and social disorder is inevitably going to come of bringing in massive numbers of Muslims. The idea that this won't happen in Canada, despite it happening in every single country which has accepted Muslim migrants is absurd and no serious person believes it. Therefore, we know the Canadian government is aware it is no more immune from terrorism than Spain or Finland or France. But if a few Canadians, or a few dozen, or a few hundred die because of bringing in massive numbers of religious fanatics, well, that's something the Left is more than willing to accept. The victims are only Canadian, after all, and the Left feels no particular national attachment to them. Besides, they can simply replace them by bringing in more immigrants and refugees...

Perhaps if Conservatives stopped maligning Muslims every chance they got, they'd get more votes from them. Anyway, there is lots of talk about how awful it is to allow immigration, but we do have a declining birth rate as do many/most of the European countries from which some people think our immigrants should come. We can't keep our economic engine going without people, so is the idea that we raid European countries for their "educated white" people? Do you think those countries are going to be happy about that? What if they, in return, start raiding us for our "educated white" people? And, what makes anyone think that Canada is such a great place to be that enough people will come from 'preferred' countries to make up our shortfall anyway? Marcus has clearly demonstrated that our immigration system primarily brings in people who can make economic contribution to our country, regardless of their country of origin. Criticizing a policy that focuses on an immigrant's ability to be economically successful because it's letting in too many educated and economically viable people from countries where the skin color is predominantly not-white seems like hidden racism.

Unfortunately, it's not just the Liberals. The Conservatives were little better. The NDP, of course, would double immigration. The media lavishes praise on politicians who like immigration, and curses on any who question it. And politicians, of whatever stripe, are whores. They will not take the hard path of laying out the foundation of their beliefs and persuading people they are right, especially in the face of thunderous condemnation from the national media. Instead they will take the easy path. Why do the Liberals bring in more Muslims? Here's a clue. Last election, 65% of Muslims voted Liberal, just 2% voted Conservative. The fact Muslims, most from the Middle East, are the least economically successful immigrants to Canada is irrelevant to the Liberals. It's all about votes.

In a world dominated by weak-minded people who believe in fairy tales (and, in that I include the new global religion of greed) and are willing to die or kill for it: I think we are already in Hell.

He's on camera reciting the Shahada in front of male Muslim witnesses. He's a Muslim to THEM. If he's still a Catholic, he's going to Hell for that, I'd imagine...

This place is a cesspool of rightwing nuts and conspiracy theory crazies.

Yes.

And that those who do not believe in fairy tales must pay lip service to them and show respect...or else. Yeah...we're in Hell.

It doesn't help that our PM pretty much is a Muslim and wants to do the "right thing" by his faith and spread Islam around to where it has never had a chance to be a pain in the neck...so to speak.

Which is why the Liberals are so anxious to bring in as many minorities with such a proclivity to reproduce - votes. They sell the idea by playing on the rather weak-minded sensibilities of the left. of course, this is 100% correct. The "right" (if there really is any such thing in Canada) didn't have the brains or the balls to stand up for what is "right" in this last election, and the harsh reality of democracy is that you get what you deserve.

Our country is determined to be North America's Sweden.

It's incredibly expensive to support refugees and their babies.

More to destroy existing cultures, I'd say. Can't have a proper Islamic State with all these bloody infidels running the show.

The only humanitarian solution about a people from a culture that clashes with our values, is to help provide a TEMPORARY refuge for them in a country that is compatible with their culture. It could even be a designated protected place in their own country. The UN should all contribute to sustain that humanitarian endeavor. The refugees go back home when the conflict is over. Taking people from countries does not help that country at all! How do they rebuild when all their educated, and skilled workers are gone and have resettled elsewhere? Furthermore, not all refugees want to forsake their own culture - nor do they want to adapt to another's. They're simply being forced to do so by the upheaval in their land.

Revisiting history.... A recent documentary confirming the CIA and MI6 involvement in the coup of 1953 and subsequent overthrow of the democratically elected prime minister Dr. Mossadegh. The overthrow of the democratically elected government of the state by the US and the british government is misrepresented by a propaganda machine and certain news outles that Iran was on the verge of falling to the hands of communists and replicating a gulags system similar to USSR back then. This is a total fabrication to perpetuate a confusion and divert attention from the fact that the brits were actually pissed off with Mossadegh nationalising Iran's oil.

