After years of race baiting by Barry and Michelle, the left gets all bent out of shape over a cartoon displaying Democrats as jungle creatures

[Nationalist]

7 hours ago, robosmith said:

You mean better at understanding your and Trump's despicable behavior. 

No...I mean you're irrational and b1tchy. 

[John Stone]

........................ I'll take Trump at his word, 'unnamed Staffer' being  responsible.

The unnamed staffer would be Stephen Miller. 

Power behind the throne might be a stretch but Steve wields incredible power. .......... nobody is more powerful. 

Steve was the guy that stood behind Trump immediately following the J6 protest. 

Let us hope that Trump survives his 2nd Term - Vance is in the wings and .........'there will be blood' with a 25th succession. 

J.D. Vance is a poor caricature of Trump ............... he won't be able to keep it together, esp with Congress.  

 

 

[Nationalist]

1 hour ago, John Stone said:

........................ I'll take Trump at his word, 'unnamed Staffer' being  responsible.

The unnamed staffer would be Stephen Miller. 

Power behind the throne might be a stretch but Steve wields incredible power. .......... nobody is more powerful. 

Steve was the guy that stood behind Trump immediately following the J6 protest. 

Let us hope that Trump survives his 2nd Term - Vance is in the wings and .........'there will be blood' with a 25th succession. 

J.D. Vance is a poor caricature of Trump ............... he won't be able to keep it together, esp with Congress.  

 

 

Lol...So it IS war that you Tweenkies want. Ok.

[CDN1]

23 hours ago, robosmith said:

NO EVIDENCE supplied for ^these OPINIONS. Unlike CITIZENS of America, you Canucks have no credibility for YOUR OPINIONS about the US.

Clue for you: this is what actual evidence looks like:

In the vast majority of black crime in America the victim is black.

 

Nearly 9/10 violent crimes between the two races are Black on White.

Adjusting per capita, at identical rates it would amount to over 2300 additional White on Black murders, well over 150k additional White on Black rapes & sexual assaults, and between 1.5-2 million+ additional White on Black acts of violence every single year.

 

Now add it all up over a decade and imagine what Democrats would be saying, even the so-called "moderates".

If these rates were reversed you would never grant such deflective framing, so gtfoh for even trying.

Edited February 8 by CDN1

[ironstone]

On 2/6/2026 at 6:52 PM, robosmith said:

Do you know ANYTHING about Europeans' theft of first peoples' land in America?

Or about white peoples' treatment of blacks (during slavery and Jim Crow)?

I believe that the 'first peoples' were already at war with each other....and stealing(conquering) land. Yes, the Europeans did conquer after their arrival.

Fun fact about the Jim Crow era: Democratic Party: During the Jim Crow era, the Democratic Party was the primary force behind the implementation of Jim Crow laws. Southern Democrats, often referred to as "Dixiecrats," strongly supported segregation and white supremacy to maintain control over local governments and prevent African American voting rights.

[West]

19 minutes ago, ironstone said:

I believe that the 'first peoples' were already at war with each other....and stealing(conquering) land. Yes, the Europeans did conquer after their arrival.

Fun fact about the Jim Crow era: Democratic Party: During the Jim Crow era, the Democratic Party was the primary force behind the implementation of Jim Crow laws. Southern Democrats, often referred to as "Dixiecrats," strongly supported segregation and white supremacy to maintain control over local governments and prevent African American voting rights.

Democrats will not come to grips with the racist history of their policy nor will they call out present day racism that is spewed daily from their party. 

[CdnFox]

30 minutes ago, West said:

Democrats will not come to grips with the racist history of their policy nor will they call out present day racism that is spewed daily from their party. 

I can forgive the history but it's the current stuff that really ticks me off. They insist that they are the only non-racist group and then constantly spew racism

And have you noticed the very first thing they do if they're losing an argument it start calling their opponent a f.a.g or the like or trying to 'gay shame' them. These are the people who insist they're "on the side of" lgbtq and it's the 'conservatives' who hate gays. But the first insult they think of is 'you like dick don't you".  We see it on this forum constantly, and it's everywhere else as well. 

The level of hypocrisy the left has is almost impossible to overstate. 

[robosmith]

20 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Do get off the pot. If I were projecting, my first post would not have said I thought the clip was a bit tasteless, yet funny.

And knowing what we do now about Barry's role in the great Russiagate scandal, it's rather obvious that The Great Mulato Prince, is nothing more than a weasel. 

Meh...maybe that's the animal he and his racist wife should have been portrayed as...eh?

Except "the great Russiagate scandal" is just a figment of YOUR IMAGINATION.

