paxamericana Posted April 6 Author Report Posted April 6 (edited) 19 hours ago, cougar said: I am on the side of international law. Wonder how you do not hate yourself already Okay globalist, hate the only successful world police harder. You speak like a spoiled brat from first world. Go live in a third world hell hole and see how that international law works for you. Edited April 7 by paxamericana Quote
Gaétan Posted April 6 Report Posted April 6 The 45‑day truce is meant to give Netanyahu’s and Trump’s armies time to rebuild their stock of bombs. Trump will make statements so that he and his sons can fill their pockets on the stock markets. Have they fixed the toilets on the space shuttle? Quote
User Posted April 6 Report Posted April 6 3 hours ago, Gaétan said: The 45‑day truce is meant to give Netanyahu’s and Trump’s armies time to rebuild their stock of bombs. Trump will make statements so that he and his sons can fill their pockets on the stock markets. Have they fixed the toilets on the space shuttle? We don't need 45 days to rebuild our stocks. 9 hours ago, cougar said: I am on the side of international law. Wonder how you do not hate yourself already There is no such thing as international law. 8 hours ago, cougar said: Spending any money on military is a waste of money (time, effort, materials) and needlessly damaging the environment. By the way, what is the US national debt and what happens when it can no longer be serviced? I know what, the credit limit gets increased! This is how one can become a superpower - just keep borrowing , make weapons and technology to threaten the world with and never repay the debt! If it were that easy, why isn't everyone doing it? 1 Quote
Deluge Posted April 6 Report Posted April 6 On 4/3/2026 at 11:02 AM, BeaverFever said: Well we know Saddam didn’t have it the last time Republicans tried to use that as an excuse to wage an unnecessary war of choice. How many soldiers have to die for Republicans’ endless lust for blood and oil? Your concerns are fueled by TDS, comrade. You can cease with the bullshit. Want to mourn American deaths? Go through the following list and share your sympathies: Recent Victims Named in Official Reports (2024–2026) The following individuals have been identified as victims in recent years: Laken Riley (22): A nursing student killed in February 2024 while jogging on the University of Georgia campus. Jocelyn Nungaray (12): A young girl murdered in Houston, Texas, in June 2024. Rachel Morin (37): A mother of five killed in Maryland in 2024. Sheridan Gorman (18): A Loyola University student killed in Chicago in March 2026. Police Officer David Lee (44): Killed in Missouri in 2024. Ruby Garcia (25): Killed in a carjacking attempt in Michigan in March 2024. Lizbeth Medina (16): Murdered in Texas in 2023. Luis Jocsan Nanez Lopez (15): Shot and killed in Kentucky in 2025 while protecting his mother. Homeland Security (.gov) +4 Victims of Fatal Traffic Incidents (2024–2025) Many reported cases involve fatal crashes involving non-citizens driving under the influence or without a license: Ivory Smith (7): Killed in a crash in Texas in 2024. Alex “AJ” Wise Jr. (10): Killed in a crash in Texas in 2024. Melissa Powell (47) and Riordan Powell (16): Mother and son killed in a Colorado crash in 2024. Katie Abraham (20): Killed in a hit-and-run in Illinois in 2025. Taliyah Crochet (18) and Rylan Oncale (18): Both killed in a Louisiana crash in 2024. Homeland Security (.gov) +2 Historical and Advocacy Listings Kate Steinle (2015): A high-profile case involving a shooting on a San Francisco pier. Grant Ronnebeck (21): Killed in 2015 while working at a convenience store in Arizona. Sarah Root (21): Killed by a drunk driver in Nebraska in 2016. The Remembrance Project: An organization that maintains a broader list of American citizens killed by illegal immigrants to advocate for stricter border policies 2 Quote
robosmith Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 On 4/5/2026 at 11:38 AM, Legato said: It's not so much the debris (if any) but more a lingering radiation belt(s) that can disrupt electronics. It's all electrickery. The radiation doesn't "linger" unless there is debris to radiate it. The problem is thousands of small pieces moving at relative velocities of 10s of thousands MPH which can tear holes in a space craft. Quote
cougar Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 (edited) 12 hours ago, User said: If it were that easy, why isn't everyone doing it? Because of i-dio-ts like Donny going around bombing countries and making them produce even more weapons later. Edited April 7 by cougar Quote
