Reg Volk Posted March 11 Report Posted March 11 29 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said: It has nothing to do with the NDP.... I was asked about Poilievre so replied. He is a hindrance though that drags the conservative party down, don't you think? No, I don't think that at all. Pierre is an amazing leader, and the fact that he makes simpleton NDP lovers and Elbowzos heads explode is just the icing on the cake. Go Pierre! Now back to the NDP - what a crock that party is. Just disgusting. Quote As Democrat and Liberal governments fall, Republicans and Conservatives come to the rescue.
Goddess Posted March 11 Report Posted March 11 7 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said: I've seen his investments, which is in a blind trust. Hi investments are not "blind" to him. He knows exactly what he's invested in. And the deals he's made so far, all benefit his investments. He's also been caught meeting several times with Brookfield execs. One of them claimed, in committee meeting, that he only requested a meeting with Carney to talk about antisemitism in Canada. I'm sure you believe him, but some of us think it's sketchy. 1 Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
LinkSoul60 Posted March 11 Report Posted March 11 7 minutes ago, Reg Volk said: No, I don't think that at all. Pierre is an amazing leader, and the fact that he makes simpleton NDP lovers and Elbowzos heads explode is just the icing on the cake. Go Pierre! Now back to the NDP - what a crock that party is. Just disgusting. I'm on the other side of the fence with your boy. His days are numbered so you'll be finding someone else before long anyway. Agree the NDP is faltering big right now....which is a shame to see. Only 5 left in the parliament and if Lewis gets nominated you'll see more cross the floor... not good at all. Quote
LinkSoul60 Posted March 11 Report Posted March 11 16 minutes ago, Goddess said: Hi investments are not "blind" to him. He knows exactly what he's invested in. And the deals he's made so far, all benefit his investments. He's also been caught meeting several times with Brookfield execs. One of them claimed, in committee meeting, that he only requested a meeting with Carney to talk about antisemitism in Canada. I'm sure you believe him, but some of us think it's sketchy. The guy is brilliant.... become PM to manipulate investment direction towards his equity holdings and travel abroad to only talk with investors who are aligned in his portfolio. Brilliant! Now, with the amount of US equities in his portfolio he really has to get the US trade deal sorted out to reap those potential gains... Quote
Reg Volk Posted March 11 Report Posted March 11 22 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said: I'm on the other side of the fence with your boy. His days are numbered so you'll be finding someone else before long anyway. The days are numbered until Pierre becomes PM. These Liberals are so corrupt and so morally bankrupt, and so greedy, they're done. Is there any politicians left in Ottawa in the NDP or Liberal base who aren't corrupt?? Anywhere?? Quote As Democrat and Liberal governments fall, Republicans and Conservatives come to the rescue.
LinkSoul60 Posted March 11 Report Posted March 11 1 minute ago, Reg Volk said: The days are numbered until Pierre becomes PM. These Liberals are so corrupt and so morally bankrupt, and so greedy, they're done. Is there any politicians left in Ottawa in the NDP or Liberal base who aren't corrupt?? Anywhere?? By the looks of it, it's only the knuckle dragging conservatives that aren't corrupt.... If you're counting the days waiting for Poilievre to become PM good luck... It's not going to happen. Quote
herbie Posted March 11 Report Posted March 11 OMG rhe condemnation from right wing ideologues who insist she could serve her constituents best stuck in a broom closet than from within the govt. One constantly complaining their interests aren't being met because they vote wrong every time. Floor crossing is a regular tradition and serves democracy much better than a clot of nutless sycophants too scared not to wear shoes four sizes too big and risk offending the Bossman. Pick the new leader that has the guts to say they'll always support the party that serves some of their interests, so long as they don't oppose their core interests. Quote
Reg Volk Posted March 11 Report Posted March 11 36 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said: By the looks of it, it's only the knuckle dragging conservatives that aren't corrupt.... If you're counting the days waiting for Poilievre to become PM good luck... It's not going to happen. There aren't any knuckle-dragging Conservatives, but sure are a lot of corrupt scumbag Liberals and NDP. And yes, it is going to happen. 29 minutes ago, herbie said: OMG rhe condemnation from right wing ideologues who insist she could serve her constituents best stuck in a broom closet than from within the govt. OMG the left wing ideologues who somehow still hypocritically claim to be the ones "standing up for democracy" while ignoring how this woman was totally bought off. You guys just plain suck. Quote As Democrat and Liberal governments fall, Republicans and Conservatives come to the rescue.
