robosmith Posted February 26 Author Report Posted February 26 There's this underage accuser, who included Trump rape allegations in her lawsuit against Epstein 1 Quote
User Posted February 26 Report Posted February 26 47 minutes ago, robosmith said: There's this underage accuser, who included Trump rape allegations in her lawsuit against Epstein Another lazy spambot link to someone else saying stuff. 1 Quote
robosmith Posted February 26 Author Report Posted February 26 1 hour ago, User said: Another lazy spambot link to someone else saying stuff. Thanks for bumping my thread LUser. Quote
John Johnston Posted February 26 Report Posted February 26 Me thinks Trump doth Protest too much. 😄 Quote
CdnFox Posted February 26 Report Posted February 26 30 minutes ago, John Johnston said: Me thinks Trump doth Protest too much. 😄 In what respect? Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
robosmith Posted February 26 Author Report Posted February 26 2 minutes ago, CdnFox said: In what respect? Desperation to keep the Files hidden. It seems you've not noticed that the 3 missing interview records files amounting to 50 pages are about accusations against Trump. LMAO Or maybe you did notice and are just PLAYING DUMB. Quote
CdnFox Posted February 26 Report Posted February 26 2 minutes ago, robosmith said: Desperation to keep the Files hidden. The files aren't hidden, they've been released. Quote It seems you've not noticed that the 3 missing interview records files amounting to 50 pages are about accusations against Trump. LMAO no indication they were ever in the pile he got tho. AND the fbi dropped the case so at the end of the day doesn't sound like there was enough evidence to proceed. AND the person was testifying about a number of things, not just trump. Sooooo... still not hearing the 'protest'? Quote Or maybe you did notice and are just PLAYING DUMB. At least when i seem dumb i'm playing LOL Any rate I don't think you're authorized to speak on behalf of John, you're just guessing what he was referring to. So let's wait and see what John was actually talking about and then we can be sure Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
LinkSoul60 Posted February 27 Report Posted February 27 44 minutes ago, CdnFox said: The files aren't hidden, they've been released. Are you that oblivious, or just not well informed? FBI files having to do with accusations of Trump have 'mysteriously' gone missing. Wonder why? BTW.... your affection for a guy trying to break our economy is admirable. Quote
Nationalist Posted February 27 Report Posted February 27 18 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said: Are you that oblivious, or just not well informed? FBI files having to do with accusations of Trump have 'mysteriously' gone missing. Wonder why? BTW.... your affection for a guy trying to break our economy is admirable. The words of the eternal bride's maid. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
LinkSoul60 Posted February 27 Report Posted February 27 24 minutes ago, Nationalist said: The words of the eternal bride's maid. There are FBI files that have 'gone missing' about accusations from what was then an underaged girl made against your make-up wearing and diaper bearing orange idol. That's of no concern, or any reason to question your infatuation for you? Quote
CdnFox Posted February 27 Report Posted February 27 1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said: Are you that oblivious, or just not well informed? Just honest. Sorry for the inconvenience, Quote FBI files having to do with accusations of Trump have 'mysteriously' gone missing. Wonder why? So a collection of files that's 10 years old may not have had some of the data included among literallly millions of pages. Gosh, it's a mystery Can't be much in them if the fbi never proceeded with charges. Quote BTW.... your affection for a guy trying to break our economy is admirable. And once again you shoot yourself in the foot MOre than anyone else who leans right on this forum i've been criticial of trump and his policy, even tho i think for america he was the best choice on the table. And i've been directly critical of his tariff policy. But of course, you're so bias and tribal than in your mind anyone who doesn't HATE trump with a passion must WORSHIP him. And this is because that's how you were with biden. I'm intelligent and educated and disapssionate, so i can look at it logically. i can say i don't think his tariff policy will work out well AND i can say there's really nothing to strongly suggest he committed any crimes in the epstien files. Two things can be true at once. Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
User Posted February 27 Report Posted February 27 4 hours ago, robosmith said: Thanks for bumping my thread LUser. OK coward. Quote