Venandi Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 (edited) 11 hours ago, cougar said: Because of i-dio-ts like Donny going around bombing countries and making them produce even more weapons later. I have yet to hear any credible argument that addresses causal issues and long term stability in the region.... short term instability is bad enough but I'd submit that it would have been much worse if Iran were left to fester and there was an extended coalition build up in area with lots of telegraphing. Even worse on all fronts (IMO) would be unilateral action by Israel... which was just as inevitable as further Iranian enrichment efforts. So, instead of waiting to hear those credible arguments freely offered, I'll frame a few of them in the form of questions: 1. At 60% enrichment and climbing, do you believe that Iran's nuclear program was intended for peaceful civilian purposes? 2. Given their history of exporting terrorism, do you believe that it would not (logically) extend to putting nuclear devices in the hands of proxies? 3. Do you think that Israel would have acted unilaterally between 60 and 70% enrichment and if so, why do you think that would prove less destabilizing (quicker, more effective, less economic fallout etc) than with US involvement? 4. Please make the argument that a showdown with Iran WAS NOT inevitable. If you can't do that I'll settle for your opinion on why addressing the issue later would be better than sooner and why a slow coalition build up (telegraphed with bagpipes) would be better than shock and awe. In other words, in the case of dealing with Iran, why do you feel that abandoning the principles of "surprise, overwhelming force and violence of action" would be a more reasonable approach and produce less of the economic fallout most here seem to be focused on? Edited April 7 by Venandi Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 (edited) 7 hours ago, cougar said: Because of i-dio-ts like Donny going around bombing countries and making them produce even more weapons later. How many more weapons have Libya and Syria produced since President Obama bombed them ? Was Obama also an i-dio-t ? Gaddafi actually gave up his nuclear program and fissile material voluntarily after seeing what happened to Iraq in 2003. Edited April 7 by bush_cheney2004 Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
User Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 11 hours ago, cougar said: Because of i-dio-ts like Donny going around bombing countries and making them produce even more weapons later. What Trump is doing has nothing to do with the stupidity of what you claimed working or not. Quote
cougar Posted April 13 Report Posted April 13 On 4/7/2026 at 3:40 AM, Venandi said: 1. At 60% enrichment and climbing, do you believe that Iran's nuclear program was intended for peaceful civilian purposes? 2. Given their history of exporting terrorism, do you believe that it would not (logically) extend to putting nuclear devices in the hands of proxies? 3. Do you think that Israel would have acted unilaterally between 60 and 70% enrichment and if so, why do you think that would prove less destabilizing (quicker, more effective, less economic fallout etc) than with US involvement? 4. Please make the argument that a showdown with Iran WAS NOT inevitable. If you can't do that I'll settle for your opinion on why addressing the issue later would be better than sooner and why a slow coalition build up (telegraphed with bagpipes) would be better than shock and awe. In other words, in the case of dealing with Iran, why do you feel that abandoning the principles of "surprise, overwhelming force and violence of action" would be a more reasonable approach and produce less of the economic fallout most here seem to be focused on? 1. Are the nuclear bombs USA and Israel currently have for peaceful purposes? Who gave these two the right to have nuclear bombs, but Iran a country of 100 million people should not? Try to be reasonable in what you are asking. 2. Exporting terrorism? Don't know what you are even talking about. How many mass shootings do you see in the USA every day - most by US citizens. All those put together kill more people in the States than any terrorist group. 3. What Israel would or would not do, is irrelevant under the circumstance. Israel want to expand and be the superpower ruling the Middle East - this is their objective, which they achieve with the help of the USA. Both can be described as rabid dogs that will not stop biting unless put down. 4. Inevitable? How about North Korea, China, Russia and the list is only growing. If you have an imbecile in power you can expect to be dragged into a war with or without a reason, all over the Globe. America did not make a single friend in the past year, but turned the whole World against it. Quote
cougar Posted April 13 Report Posted April 13 On 4/7/2026 at 4:45 AM, bush_cheney2004 said: Gaddafi actually gave up his nuclear program and fissile material voluntarily after seeing what happened to Iraq in 2003. Why not ask Natanyahu to give up his nuclear stash? Isn't this going to make the place safer? Quote
