Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/28/2017 in Posts

  1. HAHA-very funny to say Harper started a media war! Media spent years whining about his alleged "hidden agenda"-the one that never materialized! Balancing the govt books and maintaining Cdn security in the face of Muslim terror is not some sort of dirty secret. If we want to conitnue having an open border and good trade between Canada and U.S. then we MUST recognize Yankee security concerns! With 3000 dead in the ruins of World Trade Centre they are entitled to be nervous! The only "agenda" I have seen is the one where liberals demonize ALL Conservatives! How is it that Conservatives can be smeared for making senators Wallin and Brazeau pay back money that Consevative party feels was used wrongly and for suing senator Mike Duffy for refusing to pay back his carelessly spent share? While at the same time both media and liberals IGNORED that liberal senator MacDonald Harb who had mis-used MORE money than Wallin, Brazeau and Duffy COMBINED! Talk about hiding an agenda! Talk about biased reporting! But then liberal values are such that they were probably appalled by the idea of a political party taking real responsiblity-as Conservatives did- for anything! And liberals were absolutely horrified at the idea of actually paying tax payers back for money mis-used! Our Media promoted liberal propaganda-such as alleging Harper was "muzzling" Cdn scientists-reality is he was simply preventing them from insulting and reviling Conservative party on govt time! Civil servants do not care about politics-their ONLY concern is their oh so comfortable place on what Rob Ford rightly called the govt gravy train! Many civil servants see nothing wrong with using their time at work for what amounts to very partisan union business-which means disputing and smearing views that are counter to their own greedy and narrow self interests. Civil servants are demanding raises in pay and massive new funding for their already gold plated pensions while significant numbers of older Cdns cannot find the cash to purchase the medical drugs they have been prescribed! Civil service/liberal values and entitlements are way out of line-and they want to blame their greed on Harper-with media aid! And media only cares about regaining viewers and readers. Ad revenue for conventional main stream media is fading like snow in July so they are desperate to attract people-hence their willingness to cater to any point of view that gets them attention-regardless of truth about "hidden agendas"! This is why our vaunted CBC started to mock the liberal electoral reform plan-Cdns recognized electoral reform as a vote rigging scam-and CBC did not want to be on the wrong side of that fight with so much hostile public opinion -so they joined other media and mocked the badly biased liberal effort to fragment and break up our parliament. By breaking our parliament into a mass of small, one issue parties, liberals figured they could paralyze parliament and ensure that no single party could gather enough power in future to shut off the mad liberal spending machine. Fortunately CBC recognized they might be on the wrong side of that argument and did the right thing-for once!
    2 points
  2. All those digs by Kimmel towards Trump at the Oscars, were stale. I told you that. What he tried to pass for comedy weren't funny at all, because they came across as immature, vindictive and bitter. He came out flat! And I'm telling you, though the audience of actors and actresses were politely seen smiling, not everyone were applauding his act! http://www.cnbc.com/2017/01/18/matt-damon-trump-has-a-lot-of-work-cut-out-for-him.html
    1 point
  3. You also prefer war heroes that weren't captured?
    1 point
  4. If that's how you understand it, what more can I say?
    1 point
  5. Did you watch the Oscars at all? http://www.businessinsider.com/jimmy-kimmel-donald-trump-oscars-opening-monologue-jokes-2017-2 Kimmel is a very immature, bitter anti-Trump. Yes, it's about time for it to be your last time.
    1 point
  6. Trudeau asked for it. Taking potshots about Trump, and posting those reckless tweets. He's been asking for it. He craved for Trump's attention. I'm glad he got what he wanted. Of course, Trump cooperated with Trade because he's not punishing the whole country. He just wanted to reserve the public bitch-slap for its PM.
    1 point
  7. What did many write? Who wrote? The Canadian press? I know what I'd seen. No need for any press to interpret it for me. http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2017/02/14/trudeau-trump-meeting-officials_n_14735818.html It was quite obvious! Refer to the reception given to Abe and Netanyahu.
    1 point
  8. I would add we must not forget that 24 of our citizens perished that day. It's to our mutual benefit to cooperate on security measures. Welcome to the forum Phred Dobbs.
    1 point
  9. A pretty conclusive argument that Canada is wasting billions of dollars just so Trudeau won't have to launch an open competition and see the F-35 win it. Everything can be traced to the prime minister’s election campaign promise to never buy the F-35 fighter jet, allegedly because it is too expensive and doesn’t work. His conclusions are being proven wrong, but he seems determined to proceed without a timely competition, thanks to a politically created “capability gap.” That gap was based on aircraft numbers that have never been demanded simultaneously; by fudging actual CF-18 operational serviceability history; and by the false narrative that the CF-18 cannot keep operating until we start getting new aircraft. Any imagined gap, however, could be filled by 27 available Kuwaiti F-18C/D aircraft for $330 million US. Or, we could upgrade our entire fleet of 76 CF-18s to close to Super Hornet systems status for about 20 per cent of what we’ll pay for 18 Super Hornets. Neither option was explored. http://ottawacitizen.com/opinion/columnists/hawn-choosing-super-hornet-over-f-35-will-just-keep-canada-grounded
    1 point
  10. You're free to read all the previous 9-11 Troother threads for your answers. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnzHtm1jhL4
    1 point
  11. You're free to pretend otherwise. Islam is a degenerate death cult started by a warrior pedophile who was rejected as the next Moses by the Jews of the Arabian peninsula...imagine that...Arabia as Jewish/Christian. Not a single Muslim... Soon it could be illegal to say that in Canada due to Islamic blasphemy laws coming to existence. Then watch the distrust REALLY grow...
