Comey To Be Indicted For Lying To Congress

[Politics1990]

On 9/26/2025 at 12:55 PM, WestCanMan said:

In your opinion, did the DNC file any junk charges on conservatives? 

Russiagate? J6th? Flynn? Mortgagegate?

 

Were J6 rioters held too long without trial? Were they held in solitary too long?

Why did people who attacked the WH face NO similar treatment? Should anyone have been jailed for that? 

 

Amaze us with your integrity.

lock them all up    ( all radical far right consevatives that is )

[LinkSoul60]

1 hour ago, User said:

Paying a porn star is not a crime. Falsifying business records... required someone to be defrauded, it is also not a felony, and the statute of limitations long expired. 

 

I find it real hard to believe that attorneys on both sides, a court of law, or the Supreme Court didn't catch onto to that.  Don't you? 

Edited September 28, 2025 by LinkSoul60

[robosmith]

7 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Evidence? Sweetie...that chickenshit verdict will be overturned by the SCOTUS. They already had to issue an unconditional discharge. It was absolutely an abuse of the legal system and anyone with even a quarter of a brain knows it.

Which...leaves you out but...

You think Trump is one to forgive and forget? Huh...I hope he fcks Bragg and Merchan good.

STILL GUILTY. Duh

Sentences are OFTEN revised downward. Duh

Quote

An unconditional discharge is a lenient sentence in which a person is convicted of a crime but receives no jail time, fines, or probation. It finalizes the case, but the conviction itself remains on the offender's record. This type of sentence is rare and typically reserved for lower-level offenses or in cases with unusual circumstances. 

 

How an unconditional discharge works

• Conviction is upheld: The guilty verdict stands, and the person has a criminal conviction on their record.
• No punishment imposed: The court does not require the defendant to serve time in prison, pay a fine, or serve probation.
• Limited restrictions: While there are no court-imposed conditions, a person with a felony conviction may still face certain collateral consequences, such as the loss of gun rights or issues with professional licensing. 

 

Key considerations

• Discretionary sentencing: State laws govern eligibility for an unconditional discharge. In New York, for example, a judge can issue this sentence if they believe neither the public interest nor the ends of justice would be served by imprisonment or probation.

 

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said:

I find it real hard to believe that attorneys on both sides, a court of law, or the Supreme Court didn't catch onto to that.  Don't you? 

The court and the attournes caught on, the prosecution and the judge just didn't care. The judge's daughter was gettting rich from the case and the prosecution wanted the glory. 

THat's why the judge had to give some "special" instructions to the jury. 

The supreme court hasn't heard the case ,trump became president before it went there and there's been on sentencing. and so no appeal. 

[BeaverFever]

On 9/24/2025 at 7:07 PM, gatomontes99 said:

Is this FAFO or play stupid games? I get my popular memes confused sometimes. I think I will hang my hat on play stupid games. 

James Comey lied to Congress when he said he did not authorize leaks to the media. We now know Comey sent materials to a friend to have them leaked to the media. 

I don't care that the left will call this partisan or an assault on democracy or anything else. They are literally using rhetoric that is getting people killed. They don't need to be addressed or taken seriously. They are a joke and this is how you shut them up. Take down all these people that lied and literally tried to undermine democracy. Make them pay. Make them pay biggly.

Trump promised he would weaponize the DOJ and use it to settle grudges and personal vendettas. After the first US Attorney refused Trump’s order to indict his enemies he was fired/forced to resign and replaced with an unqualified 36 year old insurance lawyer with no criminal experience who is willing to do the dictator’s dirty work. Gotta love that fascism.

[CdnFox]

Just now, BeaverFever said:

Trump promised he would weaponize the DOJ and use it to settle grudges and personal vendettas. After the first US Attorney refused Trump’s order to indict his enemies he was fired/forced to resign and replaced with an unqualified 36 year old insurance lawyer with no criminal experience who is willing to do the dictator’s dirty work. Gotta love that fascism.

