CdnFox Posted March 4 Report Posted March 4 23 minutes ago, robosmith said: No I realize that you will harp on the weaknesses and ignore the parts which damn Trump. Thank you for admitting you don't realize the truth and are delusional Quote Trump didn't do anything to the Files. He doesn't have those SKILZ. Quote It APPEARS that the 3 missing files were recently in the public release, because somehow the Guardian got hold of them; but were pulled, probably because they directly accused Trump of sexual assault. Guardian said they had it from people who had copies. So not from the public relase. DUUUUUuuuuuuhhhhhh Quote A lot of things were dropped in the '80s. G Maxwell now claims there were 25 co-conspirators. The FBI went back to interview her 4 times which means they found the story convincing, as Sollenburger stated. The extra people were never charged so they didn't find them THAT convincing obviously. And once again you claim that investigating someone is proof that they're guilty when it's someone you don't like. Your own source called the claims 'outlandish'. Quote ^This is where you go off the rails. Bondi TESTIFIED UNDER OATH there were NO ACCUSATIONS against Trump in the FILES. The Guardian has copies of the files which are NOW MISSING. Sooooo - According to you bondi lied when she said there were no accusation in the file and it turns out the file was missing. Soooo that would make her right. Quote The FBI didn't say that. They went back. It was when they went back that YOUR OWN SOURCE says she became more and more "outlandish". Right there in the story YOU provided Quote They ITne THREE FILES went missing RECENTLY. Read the article again if YOU STILL HAVE A BRAIN. Oh the article that says her claims were outlandish? And it would be the same file for all four, just for separate interviews . One person. Sooo yeah. And again not only do you look like a complete twat for your childish answers but you still can't explain why he would be so devious that he would remove three out of four files but leave the other one there when it hints to the existence of the other ones as well. I mean even the villains in Scooby-Doo aren't that stupid. So do you want to explain that one? 2 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
WestCanMan Posted March 4 Report Posted March 4 History has shown again and again that left4rds will believe even the most farcical accusations against Trump, and even other GOP members and appointees, and cling to them like a dying man clutching at straws. It's also proven that everything that robo says in an OP is BS. So there's that. Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. "I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul "It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot
robosmith Posted March 4 Author Report Posted March 4 2 hours ago, WestCanMan said: History has shown again and again that left4rds will believe even the most farcical accusations against Trump, and even other GOP members and appointees, and cling to them like a dying man clutching at straws. It's also proven that everything that robo says in an OP is BS. So there's that. And Trump is desperately trying hide more than HALF of the Epstein Files for WHAT REASON. The FACT is, I posted EVIDENCE and you post BULLSHIT. "So there's that." LMAO Quote
CdnFox Posted March 4 Report Posted March 4 18 minutes ago, robosmith said: And Trump is desperately trying hide more than HALF of the Epstein Files for WHAT REASON. The FACT is, I posted EVIDENCE and you post BULLSHIT. "So there's that." LMAO More than half the files he's hiding apparently is that your argument? 3.5 million pages have been released and you figure there is more than 3.5 million pages left. So around about 7 million or more pages to this file The complete work of William Shakespeare was 1200 pages The Encyclopedia Britannica has about 33,000 pages But with 3.6 million pages released your argument is that we just don't have enough information and they must be hiding another 3.5 million pages 7 million pages isn't a police file, it's a deciduous forest. You have completely lost your mind Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
User Posted March 5 Report Posted March 5 9 hours ago, robosmith said: And Trump is desperately trying hide more than HALF of the Epstein Files for WHAT REASON. The FACT is, I posted EVIDENCE and you post BULLSHIT. "So there's that." LMAO You claiming he is hiding the files is bullshit. Quote
