FBI Interviewed Trump Accuser Epstein Files Show

[robosmith]

FBI Interviewed Trump Accuser Epstein Files Show Video

Quote

The FBI spoke to a victim of Jeffrey Epstein, who also accused Donald Trump of sexually and violently assaulting her, according to records in the publicly searchable Epstein database.

FBI Interviewed Trump Accuser, Epstein Files Show

Substack · Roger Sollenberger

760+ likes · 1 day ago

Trump was credibly accused of sexual assault in the Epstein files. It's unclear what became of the DOJ's investigation.

 

Quote

The FBI spoke to a victim of Jeffrey Epstein who also accused Donald Trump of sexually and violently assaulting her, according to records in the Justice Department’s publicly searchable Epstein database.

The records don’t show what became of the DOJ’s investigation into the allegations, but the documents indicate the government found her to be a credible accuser. Records elsewhere in the files reveal that a woman with matching biographical details sued Epstein’s estate and won a settlement in 2021.

The allegations and FBI interview are landmark revelations, undermining the White House’s protestations that Trump hasn’t been accused of wrongdoing and showing instead that the U.S. government has been aware of a credible Trump accuser in the Epstein files.

The DOJ included the woman’s allegation in a comprehensive 21-page internal slideshow presentation about the government’s investigations into Epsentation. Her accusation is one of two about Trump that the FBI’s child sex trafficking and violent crimes task forces noted on the slide, which listed a number of then-nonpublic accusations involving prominent figures.

“[REDACTED] stated Epstein and convicted co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell, as well as in an internal email chain collecting information for the Epstein introduced her to Trump who subsequently forced her head down to his exposed penis which she subsequently bit,” the presentation says. “In response, Trump punched her in the head and kicked her out.” The victim would have been “approximately 13-15 years old when this occurred,” according to the presentation. The alleged assault took place in the early-mid 1980s, and the same woman also claimed to be an Epstein victim.

 

Edited February 17 by robosmith

[robosmith]

Here are all the documents in the publicly searchable Epstein database for this case 3501.045:

Quote

 

Search

 

EFTA01245630.pdf - DataSet 9

3501.045-009 CONFIDENTIAL Page 1 of 1 EFTA_00057770

EFTA01245629.pdf - DataSet 9

Details Download image as Set 3501.045-008 CONFIDENTIAL Page 1 of 1 EFTA_000577

EFTA01245633.pdf - DataSet 9

Furthermore, she would respect the request to UNCLASSIFIED 3501.045-012 Page 1 of 2 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA...UNCLASSIFIED 2 3501.045-012 Page 2 of 2 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7,8,9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00103585 EFTA01245634

EFTA01245635.pdf - DataSet 9

telephone interview of a woman, , who reported to the FBI hotline she was a victim of sexual exploitation at the hands of case subject JEFFREY UNCLASSIFIED 3501.045...UNCLASSIFIED 2 3501.045-013 Page 2 of 2 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00091387 EFTA01245636

EFTA01245620.pdf - DataSet 9

UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO 3501.045-001 CONFIDENTIAL Page 7 of 9 EFTA_00057713 EFTA01245626 31E-NY-3027571 Serial 216 FD-302a (Rev. 5-8-10) UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO...JEFF made a statement to the effect of, "This UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO 3501.045-001 CONFIDENTIAL Page 8 of 9 EFTA_00057714 EFTA01245627 31E-NY-3027571 Serial...UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO 3501.045-001 CONFIDENTIAL Page 9 of 9 EFTA_00057715 EFTA01245628

Quote

later viewed the image sent her with her friend and neighbor,
. II told , "That is the person who has caused me great
harm and affected my entire life. He's a nightmare." advised the
photograph sent her was still saved in her cell phone messages.
Upon request by the Agents, II accessed the image, and before she showed the
picture to the interviewing Agents, II asked whether she could crop the
photograph to include only the man she was referring to (essentially
cropping out one or more individuals also included in the picture).
attorney, Mr. offhandedly mentioned the word "President" while
looking at the image on cell phone.

 

EFTA01245632.pdf - DataSet 9

UNCLASSIFIED 3501.045-011 Page 1 of 1 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00103583 EFTA01245632

 

Edited February 17 by robosmith

[Nationalist]

Lol...

[paxamericana]

30 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Lol...

Sounds like Trump’s the actual victim according to robo. 

[robosmith]

8 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Lol...

^BUPKIS is what you post when you have NO REBUTTAL.

[robosmith]

7 hours ago, paxamericana said:

Sounds like Trump’s the actual victim according to robo. 

Do you have EVIDENCE that the Epstein VICTIM LIED about being sexually assaulted BY TRUMP?