That's nice. 

You should have probably complained  about that kind of behavior when they were doing it to him  I mean.... that's WHY he promised to do it back. 

The only difference is he's up front about it while obama (faked intellegence reports to make trump look guilty before an election) and biden (numerous fake charges against trump)  were doing the same thing. 

But you didn't and now you' can't b itch about it. sorry. 

Next time one of your guy's is in make sure you tell them not to do that.  THEN you can ask other people to do the same. 

[robosmith]

19 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

That's nice. 

You should have probably complained  about that kind of behavior when they were doing it to him  I mean.... that's WHY he promised to do it back. 

The only difference is he's up front about it while obama (faked intellegence reports to make trump look guilty before an election) and biden (numerous fake charges against trump)  were doing the same thing. 

But you didn't and now you' can't b itch about it. sorry. 

Next time one of your guy's is in make sure you tell them not to do that.  THEN you can ask other people to do the same. 

You've been CONNED as usual. Trump PROMISED "retribution" to his political "enemies."

Biden NEVER said a word about who to prosecute, because HE RESPECTED the independence of the DoJ since that SERVES JUSTICE.

ALL YOU HAVE is SPECULATION, because YOU CANNOT QUOTE BIDEN demanding what YOU CLAIM. LMAO

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

You've been CONNED as usual. Trump PROMISED "retribution" to his political "enemies."MAO

Uhhh no...  he really did promise that.... that's  not a con 😆😆😆

Its' a con when someone convinces you something happened that DIDN'T not one that did   

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Biden NEVER said a word about who to prosecute, because HE RESPECTED the independence of the DoJ since that SERVES JUSTICE.

He absolutely did and eveyrone knew it.  it was beyond obvious. 

Quote

 because HE RESPECTED the independence of the DoJ since that SERVES JUSTICE.

And then pardoned his kid  LOLOL

Biden absolutely did interfere with the justice system and sent his own lawyer to make sure it went his way. 

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

ALL YOU HAVE is SPECULATION, because YOU CANNOT QUOTE BIDEN demanding what YOU CLAIM. LMAO

We can observe his actions.  If a man is observed walking up to another man and shooting him, and doesn't confess, we can still come to the conclusion it was murder even tho we can't quote him saying so 

We can see what happened and we can reasonably conclude biden interfered. We can definitely note the case was politically motivated.. And in polling about 62 percent of americans or there abouts stated they believed that was the case. 

62 percent in new poll say federal charges against Trump politically motivated

Now many of the dems who thought it was politically motivated STILL wanted him charged.  
well....     he won the election and promised to get back at the dems who attacked him, and it kinda sounds like they've got it coming  

Again - you should have spoken up when biden did it. And obama, tho i note you didn't even try to refute that one. 

 

[Nationalist]

4 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Using 'TDS' is nothing more than saying 'I got nothing'.

What's your version of the facts?

That's not true at all.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/former-attorney-general-bill-barr-trumps-criminal-charges-overturned

https://www.foxnews.com/media/dershowitz-slams-trump-conviction-worst-legal-verdict-ive-seen-60-years

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/what-happens-trump-convicted-legal-experts-break-down

So in the end...Trump will sue Bragg's ass off as well as Merchand...and he'll win.

You TDS infected fcks have raped the legal system over and over.

Which is a major reason the Demoncrats are in the toilet.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/national-poll-slaps-democrats-with-worst-rating-key-category

You dumb little pee-ons destroyed your own political party to soothe your hatred. And in the end...you all lose.

Gee...that was smaaarrrt...

[Nationalist]

7 hours ago, CdnFox said:

If we're being honest I think that In the end comey will win the case. But it will probably cost him tens if not hundreds of thousands of dollars to do so. Which is exactly what happened to trump and most of his cases

One way or the other, Comey will be destroyed. I hope he gets caged with the same guy who didn't hang Epstein.