robosmith Posted March 6 Author Report Posted March 6 Justice Department publishes missing Epstein files involving uncorroborated claim about Trump Quote The Justice Department on Thursday released additional Jeffrey Epstein files involving uncorroborated accusations made by a woman against President Donald Trump that the department said had been mistakenly withheld during an earlier review. The department said last week that it was working to determine if any records were improperly withheld after several news organizations reported that the massive tranche of records that had been made public didn’t include some files documenting a series of interviews conducted in 2019 with a woman who made an allegation against Trump. The accuser was interviewed by the FBI four times as it sought to assess her account but a summary of only one of those interviews had been included in the publicly released files. On Thursday, the department said those files had been “incorrectly coded as duplicative,” and therefore were inadvertently not published along with other investigative documents related to the disgraced financier, who killed himself while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges in 2019. “As we have consistently done, if any member of the public reported concerns with information in the library, the Department would review, make any corrections, and republish online,” the department said in a post on X. Trump has consistently denied any wrongdoing in connection with Epstein. The department noted in January that some of the documents contain “untrue and sensationalist claims against President Trump that were submitted to the FBI right before the 2020 election.” The new disclosures come as Attorney General Pam Bondi faces continued turmoil over the department’s handling of the files released under a law passed by Congress after months of public and political pressure. Five Republicans on the House Oversight Committee joined Democrats in voting Wednesday to subpoena Bondi, demanding that she answer questions under oath in a sign of mounting frustration among members of the president’s own party. The Trump administration has faced constant political headaches since the rollout of the files began in December, with critics accusing the department of hiding certain documents or over-redacting files, or in some cases, not redacting enough. In some cases, the department inadvertently released nude photos showing the faces of potential victims as well as names, email addresses and other identifying information that was either unredacted or not fully obscured. Department officials have defended their handling of the files, saying they took pains to release the files as quickly as possible under the law while also protecting victims. Department officials have said errors were inevitable given the volume of the materials, the number of lawyers viewing the files and the speed at which the department had to release them. The department has said it’s entitled to withhold records that exposed potential abuse victims, were duplicates or protected by legal privileges, or related to an ongoing criminal investigation. Some of the new records published Thursday pertained to a woman who contacted the FBI shortly after Epstein’s 2019 arrest and claimed that a man named “Jeff” living in Hilton Head, South Carolina, had raped her there in the 1980s when she was around 13 years old. The woman told the agents she didn’t know the man’s identity at the time, but decades later concluded he was Jeffrey Epstein when a friend texted her his photo from a news story. In a follow-up interview a month later, the woman added a host of other claims, including that Epstein had schemed to have her mother sent to prison, beaten her, arranged sexual encounters with other men and once flew her to either New Jersey or New York, where she claimed to have bitten Donald Trump after he tried to sexually assault her. Agents spoke with the woman two more times, at one point asking her to provide more detail on her supposed interactions with Trump, but reported that she declined to answer additional questions and broke off contact. There’s no indication that Epstein ever lived in South Carolina and it was unclear whether Trump and Epstein knew each other during the time period involved. The woman’s report was one of a number of uncorroborated, sometimes fantastical, reports that federal agents received from members of the public alleging misconduct by Trump and other famous people in the months and years after Epstein’s arrest. Quote
CdnFox Posted March 6 Report Posted March 6 32 minutes ago, robosmith said: Justice Department publishes missing Epstein files involving uncorroborated claim about Trump Reported she was a bit of a nut job and ran when they started asking serious questions Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
robosmith Posted March 6 Author Report Posted March 6 7 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Reported she was a bit of a nut job and ran when they started asking serious questions Thanks for your worthless OPINION. FBI said she was credible which is why they interviewed her FOUR TIMES. Duh All pages are in EFTA02858481.pdf - DataSet 12 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted March 6 Report Posted March 6 4 hours ago, robosmith said: Thanks for your worthless OPINION. FBI said she was credible which is why they interviewed her FOUR TIMES. Duh All pages are in EFTA02858481.pdf - DataSet 12 Your post above says the claims were unsubstantiated. You should look up what that means. Hint: unsubstantiated and credible are antonyms. Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