LinkSoul60 Posted February 27 Report Posted February 27 1 hour ago, CdnFox said: So a collection of files that's 10 years old may not have had some of the data included among literallly millions of pages. Gosh, it's a mystery Can't be much in them if the fbi never proceeded with charges. You got something on your chin.... 1 hour ago, CdnFox said: And once again you shoot yourself in the foot MOre than anyone else who leans right on this forum i've been criticial of trump and his policy, even tho i think for america he was the best choice on the table. And i've been directly critical of his tariff policy. Other than that, you got TDS 1 hour ago, CdnFox said: I'm intelligent and educated and disapssionate, so i can look at it logically. i can say i don't think his tariff policy will work out well AND i can say there's really nothing to strongly suggest he committed any crimes in the epstien files. Two things can be true at once. Who are you trying to convince... me or you. Critical thinking isn't your thing. Don't pretend it is. Nothing in the files other than his name being mentioned more than any other, his DOJ not adhering to court orders for release, files of accusations of Trump from an underaged girl now mysteriously missing....I can see your logic in saying it looks clean, nothing here. Quote
robosmith Posted February 27 Author Report Posted February 27 6 hours ago, CdnFox said: The files aren't hidden, they've been released. They may have been available at one time, but were rapidly withdrawn. AKA hidden. 6 hours ago, CdnFox said: no indication they were ever in the pile he got tho. AND the fbi dropped the case so at the end of the day doesn't sound like there was enough evidence to proceed. AND the person was testifying about a number of things, not just trump. Sooooo... still not hearing the 'protest'? The FBI dropped the case because Trump and Bondi ORDERED THAT. Duh Quote
CdnFox Posted February 27 Report Posted February 27 (edited) 13 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said: You got something on your chin.... Other than that, you got TDS Based on your previous post, more of your weird sex fantasies which seem to come out when you know you're losing 13 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said: Who are you trying to convince... me or you. Critical thinking isn't your thing. Don't pretend it is. I don't need to convince anybody kid. I already know it and it's pretty obvious you do too that's why you're crying. 13 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said: Nothing in the files other than his name being mentioned more than any other, his DOJ not adhering to court orders for release, files of accusations of Trump from an underaged girl now mysteriously missing....I can see your logic in saying it looks clean, nothing here. Well it's not true that his name is mentioned in more than anyone else amusingly it seems like gates is actually mentioned more than him. I'm sure others are as well. Having your name mentioned in that file is not actually any sign of wrongdoing. You think Whoopi Goldberg is a rapist? Carney New gislane Maxwell, is he guilty now? This guy got as close as he could to anybody who is any fame or power or money. The vast majority of them won't have done anything wrong and even the investigators that worked on the cases knew that. So that's pretty stupid evidence And he has released the data as for the doj request and this idea that there's some documents missing is still to be proven. They may never have been in there in the first place. If he was going to hide some of those documents related to that issue why wouldn't he hide all of them? Why open that can of worms and leave a breadcrumb trail for others to follow? " Oh he definitely absolutely took files out but strangely decided to leave the files in that prove that there were files left out to open a controversy". Do you hear how stupid that sounds when you say it? There's nothing that terribly proves his innocence but there's nothing that shows he's guilty either. If it wasn't for your Bigotry and hatred driving your opinion you would see that. The only thing we can say is that he definitely knew Epstein but we knew that already. He was investigated for a potential crime but never charged and apparently the FBI dropped the investigation so they can't believe it was too legit. Edited February 27 by CdnFox 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
LinkSoul60 Posted February 27 Report Posted February 27 8 hours ago, CdnFox said: Based on your previous post, more of your weird sex fantasies which seem to come out when you know you're losing I don't need to convince anybody kid. I already know it and it's pretty obvious you do too that's why you're crying. Well it's not true that his name is mentioned in more than anyone else I'm using lee it seems like gates is actually mentioned more than him. I'm sure others are as well. Having your name mentioned in that file is not actually any sign of wrongdoing. You think Whoopi Goldberg is a rapist? Carney New Glenn Maxwell, is he guilty now? This guy got as close as he could to anybody who is any fame or power or money. The vast majority of them won't have done anything wrong and even the investigators that worked on the cases knew that. So