[Nationalist]

3 hours ago, robosmith said:

STILL GUILTY. Duh

Sentences are OFTEN revised downward. Duh

 

Still POTUS. DUH!

And why? Because it became painfully evident that you Demoncrats are insane.

So enjoy the coming indictments. The Demoncrat brand is dead.

Edited September 28, 2025 by Nationalist

[LinkSoul60]

7 hours ago, Nationalist said:

That's not true at all.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/former-attorney-general-bill-barr-trumps-criminal-charges-overturned

https://www.foxnews.com/media/dershowitz-slams-trump-conviction-worst-legal-verdict-ive-seen-60-years

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/what-happens-trump-convicted-legal-experts-break-down

So in the end...Trump will sue Bragg's ass off as well as Merchand...and he'll win.

You TDS infected fcks have raped the legal system over and over.

Which is a major reason the Demoncrats are in the toilet.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/national-poll-slaps-democrats-with-worst-rating-key-category

You dumb little pee-ons destroyed your own political party to soothe your hatred. And in the end...you all lose.

Gee...that was smaaarrrt...

It's very true.  You're doing it now....

Your Trump Deification Syndrome is acute. 

[User]

10 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

I find it real hard to believe that attorneys on both sides, a court of law, or the Supreme Court didn't catch onto to that.  Don't you? 

There is a reason there are still pending appeals going on.

This is all legal analysis readily available as well.

You are not interested in discussing all the facts and you can’t answer these sumple points either because you know it was a sham and don’t want to have to admit that. 

[Legato]

12 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Using 'TDS' is nothing more than saying 'I got nothing'.

What's your version of the facts?

Not having TDS is a good thing, sorry your TDS blocks any coherent thought.

[LinkSoul60]

41 minutes ago, Legato said:

Not having TDS is a good thing, sorry your TDS blocks any coherent thought.

Your infatuation with a cognitively declining and make-up wearing 79 year old narcissist borders somewhere between comical and embarrassing.  For the sake of argument we'll call it a comical embarrassment.

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

It's very true.  You're doing it now....

Your Trump Deification Syndrome is acute. 

LOL i see you still can't make an argument to save your life  

It's amusing that all you can do is mimic @Nationalist like a 6 year old who just repeats what people say and thinks it's clever  

He's right, and you've got no objectivity

[Legato]

23 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Your infatuation with a cognitively declining and make-up wearing 79 year old narcissist borders somewhere between comical and embarrassing.  For the sake of argument we'll call it a comical embarrassment.

Not a Trump supporter, never have been, don't like him at all, and yet I don't hate the guy.

Your commonplace fall back rhetoric is nothing more than a worn out hackneyed cop out.

Do try to do better

[Nationalist]

2 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

It's very true.  You're doing it now....

Your Trump Deification Syndrome is acute. 

Or...you cant face the entire truth of the matter. But...the American electorate evidently can.

[WestCanMan]

18 hours ago, Politics1990 said:

lock them all up    ( all radical far right consevatives that is )

You're not the only left4rd saying such things. 

[CdnFox]

51 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

You're not the only left4rd saying such things. 

And haven't been for quite some time now. 

[BeaverFever]

21 hours ago, CdnFox said:

That's nice. 

You should have probably complained  about that kind of behavior when they were doing it to him  I mean.... that's WHY he promised to do it back. 

The only difference is he's up front about it while obama (faked intellegence reports to make trump look guilty before an election) and biden (numerous fake charges against trump)  were doing the same thing. 

But you didn't and now you' can't b itch about it. sorry. 

Next time one of your guy's is in make sure you tell them not to do that.  THEN you can ask other people to do the same. 

Bullshit. 
 