robosmith Posted March 6 Author Report Posted March 6 8 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Your post above says the claims were unsubstantiated. You should look up what that means. Hint: unsubstantiated and credible are antonyms. Nope, is says "uncoroborated," which means only that there were no witnesses willing to back her up which is to be expected when both Epstein and Trump were abusing her. And if you bothered to search the newly released documents, you'd find that "unsubstantiated" does NOT APPEAR in them. The Sollenburger substack article says: Quote but the documents indicate the government found her to be a credible accuser. Records elsewhere in the files reveal that a woman with matching biographical details sued Epstein’s estate and won a settlement in 2021. Next time quote YOUR EVIDENCE or STFU. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted March 6 Report Posted March 6 5 minutes ago, robosmith said: Nope, is says "uncoroborated," which means only that there were no witnesses willing to back her up which is to be expected when both Epstein and Trump were abusing her. And if you bothered to search the newly released documents, you'd find that "unsubstantiated" does NOT APPEAR in them. No they did not. She lied and they knew it: "There’s no indication that Epstein ever lived in South Carolina and it was unclear whether Trump and Epstein knew each other during the time period involved. The woman’s report was one of a number of uncorroborated, sometimes fantastical, reports that federal agents received from members of the public alleging misconduct by Trump and other famous people in the months and years after Epstein’s arrest." They found it to be completely and totally fabricated. Aka unsubstantiated. Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
robosmith Posted March 6 Author Report Posted March 6 2 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: No they did not. She lied and they knew it: "There’s no indication that Epstein ever lived in South Carolina and it was unclear whether Trump and Epstein knew each other during the time period involved. The woman’s report was one of a number of uncorroborated, sometimes fantastical, reports that federal agents received from members of the public alleging misconduct by Trump and other famous people in the months and years after Epstein’s arrest." They found it to be completely and totally fabricated. Aka unsubstantiated. Getting parts of the story wrong is not unusual for traumatized victims YEARS LATER, dummy. Uncorroborated does not mean unsubstantiated Quote While "uncorroborated" and "unsubstantiated" are often used as synonyms—both describing information lacking independent support or confirmation—they can imply different levels of weakness. Uncorroborated means no other witness or evidence confirms the claim, while unsubstantiated suggests a lack of foundational evidence entirely, often implying it is unfounded Quote
CdnFox Posted March 6 Report Posted March 6 19 minutes ago, robosmith said: Nope, is says "uncoroborated," which means only that there were no witnesses willing to back her up which is to be expected when both Epstein and Trump were abusing her. And if you bothered to search the newly released documents, you'd find that "unsubstantiated" does NOT APPEAR in them. The Sollenburger substack article says: Next time quote YOUR EVIDENCE or STFU. It doesn't mean no witnesses, it means that nobody could corroborate elements of her story. For example she couldn't prove that she traveled to these locations or even remember which city it happened in. She couldn't provide anybody who she spoke to afterwards and talk to about it, which is one of the absolute tell tales because women who have been abused that way will usually share it with one of their close friends or somebody shortly after. She couldn't even narrow down the timeline so that they might have been able to determine if Trump or Epstein were in those locations at that time That's what corroboration is.It appears as if she was 100% full of shit Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
