Karmelo Anthony is going to get Murder 1 prepare for the riots

[CdnFox]

Multi tool!  SAFE!

[User]

44 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Multi tool!  SAFE!

News Headline: Mass killing with a mutl tool. 

Shows the complete dishonest clown act @Hodad is engaged in. 

[CdnFox]

2 minutes ago, User said:

News Headline: Mass killing with a mutl tool. 

Shows the complete dishonest clown act @Hodad is engaged in. 

It's a tactic we unfortunately see commonly enough on the left. This is in the same category as the "Why are we even talking about this" Tactic where when they can't refute an argument they suggest that the argument itself is petty and beneath notice.

In this case they are trying to suggest that because of the price and by labeling it as a multi-tool instead of a knife that the weapon itself is petty and beneath notice and isn't really a weapon.

Now I'm willing to believe that the kid had it on his possession not necessarily to use as a weapon but it damn sure was a lethal weapon when he pulled it out of his pocket. It's not a $10 multi-tool, it's three and a half inches of sharpened hardened steel capable of slicing through clothing and human flesh with little resistance and penetrating deep enough to reach vital organs with a relatively small amount of force.

The moment you take that out of your pocket with the intent to do harm you are obviously aware that it is quite capable of taking a life.

[User]

26 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Now I'm willing to believe that the kid had it on his possession not necessarily to use as a weapon but it damn sure was a lethal weapon when he pulled it out of his pocket. It's not a $10 multi-tool, it's three and a half inches of sharpened hardened steel capable of slicing through clothing and human flesh with little resistance and penetrating deep enough to reach vital organs with a relatively small amount of force.

Yep.

I would add, that the testimony of witnesses show he was the one provoking and threatening. This is not self-defense. The moment you start taunting the other person to attack you, you start to lose any self-defense claims. 

"Anthony began repeating “touch me and find out” as the two argued, the witness said. Anthony put his hands in his backpack, but his threat wasn’t taken seriously, he said. Metcalf leaned in to push Anthony and was stabbed, the witness added, noting he did not see the knife. Metcalf fell down the bleachers onto his back, then pulled himself up, lifted his shirt, and on seeing his bloodied chest, looked frightened, he testified."

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/crime-courts/karmelo-anthony-fatal-stabbing-trial-rcna348642

[Reg Volk]

Megyn Kelly on just how STUPID the media is in coddling these idlot parents of Karmelo Anthony.  Such fools.

[Reg Volk]

BLM activists pee on the grave of the young man murdered in cold blood by the evil monster Karmelo Anthony.  Disgusting.  Hoodad - where you there peeing beside these evil scumbags?

[Reg Volk]

Amir Odom is so awesome.  He was one of Charlie Kirk's best friends.  Imagine that, a young black gay man was one of Charlie Kirk's best pals.

[Hodad]

21 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

It's not really a "multi-tool" per se.

When most people think of a multi-tool it's usually more tool based than knife based, like a leatherman. 

That's a "multi-tool".

Even a Swiss Army knife isn't really called a multi-tool, it's a knife with a bunch of other stuff attached.

Karmelo's "multi-tool" was a big-ass knife with some really minor "tools" attached:

That's the "Ozark Trail 6-in-1 Multi-Tool Knife with Light (Model 5335) from Walmart", which Karmelo used to kill someone.

No one would look at that and say "It's a multi-tool". 

It has a tiny light, a tiny rope-cutter, a flint, and the smallest bottle-opener anywhere.

If I attach a flashlight and a screwdriver to my shotgun can I call it a multi-tool?

"Sorry, no guns allowed here, sir."

"Oh, it's not a gun, it's a multi-tool." 

No I'm not. Not in the city.

I have a restricted firearms license, I'm allowed to own handguns, but I don't wanna carry my handgun around here.

Out hiking, maybe, but that's illegal unless you're a surveyor.

I don't mind that some police officers are allowed (narc squad police are allowed to carry while off-duty here) to carry, but I don't want that responsibility. I don't even think they're all that useful TBH. I can hit things at 200 yards with a rifle that I can't hit at 30' with a handgun.

 

I'm not doing "it". "It's" not pervasive.

The kid was carrying A. BIG. LETHAL. WEAPON. 

Not a "multi-tool". Not a multi-tool at all. 

I played softball up until last year. 57.