You can deny now SoS Republican Senator Rubio's Senate Intelligence Committee Report all you want, but it has credibility that YOU NEVER WILL, Canuck dropout.

[robosmith]

20 hours ago, Nationalist said:

No...I mean you're irrational and b1tchy. 

I am a perfectly rational interpreter of your INSANE defenses of the FASCIST DICTATOR Trump's CRIMES.

You don't even know the extent of his violations starting with extensive violation of the Impoundment Control Act.

Then move on to the Constitution's Emolument Clause. There would be far more if his violations had not been slapped down by the courts.

[Nationalist]

3 hours ago, robosmith said:

Except "the great Russiagate scandal" is just a figment of YOUR IMAGINATION.

You can deny now SoS Republican Senator Rubio's Senate Intelligence Committee Report all you want, but it has credibility that YOU NEVER WILL, Canuck dropout.

I dont deny anything. You Tweenkies had your investigation and impeachment. Both missed the mark. Why?

Because you cheated and got caught.

[Hodad]

17 hours ago, ironstone said:

I believe that the 'first peoples' were already at war with each other....and stealing(conquering) land. Yes, the Europeans did conquer after their arrival.

Fun fact about the Jim Crow era: Democratic Party: During the Jim Crow era, the Democratic Party was the primary force behind the implementation of Jim Crow laws. Southern Democrats, often referred to as "Dixiecrats," strongly supported segregation and white supremacy to maintain control over local governments and prevent African American voting rights.

That is 100% true. 

The second half of that story is that as Democrat leadership adopted a civil rights platform, the Dixiecrats, like Strom Thurmond, and their racist supporters began migrating to the Republican party. The Republicans needed voters. The Democrats had already claimed the civil rights platform, so thr Republicans adopted the racist voters opposed to civil rights who felt abandoned by the Democrats. That's how we get Nixon's "Southern Strategy" and consolation of the South as a Republican stronghold to this very day. 

I don't think you guys post these tidbits as innocent historical trivia. I think you intend them to imply something about Democrats today, but ignorant of political history, you don't realize the rest of the story that follows. 

Democrats absolutely used to be the party of racist oppression. For the last 60 years it's been the Republicans. Things change. 

 

[Hodad]

On 2/8/2026 at 7:51 AM, John Stone said:

........................ I'll take Trump at his word, 'unnamed Staffer' being  responsible.

The unnamed staffer would be Stephen Miller. 

Power behind the throne might be a stretch but Steve wields incredible power. .......... nobody is more powerful. 

Steve was the guy that stood behind Trump immediately following the J6 protest. 

Let us hope that Trump survives his 2nd Term - Vance is in the wings and .........'there will be blood' with a 25th succession. 

J.D. Vance is a poor caricature of Trump ............... he won't be able to keep it together, esp with Congress.  

 

 

There is no way that Stephen Miller has not murdered at least one prostitute. 

[John Stone]

33 minutes ago, Hodad said:

There is no way that Stephen Miller has not murdered at least one prostitute. 

I prefer to describe Steve as a controversial political figure, extremely useful re: policy .............. who should stay away from any microphone! lol

Steve is known for his hardline immigration policies and more specifically ideologically driven rhetoric - he has also been accused of a lack of empathy,  manipulation, intimidation and vitriol.

He has zero personal magnetism.

In the administration u fk with this guy at your peril. 

 

Edited February 9 by John Stone

[ironstone]

4 hours ago, Hodad said:

Democrats absolutely used to be the party of racist oppression. For the last 60 years it's been the Republicans. Things change. 

Respectfully disagree mainly because it's always the Democrats that use race as a weapon. They have screamed 'racism!' so often that it's almost meaningless now. In their eyes, pretty much everything is racist. They are the party that does not see the content of one's character, they only see skin color. They are the party that thinks POC are somehow less capable of getting ID or even finding the DMV, or even how to use the internet.

And the 'white supremacy' angle is just laughable. This was a line of attack used against Charlie Kirk for years, his response was to ask for specific examples of how the GOP is racist. The answer was always nonsense or vitriol, or crickets.

 

Edited February 9 by ironstone

[robosmith]

On 2/8/2026 at 4:00 AM, Nationalist said:

Do get off the pot. If I were projecting, my first post would not have said I thought the clip was a bit tasteless, yet funny.

And knowing what we do now about Barry's role in the great Russiagate scandal, it's rather obvious that The Great Mulato Prince, is nothing more than a weasel. 

Meh...maybe that's the animal he and his racist wife should have been portrayed as...eh?

Thank you for clearly admitting you're a white supremacist typical of the NAZIS after you previously feigned taking offense at the use of the term to describe you.