robosmith Posted March 6 Author Report Posted March 6 58 minutes ago, CdnFox said: It doesn't mean no witnesses, it means that nobody could corroborate elements of her story. For example she couldn't prove that she traveled to these locations or even remember which city it happened in. She couldn't provide anybody who she spoke to afterwards and talk to about it, which is one of the absolute tell tales because women who have been abused that way will usually share it with one of their close friends or somebody shortly after. She couldn't even narrow down the timeline so that they might have been able to determine if Trump or Epstein were in those locations at that time That's what corroboration is.It appears as if she was 100% full of shit Interviewing her FOUR TIMES proves the FBI did not believe it would a waste of time. AKA credible. Traumatized VICTIMS often cannot remember details MANY YEARS LATER. Do you know ANYTHING about RAPE VICTIMS? I had a girlfriend who told me about her experience. She claimed someone had attacked her but she ran away. She was obviously traumatized, and ran away IN HER MIND because she could not CONSCIOUSLY FACE the experience. Of course I don't expect an a-hole like you would have any empathy nor understanding of that. Quote
Goddess Posted March 6 Report Posted March 6 Well, we have now read 1.39 million DOJ documents in the Epstein case. Every one. We have built investigation dossiers on eight people: Bill Gates (2,265 documents), Woody Allen (2,613), Reid Hoffman (1,976), Bill Clinton (1,586), Larry Summers (739), Leon Black (667), Elon Musk (55), and Donald Trump. For Donald Trump, across the entire corpus, we found 40 documents. Not 40 damning documents. 40 documents total -- every sworn deposition, every FBI interview, every civil complaint, every flight log entry, every media reference of any kind linking Trump to Epstein in the largest document production in DOJ history. As with Elon, the number is the story. And as with Elon, the documents themselves tell that story even better. Every quote below is verbatim. Every citation is a DOJ document number you can verify. Click the links. This post comes from those links. There are just 40. You can read them yourself. THE FRIENDSHIP It must be made clear: Trump and Epstein were friends. This must be stated plainly, because everything that follows only makes sense if you understand that. They were Palm Beach neighbors in the 1990s. Both owned waterfront estates. Both moved in the same Manhattan social circles -- the dinner-party circuit that included Mort Zuckerman, Leon Black, Ronald Perelman, and a dozen other New York billionaires. In March 2003, Vanity Fair profiled Epstein as "The Talented Mr. Epstein" and named Trump as one of seven businessmen who dined at his 71st Street townhouse [187-11]. Juan Alessi, Epstein's house manager, named Trump among many prominent visitors to the Palm Beach property [055-12]. A 1993 photograph shows Trump and Marla Maples with Epstein and Maxwell at a New York party [EFTA00787056]. This was before Epstein's convictions. In 2002, reached by phone for a New York Magazine profile, Trump gave the currently most weaponized quote in the entire archive: "I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy. He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it -- Jeffrey enjoys his social life." [EFTA00013640] That quote has been cited thousands of times. It was given on speakerphone, before any public allegations, before any investigation, before any reason to be cautious. "It is even said that" is hearsay framing -- Trump reporting what others say. "On the younger side" is ambiguous. But the quote exists, and it reflects a social warmth that post-Epstein scandal Trump would prefer to erase. In 2003, Ghislaine Maxwell assembled a leather-bound album for Epstein's 50th birthday. Trump's contribution: a card with "several lines of typewritten text framed by the outline of a naked woman, which appears to be hand-drawn with a heavy marker," signed below the waist [senate_judiciary_to_bondi]. These are the facts, and the facts must be stated openly. The friendship was real. But what happened next matters more. THE FALLING OUT Around 2004, that friendship ended. Trump outbid Epstein at auction for the Maison de L'Amitie estate in Palm Beach. In Michael Wolff's 2017 recordings, Epstein himself confirmed the real estate dispute as the breaking point [wolff_tapes_transcript_exhibit]. But the real estate dispute was simply the excuse that Epstein made for something darker. Brad Edwards, the attorney who represented Epstein's victims, established under oath that Trump banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago after Epstein sexually assaulted an underage girl at the club [773-04]. There is no documented contact between Trump and Epstein after the falling out in 2004. Not one email. Not one phone call. Not one schedule entry. Not one reference of any kind in 1.39 million documents. After 2004, the relationship was over. Trump had drawn a hard line. THE GIRL IN THE SPA Virginia Roberts was sixteen years old, earning nine dollars an hour as a locker room attendant at Mar-a-Lago [1218-11]. In her memoir, she described the club in awestruck terms -- "sheer awe at the gold arches." Ghislaine Maxwell approached her while she was reading a book about massage [EFTA01689026]. "I was working at Donald Trump's spa in Mar-a-Lago and I was prompted by Ghislaine to come to Jeffrey's mansion in Palm Beach that afternoon after work." [1090-16] Roberts names many powerful men in her testimony. Clinton. Prince