From time to time teams bring those kinds of tents to tournaments to block the sun usually, but also the rain. 

I have "mingled" in other teams' tents before, but if they asked me to leave I'd never say "no". That's just plain fkn ignorant.

But if you're not a friend, or you're unwanted, fkn leave. 

You could even say "He shouldn't have shoved that guy, he should get suspended for 2 days."

But could you ever say "Someone shoved him so he stabbed the guy to death"? Does that make fkn sense?

Zimmerman was jumped and was beating seriously beaten. That's nothing like this story.

I will see what kids testified to in court before I start weighing in on that aspect of it.

Oh, I dunno. Maybe because he killed someone?

Do you think Kevin Hart sits around laughing and joking and then just stabs people?

Only Will Smith goes from "laughing at a joke" one second, and then slapping someone the next, and even black people can't believe he went and did that. And that was just a slap, not a stab. 

Regardless of what I think of Will Smith now, I don't think there's a chance in hell that he woulda stabbed anyone that night.

 

And stop acting like conservatives are being weird about race.

It's conservatives that say "Baldwin killed that woman", and he's no blacker than I am. 

Oh FFS, I know you've spent your whole life pretending that 3.5 inches is big, but it's not. It's not a harpoon or a scimitar or a combat knife or even a hunting knife. It's for camping. Jeebus. 

And I really don't care about your softball games. You were trying to pretend that it's some egregious behavior (he was asking for trouble) by going under the canopy. You have it on record that he went to visit a friend. You have it from the dead kid's coach directly that it was common for people from other teams to mingle under the canopies. Three strikes in your made up version of events. 

Like I said, most people wouldn't stay somewhere they weren't wanted. If you ask someone to leave the wrong way though and they just might stay out of spite. Which he was legally entitled to do. It's not a free pass to commit battery against the interloper. Grow up. 

So, again, from a legal standpoint, he had no duty to retreat. He was not the aggressor. He reacted to violence done against him. In all of these things he was safely withing his rights. Correct? 

So the questions become whether he could be reasonably afraid of serious harm being done to him, and whether an escalation of force was necessary to avoid that harm. If he had not escalated and had simply shoved back, does that end the confrontation? Or does it end with him getting a beating from a MUCH bigger kid? And potentially that kid's twin brother and teammates? 

His argument is as good or better than other people who have been acquitted on the same rationale. FFS, the theater shooter literally killed the man he was arguing with because the other man was A. bigger and stronger and B. threw popcorn at him. And he walked away with an acquittal. 

It's not justice if it's not applied equally. 

And apologies for painting you as a supporter of everyday carry. I don't recall a MAGA type who isn't also a gun proliferation advocate on principle. Good on you.

[Fluffypants]

28 minutes ago, Reg Volk said:

BLM activists pee on the grave of the young man murdered in cold blood by the evil monster Karmelo Anthony.  Disgusting.  Hoodad - where you there peeing beside these evil scumbags?

Too many of them still believe that Austin and his brother "jumped" him and beat on him. Nothing you can say or show them will matter even if they acknowledge the truth they will still blame the victim due to skin color. Somehow just the fact that the person Karmelo stabbed was white was enough to make it just.

Austin's father finally had it and the fatigue was real, having a gag order while they trashed his sons with no evidence told complete and utter lies made up and taken as reality. If you watch his response it was epic. 

 

[Reg Volk]

I don't know who is dumber, Jasmine Crockett or Hodad.

[CdnFox]

3 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Oh FFS, I know you've spent your whole life pretending that 3.5 inches is big, but it's not. It's not a harpoon or a scimitar or a combat knife or even a hunting knife. It's for camping. Jeebus. 

What a load of shit

By the way I've skinned many a moose with a three-and-a-half-inch folding knife of a similar shape and size.

It is a lethal weapon.  As we have seen. Your heart is about 1.5 inches below your skin.  A 3.5 inch knife is more than large enough to kill someone and you're pretending it's some sort of toy. 

What a joke you are. 

Yet you'll also pretend that a 4000 lb vehicle with hundreds of horsepower is NO THREAT AT ALL if you drive it at a cop 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄

[User]

6 minutes ago, Hodad said:

So, again, from a legal standpoint, he had no duty to retreat. He was not the aggressor. He reacted to violence done against him. In all of these things he was safely withing his rights. Correct? 