    1 point
  12. Islam has NEVER been trusted in the West. Nor will it be (by Westerners).
    1 point
  13. Yeah, right. And all the terribly misled western posters on all the forums across the western nations would be screaming, "I told you so, I told you so, they can't be trusted, watch out! they are there to kill infidels, Islam is a religion of violence, blah blah blah." Sixty five years ago, it was the same thing, just take out Muslims/Islam/... and stick in 'commies/communists/reds/... .
    1 point
  14. My the entire future of the country based on a nebulous screening policy. It seems that hate is your only motivator. The economy, social issues, environment, Canadian Forces, trade, health care, etc. are all irrelevant, so long as you have some feel good policy about hating others.
    1 point
  15. I see that this is a "old" reply. But with new stunning revelations coming to light, think back and consider who the entire narrative has been written by since 9-11, the day that alleged hijackers were falsely accused for something that it was impossible for them to have done. Consider, seriously, the implications that that raises.
    1 point
  16. It refers to the US's plan that was already in place before the false flag event of 9-11 to invade seven countries in five years. General Wesley Clark: Wars Were Planned - Seven Countries In Five Years
    1 point
  17. Topic is made, some how i knew you would not have the energy to make it.
    1 point
  18. Altai, here is the article I told you about. The Missing Jolt http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2008/TheMissingJolt7.pdf
    1 point
  19. Pretty much all politicians are globalists especially the ones in Canada. They all pretty much take their orders from the elite establishment who work against the people. Trump has said no to globalism. America will come first. You won't get that from our fearless puppet on s string politically correct Canadian politicians. They want the rest of the world to be their oyster. The last thing America needed was a fool like Obama and Hillary. Both can be up on criminal charges if Trump wanted to do just that. And maybe he still will do just that. The internet is full of stories about their crimes against the American people and America itself. Trump may have gone bankrupt with some of his adventures but he still has a lot of businesses and they are all appearing to go just fine, thank you. You obviously hate Trump because the main scream media has convinced you that Trump is a bad boy. If the main scream fake and phony liberal left wing media attacked Hillary on her crimes as much as they did with Trump you would not be so quick to constantly attack Trump. I guess that liberals have to stick together with liberals and attack others whom they are not in agreement with. Liberals can be such an intolerant bigoted bunch. At least Trump gives Americans hope not lies like JT and the liberals like to do. Canadians were certainly dumb enough to vote for JT the refugee/muslim lover. This dictator is going to destroy Canada. What more can be said.
    1 point
  20. Canoes, sweat lodges, and potlatch
    1 point
  21. Conservatives value the culture and values and traditions of our country and don't want to see them changed by mass immigration from the Middle East.
    1 point
  22. This is one of your values, Betsy. You are perfectly fine with forcing a woman to have a baby regardless of her personal situation. You are perfectly fine with forcing a woman to wear clothes that you deem appropriate, regardless of her preferences. In your view, women are not able or entitled to make their own decisions regarding their own body; you think you should have the right and abiilty to judge for them. Fortunately for us, the laws of Canada do not favor your values, they favor mine and so women are still able to obtain abortions and still able to wear ugliest form-hiding clothing known to humankind, or the skimpiest outfit they can find. This is not to say that Muslim countries are equal to or better than Canada; women (and minorities of all kinds) are much better off in Canada than almost any Muslim country, but if Christians had held sway politically in this country for the last 100 years, I am not sure that would be the case. Fortunately, as education has increased so has secularism and so have freedoms and rights for women. I certainly hope that holds true for third world countries, whether Muslim or Christian since many of those non-Canadian "values" are held by Christians as well as Muslims in those regions.
    1 point
  23. Court do not have oversight authority anywhere. They are called upon by others to interpret laws, they do not initiate anything.
    1 point
  24. # 5 PERU So here are the first 5: #1. UK #2. Mexico Japan #3. Canada #4. Israel #5. Peru
    1 point
  25. Russian fighters (Su-27/30, MiG 29/35) are perfectly capable of launching cruise missiles, like the Kh-31.
    1 point
  26. I understand that you personally don't like this aircraft. But, it is proven in action and has many of the same features of the F-35 in terms of survivability and effectiveness. Satellite integration, etc. Think Skyraider or Trojan...not F-4 Phantom.
    1 point
  27. Extremely long range supersonic cruise missile, launched from a bomber able to sprint faster then any fighter in NATO.....a threat the Soviets didn't even pose.
    1 point
  28. I'll take that as a wry "agree". Facing current and future threat environments, Canada cannot effectively act alone. And that's OK, most other nations can't either.