Andrew. Dershowitz. Wexner. She does not name Trump. He was the property owner. But Maxwell did the recruiting. An FBI interview of a different victim's mother captures how this worked: she "heard that a prince and DONALD TRUMP visited EPSTEIN's house and this made [her] think that if they are there then how could EPSTEIN be a criminal" [EFTA00089603]. That is what Epstein did with famous names. He wore used them as bait. As camouflage. If Epstein was associated with so-and-so, then how could he be a predator? Trump, unlike others, immediately put a stop to that. THE ACCUSATIONS Three allegations against Trump exist in the corpus. A Jane Doe civil lawsuit against Epstein's estate alleges that Epstein introduced her to Trump when she was fourteen, "allegedly elbowing Trump and saying, 'This is a good one, right?' Trump smiled and nodded in agreement" [1078-5]. At the Maxwell trial, a victim testified under oath that Epstein introduced her to Trump and took her to Mar-a-Lago when she was fourteen [120-cr-00330/745]. That testimony confirmed the social introduction. It contained no allegation of misconduct by Trump. Defense counsel used Trump's name to establish Epstein's social reach, not to implicate Trump. In 2016, during the presidential campaign, a civil complaint alleged the rape of a thirteen-year-old at Epstein's 71st Street house in the summer of 1994 -- Katie Johnson v. Trump & Epstein [EFTA01386393]. It was filed pro se, dismissed for improper filing, refiled with an attorney, and dropped before trial. It was never proven, never tested under cross-examination, never corroborated by any other witness in the criminal investigation. In August 2017, Epstein told Michael Wolff on tape: "I was Donald's closest friend for 10 years" [wolff_tapes_transcript_exhibit]. He claimed Trump liked to "f--- the wives of his best friends" and that Melania first slept with Trump on Epstein's plane. These recordings were released days before the 2024 election. They are unsworn claims by a convicted pedophile and serial liar to an author -- a man who told the same journalist his week included "woody allen, elon musk, frank gehri... bill gates" [EFTA02561193]. And that pedophile and liar had an axe to grind. A big one. Those are the allegations. What follows is what happened when they were investigated. THE INVESTIGATION The FBI investigated Donald Trump in connection with the Epstein case. The master case index lists him as a "positive case hit" with "salacious information": "Donald Trump (one identified victim claimed abuse by Trump but ultimately refused to cooperate)" [EFTA00161528]. One allegation. One victim who refused to cooperate. No prosecution. The FBI's National Threat Operations Center received four separate complaints naming Trump [EFTA01660679]. A hearsay oral sex claim via a friend-of-friend chain. An anonymous party guest list. A claim about "big orgy parties" from a sixteen-year-old model. A Trump Golf Course allegation "deemed not credible." All anonymous. None corroborated. The Senate Judiciary Committee -- bipartisan, Grassley and Durbin -- reported that FBI personnel were specifically instructed to "flag" any records in which President Trump was mentioned across all 1.39 million documents. The result: no incriminating "client list." No evidence of criminal conduct [senate_judiciary_to_bondi]. The Southern District of New York, which prosecuted the Epstein case, had Trump's phone records in their evidence. Their grand jury presentation includes a message slip showing Trump called Epstein on November 1, 2000 -- a routine call, no message content [EFTA00008599]. The same presentation, same pages, includes message slips reading "She has females for Mr. J.E." Prosecutors had Trump's innocuous call alongside explicit trafficking procurement. They found nothing to charge. Attorney General William Barr, under oath before the House Oversight Committee: "I was never informed of the evidence, and I'm skeptical there is any... if they had evidence, this would've been low-hanging fruit." [oversight_republican_staff_memo] THE ATTORNEY WHO WOULD KNOW Brad Edwards represented Epstein's victims for years. He investigated every lead. He subpoenaed records, deposed witnesses, and built the case that led to federal prosecution. He was the attorney most motivated to find evidence against anyone connected to Epstein. In April 2010, Edwards filed a sworn affidavit: "While research by other plaintiffs' attorneys and myself has uncovered other persons that were acquaintances of Mr. Epstein, specifically Donald Trump, Alan Dershowitz, Bill Clinton, Tommy Mottola, and David Copperfield, we have no information that any of those people (other than Mr. Dershowitz) have spoken to Mr. Epstein about Jane Doe or any of the other specific victims of Mr. Epstein's molestation." [560-03] Edwards' attorney Jack Scarola: "There is no evidence the President was involved in Epstein's schemes" [773-04]. Edwards filed a