LinkSoul60 Posted March 12 Report Posted March 12 50 minutes ago, Reg Volk said: There aren't any knuckle-dragging Conservatives, but sure are a lot of corrupt scumbag Liberals and NDP. And yes, it is going to happen. I disagree. This forum and I'm sure countless others are littered with them. Hell, you might even be one.... And no, it's not going to happen. You and a handful of others love the clown but beyond that....the majority of Canadian's don't want him anywhere near the PM seat. He's a failure....time to move on and find another party leader. Quote
ironstone Posted March 12 Report Posted March 12 3 hours ago, herbie said: OMG rhe condemnation from right wing ideologues who insist she could serve her constituents best stuck in a broom closet than from within the govt. One constantly complaining their interests aren't being met because they vote wrong every time. Floor crossing is a regular tradition and serves democracy much better than a clot of nutless sycophants too scared not to wear shoes four sizes too big and risk offending the Bossman. Pick the new leader that has the guts to say they'll always support the party that serves some of their interests, so long as they don't oppose their core interests. Floor crossings have happened before of course, but this time it's different in that it's pushing the Liberals to a majority because certain MP's have likely gotten offers (rewards) they couldn't say no to. By your logic, it would serve Canada just fine if dozens more MP's crossed over just to strengthen that majority. Never mind the people that voted for candidates of one party over another. Quote Beware the Brookfield industrial complex...
eyeball Posted March 12 Report Posted March 12 4 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said: Agree the NDP is faltering big right now....which is a shame to see. Only 5 left in the parliament and if Lewis gets nominated you'll see more cross the floor... not good at all. It's unfortunate Canada, notwithstanding Quebec's representation, is slipping closer to a two-party Parliament. I still think Canada's natural ideology will prevail no matter whoever's banner is flying overhead. Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
LinkSoul60 Posted March 12 Report Posted March 12 1 hour ago, eyeball said: It's unfortunate Canada, notwithstanding Quebec's representation, is slipping closer to a two-party Parliament. I still think Canada's natural ideology will prevail no matter whoever's banner is flying overhead. It is unfortunate, but probably not surprising given how politics in our part of the world has evolved this last decade. Interesting where we go.... and would think most Canadian's have that same ideology. I think most also believe we need more infrastructure and use of our natural resources to support the economy, but would think that whatever the color jersey there will be enough pressure to do it responsibly or it won't happen. Quote
Goddess Posted March 12 Report Posted March 12 (edited) 16 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said: Now, with the amount of US equities in his portfolio he really has to get the US trade deal sorted out to reap those potential gains... Does he? Carney was just in India and actually met with the head of Reliance - at his personal home - and got nothing for Canada. But Trump just did. He got a $300 billion deal to build a refinery in Texas. And he didn't even travel to India. Brookfield is partnered with Reliance, so this US deal benefits Carney. But does nothing for Canada. So when Carney met with the guy from Reliance, was he doing a deal for Canada? Or for Brookfield? So maybe you are someone who gets easily twitterpated by Carney's vague tweet about Canada being an energy superpower and being positioned for opportunity, but those words don't put money in citizen's pockets. You know what does? A $300 billion deal to build a refinery. Unfortunately those citizens are Americans. Canadians get bupkis. Again. Carney is accomplishing fuque all for us. But lots of deals that improve his own investments. Edited March 12 by Goddess 1 Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
John Johnston Posted March 12 Report Posted March 12 On 3/10/2026 at 10:25 PM, Reg Volk said: Yes, the pro-spendaholic Jew-hating current version of the NDP has Tommy Douglas rolling in his grave. The dumbest people in Canada other than the Elbows Up losers and the Green psychopaths. Their only real function is to split the vote with the evil Liberals. So who is the new leader of this rudderless loser NDP ship? McPherson? Does it really matter? The base of this stupid party let Jagmeet kill it. What total fools. I think you have other issues that you maybe should sort out. What a ridiculous, hateful comment. Quote
LinkSoul60 Posted March 12 Report Posted March 12 30 minutes ago, Goddess said: Does he? Carney was just in India and actually met with the head of Reliance - at his personal home - and got nothing for Canada. But Trump just did. He got a $300 billion deal to build a refinery in Texas. And he didn't even travel to India. Brookfield is partnered with Reliance, so this US deal benefits Carney. But does nothing for Canada. So when Carney met with the guy from Reliance, was he doing a deal for Canada? Or for Brookfield? So maybe you are someone who gets easily twitterpated by Carney's vague tweet about Canada being an energy superpower and being positioned for opportunity, but those words don't put money in citizen's pockets. You know what does? A $300 billion deal to build a refinery. Unfortunately those citizens are Americans. Canadians get bupkis. Again. Carney is accomplishing fuque all for us. But lots of deals that improve his own investments. You need to sort a lot of things out, and one of them is how business and investment works. You say he met with the Reliance chair at his personal home which is great and shows there is a level of comfortability there. What you don't understand is that we have just begun to change our trade relationship with India and multi-billion investments are not completed in a 60 minute sit down meeting. There is something called due diligence of given opportunities that happens well in advance of any 'deals'. Sorry, I don't buy your conspiracy theory of Carney and Brookfield so done commenting on that asinine narrative. You call an investment in a Texas refinery a win.... For what reason... the harmful emissions they emit or the fact no other US based O&G companies want to invest in one? I'm pro-industry but not at any cost...and certainly not a polluting refinery that doesn't have a decades long future. The upside is that your boy Poilievre is going to the US to champion free trade and the elimination of tariffs. The guy is fùcking brilliant! I sure hope Carney and his team has thought of this.... Quote