Of course we KNOW what happened to the FBI INVESTIGATION: it was SHUT DOWN on Trump's ORDERS.

And we now know that Bondi LIED about there NOT being accusations against Trump.

[robosmith]

BTW, if you read the PDF ending in 620, you'll see where the accuser had a pic of Epstein and Trump together on her phone according to the FBI agents involved in the case.

[paxamericana]

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

EVIDENCE

Did you actually read your own post, says there someone tried to bite Trump’s exposed penis and he defended himself.

Edited February 17 by paxamericana

[robosmith]

37 minutes ago, paxamericana said:

Did you actually read your own post, says there someone tried to bite Trump’s exposed penis and he defended himself.

Why are you ^LYING?

It says she bit because he shoved her mouth onto it, and then he knocked her down hard.

[paxamericana]

10 minutes ago, robosmith said:

she bit because he shoved her mouth onto it

That’s not what it said, says there Epstein introduced someone to Trump who found them selves facing Trump’s private voluntarily and decided to bite it. Trump in an act of defense, punched and dismissed them. Sounds perfectly reasonable given the circumstances, that Trump was setup and the real victim.

Edited February 17 by paxamericana

[robosmith]

16 minutes ago, paxamericana said:

That’s not what it said, says there Epstein introduced someone to Trump who found them selves facing Trump’s private voluntarily and decided to bite it. Trump in an act of defense, punched and dismissed them. Sounds perfectly reasonable given the circumstances, that Trump was setup and the real victim.

Your FAILURE to quote ^this means you have no evidence.

I read the account and KNOW what it says, LIAR.

Quote

“[REDACTED] stated Epstein introduced her to Trump who subsequently forced her head down to his exposed penis which she subsequently bit,” the presentation says. “In response, Trump punched her in the head and kicked her out.”

 

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, robosmith said:

^BUPKIS is what you post when you have NO REBUTTAL.

The FBI obviously didn't think there was anything substantial to the claim or they would have laid charges or continued investigating. 

If they didn't even bother investigating after that pretty quickly they obviously realized it wasn't likely to be true

[paxamericana]

4 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Your FAILURE to quote ^this means you have no evidence.

I read the account and KNOW what it says, LIAR.

 

Did you conveniently redact the part where it says alleged, meaning your post has no evidence?

[robosmith]

32 minutes ago, paxamericana said:

Did you conveniently redact the part where it says alleged, meaning your post has no evidence?

Like the rest, it was from [redacted] whom the FBI found to be credible.

She had a pic of Epstein and Trump together on her phone, which is probably a big reason the FBI found her claims CREDIBLE.

Could be PROOF if Trump hadn't quashed the investigation because he's scared.

In any case, Bondi LIED when she said there are no accusations against Trump in the Files.

AKA, COVERUP. Why would she coverup, if it's not true?

Why were YOU LYING about what it says if it's not true?

[robosmith]

https://www.facebook.com/reel/925704203476794 Video

[CdnFox]

22 minutes ago, robosmith said:

https://www.facebook.com/reel/925704203476794 Video

NAKED LINK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[robosmith]

19 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

NAKED LINK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

PREVIOUSLY QUOTED!!!!!! lDIOT

[CdnFox]

19 minutes ago, robosmith said:

PREVIOUSLY QUOTED!!!!!! lDIOT

STILL A NAKED LINK,!!!!!!! TWAT

And thanks for proving i'm not on ignore, you're just to chicken shit scared of me to reply most of the time  

[WestCanMan]

Leftists shot themselves in the foot when they trotted out E Jean Carroll, Christina Blasy-Ford and Lisa Swetnick as credible witnesses.  

Carroll was just a slut who got what she seemed to have wanted, Ford was a serial liar, and Swetnick told the only story about "rape" that ever made me laugh.... "I went to ten gang-rape parties" 😂 That B is into some freaky shiznit if she went to 2 of them and then kept on going again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again... I mean, why did she stop? Did she manage to find some parties where they were torturing and killing women?

 

Now there are alleged "sister survivors" talking about getting together and compiling their own lists...

To me that sounded a lot like "come find us, and if the money is right, we will accuse whoever you want." There aren't a lot of people who could come up with an alibi for "Where were you between June 3rd and June 28th, 2005?" Due to modern banking records, a lot of people might be able to say where they were a year ago at that time, but not in 2005. 

If those women named you, could you prove that you weren't there? Do you get your passport stamped if Epstein flies you to his private island? 

[User]

6 hours ago, robosmith said:

^BUPKIS is what you post when you have NO REBUTTAL.