Holy shit, you have no clue what you are talking about. 

No duty to retreat from what? He was not faced with a deadly threat to his life. The law you are butchering is regarding the use of deadly force against a deadly threat. There was no deadly threat here. 

Once he started taunting, he is no longer just an innocent bystander who gets to react to the provocation he is engaged in. 

He did not merely react to violence; he used deadly force and killed someone. Self-defense must be proportional.

Now, keep hiding from me like the cowardly turd you are.  

[CdnFox]

10 minutes ago, Hodad said:

 

So, again, from a legal standpoint, he had no duty to retreat. He was not the aggressor. He reacted to violence done against him. In all of these things he was safely withing his rights. Correct? 

Hey. Jack Mccoy. (or should i say dan fielding).  He went to trial. They had real lawyers and judges. He's guilty of murder.  

You're wrong. Period. 

He murdered a young man. Without lawful excuse. 

Buy bye you murderous freak.  

[User]

19 minutes ago, Hodad said:

His argument is as good or better than other people who have been acquitted on the same rationale. FFS, the theater shooter literally killed the man he was arguing with because the other man was A. bigger and stronger and B. threw popcorn at him. And he walked away with an acquittal. 

You are now conflating a bad jury verdict with the law. Your argument now is that this jury should have let him go because another jury made a poor decision. 

Just brilliant.

Also, in the case you are citing, the man was not just bigger and stronger; the other man was over 65, he was 71, his claim was that he was trapped in his seat, had no way to escape, as what he perceived to be a looming violent threat was coming at him which carries additional legal precedent regarding age and the ability to defend oneself. 

So... completely different circumstances. 

In this case Karmelo could leave. He had an exit. He chose to stay and he chose to taunt. The threat coming at him was not in the dark, he was not pinned with no escape, he was not elderly.

 

[Hodad]

1 hour ago, Fluffypants said:

Too many of them still believe that Austin and his brother "jumped" him and beat on him. Nothing you can say or show them will matter even if they acknowledge the truth they will still blame the victim due to skin color. Somehow just the fact that the person Karmelo stabbed was white was enough to make it just.

Austin's father finally had it and the fatigue was real, having a gag order while they trashed his sons with no evidence told complete and utter lies made up and taken as reality. If you watch his response it was epic. 

 

I don't know if Austin Metcalf was racist or not, but his dad is both a racist and a homophobe. His speaking publicly isn't doing anyone any favors. What a dick. 

[Fluffypants]

13 minutes ago, Hodad said:

I don't know if Austin Metcalf was racist or not, but his dad is both a racist and a homophobe. His speaking publicly isn't doing anyone any favors. What a dick. 

I think the murder of his son and how the "community" has treated him and his son converted him. They are making AI videos of themselves pissing on Austin's grave. Saw one guy threaten to beat white peoples asses this weekend if they dare leave their homes. 

[User]

26 minutes ago, Hodad said:

I don't know if Austin Metcalf was racist or not, but his dad is both a racist and a homophobe. His speaking publicly isn't doing anyone any favors. What a dick. 

I mean, other than you being the usual degenerate on here, now you are attacking the father who lost his son to murder, calling him a racist. 

Lets see it, show us what exactly he has said or done that makes him a racist. 

Stop being the coward you are for once. 

Edited Friday at 10:47 PM by User

[WestCanMan]

3 hours ago, Hodad said:

Oh FFS, I know you've spent your whole life pretending that 3.5 inches is big, but it's not.

OK, that was funny for a left4rd jab. I'll grant you that one.

Up until yesterday people were calling it a 5" knife. Then a 5" multi-tool knife. Now I think the consensus is that it's a 3.5" knife. 

Quote

It's not a harpoon or a scimitar or a combat knife or even a hunting knife. It's for camping. Jeebus. 

1) 'Tis not so deep as a well, nor wide as a church door, but 'twill suffice.

2) No, it looks like it a knife that was designed for people who need to say "it's a multi-tool, so I'm allowed to carry it here" on occasion.

Quote

You were trying to pretend that it's some egregious behavior (he was asking for trouble) by going under the canopy.

No, but it was egregious behaviour to stay after he was asked to leave.

Quote

You have it on record that he went to visit a friend. You have it from the dead kid's coach directly that it was common for people from other teams to mingle under the canopies. Three strikes in your made up version of events.

