All Activity

Not sure where your getting your numbers from but they seem really high....and this is not a global crises there are many countries with less resources than we have that have little to none homeless problems... https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/countries-with-no-homeless And do i blame this on the Liberals, as there numbers have only grown while the liberals have been in charge...yes i do they seem to have brushed it aside in favor of other projects like high speed trains, other social programs that we don't really need....which in my opinion sends the message we don't really care when they become a problem we will swoop down and clear them out.....there are lots of private charities that are doing more than the government building tiny homes and communities with built in support programs and people there to help those struggling... none of them are building high speed trains, or paying out contractors and bankers for bad investments....

Whats wrong with "landlords"? Who buys real estate to lose money? I feel like you're just whining and you don't have a point to make. The Feds are just giving taxpayer money away to developers right now, they're not merely "allowing capitalism to occur 😱". Still, unaffordability increased by more under Trudeau. That's a far more important metric. Yeah. Sorry, not sorry. OMFG, dummy. Canada was a top 5 place in the world to live and visit under Harper. What are we now, 35th? 2014 was the peak of our civilization here. That's some powerful glue that you're sniffing there. You could attach Jupiter to the Sun with that shiznit.

You posted a violation of laws example with no explanation for what it had to do with anything here.

'Alberta' doesn't have the desire to separate, it's a small percentage (~27%) of mainly rural idi0ts in that province do. Why.... because Canada keeps electing the liberal party as our federal government where Alberta is made up heavily of conservative supporters, though that's lessening. This will go nowhere....except for seeing the Premier of the province losing her role when the time comes.

I posted the facts. You choose to ignore them. Rather like a bunch of Libbies I know...

No, I mean he sold affordable rental housing units to landlords and developers so they could profit. Also hard to escape the fact that the average housing cost increased more during Harper's term than it did in Trudeau's. Facts are facts... Harper was by and large a failure, and the little mouthpiece who is party leader today is an utter embarrassment and proven failure.

You don't understand the meaning of the word, dropout.

ZERO EVIDENCE for your ^FANTASIES as USUAL. You're NOT excused, dropout. LMAO

No, not just because of Trump. He made the threat to our sovereignty utterly obvious on multiple levels but the data problem of backdoors has been discussed for years. https://wire.com/en/blog/eu-digital-sovereignty-vs-big-tech-encryption I know very little about this but enough to be concerned.

You mean he allowed people that own property to sell their property. Every liberal government before and after has done the exact same thing. It is a bailout for Developers. They will make money and go away happy instead of selling their homes at a discount and driving prices down which would happen in a normal market environment. They took the profits when prices were going up, why shouldn't they accept the losses now that prices are going down He did quite a bit about it. And once again you're lying. Further at the beginning of harper's houses were seriously undervalued having come through the 90s with very very poor growth. But housing was still affordable even if it was expensive at the end of harper's term. Justin got in in 2015 saying he would fix the problem and make sure that housing stayed affordable because at that point it was just barely affordable. THEN he drove it up 62 percent. Poilievre voted against initiatives to make housing affordable in 2006, 2009, 2010, 2013 and 2014 when Conservatives were in power; and again in 2018 and 2019 as a member of the official opposition. Actually all of the top real estate developers are supporting the liberals. That's part of the ethics scandal is beginning to unfold Carney is bailing out real estate developers that paid a lot of donations to the liberals and who are friends with carney personally and many of the people that will benefit work for Brooksfield subsidieres. So Brooksfield will benefit substantially. This is just corruption plain and simple. There's no justification for this bailout, it hurts the population, and it doesn't incentivize these developers to go out and build new homes they're just going to take their cash and walk The poorest people will be the ones that are hurt the most and you're sitting here clapping for it

Of course Trump's EO is invalid, and so is YOUR "ANALYSIS." Texans like you are unpopular all over the NATION. LMAO

Not forced at gunpoint but heavily mandated, I thought you knew that, or was you out voting NDP at the time and missed it?

The reason it's going to be a partisan issue and to a degree rightfully so is that the liberals just spent 10 years saying no we're not going to do anything about this even though there was pressure from the right and other groups to tackle it. Now they're presenting it as this big pride moment and they're doing interviews saying how proud they are to work for a government that's tackling this issue. Were they ashamed of the government when it was Justin Trudeau? Once again we're just supposed to forget how we got here and pretend this is a new government even though all the ministers are the same and carney was a part of the previous government for 5 years.

In 2015, Poilievre was Housing Minster in Harpers government, which allowed 800,000 affordable rental units to be sold off to corporate landlords and developers. In 2026 Poilievre slams Federal-BC plan to buy vacant condos, calling it a 'bail-out' for developers. Under Harper's conservatives, the average home price in Canada went up +67% (compared to +62% during Trudeau's term), who refused to do anything about it. Poilievre voted against initiatives to make housing affordable in 2006, 2009, 2010, 2013 and 2014 when Conservatives were in power; and again in 2018 and 2019 as a member of the official opposition. He must be conflicted now considering his top donors are real estate investors. That's our boy Poilievre.... a useless mouthpiece....utterly useless.

Why it's almost like you were paying attention during 10 years Of Trudeau

Brivael Le Pogam @brivael · 4h Translated from French I'm fed up with guys over 20 who still believe in Santa Claus. So I'm going to explain it to you, like to a kid, just how retarded it is to believe in socialism. You're in a class of 30 students. One kid works his ass off and gets an 18 average. Another does jack shit and gets a 4. The teacher decides it's unfair and gives everyone the class average: 11. The one who had 18 stops working. Why bust your hump if it changes nothing? The one who had 4 keeps doing nothing. Why work if you're handed an 11 for free? The next year the class average is 7. Then 5. Then 3. The teacher doesn't get it. He thinks the problem is the students aren't supportive enough. So he sets up punishments for those who don't put in enough effort. He monitors everyone. He decides who studies what. He bans switching classes. That's exactly what happened. Every time. In every country. No exceptions. USSR, China, Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea, Cambodia, Ethiopia, East Germany. 40 attempts. Same result. Every time. Socialism punishes those who produce and rewards those who don't. Everyone ends up producing nothing. And when no one's producing anymore, the government uses force to make people work. It's not an accident. It's the design. Santa Claus, at least, you stop believing in him around age 8.

A name for a God that does not exist. Shrug.

Consensus has nothing to do with science. It was once the consensus of all learned and wise people that the earth was flat. Pretty much everyone told Galileo that he was nuts when he tried to explain how far away the stars must be. Consensus is not science

This should not be a partisan issue. Prime ministers have lived there for seventy years and the house is as old as the country itself. I can’t imagine many countries begrudging the restoration of the residence of our head of government. Presumably, the restoration aspect massively adds to the price? We wouldn’t want to just gut the place although one could make an argument for that. I’m sure it would be a much cheaper option. Some of the estimates are alarmingly large. I’d like to see a fair degree of transparency about the costs as the project proceeds.

1. Who gives a shit? Ever hear of critical mass? That 4.9% is already a handful; wait till they get a few more percentage points; Sharia will be your new law. 2. Good luck then. I hope it works. 3. I disagree. Given your present course, I give it 10 years to jihad takeover.

Absolutely, and we all know you like to lie about it. In fairness I'd be ashamed If I said half the crap you say and would try and deny it as well later but you did say it. Lying about it doesn't help

Yes and if i just start reading the words in it in order it makes about as much sense as you do Your problem isn't the words, it's that you can't put them together in a way that makes sense

You disparage America because Trump and yet oddly brush off a greater threat, Ignore at your peril.