All Activity

Concern about the weird US relationship with Israel is spread across the political spectrum now. Why does such a wealthy country still need subsidies and why does reasonable debate about it by Dem pols trigger massively funded primary campaigns against them?

They’re 1990s version of libertarians Texas. It’s not that hard. The prairie provinces and middle America share more in common than differences.

I merely pointed out the facts about your source, then you decided you had to make a false claim about it being published and peer reviewed and keep pushing that point. I also pointed out the limits of this study as cited by the authors themselves.

It’s not their war when we have mutual interests and wanted to help. Iran was developing Nuclear weapons. They also have their terror proxies in the region like the Houthis that have been attacking our ships. The point is, you made silly and outlandish assertions about being controlled by Israel.

Sure anyone can write a paper, this was a study done by Lois Lamerato, PhD1 , Abigail Chatfield, MS1 , Amy Tang, PhD1 , Marcus Zervos, MD2,3, involving 18,468 children. The absurdity is your attempt tp pass it off as some flim flam piece. Take it as it is, or not, that's your choice.

My oh my confux...you can never get it straight. LOL LOL LOL LOSER

Climate change is every bit as dangerous as the boogeyman.

I don't have "funny 9/11 beliefs". Just the unanswered questions about inexplicable events surrounding WTC 7. What did I say happened that so concerns you, eyeball? Unlike a left4rd, I didn't make declarative statements about "WHAT ABSOLUTELY HAPPENED BECAUSE SO AND SO SAID IT HAPPENED!!!! EVERYONE WHO DOESN'T BELIEVE WHAT THEY SAID ON CBC IS A RET4RDED RACIST!!!!", I just pointed out things that contradict the official narrative. You, on the other hand, made dozens of declarative statements about covid jabs and the origin of covid that were all wildly stupid, and now thoroughly debunked. You're still on the record as being stuck at "Safe, you won't get sick, and you don't have to worry about giving it to granny." You're so far out in left field that even Fauci feels sorry for you.

So… you did or did not understand the concept of published? No one said an unpublished study means the information inside is negated. The point is that anyone can write a paper. That's why peer review exists in the first place. It's a quality-control process where independent experts try to poke holes in the methodology, statistics, and conclusions before the broader scientific community accepts it. Published doesn't automatically mean true. Unpublished certainly doesn't automatically mean false. But you taking an unpublished manuscript, posting a fancy chart like you did, trying to show it proves vaccines broadly cause chronic disease is absurdity. Extraordinary claims deserve more than, "Here's a PDF."

Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature - Astrophysics Data System We analyze the evolution of the scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming (AGW) in the peer-reviewed scientific literature, examining 11 944 climate abstracts from 1991-2011 matching the topics ‘global climate change’ or ‘global warming’. We find that 66.4% of abstracts expressed no position on AGW, 32.6% endorsed AGW, 0.7% rejected AGW and 0.3% were uncertain about the cause of global warming.

Thank you for finally seeing this point. Previously, you've been a rabid proponent of "consensus science", often citing some generic "the vast majority of scientists say......" Glad you're finally cluing in.

Less Israel, more talking about these freaking DSA clowns, that are destroying the western world with their disgusting and stupid regressive policies. "Willing children" - that's as deceptive and sick as the term "gender-affirming care".

Nope, but millions of you still know climate change isn't a crisis. How? Because the UN dialled back a couple of predictions? How's that worked out for them? That's right.

By getting involved in their war - giving them our muscle. Trump should've just kept quiet and stayed focused on here. Who was Iran attacking when we started bombing them? The point is, we should have stayed here and let Israel handle it. There is MORE than enough to do here.

I can't add to this. Very well done.

How is Trump kissing their ass? Trump had been holding them back, criticizing their over reach, had been not picking and making demands on their humanitarian aid efforts, threatening military supplies to leverage Israel to do what we want… We had a mutual interest in seeing Iran not obtain nuclear weapons and not threaten the gulf region with their terror proxies. Saying we have accomplished nothing as we systematically destroyed their navy, a crap ton of their military capabilities to the point we could effectively fly bombing runs at will across their country, burying all nuclear weapons production under rubble or destroying it… is simply absurd.

This is one of the best takedowns of Mark Carney I’ve seen. He’s not a businessman. He’s never run a company. He’s never met a payroll. He’s a lifelong bureaucrat who somehow convinced people he’s some kind of economic genius. The guy actually went on TV in Atlantic Canada and downplayed steel tariffs because “we don’t use that much steel.” That’s not just tone-deaf — that’s fundamental ignorance of how manufacturing, auto, and resource sectors actually work in this country. Carney keeps all the worst Trudeau-era policies in place — emissions caps, anti-oil and gas rules, the whole net-zero scam — but now he can personally override them whenever he wants. If those policies were good, why does he need an override button? He’s admitting they’re damaging Canada but refuses to scrap them. He’s concentrating more power in the PMO than ever, acting like the King of Canada while surrounding himself with the same failed Trudeau retreads. His own caucus is still pushing the climate nonsense that’s been proven to waste billions and make life more expensive for regular people. Meanwhile, oil and gas — our single biggest export earner — is still being deliberately held back. Provincial trade barriers are still choking the economy. And the same people who created this mess are still in charge, still pocketing money from the climate grift while average Canadians get squeezed. This government was a failure under Trudeau. Under Carney it’s just a more polished version of the same failure. Less government. Lower taxes. Cut the red tape. Develop our resources. Stop robbing the middle class to enrich insiders. That’s the only reset that actually works.

Okay, so not being officially peer reviewed does not negate the information in the document.