that's pretty stupid evidence And he has released the data as for the doj request and this idea that there's some documents missing is still to be proven. They may never have been in there in the first place. If he was going to hide some of those documents related to that issue why wouldn't he hide all of them? Why open that can of worms and leave a breadcrumb trail for others to follow? " Oh he definitely absolutely took files out but strangely decided to leave the files in that prove that there were files left out to open a controversy". Do you hear how stupid that sounds when you say it? There's nothing that terribly proves his innocence but there's nothing that shows he's guilty either. If it wasn't for your Bigotry and hatred driving your opinion you would see that. The only thing we can say is that he definitely knew Epstein but we knew that already. He was investigated for a potential crime but never charged and apparently the FBI dropped the investigation so they can't believe it was too legit. You're trying to defend the indefensible 🤡 Another so-called Canadian with TDS... Wipe your chin Quote
gatomontes99 Posted February 27 Report Posted February 27 Hillary lied yesterday. Go figure. Proof? She pretended not to know Epstein by calling him Epstine. That is such a little kid lie. Who does not know how to say Epstein? Anyone? And she is pretending to be so ignorant of his name that she can't say it properly? Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
CdnFox Posted February 27 Report Posted February 27 2 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said: You're trying to defend the indefensible 🤡 Whereas you can't seem to defend anything at all. You couldn't refute a single point, you know that they're true so once again you make a silly little statement with no logic or reason. I accept your admission of defeat Quote Another so-called Canadian with TDS... Wipe your chin Wow, you must really feel you're losing if you're pulling out this weird homosexual references again The lefties like yourself are the first to say that they stand up for homosexuality and that it should be normalized. And yet your go-to for most of you when you're losing an argument is to accuse somebody else of being homosexual as if it's the worst insult you could come up with. I guess when the pressure is on your true colors show. Ignorant AND homophobic, lol. You're the whole package ain't ya! Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
robosmith Posted February 27 Author Report Posted February 27 The big new controversy over the Epstein files, explained The Hill https://thehill.com › homenews › administration › 5757... 8 hours ago — Controversy surrounds missing documents from the Jeffrey Epstein case, including interviews related to allegations against President Trump. DOJ says it's 'reviewing' whether Epstein reports were ... Good Morning America https://www.goodmorningamerica.com › news › story 1 day ago — The FBI reports -- which the Guardian said it had obtained -- amount to 25 pages of notes from four interviews conducted with the witness ...Read more Why Are 50 Pages of Epstein Files Missing? Democrats ... The Sunday Guardian https://sundayguardianlive.com › world › why-are-50-p... 1 day ago — Democrats accuse the Trump administration of hiding Epstein-related files tied to a sexual assault allegation. Here's what's missing and why ... Quote
User Posted February 27 Report Posted February 27 13 hours ago, robosmith said: The FBI dropped the case because Trump and Bondi ORDERED THAT. Duh You have no evidence of this and even then, was Biden in on this too? Quote
robosmith Posted March 2 Author Report Posted March 2 The big new controversy over the Epstein files, explained Quote This is exactly what has happened. Major news outlets this week picked up on reporting, which first came from an independent journalist, about potentially vital documents that appear not to have been made publicly available. It’s a complicated story. Here’s what you need to know. What is the core of the controversy? Documents outlining three of four FBI interviews apparently related to a woman who accused President Trump, as well as Epstein, of sexually assaulting her decades ago, seem to be missing from the latest release. The woman made the claims in 2019, but they date back to the 1980s, when she was a minor. Her allegation against Trump is uncorroborated. The president has denied all wrongdoing in relation to his friendship with Epstein, which ended roughly two decades ago. Also, The Guardian late on Thursday published a story in which it said its reporters had obtained the missing documents and that the woman’s claims “at times appear outlandish.” What’s the broader explanation? The latest release of the Epstein files includes a 2021 catalogue of material provided to Ghislaine Maxwell’s legal team. Maxwell, Epstein’s sometime-girlfriend, was tried and convicted of sex trafficking charges at the end of that year. The data set lists “non-testifying witness material.” It includes an