Wrong. 

One person from that whole team knew him. FYI it's possible to invite someone to a party and then find out that ten people there hate them.

People had every right to ask him to leave, the majority of people were very clear that they wanted him out.

And at the end of the day, none of that matters. Witnesses agreed that no one was violent towards him, and he was provoking people:

Quote

multiple witnesses testified that Karmelo Anthony provoked the deadly confrontation. During his trial in McKinney, Texas, evidence showed that Anthony cursed at and insulted other students

He wasn't sitting there afraid of people, but then swearing at them all, and challenging them. 

Quote

 If you ask someone to leave the wrong way though and they just might stay out of spite. Which he was legally entitled to do. It's not a free pass to commit battery against the interloper. Grow up. 

OMG, listen to yourself now.

• Stabber: "I don't like the way they asked me to leave. I'm gonna stay here and stab someone." 
• Judge: "SYG defence denied. Next."

Can you imagine if your flimsy excuse for murdering people became the standard?

Quote

So the questions become whether he could be reasonably afraid of serious harm being done to him

And the answer is no, and was for every single moment of that encounter.

• Immediately after the incident with 17-year-old Austin Metcalf, Anthony told officers, "I was protecting myself" and "He put his hands on me. I told him not to"

He's not describing "fear" of Metcalfe or the team in general. That's defiance and hubris. He only ever showed real fear of "the consequences of his actions". 

Quote

whether he could be reasonably afraid of serious harm being done to him, 

Even if he was unreasonably afraid, that's a legal defence that has been used successfully before. 

A woman in Minnesota called police, and when she went to the back alley in her housecoat, a cop shot her. 

He had no chance of getting off based on "reasonable fear", she just surprised him and he killed her.

Anthony never killed Metcalfe because he was afraid. Not once did he say that he felt actual fear: not to the students in the tent, not to the police, and not in court. See his quotes above.  

Quote

whether an escalation of force was necessary to avoid that harm. If he had not escalated and had simply shoved back, does that end the confrontation? Or does it end with him getting a beating from a MUCH bigger kid? And potentially that kid's twin brother and teammates? 

That's all worthless speculation.

Quote

His argument is as good or better than other people who have been acquitted on the same rationale.

Wrong.

I'll explain at the end.

Quote

FFS, the theater shooter literally killed the man he was arguing with because the other man was A. bigger and stronger and B. threw popcorn at him. And he walked away with an acquittal. 

It was a 79-yr-old man and a 43-yr-old man.

If a 43-yr-old Mike Tyson wanted to make a 79-yr-old man think that he was gonna kill him, could he do it? I would say that the answer is 100% yes. And I think that there are tens of thousands of people that scary, although few are as capable.

Even a crazy psychopath like little Charles Manson could do scare a person enough to think that he was gonna kill him. 

And if the theatre guy said "I thought for sure he was gonna kill me", then it was self-defence.

Quote

And apologies for painting you as a supporter of everyday carry. I don't recall a MAGA type who isn't also a gun proliferation advocate on principle. Good on you.

I think that pro concealed-carry conservatives in Canada are probably akin to "healthy 8th month abortionists" in the US. They're there, but not in number. When put to the test, I think it's maybe 3%.

In Canada I don't think many are in favour of concealed carry. We're not a handgun country.

Quote

It's not justice if it's not applied equally. 

Here's my take on it.

Karmelo's comments all sound like: "I warned him, then he put his hands on me".

He never describes actual fear for his life, or a serious threat to his life or health.

If a person kills someone and then asks a cop: "Was it self-defence?" I would posit that the answer is always "no". 

Because the person who did the killing is the only person who ever truly knows, right? And if they knew that they were afraid for their life, then their statement is more like: "I thought for sure they were gonna kill me", or "I had no choice." At which point it takes a lot of contradictory evidence to say that it was not "self-defence".

"Officer, was it self-defence?"

"No"

If Karmelo talked to a lawyer before he talked to the police, his lawyer would have said "Your answer is always: 'I was afraid for my life', and then a jury will have no choice but to acquit them. 

Edited Saturday at 01:03 AM by WestCanMan

[User]

5 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

If Karmelo talked to a lawyer before he talked to the police, his lawyer would have said "Your answer is always: 'I was afraid for my life', and then a jury will have no choice but to acquit them. 