That pesky President Trump could cause trouble for Canadian workers trying to enter the U.S. : NAFTA 2.0 talks are underway, and I fully expect work visa provisions and quotas to be reviewed and/or used as leverage. Some Canadians hate "TFWs" at home, but they love to TFW in the USA.

Q: Whatever happened to Christy Clark's retaliatory export ban on U.S. thermal coal ? A: Nothing, and Christy Clark was soon turfed. I love it when a plan comes together !

Trump doesn't care about approval ratings...Trudeau and the Liberals have to for political survival, and it is not going well. Trump was elected to break things...not get Americans (or Canadians) to kiss his ass.

Well I see you're still here, still trolling. I guess the mods like your style.

High altitude radiation is a dirty little secret with airline crews, especially on polar routes. I'm thinking it will be a big factor in long duration space travel.

Like I just posted to Micheal: "Racism is evil -- and those who cause violence in its name are criminals and thugs, including KKK, neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and other hate groups are repugnant to everything we hold dear as Americans. Those who spread violence in the name of bigotry strike at the very core of America," Trump said in response to the attacks in Charlottesville, Virginia, over the weekend. The alt-right were not the only violent individuals there, why shouldn't Antifa hold some responsibility? They showed up looking for a fight, not just protest with words. Furthermore, show me anyone here who is defending fascists or thinks that we shouldn't protest racism? Peaceful protest. What makes you perceive that all non-liberals are the next best thing to Hitler? Do you not get that the attitude that the alt-left is above responsibility, that all on the right hold monstrous views to be shunned, ridiculed, hated, fired, is every bit a part of the problem that leads to our undoing? Why has everyone become so unreasonable these days?

Apparently he is also rocket fuel to a few CEO's of rather large companies who continue to walk away from the dolt.

Don't see any evidence of that but hey, dialamah gave you a little leg up with a source I'm sure will fit well into your protocol

"Your ilk is responsible for the woman's death". That's almost as classic an assumption/attempt at deflection as we get from argus.

And exactly how was the left referring to it? Any back up or just another argus assumption?

Care to tell us where you got that horse shit from? I doubt even Faux news is that stupid.

Shake your mixed up head and look at the videos. And please, go read a bit on who the driver of the murder car actually is, instead of continuously making a fool of yourself with such comments.

You mean like the right winger/nazi who drove over the young woman in Virginia. Sorry that seems to be your ilk.

Sorry pal, but it's Trump who makes life difficult for himself. He contradicts himself on a regular basis, and he obviously supports the White Supremacy/Neo Nazi knuckledraggers. He is being abandoned daily by by people who have the grace/intelligence to not want to be embarrassed further by their association with him.

Where the hell did you come up with that idea, especially in light of current events?

Your relationship to Faux News shows. Even they are having trouble trying to keep up with Trump's wild excursions, and they are about the only well known media outlet that is not simply rolling their eyes at him.

You're really strugglin' now. Get back when ya got something valid.

I see, so that's your problem. It would more properly be spelled Faux News, because that's what it usually is.

Your rather feeble attempt to support your idol Trump's attempt at moral equivalency is rather transparent and falling flat.

If you think these monuments are an "obsession du jour" you are either ignorant of history, or just simply happy to ignore in favor of your typical wild often erroneous, assumptions. They have been a source of contention for many years in the US.

So there are no such schools. Thank you.

Well if someone did that then they will have broken a law and should face the consequences.

Maybe you should study the first amendment. It doesn't say it's OK to cause a riot under the guise of freedom to speech.

I'm talking about the Robert E Lee statue. You know, the one that sparked the protest by the neo Nazis in the first place.

Um, who's decision do you think it was to move the one in Virginia? Give you a hint, it wasn't mob rule.

Matthew Fisher's column in today's Post is foreboding in considering what our future could hold in store. A fear that is much discussed in the media is that Rosengard and Arab-majority neighbourhoods elsewhere in Sweden have become home to large numbers of Islamic extremists. Sweden’s top spy, Anders Thornberg, believes that where there were fewer than 200 Islamic extremists in the country 10 years ago that number has today exploded into the thousands. “We have never seen anything like this before,” Thornberg told Sweden’s TT news agency. “This is the new normal,” http://nationalpost.com/news/world/matthew-fisher-sweden-refugees/wcm/11aa962f-2aea-4bb9-bb9b-2de3e9bf487d#comments-area

Gee.....that would be the very thing our resident conspiracy theorist will say. I swear it seems you took that sentence right out of his mouth! Are you being a monkey? Or, you're a couple? Btw, your own link doesn't say that. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-40965581