notice to depose Trump in September 2009 [701]. As a witness. Not as a suspect. He sought Trump's testimony to help the victim's case. And there is this: when Edwards was investigating Epstein, reaching out to the powerful men in Epstein's orbit for cooperation, Trump was the only person who picked up the phone and returned his call [50-2009-CA-040800/549]. The attorney who spent years investigating on behalf of Epstein's victims -- who had every reason to find evidence, every incentive to implicate the powerful -- swore under oath that his investigation found nothing linking Trump to the abuse. When he called, Trump answered. Readily. Trump knew what Epstein was and wanted to talk about it. WHAT THE DOCUMENTS DON'T SHOW Pilot David Rodgers flew Epstein's planes for twenty-eight years. He sat for a seventeen-page FBI interview and reviewed his flight logs covering 1991 through 2007 [EFTA00159180]. Trump appears once: Flight 934, January 5, 1997. Passengers: Epstein, Maxwell, Donald Trump, Mark Epstein, and Didier, a chef. Route: Palm Beach to Newark. No flight in the corpus shows Trump traveling to Little Saint James, to Zorro Ranch, or to any international destination on Epstein's aircraft. Epstein's famous ninety-two-page personal contact book does not contain a "Donald Trump" entry [black-book-redacted]. It lists Robert and Blaine Trump, Ivana Trump, Ivanka Trump, and Trump Management Inc. -- the socialite channel, not Donald. There are zero financial transactions between Trump and Epstein in any direction. No donations. No investments. No advisory fees. No foundation grants. Even Epstein's own defense lawyers, in a motion to pare down a 169-person witness list, argued that Trump had "no connection at all" to the case [1338]. And Epstein himself, in a draft letter, grouped Trump among "friends and other innocent bystanders" whose names had been dragged in by "abusive discovery" [EFTA01128737]. THE COMPARISON The Epstein documents reveal concentric circles of association. At the center: people who were financially entangled, who visited the island repeatedly, who maintained the relationship through and after Epstein's conviction. Trump was not in any of these circles. Woody Allen: 2,613 documents. Nine years of regular contact. Dinner companion. Epstein attended his film shoots. Bill Gates: 2,265 documents. Multiple confirmed meetings. Donations routed through Epstein. Boris Nikolic named in Epstein's will. Reid Hoffman: 1,976 documents. 36 documented gift exchanges. Slept at Epstein's 71st Street mansion. Bill Clinton: 1,586 documents. 147 sexually explicit messages with Maxwell. Multiple confirmed island visits. Flights on Epstein's plane confirmed by his pilot ("ten or twenty times"). Active participation in the post-arrest denial campaign. Larry Summers: 739 documents. Regular dinner companion. Island visits with family. Harvard Program for Evolutionary Dynamics funded through Epstein. Leon Black: 667 documents. $158 million paid to Epstein across a decades-long financial relationship. Elon Musk: 55 documents. Zero financial transactions. Twenty-two months of sporadic, taciturn emails with Epstein chasing Musk, but leaving Epstein little to grab onto. Donald Trump: 40 documents. Zero financial transactions. Zero island visits. One commuter flight. A friendship that ended in 2004, eleven years before the first federal prosecution, after Trump drew the line and Epstein was banned from Mar-a-Lago for his behavior. The only person in Epstein's orbit who returned the victim's attorney's call. Trump's entire file is 1.8% the size of Gates's. WHAT REMAINS These documents show a man who was part of an early social world he did not yet completely understand, who called a predator "terrific" before anyone knew what that predator was, who sent a crude birthday card before there was any reason not to, whose property was used as a hunting ground without his knowledge or permission -- and who, when the investigation came, banned the predator from his club, picked up the phone for the victim's attorney, and was cleared by every investigative body that looked. 40 documents. Every quote verbatim. Every citation verifiable. Full compendium (40 docs): THE_DONALD_TRUMP_FILES.pdf - Google Drive AI-optimized compendium (upload to any LLM and ask it anything): trump_gold_complete.md - Google Drive 1 2 Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
CdnFox Posted March 7 Report Posted March 7 2 hours ago, robosmith said: Interviewing her FOUR TIMES proves the FBI did not believe it would a waste of time. AKA credible. Nope not even in the slightest. In fact they could interview somebody 10 times and not find them credible, and it's obvious that in the end they didn't. Not to mention the fact that she apparently just ran away and wouldn't talk to them anymore after they started to ask too many questions. So 100% not credible. And let's get honest if you can't even remember what city it occurred in it's hard to take someone seriously. Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