This is only partially good advice. 

Yes, you should say you were in fear for your life... BUT morally speaking, you damn well better actually be so too. 

However, to say a jury has no choice but to acquit is wildly wrong. The legal standards are for what a reasonable person would feel in that moment under the totality of those circumstances. If someone pokes you with their finger, that doesn't mean you can get away with killing them with a gun just because you say you were in fear for your life. 

 

[gatomontes99]

On 6/11/2026 at 6:57 PM, WestCanMan said:

It's not really a "multi-tool" per se.

When most people think of a multi-tool it's usually more tool based than knife based, like a leatherman. 

That's a "multi-tool".

Even a Swiss Army knife isn't really called a multi-tool, it's a knife with a bunch of other stuff attached.

Karmelo's "multi-tool" was a big-ass knife with some really minor "tools" attached:

That's the "Ozark Trail 6-in-1 Multi-Tool Knife with Light (Model 5335) from Walmart", which Karmelo used to kill someone.

No one would look at that and say "It's a multi-tool". 

It has a tiny light, a tiny rope-cutter, a flint, and the smallest bottle-opener anywhere.

If I attach a flashlight and a screwdriver to my shotgun can I call it a multi-tool?

"Sorry, no guns allowed here, sir."

"Oh, it's not a gun, it's a multi-tool." 

No I'm not. Not in the city.

I have a restricted firearms license, I'm allowed to own handguns, but I don't wanna carry my handgun around here.

Out hiking, maybe, but that's illegal unless you're a surveyor.

I don't mind that some police officers are allowed (narc squad police are allowed to carry while off-duty here) to carry, but I don't want that responsibility. I don't even think they're all that useful TBH. I can hit things at 200 yards with a rifle that I can't hit at 30' with a handgun.

 

I'm not doing "it". "It's" not pervasive.

The kid was carrying A. BIG. LETHAL. WEAPON. 

Not a "multi-tool". Not a multi-tool at all. 

I played softball up until last year. 57.

From time to time teams bring those kinds of tents to tournaments to block the sun usually, but also the rain. 

I have "mingled" in other teams' tents before, but if they asked me to leave I'd never say "no". That's just plain fkn ignorant.

But if you're not a friend, or you're unwanted, fkn leave. 

You could even say "He shouldn't have shoved that guy, he should get suspended for 2 days."

But could you ever say "Someone shoved him so he stabbed the guy to death"? Does that make fkn sense?

Zimmerman was jumped and was beating seriously beaten. That's nothing like this story.

I will see what kids testified to in court before I start weighing in on that aspect of it.

Oh, I dunno. Maybe because he killed someone?

Do you think Kevin Hart sits around laughing and joking and then just stabs people?

Only Will Smith goes from "laughing at a joke" one second, and then slapping someone the next, and even black people can't believe he went and did that. And that was just a slap, not a stab. 

Regardless of what I think of Will Smith now, I don't think there's a chance in hell that he woulda stabbed anyone that night.

 

And stop acting like conservatives are being weird about race.

It's conservatives that say "Baldwin killed that woman", and he's no blacker than I am. 

I'm going to attach a flash light, a laser and a tape measure to an AR and call it a multi tool. 

"It slices! It dices! It's a level and a pointer. It can see at night and it can turn your enemy into a pink mist!" 

[WestCanMan]

12 minutes ago, User said:

This is only partially good advice. 

Yes, you should say you were in fear for your life... BUT morally speaking, you damn well better actually be so too. 

Morals and legal outcomes are often wildly different.

Quote

However, to say a jury has no choice but to acquit is wildly wrong. The legal standards are for what a reasonable person would feel in that moment under the totality of those circumstances. If someone pokes you with their finger, that doesn't mean you can get away with killing them with a gun just because you say you were in fear for your life.

You're right, and I did say "it takes a lot of contradictory evidence to say that it was not "self-defence".

23-yr-old Mike Tyson couldn't say "I feared for my life" about a 79-yr-old man in a movie theatre who threw popcorn in his face. Could Karmelo have said it? With so many witnesses going against him? Maybe not. But if he had Johnny Cochrane type money, probably. 

 I'd say that if he hadn't asked the cop "Was it self defence", and he got a good lawyer who could get the case on TV, and then drag the case along for a few months, while Anthony cried, and the lawyer talked about racism, slavery, and Jim Crowe laws ad nauseam... Forming an angry mob... 