Quote

Yes, Nazi ideology and propaganda frequently portrayed Black people as subhuman, often equating them with apes, monkeys, or other primates. This dehumanization was part of a broader racial hierarchy developed by the Nazis, which placed the "Aryan" race at the apex and considered other groups, including Black people, as less evolved or inferior. 

Key aspects of this dehumanization included:

• Scientific Racism: Nazi ideologues and supporters of eugenics, such as Dr. A. Plotz and Hans F.K. Gunther, argued that while the Aryan race was descended from a higher form, "inferior" races had closer links to apes.
•  
• Dehumanizing Propaganda: Black individuals were often depicted in propaganda as closer to apes and monkeys, which served to justify their exclusion from German society, the prohibition of interracial relationships, and their ultimate persecution.
• Targeting of Afro-Germans: During the Third Reich, Black Germans and people of African descent faced extreme marginalization, and these racist caricatures were used to deny them their humanity.
•  
• Continuation of Historical Racism: This portrayal was not unique to the Nazis but was a continuation of centuries-old racist tropes used to justify slavery and colonial exploitation, which the Nazis intensified and formalized into state policy. 

 

[Deluge]

On 2/6/2026 at 4:52 PM, robosmith said:

Do you know ANYTHING about Europeans' theft of first peoples' land in America?

Or about white peoples' treatment of blacks (during slavery and Jim Crow)?

Ever heard of Greenwood District of Tulsa, Oklahoma?

 

This is conquered territory, robomarx. Go cry to your globalist overlords. 

[ironstone]

White liberals dumb themselves down when they speak to black people, a new study contends

https://archive.ph/DZL3z#selection-1007.0-1007.89

You have recently joined a book club.
Before each meeting, one member of the literary collective sends an email to the club secretary offering a few thoughts on the assigned text. This month, it’s your turn to compose the brief review.
A new study suggests that the words you use may depend on whether the club secretary’s name is Emily (“a stereotypically White name,” as the study says) or Lakisha (“a stereotypically Black name”). If you’re a white liberal writing to Emily, you might use words like “melancholy” or “euphoric” to describe the mood of the book, whereas you might trade these terms out for the simpler “sad” or “happy” if you’re corresponding with Lakisha.
But if you’re a white conservative, your diction won’t depend on the presumed race of your interlocutor.
This racial and political disparity is among the discoveries made by a pair of social psychologists in a paper forthcoming in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, a peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the American Psychological Association. Cydney Dupree, an assistant professor of organizational behavior at the Yale School of Management, and Susan Fiske, a professor of psychology and public affairs at Princeton, documented what they call a “competence downshift” exhibited by white liberals in interactions with racial minorities, and with black people in particular.
AD
The findings, based on what the authors stress is “preliminary evidence,” raise difficult questions about aspirations for a so-called post-racial society. The results reveal how subtle forms of discrimination may coincide with progress toward equal treatment, or what the paper identifies as “a significant reduction in the expression of explicit prejudice and endorsement of negative stereotypes.”
The psychologists further discovered that white liberals rarely admit to the goal of appearing less competent, a fact that highlights the role of implicit bias and “the covert nature of the competence downshift strategy.”
“White liberals may unwittingly draw on negative stereotypes, dumbing themselves down in a likely well-meaning, ‘folksy,’ but ultimately patronizing, attempt to connect with the outgroup,” argues the paper, titled “Self-Presentation in Interracial Settings: The Competence Downshift by White Liberals.”

 

[CdnFox]

10 hours ago, robosmith said:

Except "the great Russiagate scandal" is just a figment of YOUR IMAGINATION.

 

It's been proven robo

You can lie to yourself all you want. Apparently it's your favorite hobby

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, ironstone said:

White liberals dumb themselves down when they speak to black people, a new study contends

