The UNs scientist admits they are wrong about climate change

[SpankyMcFarland]

1 minute ago, Michael Hardner said:

They plotted scenarios that included no mitigation to heavy mitigation, and I have seen people plot current temps against the wrong scenario.

But, there's a lot of intellectual dishonesty happening in the denial arena, as evidenced by posts here.

There’s a lot of delusion too. Many people appear to believe the false claims they are making. 

[CdnFox]

47 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

It's not perfect, but anthropomorphic climate change is real.

I don't think anyone denies that though. What they deny is claims that it's some sort of Crisis that's going to kill us all. Or that if we make certain changes like tax our emissions this is somehow going to change Anthropomorphic climate change in a meaningful way.

And despite having been asked trillions of times on this forum to trillions of people making climate change statements I have never once seen anyone post any actual science that indicates that climate change is a real crisis or that any of the proposed solutions will remove that crisis in some fashion

Like not one. And I don't even mean something that specifically uses the word crisis, although you would expect that it would and certainly many scientific papers about other serious issues use that word, but I mean just proving evidentially that if climate change continues the result will be so massively negative that we wouldn't have time to adapt to it and it would have disastrous losses. 

So with all this Supposed science out there I'm pretty shocked That nobody in all this time has been able to produce research papers that clearly show that as a logical conclusion.

What they inevitably link to is websites that claim that that research is out there somewhere but don't actually produce it

[robosmith]

53 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Ya except THIS particular issue has cost humanity more than we can afford. 

And...as it turns out...the panic and resulting expense, was all based on overly zealous a55holes who figured the human race needed to be placed in a state of fear, in order to impose their will.

It took more than a decade for actual scientists to apply the brakes on this cr@p and admit that it was all based on absolute worst case scenarios like that garbage hockey stick graph.

What YOU STILL don't understand is that estimates were ALWAYS based on the PREMISE of NOTHING being done to MITIGATE GHG emissions. Many things were done, DESPITE your CONTENTION of UNAFFORDABLE.

IOW, you're WRONG in SO MANY WAYS. AGAIN

45 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Sure it is.

But is it really so bad, that we have to trounce on the very base of the global economy?

We now know the answer and it is NO!

You've learned NOTHING.

[CdnFox]

Just now, robosmith said:

What YOU STILL don't understand is that estimates were ALWAYS based on the PREMISE of NOTHING being done to MITIGATE GHG emissions. Many things were done, DESPITE your CONTENTION of UNAFFORDABLE.

IOW, you're WRONG in SO MANY WAYS. AGAIN

Well if that's true then you should have no problem showing us the research papers that produced those conclusions

Go ahead. Post the research work that shows the conclusions you're referring to so we can look at their methodology and their claims.

Otherwise you're either wrong or lying or both

[robosmith]

28 minutes ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

Every time scientists steering the man-made climate change argument make a small course correction, the naysayers claim it has turned around. That’s not the case, unfortunately. That will never be the case and we better start facing the facts. I thought right-wingers were the realists but not so much anymore. 

They misunderstand the scientists ON PURPOSE to DISCREDIT THEM.

28 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

And @Michael Hardner

This is where we're at. More social division because it turns out we were right all along.

You were wrong because you misunderstand the SCIENCE.

 

23 minutes ago, Legato said:

Well we have been right about the unreality of the doomsday predictions.

You ALSO misunderstand the SCIENCE and the RESULTS.

[Deluge]

On 5/16/2026 at 10:37 PM, robosmith said:

Because you say so? LMAO

IF you bothered to try to find EVIDENCE for your flippant irrelevancy, you would find it's irrelevant.

The FACT that CO2 causes atmospheric WARMING is proven in the laboratory and undisputed because atmospheric temperatures are correlated with atmospheric CO2 concentrations througout HISTORY.

What we have is consensus as a byproduct of EXTENSIVE EVIDENCE.

If you don't believe it, I suggest you visit Venus.