[CDN1]

13 hours ago, Hodad said:

I don't know if Austin Metcalf was racist or not, but his dad is both a racist and a homophobe. His speaking publicly isn't doing anyone any favors. What a dick. 

Gfy. He was the first person to say this wasn't a racial incident. Black people have been harrassing, threatening his family ever since his son was killed. Of course he has Black fatigue. Totally understandable.

Black Americans have been murdering, raping, and assaulting White Americans at obscene disproportional rates for multiple generations, our entire f'n llifetimes. If these rates were reversed it's all we'd ever hear about, incessantly politicized.

Democrats cannot even acknowledge this reality, but continue to stoke & gaslight on racial violence which perpetuates more anti-White crimes.

Poll Democrats & Black Americans on that interracial bent and see how wildly distorted their worldviews truly are by all the anti-White propaganda they regularly consume.

 

Edited Saturday at 12:13 PM by CDN1

[Hodad]

11 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Morals and legal outcomes are often wildly different.

You're right, and I did say "it takes a lot of contradictory evidence to say that it was not "self-defence".

23-yr-old Mike Tyson couldn't say "I feared for my life" about a 79-yr-old man in a movie theatre who threw popcorn in his face. Could Karmelo have said it? With so many witnesses going against him? Maybe not. But if he had Johnny Cochrane type money, probably. 

 I'd say that if he hadn't asked the cop "Was it self defence", and he got a good lawyer who could get the case on TV, and then drag the case along for a few months, while Anthony cried, and the lawyer talked about racism, slavery, and Jim Crowe laws ad nauseam... Forming an angry mob... 

So if the very first words out of Anthony's mouth were as he was arrested were "I was protecting myself," you'd think it was a more reasonable claim of self defense? 

I'm not sure that makes sense, legally, given the way people respond differently to traumatic circumstances. 

[Hodad]

1 hour ago, CDN1 said:

Gfy. He was the first person to say this wasn't a racial incident. Black people have been harrassing, threatening his family ever since his son was killed. Of course he has Black fatigue. Totally understandable.

 

He can't be racist. He has a Black friend! So don't worry about the racist shit he says. 

[WestCanMan]

51 minutes ago, Hodad said:

So if the very first words out of Anthony's mouth were as he was arrested were "I was protecting myself," you'd think it was a more reasonable claim of self defense? 

I'm not sure that makes sense, legally, given the way people respond differently to traumatic circumstances. 

No. If you say "I was protecting myself" that still just sounds like you're trying to speak in legal terms, and it sounds like an unemotional event, which doesn't require a self-defence stabbing. .

If you actually killed someone in self-defence you'd be talking about how certain you were of death, and talking about all the crazy things that the deceased was saying and doing. 

Imagine a person completely freaked out, saying they thought that they were going to be murdered, describing the irrational and scary things that a madman was saying and doing... That sounds exactly like a legitimate instance of self-defence.

Even: "The guy was trying to kill me. He went totally crazy and threw his popcorn in my face as hard as he could, and i don't even know why. Then he was just screaming and making threats. I couldn't see very well because I have butter and salt in my eyes, then he put his hand on my throat, and I thought for sure I was gonna die" sounds like a self-defence claim.

Now try to imagine the most completely freaked out person saying:

• "I warned him, and then he put his hands on me. Was it self-defence?"

How can someone say those words and make it sound like they were afraid for their life? I don't think Meryl Streep could do it. 

To me, it honestly sounds like he killed the guy for disobedience. I'm not even 1% convinced that it was self-defence.

 

Do you know what the ratio of shoves to murders is, even in Texas? 

Think of how many shoves there are in a school year, vs how many murders at every school...

C'mon, this isn't even a real discussion. 

 

Just remember that in reality, it's not about "What do I say to get out of going to prison?" It's about people only using lethal force when they think it's necessary.

No one thinks Karmelo was actually protecting his life. No one thinks that he felt like he was defending his life. I truly don't. Do you honestly think he was?

1. By his own words and story, it doesn't sound like he felt like death was imminent
2. By the testimony of all the witnesses present, his stabbing of the victim was a completely wild and unreasonable escalation

Imagine a world where everybody who shoves someone gets killed. They'd realistically need a mass grave at every high school.