All Activity

👆 THIS 👆

So you claim to be an anarchist? Says the hard-boiled partisan. A billionaire who's been hounded by Democrat lawfare and still won the Whitehouse...twice. TDS much?

One more classic for the day!

It's more like gibberish the way you word it.

That's odd because I actually think we should govern ourselves. That irritates you because you're such a hard-boiled partisan. Sure, they'd sooner put their stock in a childish loser who projects his failings on everybody.

Until you decide to become a state, you will address any sitting American president as emperor.

Can you point me to the guiding principles of Gnostics you adhere to and what that is founded on?

Surprised Trump did not have these two fictitious characters on his UFC night. I would pay 20 bucks to see that. 😄

How can a rational person, take these silly fops seriously? Trump and his Zionist war, should have already tanked the Republicans. But these Libbies are so insane and blatantly hypocritical, that the Dumbocrats may easily lose in the mid-terms. Its fascinating to watch this madness.

Prove you're stupid? OK. Now...22 out of 24 fake accounts got accepted and serviced as if valid. That's roughly 92% of the test accounts. This shows that the "system" setup to validate the applications from the public, is failing miserably. Yet you dont realize the sheer stupidity of saying, Bon...your stupidity proven. Have a nice day.

BS. You're 5'7, skinny AF, you wear thick glasses, and your wife is the one who weighs 230 (if she's to be believed). I doubt that you can curl 40lbs with the ez curl bar. Now go take the trash out before she beats you up again.

"DUDE: ELECTION CHEATING WAS A BILLION PERCENT REAL IN 2016. LIKE,THE REALEST THING EVER IN THE WHOLE WIDE WORLD! BUT IN 2020 THEY ENDED ELECTION CHEATING FOREVER! IT'S IMPOSSIBLE NOW!!!!" - the left

Yes...I'm sure you're a tall fruitcake.

Is democracy just an appeal to popularity then? Therefor, logically flawed? I guess you could make a great case that Obama and Biden were evidence of that, right? You sure do seem to be coming to the defence of CNN today. If you're so convinced that CNN is a legit news source, then why do you never watch it? I mean, it's there on your TV 24/7... Why go to other sources if CNN is real news? Are you admitting to it now?

Maybe @eyeball really doesn't comprehend his own irrational behavior? It certainly looks that way. Look at the endless denials. "I DIDN'T DO IT." The way he tries to hide, when cornered. There's a serious lack of "backbone" in the lad.

US intelligence agencies. FBI. DoJ. Email evidence. A confession from Morens. That's all "bullshit"? 😂 Oh, wait... I know what you're looking for when I say 'evidence': and an anonymous source, close to the White House. "I guess that if an anonymous source said it, then it has to be true!" - robosmith

"I gave you the proof in the article and essay." No, you gave me someone else's argument. Those aren't the same thing. I've asked a very specific question several times now. Can you identify a textual variant and explain why the reading in Vaticanus or Sinaiticus is demonstrably secondary or corrupt? Pointing me to an entire website or a book isn't answering that question. "The manuscripts... number over 5,000." That's an argument for the Majority Text. It is not, by itself, proof that Vaticanus and Sinaiticus are corrupt. Quantity and corruption are two different questions. "The witnesses overwhelmingly support the KJV." Again, that's simply restating the Majority Text position. The debate isn't whether there are more Byzantine manuscripts. The debate is whether the majority reading is necessarily the original reading. Those are not the same claim. "Read the essay..." I've noticed a pattern. Whenever I ask for the evidence supporting a specific claim, the answer is another article, another website, or another book. I'm not asking for another reading assignment. I'm asking you to support your claim. If the evidence is as overwhelming as you suggest, then it should be straightforward to present one or two concrete textual examples and explain why they demonstrate corruption. That's how discussions move forward. "Go read this website" isn't, by itself, an argument.

I dont like lies...liars...and fear. You depend on all three. I also like prosperity. You...not so much. So cough up these 8.5 million scientists who say the global climate is a crisis. Oh my! The b1tch is angry.

Watched the VIDEO and IT LIES about what Bernie said. IT's not just plausible, Bernie didn't say. "~6 years left before climate catastrophe wiped us out unless we passed his $30T communist Green New Deal." And you're either an IGNORANT DROPOUT or completely dishonest.

And then you were asked to the other people were and you said not me Not very complicated is it

Truely a wtf moment . . .

The democrats literally say that constantly. Biden called the georga laws "jim crow for the 21st century" (turned out they were perfectly lawful and fine) They insist anything requiring id is racist because black people are way too stupid to get id. Literally say that and more than once. Usually right around the time when I say that people like you should be holding the government to account for their bad behavior. I always seems to irritate you, the idea that voters should be responsible for the gov't. You lying about everything so why would anybody take your word for it? All we can do is look at what you actually say and do around here before you deny ever saying and doing it and use that as a reference for your likely Behavior You don't get to act outraged when all you do is lie and people don't believe you

Thanks for proving just how wrong you are. Unlike YOU, I am 6'6" 230lbs and in great shape working out at the gym 5 nights a week. When was the last time you lifted weights besides a 5lb putter, beer boy? LMAO I'll bet you don't even walk the golf course like Trump does NOT.

You think I support the things happening on your list of grievances. You're a deluded loon who can't think straight. By not projecting his childishness on others. So grow up already why don't you?

It means APPEAL TO POPULARITY FALLACY. You don't even know what FALLACY means.