 

Too bad all you have is ^this speculation unsupported by ANY evidence. LMAO

Reagan enacted climate protection shit decades ago, so why are you b*tches still crying? 

[Legato]

9 minutes ago, robosmith said:

They misunderstand the scientists ON PURPOSE to DISCREDIT THEM.

You were wrong because you misunderstand the SCIENCE.

 

You ALSO misunderstand the SCIENCE and the RESULTS.

You mean the science that was bought and payed for, sanctioned by little miss Greta which brought no results, that science?

[WestCanMan]

 

[WestCanMan]

On 5/16/2026 at 7:11 PM, robosmith said:

While the United Nations (UN) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has faced criticism for 1) specific errors and 2) overly apocalyptic scenarios

1) Lies

2) Bigger lies

All lies that Dems and the LPoC used as their only "winning" election policy.

Dems and the LPoC have been underwater on every issue aside from abortion and Globull Warming, now they finally have to admit they lied about it. 

Leftists won't care. They cherish their lies. 

Edited 5 hours ago by WestCanMan

[Nationalist]

13 minutes ago, robosmith said:

What YOU STILL don't understand is that estimates were ALWAYS based on the PREMISE of NOTHING being done to MITIGATE GHG emissions. Many things were done, DESPITE your CONTENTION of UNAFFORDABLE.

IOW, you're WRONG in SO MANY WAYS. AGAIN

You've learned NOTHING.

Sweetie...the industry has been cleaning up its processes for decades. I am well acquainted with some of this effort, as I worked for Westinghouse at one point and was responsible for designing and implementing their Westation control systems.

Those "estimates" that were WAY off the mark, were promoted by politicians and media...and light-headed fools who can't think for themselves. 

The FACT is...those "estimates" were promoted in order to justify an assault on the base of the global economy.! There could be no other reason for such abuse of both science and the economy.

Now do the entire world a favor and go play in the street.

[WestCanMan]

23 minutes ago, robosmith said:

What YOU STILL don't understand

Robo, the dumbest cultist on earth, is trying to tell people what they don't understand 🤣

Quote

What YOU STILL don't understand is that estimates were ALWAYS based on the PREMISE of NOTHING being done to MITIGATE GHG emissions. Many things were done, DESPITE your CONTENTION of UNAFFORDABLE.

IOW, you're WRONG in SO MANY WAYS. AGAIN

You've learned NOTHING.

What YOU STILL don't understand is that we have been blowing past all of their dire predictions, with absolutely no consequences, despite the fact that emissions have been rising this whole time. 

You're 100% wrong, in every way, as usual, and yet you still can't admit to anything.

Reducing deforestation is the most cosequential change that has been made in the last 20 years. 

[robosmith]

30 minutes ago, Legato said:

You mean the science that was bought and payed for, sanctioned by little miss Greta which brought no results, that science?

Greta has nothing to do with science, CLOWN

She is a spokesperson like Gore, only Gore actually took college level courses from a famous Climatologist.

Thanks for proving you're a CLOWN again.

29 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

 

^The best you got. LMAO

[robosmith]

29 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

1) Lies

2) Bigger lies

All lies that Dems and the LPoC used as their only "winning" election policy.

Dems and the LPoC have been underwater on every issue aside from abortion and Globull Warming, now they finally have to admit they lied about it. 

Leftists won't care. They cherish their lies. 

Your partial quote that I QUOTED, ONLY PROVES YOUR DISHONESTY.

[robosmith]

28 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Sweetie...the industry has been cleaning up its processes for decades. I am well acquainted with some of this effort, as I worked for Westinghouse at one point and was responsible for designing and implementing their Westation control systems.

Those "estimates" that were WAY off the mark, were promoted by politicians and media...and light-headed fools who can't think for themselves. 

The FACT is...those "estimates" were promoted in order to justify an assault on the base of the global economy.! There could be no other reason for such abuse of both science and the economy.

Now do the entire world a favor and go play in the street.

^DISHONEST IGNORANCE of the PREMISE of NOTHING BEING DONE. Duh

Your involvenment with control systems software proves NOTHING about your knowledge of scientific study PREMISES which you consistently IGNORE.

