Leaderboard

I asked you how you explain the videos of the airliners flying into the towers. You answered with a video. I don't have time to sit down and watch a propaganda video. Why can't you give an answer in a sentence?

Its irrelevant. If you note where they asked Muslims of the major things they don't like about Canada discrimination was way down the list, well below the weather. And nobody rejecting patriarchal values is going to be simultaneously covering their hair and body all the time while men go around in shorts and t-shirts. No, I accept a clearly stated fact, such as how many Muslims are wearing the hijab as opposed to ten years ago and how many see themselves as Muslims first, and Canadians second. You on the other hand, take broad statements about being proud to be Canadian and read things into them. As an example, there is nothing which says you can't be proud to be Canadian and still hate Jews and still think women who don't cover their hair are whores and should be beaten.

I didn't say I was in possession of ALL facts. But when I make an opinion it is an informed opinion and I post cites to back it up. You, on the other hand, have fringe opinions derived from places most people would want to bathe after briefly exploring.

Canadian is not a race. Obviously, you know nothing about sociology.

If you dress and behave like an outsider it's small wonder many Canadians don't accept you. The problem with the comparison is even those who consider themselves to be Christians first and foremost do not seem to identify with Christians in other lands the way Muslims do. They might consider themselves Christian, but they aren't going to murder people in outrage that some Christians overseas are, in their mind, being abused. There is also no conflict between Canada or the West, and Christianity, while there most definitely IS conflict with the Muslim world. Further, there is very little conflict between Canada's value system and that of Christianity, since Canada's culture is derived from Judaeo-christian values. On the other hand, there is enormous conflict with Muslim laws and values. As I have already said, people who reject the theme of patriarchy are not going to be donning bukhas and hijabs. Actions speak louder than words here.

How would you know? I am always, after all, in possession of the facts, at least here.

I've met guys like that. Presumably life is better here as a taxi driver than being a neurosurgeon in their place of birth. I tell you we have the most highly educated taxi-driving workforce in the world in this country. Let's say you're a Muslim who becomes a Canadian citizen. Thanks god, you don't have to go back to that little village in Bangladesh because life is so much better here. One day the phone rings. Someone asks, "Would you say you are proud to be a Canadian, or Very proud?". There is only one smart answer to give,regardless of personal opinion...

I believe the bible teaches us that God always existed. The bible says God is a spirit. The bible tells us God is eternal, omnipresent (exists everywhere), and omniscient (infinite in knowledge), and infinite in power. He exists in a trinity, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, but as one God.

LoL I dont really think he is serious, he is just making fun with us. If he dont believe in the new informations, he should leave Canada which was found through investigations and researches and he should move back to Europe and should pretend like there is no America

Depends on the definition of good.

Why do you use words like 'fact' for things which are not factual? Do you, like Donald Trump, simply believe anything you wish to be true is true? Do you, like Trump, not care about what is or is not factual as long as a statement supports your argument? I have stated that growing numbers of Muslim women are wearing the hijab which indicates a growing dedication to the more conservative strain of Islam. As for their loyalties: Among those who consider both religion and country to be very important to their identity (72% of the population), half (50%) say that being Muslim is more important, compared with 15 percent who place greater emphasis on being Canadian, and 27 percent who maintain that both parts of their identity are equally important. ...Most strongly identify as both Muslim and Canadian, although the Muslim identity tends to be the stronger of the two, especially among individuals under 35 years of age. Among immigrants, attachment to Islam is more likely to have strengthened than weakened since moving to Canada. http://www.environicsinstitute.org/uploads/institute-projects/survey of muslims in canada 2016 - final report.pdf I am supremely uninterested in what the alt right has to say about anything.

That's hardly surprising since it's nonsense.

Author/source is identified in the diagram. It is easy to let the Truthers fight among themselves, revealing all to be fools.

Good job....the nanothermite red herring is debunked yet again. So many conspiracies...so little time.

The connection was to you.

Ah...right, I missed this. No need to respond.

You know eyewitness make up the vast bulk of evidence for UFO claims so why wouldn't you know that given your faith in witnesses? What is there to even think about, the claims must ring just as true. I'm talking about thousands and perhaps millions of living witnesses not the witnesses recorded in a book that's hundreds and hundred of years old.

Are you as open-minded about UFO sightings? I'm quite serious even if this is also a trick question.

And yet, you have done this very thing...selectively choosing which science to believe, and even more damning, which American science you choose to believe. That's two strikes...in an American game called baseball.

My own conclusion about the bibles ficticiousness stems from the utter lack of any evidence for the supernatural phenomenon it routinely mentions right from page one on. What is it that believers don't get about people's conclusions in this regard?

Not at all. I try my best to subscribe to a precept mentioned in the bible, that of doing to others as I'd have them do to me. But that's a pretty simple, commonsensical thing that can be taught and learned in a playschool. Neanderthals and Cro Magnons probably even managed to figure this one out on their own.

