WestCanMan Posted March 20 Report Posted March 20 On 3/18/2026 at 10:31 AM, Goddess said: OK. Have a great day. The losers who have nothing to do but grovel over unsubstantiated accusations don't like the facts. You triggered their confirmation bias to DefCon 5. It's the ultimate compliment when people like that dislike you. Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. "I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul "It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot
CdnFox Posted March 21 Report Posted March 21 1 hour ago, robosmith said: Lawyer Dan Goldman details the Epstein Files case against Trump's sexual assault of a 14yo girl. VIDEO FBI conducting 4 interviews with her, proves they found her credible. No doesn't prove they found a credible. In fact they found your less credible with every interview according to the interviews And as her story began to fall apart she vanished I wouldn't talk to them anymore If you have to lie to make your point you don't have a very good point Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
robosmith Posted March 24 Author Report Posted March 24 (edited) This is the SAME CASE that Sollenberger wrote about in substack. Quote The Department of Justice released files accusing Donald Trump of sexually abusing a minor, and the White House responded by attacking the victim's character despite claiming not to know who she is. After Oversight Democrats voted to subpoena Attorney General Pam Bondi, the DOJ finally released a portion of previously withheld Epstein documents containing what the committee called "serious allegations" of Trump's sexual abuse of an underage victim. These files had been deliberately removed from earlier releases. It took a subpoena threat to shake them loose. And they're still not complete. At least 37 pages remain missing, including the internal notes and communications that would show how the FBI handled the accusation. The pages that would tell us whether anyone actually investigated, or whether it was buried. The White House response was revealing in ways they didn't intend. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt called the accusations "completely baseless" and described the accuser as "a sadly disturbed woman who has an extensive criminal history." A PBS anchor asked the obvious question: if the accuser is unidentified, how would the White House know anything about her criminal history? They told on themselves. Either they know who she is and are lying about it, or they're smearing a sexual abuse victim they've never met. Pick one. This comes after Bondi was photographed during congressional testimony with a document titled "Jayapal Pramila Search History," suggesting the DOJ was tracking which Epstein files members of Congress were searching. Thomas Massie, a Republican, called the whole scandal "bigger than Watergate." Congressman Maxwell Frost said after viewing unredacted files that he'd only "scratched the tip of the iceberg" but that "a lot of these did relate to Donald Trump." Jamie Raskin said Trump's name appears "more than a million times" in the files. They're not hiding these documents because there's nothing in them. They're hiding them because of exactly what's in them. The DOJ's job is to pursue justice. Instead, it's functioning as the president's personal defense attorney, burying evidence, surveilling Congress, and smearing victims. Pam Bondi won't sit for her deposition. 37 pages are still missing. And every time someone pulls back another layer, Trump's name is underneath. Edited March 24 by robosmith Quote
CdnFox Posted March 24 Report Posted March 24 Just now, robosmith said: So you're saying there's no proof whatsoever that any of this was true and the stories weren't believable? Agreed Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
robosmith Posted March 24 Author Report Posted March 24 On 3/20/2026 at 4:09 PM, WestCanMan said: The losers who have nothing to do but grovel over unsubstantiated accusations don't like the facts. You triggered their confirmation bias to DefCon 5. It's the ultimate compliment when people like that dislike you. Dozens of people are talking about this and that means it's NOT GOING AWAY no matter how much YOU TRY to BURY IT. LMAO There's a reason the FBI interviewed her FOUR TIMES and it isn't because of "unsubstantiated accusations" no matter how much YOU WISH it is. Quote
robosmith Posted March 24 Author Report Posted March 24 5 minutes ago, CdnFox said: So you're saying there's no proof whatsoever that any of this was true and the stories weren't believable? Agreed *I* didn't say ANYTHING. MANY PEOPLE are saying stuff that you've demonstrated you can't understand. LMAO Quote
robosmith Posted April 2 Author Report Posted April 2 More people talking about this case all the time. VIDEO Quote
gatomontes99 Posted April 2 Report Posted April 2 5 minutes ago, robosmith said: More people talking about this case all the time. VIDEO You created more personalities in your head? Because no one is talking about this. Not even lwnjs. No one. Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
CdnFox Posted April 2 Report Posted April 2 3 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: You created more personalities in your head? Because no one is talking about this. Not even lwnjs. No one. I think he means this guy: Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
gatomontes99 Posted April 2 Report Posted April 2 14 minutes ago, CdnFox said: I think he means this guy: I was going to make a vulger statement that would have been both funny and gross, but I will let it go. 1 Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
robosmith Posted June 1 Author Report Posted June 1 Bondi to face disbarment over LIES about, and illegal, Epstein Files redactions among other things. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.