“I'm out": Tucker Carlson says he's done with the GOP

[robosmith]

15 hours ago, Nationalist said:

I don't deal in rumors. I've been caught doing so and its embarrassing. 

I've never heard Carlson say anything like that about Oct. 6. I actually think the Gazans got what they paid for. I'd have leveled it completely the 1st 24 hours.

Thanks for admitting you're an ADVOCATE FOR GENOCIDE. AKA TRULY EVIL.

Be sure to put that on your application for admittance to the US next time. LMAO

15 hours ago, Nationalist said:

But that, by no means, justifies the Iran debauchery. Or what's going on right now in the West Bank. The USA has never had a serious threat from Iran. As for the Lebanon issue, the original Israeli settlers created that problem...and you know it too.

So let's just be 100% historically and morally correct and neutral, shall we?

Advocating genocide is FAR FROM "morally correct." 🤮

[John Johnston]

4 hours ago, Barquentine said:

And MTG for Veep.

I would love to see that. Might as well get some free entertainment. I'm bored with the Trump Show.

Edited Tuesday at 06:06 PM by John Johnston

[User]

31 minutes ago, John Johnston said:

I would love to see that. Might as well get some free entertainment. I'm bored with the Trump Show.

Bored?

Interesting. You still obsess over Trump day in and day out on here. 

[Nationalist]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Thanks for admitting you're an ADVOCATE FOR GENOCIDE. AKA TRULY EVIL.

Be sure to put that on your application for admittance to the US next time. LMAO

Advocating genocide is FAR FROM "morally correct." 🤮

Abusing zucchini is morally incorrect.

[Reg Volk]

[eyeball]

15 hours ago, West said:

Well they did have the world trade centers blown up. Unless you believe that was "the joooooos" too

Nope. It was 15 Saudis 2 from the UAE 1 from Egypt and another from Lebanon.

I'm not surprised you figure the US government was in on it too

LMAO!

[eyeball]

9 hours ago, Deluge said:

Which is really stupid because there's no place else to go except the left, and we all know what a conplete shithole that side is. 

He'll pull his head out of his ass  and get back to the Right. 

No he won't. He's proving that the right wing remains a trajectory. It's not a place, its a direction towards a yearning for who the fùck knows what.

Old righties who can't keep up become left behinds.

Look how many old righties litter this place who've had the temerity to laugh at MAGA. Soon dissing Tucker will be all it takes.

If it wasn't so funny it would be tragic.

Instead of stepping away from right-wing populism, Carlson appears to be positioning himself as the representative of a purer form of it ahead of a potential future political run.

One day however Tucker will face the same fate.

 

 

[John Johnston]

5 hours ago, User said:

Bored?

Interesting. You still obsess over Trump day in and day out on here. 

Well ya. Your Goof of a President is costing everybody money because has no idea whatsoever what he is doing. You damn straight people are going to pay attention. Grow a pair. 

[robosmith]

9 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Abusing zucchini is morally incorrect.

Your ^fantacies and obsessions mean NOTHING HERE.

[West]

5 hours ago, eyeball said:

Nope. It was 15 Saudis 2 from the UAE 1 from Egypt and another from Lebanon.

I'm not surprised you figure the US government was in on it too

LMAO!

Not according to the woke Reich 

[Nationalist]

Look at these Libbies, celebrating a perceived conflict within the republican camp. Such silly dweebs.

Carlson is expressing his views and a lot of people view things the same. The unfortunate fact is, this attack on Iran was not a good decision by Trump and his administration. 

The only real solution for America now, is to open the strait, take your lumps and move on.

If Israel and the Shiites need to fight...let 'em.

But this is not and never has been...America's fight.

[Deluge]

15 hours ago, eyeball said:

No he won't. He's proving that the right wing remains a trajectory. It's not a place, its a direction towards a yearning for who the fùck knows what.

Old righties who can't keep up become left behinds.

Look how many old righties litter this place who've had the temerity to laugh at MAGA. Soon dissing Tucker will be all it takes.

If it wasn't so funny it would be tragic.

Instead of stepping away from right-wing populism, Carlson appears to be positioning himself as the representative of a purer form of it ahead of a potential future political run.

One day however Tucker will face the same fate.

I agree with Tucker that America First isn't first for Trump right now, but Trump still shit canned the queer agenda and he's doing something about illegal immigration. Running away doesn't solve anything, neither does being a democrat by sniping others within the circled wagons. He needs to stay in the party and help get a stronger president in place. 

[gatomontes99]

Just to get this straight, Tucker left the Republicans because the Republicans would not tolerate his antisemitism. So now he is a Democrat? 

[West]

7 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Just to get this straight, Tucker left the Republicans because the Republicans would not tolerate his antisemitism. So now he is a Democrat? 