Goddess Posted March 12 Report Posted March 12 2 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said: You call an investment in a Texas refinery a win.... For what reason... the harmful emissions they emit or the fact no other US based O&G companies want to invest in one? So, if Carney had gotten this $300 billion deal for Canada, you would protest it? Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
LinkSoul60 Posted March 12 Report Posted March 12 4 minutes ago, Goddess said: So, if Carney had gotten this $300 billion deal for Canada, you would protest it? A $300B refinery project... yes I would. Quote
Goddess Posted March 12 Report Posted March 12 14 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said: A $300B refinery project... yes I would. On what basis? Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
LinkSoul60 Posted March 12 Report Posted March 12 4 minutes ago, Goddess said: On what basis? On the basis of the harm they do to the climate and the local environment. I could probably make a lot of money selling fentanyl and meth, but that doesn't mean I should be doing that. Quote
Goddess Posted March 12 Report Posted March 12 4 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said: On the basis of the harm they do to the climate and the local environment. Mining hurts the climate and the local environment and yet is critical for both solar panels and wind turbines. Turbine blades need to be replaced every 20 years and are buried in the ground, along with all the chemicals that went into producing them. Is that good for the environment, do you think? Off-shore wind farms harm the earth's natural weather patterns and also interfere with ocean creatures, particularly whales. The blades kill untold millions of birds every year. The energy produced by them is intermittent, so backup fossil fuels are needed. Unless you're okay with your grama freezing to death when it's -45. Commercial fishing harms the environment. Forestry and pulp mills harm the environment. Agriculture harms the environment with fertilizers and pesticides. All industry harms the environment. Auto manufacturing harms the environment and fossil fuels are needed for that industry. I bet you are against coal mining, yes? You would be one of the people protesting the coal mine right now, in Alberta. You likely don't know that the coal mine being protested is for a special kind of coal - metallurgical coal that is necessary for steel production - which you are likely against the steel industry as well. So if your criteria for rejecting an industry is based on it harms the environment, you most decidedly ARE anti-industry. Which explains your support of the Liberal anti-industry strategy for the last 11 years. 1 Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
Goddess Posted March 12 Report Posted March 12 20 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said: I could probably make a lot of money selling fentanyl and meth, but that doesn't mean I should be doing that. Hmmmm. Yet you support the party that is adamant about passing it out to Canadians for free. Including children. Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
LinkSoul60 Posted March 12 Report Posted March 12 7 minutes ago, Goddess said: Mining hurts the climate and the local environment and yet is critical for both solar panels and wind turbines. Turbine blades need to be replaced every 20 years and are buried in the ground, along with all the chemicals that went into producing them. Is that good for the environment, do you think? Off-shore wind farms harm the earth's natural weather patterns and also interfere with ocean creatures, particularly whales. The blades kill untold millions of birds every year. The energy produced by them is intermittent, so backup fossil fuels are needed. Unless you're okay with your grama freezing to death when it's -45. Commercial fishing harms the environment. Forestry and pulp mills harm the environment. Agriculture harms the environment with fertilizers and pesticides. All industry harms the environment. Auto manufacturing harms the environment and fossil fuels are needed for that industry. I bet you are against coal mining, yes? You would be one of the people protesting the coal mine right now, in Alberta. You likely don't know that the coal mine being protested is for a special kind of coal - metallurgical coal that is necessary for steel production - which you are likely against the steel industry as well. So if your criteria for rejecting an industry is based on it harms the environment, you most decidedly ARE anti-industry. Which explains your support of the Liberal anti-industry strategy for the last 11 years. I have a difficult time keep up with your idiocy.... Comparing an oil refinery to all other industry as an apples to apples comparison is beyond ridiculous, even for you. You have a very high opinion of your so-called acumen, but because of your twisted views, a real misguided insight into how people think Considering that I enjoyed a successful career on the backbone of industry I wasn't then and am not now anti-industry. Calling me a proponent for climate and environmentally responsible industry would be far more accurate. In regards to liberal support.... the more I listen to you rightwing wackjobs the more inclined I am to get a liberal tattoo and vote for them forever. Quote
Goddess Posted March 12 Report Posted March 12 15 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said: the more I listen to you rightwing wackjobs the more inclined I am to get a liberal tattoo and vote for them forever. I'm sure you will. Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
LinkSoul60 Posted March 12 Report Posted March 12 18 minutes ago, Goddess said: I'm sure you will. Lol... Mom, look at this chart! Quote
ironstone Posted March 12 Report Posted March 12 10 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said: Lol... Mom, look at this chart! What conclusion do you arrive at when you look at that chart? Quote Beware the Brookfield industrial complex...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.