https://archive.ph/DZL3z#selection-1007.0-1007.89

You have recently joined a book club.
Before each meeting, one member of the literary collective sends an email to the club secretary offering a few thoughts on the assigned text. This month, it’s your turn to compose the brief review.
A new study suggests that the words you use may depend on whether the club secretary’s name is Emily (“a stereotypically White name,” as the study says) or Lakisha (“a stereotypically Black name”). If you’re a white liberal writing to Emily, you might use words like “melancholy” or “euphoric” to describe the mood of the book, whereas you might trade these terms out for the simpler “sad” or “happy” if you’re corresponding with Lakisha.
But if you’re a white conservative, your diction won’t depend on the presumed race of your interlocutor.
This racial and political disparity is among the discoveries made by a pair of social psychologists in a paper forthcoming in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, a peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the American Psychological Association. Cydney Dupree, an assistant professor of organizational behavior at the Yale School of Management, and Susan Fiske, a professor of psychology and public affairs at Princeton, documented what they call a “competence downshift” exhibited by white liberals in interactions with racial minorities, and with black people in particular.
AD
The findings, based on what the authors stress is “preliminary evidence,” raise difficult questions about aspirations for a so-called post-racial society. The results reveal how subtle forms of discrimination may coincide with progress toward equal treatment, or what the paper identifies as “a significant reduction in the expression of explicit prejudice and endorsement of negative stereotypes.”
The psychologists further discovered that white liberals rarely admit to the goal of appearing less competent, a fact that highlights the role of implicit bias and “the covert nature of the competence downshift strategy.”
“White liberals may unwittingly draw on negative stereotypes, dumbing themselves down in a likely well-meaning, ‘folksy,’ but ultimately patronizing, attempt to connect with the outgroup,” argues the paper, titled “Self-Presentation in Interracial Settings: The Competence Downshift by White Liberals.”

 

We all know that the editor of a publication chooses the title and OFTEN does NOT reflect the content of the AUTHORS of the ARTICLE who have chosen to EMPHASIZE theirs' is  "preliminary evidence."

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, ironstone said:

White liberals dumb themselves down when they speak to black people, a new study contends

https://archive.ph/DZL3z#selection-1007.0-1007.89

You have recently joined a book club.
Before each meeting, one member of the literary collective sends an email to the club secretary offering a few thoughts on the assigned text. This month, it’s your turn to compose the brief review.
A new study suggests that the words you use may depend on whether the club secretary’s name is Emily (“a stereotypically White name,” as the study says) or Lakisha (“a stereotypically Black name”). If you’re a white liberal writing to Emily, you might use words like “melancholy” or “euphoric” to describe the mood of the book, whereas you might trade these terms out for the simpler “sad” or “happy” if you’re corresponding with Lakisha.
But if you’re a white conservative, your diction won’t depend on the presumed race of your interlocutor.
This racial and political disparity is among the discoveries made by a pair of social psychologists in a paper forthcoming in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, a peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the American Psychological Association. Cydney Dupree, an assistant professor of organizational behavior at the Yale School of Management, and Susan Fiske, a professor of psychology and public affairs at Princeton, documented what they call a “competence downshift” exhibited by white liberals in interactions with racial minorities, and with black people in particular.
AD
The findings, based on what the authors stress is “preliminary evidence,” raise difficult questions about aspirations for a so-called post-racial society. The results reveal how subtle forms of discrimination may coincide with progress toward equal treatment, or what the paper identifies as “a significant reduction in the expression of explicit prejudice and endorsement of negative stereotypes.”
The psychologists further discovered that white liberals rarely admit to the goal of appearing less competent, a fact that highlights the role of implicit bias and “the covert nature of the competence downshift strategy.”
“White liberals may unwittingly draw on negative stereotypes, dumbing themselves down in a likely well-meaning, ‘folksy,’ but ultimately patronizing, attempt to connect with the outgroup,” argues the paper, titled “Self-Presentation in Interracial Settings: The Competence Downshift by White Liberals.”

 

That's actually amazing. It's not surprising considering that democrats also believe that black people can't get iD and they're too stupid to use the internet but to see it ingrained at that level is actually a little startling to me.

Everyday new evidence comes out that the most racist group in the world is the left

[ironstone]

36 minutes ago, robosmith said:

We all know that the editor of a publication chooses the title and OFTEN does NOT reflect the content of the AUTHORS of the ARTICLE who have chosen to EMPHASIZE theirs' is  "preliminary evidence."

Like telling a black audience that you carry around hot sauce or something like that.

[robosmith]

10 minutes ago, ironstone said:

Like telling a black audience that you carry around hot sauce or something like that.

Nothing unusual about appealing to your audience except when cons just don't care about doing that because NO RESPECT. 🤮 

[gatomontes99]

4 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Nothing unusual about appealing to your audience except when cons just don't care about doing that because NO RESPECT. 🤮 

Wow. You actually just said you have to dumb down your language when the audience is black. At least you admit you are racist now. 

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Wow. You actually just said you have to dumb down your language when the audience is black. At least you admit you are racist now. 

It's so ingrained into them they don't even realize what they're saying. I don't think it's occurred to him that he just admitted to being a racist

[SpankyMcFarland]

There is no point arguing with committed racists. They’re not going to see any problem with what they are saying and will deny centuries of similar racist tropes until the cows come home. This attack on the only African-American president and his wife is what the white nationalist wing of Trump’s coalition wants to see.