User Posted March 7 Report Posted March 7 21 hours ago, robosmith said: Interviewing her FOUR TIMES proves the FBI did not believe it would a waste of time. AKA credible. The way your brain works this pretzle logic should be studied. It is truly amazing. Quote
CdnFox Posted March 7 Report Posted March 7 10 minutes ago, User said: The way your brain works this pretzle logic should be studied. It is truly amazing. It's obvious from the files that she was bananas and less and less credible each time they pressed her for info. In the end she couldn't remember the year, or even the city this supposedly happened in. ANd when they asked more questions she ran. This behavior is pretty typical of someone who's making up a story either to gain fame and money or because they've been put up to it by someone for some species of compensation. It's a joke 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
gatomontes99 Posted March 8 Report Posted March 8 On 3/6/2026 at 3:15 PM, robosmith said: Getting parts of the story wrong is not unusual for traumatized victims YEARS LATER, dummy. It was so wrong, the FBI dismissed any possibility that it was true. She was a liar trying to create a fake accusation before the election. 2 Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
robosmith Posted March 18 Author Report Posted March 18 On 3/6/2026 at 2:50 PM, Goddess said: Well, we have now read 1.39 million DOJ documents in the Epstein case. Every one. Not even close. There are STILL OVER 2.5 MILLION documents being HIDDEN. Quote As of March 2026, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) has released over 3 million pages of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, but a significant number of records—estimated by some lawmakers to be another 2.5 million or more—remain withheld or heavily redacted, causing intense bipartisan scrutiny. YouTube +2 Here is the current status of the Epstein documents based on 2026 reports: Massive Release vs. Missing Files: While the DOJ, led by Attorney General Pam Bondi, announced in late January 2026 that it had released a final major tranche of over 3 million pages, investigators, lawmakers, and victims' lawyers have identified that many files remain in the "black box" of the justice system. The "Hidden" Total: Critics argue that the DOJ is holding back roughly 2.5 million to 3 million more documents that were initially identified as "potentially responsive" to the Act. Lawmakers have accused the DOJ of failing to comply with the mandate, with Rep. Ro Khanna calling the withheld documents a potential cover-up. Redaction Scandals: The released documents included significant, often haphazard, redactions. In early February 2026, the DOJ had to take down thousands of documents after it was revealed that they exposed the names of victims, while simultaneously heavily redacting the names of potential influential co-conspirators. Missing Information: The FBI is suspected of withholding key documents, including interviews with accusers, while a 2026 review found that at least 37 pages of records related to specific allegations remained missing from the public database. Continued Investigation: Due to the incompleteness of the release, the House Oversight Committee has formally subpoenaed Attorney General Pam Bondi to appear for a sworn deposition on April 14, 2026, to explain the handling of the files. BBC +5 While the DOJ asserts it is protecting victim identities, critics believe the continued redaction of influential names is a move to protect the "Epstein class" of elite figures Quote
Goddess Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 3 minutes ago, robosmith said: Not even close. There are STILL OVER 2.5 MILLION documents being HIDDEN. And he's read the 1.39 million of them that have been released. Your TDS in interfering with your reading comprehension. Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
robosmith Posted March 18 Author Report Posted March 18 1 minute ago, Goddess said: And he's read the 1.39 million of them that have been released. Your TDS in interfering with your reading comprehension. You said "every one," and that is a LIE. Even the released 1.39M are ILLEGALLY REDACTED to hide perpetrators' identity according to the Epstein Transparency Act. Quote
Goddess Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 1 minute ago, robosmith said: You said "every one," and that is a LIE. Even the released 1.39M are ILLEGALLY REDACTED to hide perpetrators' identity according to the Epstein Transparency Act. OK. Have a great day. Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
robosmith Posted March 20 Author Report Posted March 20 Lawyer Dan Goldman details the Epstein Files case against Trump's sexual assault of a 14yo girl. VIDEO FBI conducting 4 interviews with her, proves they found her credible. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.