[robosmith]

24 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Robo, the dumbest cultist on earth, is trying to tell people what they don't understand 🤣

What YOU STILL don't understand is that we have been blowing past all of their dire predictions, with absolutely no consequences, despite the fact that emissions have been rising this whole time. 

You're 100% wrong, in every way, as usual, and yet you still can't admit to anything.

Reducing deforestation is the most cosequential change that has been made in the last 20 years. 

You are obviously completely IGNORANT about the MILLIONS of electric vehicles on the road TODAY.

Probably because you Canucks don't see them because it's TOO COLD UP THERE. LMAO

I am always amazed by the number of Teslas I see on the road EVERY DAY.

[Deluge]

On 5/16/2026 at 8:11 PM, robosmith said:

A "Truth" from Trump means absolutely NOHTING except that you've been CONNED AGAIN.

 

Sorry, the UN was just too eager to f*ck humanity. Their impatience got the best of them and it f*cked the rest of you cultists up.

There is no manmade climate change. There IS, however, manmade climate hysteria and it's spearheaded by the lunatics at the UN. 

[Nationalist]

5 minutes ago, robosmith said:

^DISHONEST IGNORANCE of the PREMISE of NOTHING BEING DONE. Duh

Your involvenment with control systems software proves NOTHING about your knowledge of scientific study PREMISES which you consistently IGNORE.

Didn't I tell you to go play in the street?

[Deluge]

47 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

1) Lies

2) Bigger lies

All lies that Dems and the LPoC used as their only "winning" election policy.

Dems and the LPoC have been underwater on every issue aside from abortion and Globull Warming, now they finally have to admit they lied about it. 

Leftists won't care. They cherish their lies. 

If they repeat their bullshit forcefully enough and often enough people will eventually start believing it. That's how these a$$holes have gotten so far in the first place. 

[Nationalist]

20 minutes ago, Deluge said:

If they repeat their bullshit forcefully enough and often enough people will eventually start believing it. That's how these a$$holes have gotten so far in the first place. 

This is unfortunately true.

The loudest, most annoying, generally get what they want. Then the vast majority see what's happening and try to stop the sopping wet stupidity.

[Legato]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

She is a spokesperson like Gore, only Gore actually took college level courses from a famous Climatologist.

 

Yeah but people willingly used Al-Gores algorythms to predict nonsense which they faithfully did.

[Nationalist]

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

She is a spokesperson like Gore, only Gore actually took college level courses from a famous Climatologist

Who Gore promptly tossed under the bus when the scientist did not agree with his fear-porn.

Edited 2 hours ago by Nationalist

[Michael Hardner]

4 hours ago, Nationalist said:

  More social division because it turns out we were right all along.

Three hottest years since temperatures have been recorded in 1850:

2023, 2024, 2025

[robosmith]

3 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Didn't I tell you to go play in the street?

You're a FOOL if you believe anyone but MAGAts are listening to you. LMAO

 

DOE climate report 'demonstrably incorrect', say leading ...

University of East Anglia

https://www.uea.ac.uk › about › news › article › doe-cli...

Feb 27, 2026 — A leading climate scientist has sought to set the record straight over “demonstrably incorrect” claims made in a major US government report

Missing: admits ‎| Show results with: admits

 

 

 

DOE climate report 'demonstrably incorrect', say scientists ...

Phys.org

https://phys.org › Earth › Earth Sciences

Feb 27, 2026 — A leading climate scientist has sought to set the record straight over "demonstrably incorrect" claims made in a major U.S. government ...

[CdnFox]

14 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Three hottest years since temperatures have been recorded in 1850:

2023, 2024, 2025

So what.

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

This is unfortunately true.

The loudest, most annoying, generally get what they want. Then the vast majority see what's happening and try to stop the sopping wet stupidity.

Like I said: A ^FOOL dropout with ZERO SCIENTIFIC EDUCATION. LMAO