User Posted April 13 Report Posted April 13 1 hour ago, cougar said: Why not ask Natanyahu to give up his nuclear stash? Isn't this going to make the place safer? No. Quote
User Posted April 13 Report Posted April 13 1 hour ago, cougar said: 1. Are the nuclear bombs USA and Israel currently have for peaceful purposes? Who gave these two the right to have nuclear bombs, but Iran a country of 100 million people should not? Try to be reasonable in what you are asking. 2. Exporting terrorism? Don't know what you are even talking about. How many mass shootings do you see in the USA every day - most by US citizens. All those put together kill more people in the States than any terrorist group. 3. What Israel would or would not do, is irrelevant under the circumstance. Israel want to expand and be the superpower ruling the Middle East - this is their objective, which they achieve with the help of the USA. Both can be described as rabid dogs that will not stop biting unless put down. 4. Inevitable? How about North Korea, China, Russia and the list is only growing. If you have an imbecile in power you can expect to be dragged into a war with or without a reason, all over the Globe. America did not make a single friend in the past year, but turned the whole World against it. 1. Yes. If you are seriously somehow ignoring all of modern history in understanding that the US is the good guys and Iran is the bad guys in thinking they should get a nuke too... there is no hope for you. 2. I guess you really are this ignorant of world history. Iran backs terrorism in Yemen, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Gaza... Most all of the shit going on with Israel today is because Iran is funding it to attack them. 3. What a stupid analogy. The only ones we are biting are the ones harming us or threatening to. If we were rabid dogs, there would be a whole hell of a lot more carnage going on. 4. Many countries in the Middle East welcome us because Iraq has been a looming threat over them as well. You clearly have no idea what you are talking about. Quote
Venandi Posted April 13 Report Posted April 13 (edited) 2 hours ago, User said: You clearly have no idea what you are talking about. A good effort but nothing will cure it except bad experience. To this day, some of the most interesting (and lovely) people I've ever met were in shelters during a rocket attack. For me, a fascinating part of this board is the willingness of some to set common sense and observed reality completely aside in support of political ideology. What's been lost is actually a bigger loss than it appears on the surface...the political centre. Lack of a political centre is what greases the pivot point on political see-saws, limits choices exclusively to bad ones, and prevents adapting to changing / evolving circumstances. In some circles it's called strength of an idea. Taking the time to refute nonsense like 4 hours ago, cougar said: Exporting terrorism? Don't know what you are even talking about. or: 4 hours ago, cougar said: What Israel would or would not do, is irrelevant under the circumstance .... in any sort of coherent manner is time you will never get back. It's nothing more than an "oh ya, well what about this" deflection and you will end up chasing it across the globe and through every page of the bible. I'm rooting for ya though. Edited April 13 by Venandi 3 1 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted April 14 Report Posted April 14 Well...no ground invasion yet. 1 Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
WestCanMan Posted April 14 Report Posted April 14 On 4/4/2026 at 11:29 AM, BeaverFever said: Stip propagating misinformation. OMG look at collusion boy, the CNN/CBC cultist, complaining about misinformation 🤣🤣🤣 What's the matter, do you prefer disinformation? Beavey, did the virus go from bats to humans via the unicorn? Does the vax stop the spread of covid? Does it prevent you from getting sick? Were the conservatives "accusing" Carney of lying about Brookfield, or did Carney lie about Brookfield? Was Biden mentally healthy you f'ing clown? All that you have ever done here is spread disinformation, with a "d". The lack of self-awareness that it took for you to accuse someone else of spreading misinformation is mind-boggling. Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. "I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul "It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot
WestCanMan Posted April 14 Report Posted April 14 On 4/5/2026 at 6:23 AM, Gaétan said: What are the babies in Iran going to eat? The Pope must not beat around the bush and should denounce the authors of genocides such as Trump, Biden, Netanyahu, Bush, Blair. Why? Because those who vote for them will put pressure on the elected officials of their political parties to stop them. What do they eat when their moms are put in prison for showing their hair, genius? What group of people do you actually care about? Just Gazans and the IRGC? IOW only people who are dedicated to committing genocide? Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. "I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul "It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot
WestCanMan Posted April 14 Report Posted April 14 On 4/6/2026 at 12:09 AM, cougar said: I am on the side of international law. But only after Iran and Gaza are finished committing their terrorist attacks. Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. "I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul "It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot
WestCanMan Posted April 14 Report Posted April 14 On 4/6/2026 at 12:18 AM, cougar said: Spending any money on military is a waste of money (time, effort, materials) and needlessly damaging the environment. What do you think would happen if China had the only military on the planet? Are you aware what they did to their own people in the mid 1900s? What do you think would happen if Iran had the only military on the planet? Do you understand what their Quds force is dedicated to achieving? On 4/6/2026 at 6:12 AM, Gaétan said: The 45‑day truce is meant to give Netanyahu’s and Trump’s armies time to rebuild their stock of bombs. Good, because they haven't killed enough IRGC yet. Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. "I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul "It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot
Gaétan Posted April 14 Report Posted April 14 9 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: What do they eat when their moms are put in prison for showing their hair, genius? What group of people do you actually care about? Just Gazans and the IRGC? IOW only people who are dedicated to committing genocide? We know that you work for an agency that promotes genocides Quote
WestCanMan Posted April 14 Report Posted April 14 On 4/12/2026 at 11:21 PM, cougar said: 1. Are the nuclear bombs USA and Israel currently have for peaceful purposes? Who gave these two the right to have nuclear bombs, but Iran a country of 100 million people should not? Try to be reasonable in what you are asking. How old are you? Where do you get your information? Please tell me what you think the ayatollah's plans are. Just for shits and giggles. 1 minute ago, Gaétan said: We know that you work for an agency that promotes genocides No, Gaetan. What group of people do you love? If you were going to fight in an army, whose would it be, and why? What would you hope to accomplish there? Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. "I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul "It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot
cougar Posted April 15 Report Posted April 15 On 4/13/2026 at 12:44 AM, User said: 1. Yes. If you are seriously somehow ignoring all of modern history in understanding that the US is the good guys and Iran is the bad guys in thinking they should get a nuke too... there is no hope for you. I am basing it exactly on the modern history. Good guys, my ass! Quote
User Posted April 15 Report Posted April 15 4 hours ago, cougar said: I am basing it exactly on the modern history. Good guys, my ass! Clearly not. You should renounce your Canadian citizenship and go live in Iran if you think they are the good guys. 1 Quote
cougar Posted April 17 Report Posted April 17 On 4/15/2026 at 1:46 AM, User said: Clearly not. You should renounce your Canadian citizenship and go live in Iran if you think they are the good guys. Why would I live in Iran? I will be happy to visit Iran as a tourist but now I am worried they will not be able to tell the difference between me and those who bombed them! Even worse, if I am in Tehran as a tourist , that turd of an American president or that mad dog Natanyahu may decide to drop bombs on me in a surprise attack! The fact you do not understand the culture of a country or do not like their system or leadership does not mean you should go an bomb them! The World has eyes and does not forget or forgive. Quote
User Posted April 17 Report Posted April 17 4 hours ago, cougar said: Why would I live in Iran? I will be happy to visit Iran as a tourist but now I am worried they will not be able to tell the difference between me and those who bombed them! Even worse, if I am in Tehran as a tourist , that turd of an American president or that mad dog Natanyahu may decide to drop bombs on me in a surprise attack! The fact you do not understand the culture of a country or do not like their system or leadership does not mean you should go an bomb them! The World has eyes and does not forget or forgive. You think so highly of them and so little of the West. Put your money where your mouth is, renounce your citizenship and go be with the people you think are so amazing. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.