Sadly the Democrats have been taken over by radical Islam 

[Hodad]

8 hours ago, West said:

Sadly the Democrats have been taken over by radical Islam 

 

15 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Just to get this straight, Tucker left the Republicans because the Republicans would not tolerate his antisemitism. So now he is a Democrat? 

You don't have any interest in getting "this straight," because you are a fundamentally dishonest person. So you are intentionally "crooked." 

Opposing the actions of the government of Israel and our complicity in this actions is not antisemitism any more than opposing the actions of the government of China makes one racist. 

And, no, Carlson is not now Democrat. Obviously. 

[gatomontes99]

2 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Opposing the actions of the government of Israel and our complicity in this actions is not antisemitism any more than opposing the actions of the government of China makes one racist. 

So being against BLM is not racist? Be consistent for a change. 

However, Tucker did not just oppose the actions of Israel. That would not be anti-Semitic. But he said Daryl Cooper was the most honest man when talking about Cooper's views on the Holocaust. To be clear, Cooper is a borderline Holocaust denier. Tucker blamed the Iran war on some Jewish group controlling the President. 

The ADL labels Tucker as anti-Semitic for his views. So, no, he doesn't just question Israel's actions. 

[Nationalist]

Sigh...the capital crime of "antisemitism". What is it...exactly?

Well...if you acknowledge that, not only Germany but most Central and Eastern European countries, engaged in murdering Jewish people, but question the fabled "6 million" number...you're labeled an "antisemite". Hell you can even be tossed in jail for that. Its all just a tad over the top. So let's be dry and truthful...for a change.

First of all, the Jewish Israelis are about as "semitic" as an Indian or Chinese Jewish person. Little to none. The FACT is, they are Russian and Central European Jewish people. They are...Yiddish...if anything at all. So the evil accusation of "antisemitism" is a complete misnomer...unless its applied to the Palestinians or other Arab people.

Next, the insane idea that Jewery is a race of people. Judaism is a RELIGION. It stemmed from a bunch of Arab/Palestinians who developed their own religion. Nothing more. There are Indian Jews...Chinese and Japanese Jews...even New York Jews like Gene Simons.

Finally...the insanity that Gawd gave that useless strip of sand to the people following Judaism. Gawd gave life to the entire universe. It did not just show up and say, 'This sliver of sand is just for you Arab believers of Jewdaism'. That act would have...and HAS promoted wars and conflict. Now...if you actually believe this line of clap-trap...I would strongly suggest you re-evaluate the Gawd you worship, because the Gawd of creation would NOT instigate war. Thus the Jewish people have been sold a blatant lie.

Gee...which of the fabled Angels is the greatest of liars?

So...if acknowledging the dry truth of the matter is a crime...then I'm guilty and "truth" is dead.

Have a nice day...

Edited 6 hours ago by Nationalist

[Hodad]

1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

So being against BLM is not racist? Be consistent for a change. 

However, Tucker did not just oppose the actions of Israel. That would not be anti-Semitic. But he said Daryl Cooper was the most honest man when talking about Cooper's views on the Holocaust. To be clear, Cooper is a borderline Holocaust denier. Tucker blamed the Iran war on some Jewish group controlling the President. 

The ADL labels Tucker as anti-Semitic for his views. So, no, he doesn't just question Israel's actions. 

I have no idea what Tucker Carlson believes personally (because why would I care?), but he has ALWAYS created a platform to promote awful people with awful views--most of them MAGA banner bearers. He's not splitting with MAGA because MAGA doesn't tolerate hate. It's the home of hate. Nobody kicked him out for being hateful or platforming hate.  

And that is the EXACT logic that you have applied liberally on this forum: opposed to Israeli action = antisemitism. Opposition to the Iran misadventure = support for the Ayatollah. Over and over and over again you guys apply these wildly dishonest reductions. 

[gatomontes99]

5 minutes ago, Hodad said:

I have no idea what Tucker Carlson believes personally (because why would I care?), but he has ALWAYS created a platform to promote awful people with awful views--most of them MAGA banner bearers. He's not splitting with MAGA because MAGA doesn't tolerate hate. It's the home of hate. Nobody kicked him out for being hateful or platforming hate.  

Yeah. Actually. He was getting a lot of hate for being an antisemite from the right. Your hate for us does not color what happened. 

 

7 minutes ago, Hodad said:

And that is the EXACT logic that you have applied liberally on this forum: opposed to Israeli action = antisemitism. Opposition to the Iran misadventure = support for the Ayatollah. Over and over and over again you guys apply these wildly dishonest reductions. 

Ok, not all opposition to Israel was anti-Semitic, but all of the left's opposition was. Maybe 1% was not.