    1 point
  29. By a first world force, against a force with a integrated air defense network? My opinion is supported by fact........
    1 point
  30. The Russians, afforded the benefit offered by long range, air launched, supersonic cruise missiles can "bomb" North America from the periphery........The fact that the Russians can attack North America with nuclear armed supersonic cruise missiles does constitute a threat, is the basis of NORAD, and is why NORAD has returned to Cheyenne mountain recently.
    1 point
  31. Your opinion, apparently as the Tucano already operates in these dangerous theaters against folks with real live AAA.
    1 point
  32. Wrong...it is commonly understood to be disrespectful to sit in the president's chair. This also applies to other heads of state, ship's captain' chairs, etc. Trudeau was wrong to suggest it if he did, and only demonstrated his naivete and inexperience in such matters. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4223814/Ivanka-posts-picture-Oval-Office-desk.html
    1 point
  33. Great picture, it seems Justin was the one who suggested that Ivanka take the seat in the President's chair
    1 point
  34. And certai9nly not by anyone who understands the language(s) well, and knows anything about body language. Our boy stole the show, but he was nice about it.
    1 point
  35. Your opinion only, not shared by anyone who actually is not extremely biased.
    1 point
  36. Lots of lovers of Israel.....and LOVERS of CANADA. That's why I'm blasting at Trudeau......because he'll end up destroying Canada, single-handedly...without even the need for any war, or a single shot fired! Wait for 2050, and see how we're doing with our deficit! Look how he brown-nose to Trump. Don't you find that humiliating?
    1 point
  37. Regardless of font size or color, it still makes no sense. It seems you love the man who may well drag the country you love through the mud. But hey, that's your choice.
    1 point
  38. It happens, look at how you've fallen in love with Trump.
    1 point
  39. 1 point
  40. I suppose so except these dickheads really go out of their way to make asshats out of themselves.
    1 point
  41. Speaking of separatist leanings. #Calexit secession effort begins signature gathering to be on California ballot
    1 point
  42. These plow-boys are clearly wearing stupid looking white cones that come with a hoodie. The hoodie thing always makes me wonder if the silly pricks also have a affection for wearing dickies.
    1 point
  43. It must be the notion that racism has got nothing to do with it that produces the stench. They're only losing because they're losers. Like I said, go back to school...I must have gone back at least three or four times myself. Ten bucks says the fattest people also live in Republican areas. Their mothers dress them funny too.
    1 point
  44. Again I ask, where were the right-wingers when lefties were pointing this out decades ago?
    1 point
  45. Changing the subject won't help you. Slacker. Go back to school and get a trade. Where's my fricken shovel...
    1 point
  46. It's like you people are all on LSD or something.
    1 point
  47. Nope, I'm saying that some people's rhetoric make it clear that killing Muslims for being Muslims is just fine with them. Did you know that about 350 Western civilians worldwide were killed by Islamic extremism from 2014-2016? Did you know that as many as 1000 Muslim civilians (aka non-combatants) have been killed in Syria alone since 2014? Bring up the civilian casualties attributable to Western forces, and these people don't care at all. That's fine, these casualties are the price of war. Bring up the fact that the vast majority of victims of Islamic terrorists are Muslims, they don't care about that. As far as they are concered, Muslims don't matter when it comes dying. But if a terrorist attack claims a non-Muslim victim? OMG - that is outrageous, barbarous, and those Muslims must be punished! And not just the guilty ones; all of them! So yeah, these people support the killing of Muslims for being Muslims. As I said prior - they may not pull the trigger, but they're happy to hold the gun. https://www.start.umd.edu/pubs/START_AmericanTerrorismDeaths_FactSheet_Oct2015.pdf http://www.datagraver.com/case/people-killed-by-terrorism-per-year-in-western-europe-1970-2015 https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/oct/26/syria-coalition-airstrikes-civilian-death-toll-amnesty-international https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jul/29/us-airstrikes-isis-death-toll https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jul/20/us-airstrike-allegedly-kills-56-civilians-in-northern-syria http://inthesetimes.com/article/19501/the-u.s.-recently-apologized-for-killing-syrian-soldiers.-why-wont-it-do-th https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/nov/09/us-airstrikes-civilian-deaths-iraq-syria
    1 point
  48. The concern being raised over this is ridiculous...it's on par with fears over creepy clown masks. It's amazing how tightly wound up some people insist on being. I wonder how many old stock Canadians are descended from similarly tangled roots of conflicted often failed regions?
    1 point
  49. Right... and politicians that send 18 year olds to die by the thousands are... cool and tough! Trust me... you can be sure these people would rather have a shiny new fighter plane to deliver ordinance to the target. But these are guerillas against a VASTLY superior opponent. Assymetric warfare is the only option at their disposal. They arent gonna march out onto the battle field, stand in a line, and fight fair. Israel is trying to permanently occupy an area with millions of hostile inhabitants in it, and settle it and plunder its resources. The relatively managable ammount of succesful attacks against it are just the cost of doing business.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...