No rebuttal to what? You didn't say anything. LOL

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Leftists shot themselves in the foot when they trotted out E Jean Carroll, Christina Blasy-Ford and Lisa Swetnick as credible witnesses.  

Carroll was just a slut who got what she seemed to have wanted, Ford was a serial liar, and Swetnick told the only story about "rape" that ever made me laugh.... "I went to ten gang-rape parties" 😂 That B is into some freaky shiznit if she went to 2 of them and then kept on going again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again... I mean, why did she stop? Did she manage to find some parties where they were torturing and killing women?

 

Now there are alleged "sister survivors" talking about getting together and compiling their own lists...

To me that sounded a lot like "come find us, and if the money is right, we will accuse whoever you want." There aren't a lot of people who could come up with an alibi for "Where were you between June 3rd and June 28th, 2005?" Due to modern banking records, a lot of people might be able to say where they were a year ago at that time, but not in 2005. 

If those women named you, could you prove that you weren't there? Do you get your passport stamped if Epstein flies you to his private island? 

Wow! A ^gish gallup of whataboutisms.

The FBI said "redacted" was a CREDIBLE WITNESS and you don't even understand the EVIDENCE that made that judgement sound. LMAO

[gatomontes99]

Isn't this the girl that claimed this all happened at a golf course that had not been built when she claimed it happened a d did not report it until after Trump was in poilitics? 

This was in the same files: 

Some of these documents contain untrue and sensationalist claims made against President Trump that were submitted to the FBI right before the 2020 election,” the statement said. “To be clear: the claims are unfounded and false, and if they had a shred of credibility, they certainly would have been weaponized against President Trump already.

 

[CdnFox]

4 minutes ago, robosmith said:

The FBI said "redacted" was a CREDIBLE WITNESS and you don't even understand the EVIDENCE that made that judgement sound. LMAO

Credible witness doesn't mean what you think it does 

It simply means that what they claim is TECHNICALLY possible.  If i claim i saw you eat a zuchinni but i can't prove i was in the same city as you at the time i'm not credible. If i can prove I was then i become a 'credible' witness. 

And the fbi didn't say it, the person reporting on this says It SEEMS like that's what the Fbi thought. 

And here you are once again claiming that when it's against donald, ANY accusation is PROOF he did it, when it's someone else you like it's  "NO JUDGE HAS EVER RULED THAT< YOU"RE SUCH A DUNNING KRUGER!!!"

some girl made a claim somewhere in the past, the FBI apparently investigated briefly and then decided it wasn't worth continuing. And this was long long before he was president so can't claim he had them remove it

Completely fake

[robosmith]

3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Isn't this the girl that claimed this all happened at a golf course that had not been built when she claimed it happened a d did not report it until after Trump was in poilitics? 

This was in the same files: 

Some of these documents contain untrue and sensationalist claims made against President Trump that were submitted to the FBI right before the 2020 election,” the statement said. “To be clear: the claims are unfounded and false, and if they had a shred of credibility, they certainly would have been weaponized against President Trump already.

 

IF it's not case #3501.045, it's not the same case.

And that statement: "they certainly would have been weaponized against President Trump already." is just BULLSHIT since the Epstein Files were SEALED at that time before Bondi had all the files sent to HER.

None of case #3501.045 files have that statement in them and you can open  them and look for yourself.

[gatomontes99]

5 hours ago, robosmith said:

IF it's not case #3501.045, it's not the same case.

And that statement: "they certainly would have been weaponized against President Trump already." is just BULLSHIT since the Epstein Files were SEALED at that time before Bondi had all the files sent to HER.

None of case #3501.045 files have that statement in them and you can open  them and look for yourself.

I checked out that file. First, the FBI did not call her credible. They said she gave enough details to warrant a second interview. The second interview was a disaster.

First, she admitted she had abused drugs and alcohol at 13, before she met Epstein:

Quote

JEFF offered • cocaine, an (alcoholic) drink, and "weed" that day. •
recalled that while she had tried each previously (cocaine once before, and
alcohol/marijuana more than once previously), she had never before used all
three at the same time. After accepting the drugs and alcohol from JEFF,
everything got "blurry" and "like a dream". 

And she also, conveniently, claimed everyone that knew anything was dead:

Quote

advised that until recently, was the only individual alive
to whom • confided incidents of abuse she endured when she was a child
(detailed herein), mother also knew about what happened to II, but her
mother is deceased now. II never would have written down what happened to
her, she did not keep a formal diary, and she did not make any recordings of
any kind regarding the incidents,

So she made a claim that was 35 years old from a period in her life when she was on drugs and that no one can verify and she did it as Trump began his second run for President. The photo she had was a photo that the FBI had already received from another victim.