You use stats and cites to mislead. For example claiming that increased wearing of hijab among younger women "proves" younger Muslims are more loyal and committed to Islam and their "home" country while ignoring and dismissing the fact that the majority of Muslims (and all immigrants) consider themselves Canadian first and Muslim (or whatever) second. Do you think alt-right nutbars don't use the same information the same way as you?

Hardly. Everything I've said has related to proven behavior, with cites and stats to back it up. You simply can't stand any criticism of Islam - for fairly obvious reasons.

We try, but usually fail. I can't recall a single mind being changed around here, can you?

Your comments on Muslims and immigrants put you right in line with alt-right zealots so I guess we're just two sides of the same coin.

Really? Shall we ask the Jews on this web site whether they think I hate Jews or you do? You're the one who talks about the international Zionist conspiracy that rules our banking and governments, after all.

So you're a paragon of virtue as far as political posturing goes, have I got that right - or left? But... but... when dre talks with great delight about having all the conservatives violently KILLED and how he'd eat popcorn and laugh, that's not something which calls for any sort of protest on your part, right? The truth is you're as much an ideological zealot of the far Left as he is.

It's a verifiable scientific fact that E-bike riders are all losers.

That's why I said, "CAN." Go back and review our exchanges.

Ahhh, I see what you're saying. Fair enough: freedom of speech will be compromised - if there becomes law against Islamophobia. (as explained above). As I've explained to Dialamah, what I gave is an example of what CAN be manipulated.

Mostly from the crap you post and other comments I've heard other subscribers make. I believe some can but not you.

Thankfully, not all Christians subscribe to Betsy's belief. As far as I'm concerned, she is from that subgroup of Christians who give Christianity a bad name as they support and condone terrible and even deadly actions in the name of their God.

The extremer versions white pride you subscribe to, as evidenced by the sources of information you often provide, is a problem for obvious reasons. I'd have the same issues with any race that expressed its pride in similar fashion.

Polls from Muslim and non-Muslim countries show they agree with and want death for gays, honour killings, female subordination, etc. Even if they live in countries where the laws do not agree. Some Christians may argue for those same things but it would be interesting to see how many Christians would agree with and go along with the whole-sale slaughter of gays, female subordination etc. I don't think it would be as high.

Very handsome dogs! And they look so happy!

This is Whiskey who I lost in the Fort Mac fires. I miss him desperately most days. He ski doo'ed for the first time last year and loved it! He would try to crawl into the backpack before I could even get it ready. I adopted him when I was living in teh US and he first saw snow two years ago. He walked off the back step into a huge snowdrift and didn't know what to do. I had to put my boots on and go outside to perform a rescue mission. His resting face always looked sad, but he was always very happy.

LoL, smoke weed everyday http://bit.ly/McRt9M

You certainly ought to know, Argus.

Then how is it that every time there's a terror incident involving Islam, none of them ever give "poverty" as a reason for their actions? When they state their reason is for their religion, why do you disagree with them?

Short version: He viewed the American military presence in Saudi Arabia as an insult to Islam.

This will address all your questions, blackbird. Let's watch it together. 9/11 Theories: Expert vs. Expert

Again, you go on about a subject you either know nothing about, or you are purposefully trying to derail the topic, a violation of this site's rules. Watch starting at 9:10 of the video," https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ySUrEiVFIM where Jonathon Cole describes the newly patented US non-commercially available nanothermite "that can be employed to demolish a concrete structure at a high efficiency, while preventing a secondary problem due to noise, dust, flying chips and the like." Patent # .... Murakami July 2, 1996. Remember everyone. Residues of this nanothermite were found in WTC dust. Unreacted particles of this same nanothermite were found in WTC dust. The only difference that nanothermite has to regular thermite, that you all can buy and make yourself, is that the nano level size makes this a superthermite, a super explosive, with all the same super high temperatures of regular thermite, except AGAIN, very important, the size of the particles makes this a super high explosive without the noise. Michael Hardner, everyone, who had access to this nanothermite?

Just derailing the discussion is your total interest, has been since these threads started, with you using the same old tired lines. You admit that you know nothing at all, that you have no interest, which is obviously another of your fabrications. You don't want to know because your whole world will be crushed. All your hate hate hate for no logical reason. I appreciate your burden. Why compound it?

1) So that's how science works. A science that you want to jettison because the "science" you want to believe supports your preconceived notions. 2) The 9/11 commission didn't do any science. They were controlled beginning to end by Zelikow. 3) Opinions have no place in a discussion on science, yet that is all you keep advancing

As always no sources. Rants do not qualify as sources. Nanothermite isn't a "plain old garden variety". It is a new, non-commercially available US product, which you and Michael are studiously avoiding discussing how it refutes your nonsense that you magically derived from the Dwain Deets material that you still have failed to provide a link to. Why are you so confused on this whole issue? And actually normal everyday thermite is more than "energetic enough, as a shaped charge" to melt thru steel beams/columns. When are you going to explain about the WT and the Interstate bridge fires and how they support your science?

That has been the tall tale told.

There is only one answer to give and it is the answer that is being demanded by racists and racist politicians, like Kellie Leitch. Are there other racist politicians I should be aware of?