anonymized reference to four interviews relating to one person, who has the case number 3501.045. Of those four interviews, only one appears to have been publicly released. In that interview, the woman makes detailed allegations of rape by Epstein but makes no allegation of abuse against Trump. The president is mentioned only in relation to a friend sending the woman a photograph. In her interview with FBI agents, the woman notes she still has this photo saved in her cellphone messages but asks if she can crop it so it shows only Epstein. When she was asked why she wanted to crop the photo, she hesitated, and the notes reflect that her “attorney advised [she] was concerned about implicating additional individuals, and specifically any that were well known, due to fear of retaliation.” The photo, according to the FBI account of the interview, was “a widely distributed photograph” of Epstein and Trump. The strand of the Epstein story centering on this woman was first brought to light by independent journalist Roger Sollenberger. Sollenberger, and subsequently outlets including NPR, The New York Times and CNN, have traced details about the woman in question that match a woman who made the serious but unproven allegation of sexual assault against Trump. Some commentators have pointed to the fact that four interviews took place as a sign that investigators believed the woman to be credible. But her credibility would not, in itself, prove any specific claim to be true. Quote
CdnFox Posted March 2 Report Posted March 2 1 hour ago, robosmith said: The big new controversy over the Epstein files, explained You realize your post kind of shoots the whole idea down There's no evidence trump took anything out of the files, it would make no sense for him to take some of it out of the files and leave other parts behind that proved there was more to the story, they've accessed the files through another source and they refer to the testimony as outlandish. Which makes sense considering that even though the FBI obvious in the '80s they didn't see any value in pursuing it with trump. Indicating that the charges did not seem plausible to them This is about as dead in the water as it can get. There's no real controversy here. Somewhere over the last 45 years three out of the four files referring to the specific issue or either lost or never made it into The final police files and we have them and we know what they said and they're outlandish. If you find the idea that over 45 years something can go missing from those files to be strange in any way shape or form you need a new brain Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
gatomontes99 Posted March 3 Report Posted March 3 Bill Clinton was there, he never saw Trump. Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
robosmith Posted March 4 Author Report Posted March 4 On 3/1/2026 at 8:52 PM, CdnFox said: You realize your post kind of shoots the whole idea down No I realize that you will harp on the weaknesses and ignore the parts which damn Trump. On 3/1/2026 at 8:52 PM, CdnFox said: There's no evidence trump took anything out of the files, it would make no sense for him to take some of it out of the files and leave other parts behind that proved there was more to the story, they've accessed the files through another source and they refer to the testimony as outlandish. Trump didn't do anything to the Files. He doesn't have those SKILZ. It APPEARS that the 3 missing files were recently in the public release, because somehow the Guardian got hold of them; but were pulled, probably because they directly accused Trump of sexual assault. On 3/1/2026 at 8:52 PM, CdnFox said: Which makes sense considering that even though the FBI obvious in the '80s they didn't see any value in pursuing it with trump. Indicating that the charges did not seem plausible to them A lot of things were dropped in the '80s. G Maxwell now claims there were 25 co-conspirators. The FBI went back to interview her 4 times which means they found the story convincing, as Sollenburger stated. On 3/1/2026 at 8:52 PM, CdnFox said: This is about as dead in the water as it can get. There's no real controversy here. ^This is where you go off the rails. Bondi TESTIFIED UNDER OATH there were NO ACCUSATIONS against Trump in the FILES. The Guardian has copies of the files which are NOW MISSING. On 3/1/2026 at 8:52 PM, CdnFox said: Somewhere over the last 45 years three out of the four files referring to the specific issue or either lost or never made it into The final police files and we have them and we know what they said and they're outlandish. The FBI didn't say that. They went back. On 3/1/2026 at 8:52 PM, CdnFox said: If you find the idea that over 45 years something can go missing from those files to be strange in any way shape or form you need a new brain Tne THREE FILES went missing RECENTLY. Read the article again if YOU STILL HAVE A BRAIN. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted March 4 Report Posted March 4 Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.