First Trump DID commit the crimes he was convicted for the only republican complaint was that he should be exempt because he is a politician 

Second, prosecutors took those cases under their own authority and discretion, Biden didn’t order them to  Amd Obama didn’t order any “faked” intelligence reports on Trump  

Third as Ive pointed out before your argument of “now it’s OUR turn to be corrupt” has no moral or legal basis.  Even you claims of Biden/Obama corruption were true (which they’re not) the only solid is to END the corrupt and govern with integrity, not make corruption the permanent “new normal” by perpetuating it. 
 

Fifth, neither Obama nor Biden had to fire a prosecutor for refusing to bring charges against Trump and then replaced them with a completely unqualified INSURANCE LAWYER with ZERO criminal experience in order to bring charges against Trump

Edited September 29, 2025 by BeaverFever

[CdnFox]

39 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

Bullshit. 

LOL - i' always know you've realized you've lost without reading another word when you begin like this  "let me just start off by displaying my emotional damage...." LOL
 

 

Quote

First Trump DID commit the crimes he was convicted for the only republican complaint was that he should be exempt because he is a politician 

The crime was invented and cobbled together to go after trump. it's never been used before and never will again. it's a fake crime.  It's like saying "being called called beaverfever is now a crime OH MY GOD YOU JUST BROKE THE LAW!!!"

I doubt it would stand up to appeal , although it's going to be a while before we know.  The judge has to pass sentence first and didn't. 

And the Rrepublicans screamed bloody blue murder about the use of lawfare like this from minute one, they were VERY vocal about it and in fact i discussed it with you at the time.  So nice try but fail 

 

Quote

Second, prosecutors took those cases under their own authority and discretion, Biden didn’t order them to  Amd Obama didn’t order any “faked” intelligence reports on Trump  

Wrong.  Biden sent his own lawyer to work for the prosecutor directly BEFORE the charges were laid and he admitted he went there to work on this.  

 

Quote

 

Third as Ive pointed out before your argument of “now it’s OUR turn to be corrupt” has no moral or legal basis.  

 

 

 

It absolutely has a moral basis. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. Even if republicans disagree with the rules there has to be one set of rules for everybody. So if democrats  get to do it then trump gets to do it. There's nothing wrong with that as a moral argument.

Legally, it looks like there's no problem with it. Obama did it, Biden did it, now trump's doing it.

Don't get me wrong, I think it's a terrible thing. But I think it's absolutely necessary that either both sides can't do it or both sides are allowed to do it. Your argument that it's only fair when democrats do it is obviously bullshit

Quote

Fifth,

Fourth i think, unless you deleted something ,

Quote

Even you claims of Biden/Obama corruption were true (which they’re not) the only solid is to END the corrupt and govern with integrity, not make corruption the permanent “new normal” by perpetuating it. 

It's absolutely true. In fact now we have proof of Obama that is pretty much irrefutable. And there's more than enough evidence for Biden to pass a burden of proof such as balance of probabilities. Which is plenty enough for a civil case

So now that we know that it's true we can address your comment

The duty to call off a war lies with the attacker. Twice the democrats have allowed this to go on. It is obvious the democrats will continue to do this constantly unless somebody stops them.

So the correct answer is to do it night and day every chance that trump gets and hurt as many of them as humanly possible in the hope that at some point they will come forward and be willing when it is their turn to say that they want to see it end for both sides.

You don't walk up to someone and punch them in the face and when they turn around to hit you back throw up your hands and say oh we should have peace

And I warned you about this back then. I told you and you were 100% fine with what the democrats had done.

I hope you're enjoying the fall out and now we're watching a race to the bottom. It will be up to the democrats to see if they want to put a stop to the situation they created but it is definitely not up to republicans

You need to work on your morals.

 

Edited September 29, 2025 by CdnFox

[robosmith]

23 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Still POTUS. DUH!

And why? Because it became painfully evident that you Demoncrats are insane.

So enjoy the coming indictments. The Demoncrat brand is dead.

Nope. It became evident that Biden was in no shape for the rigors of the campaign and that left Harris with too little time to win it.

15 hours ago, Legato said:

Not having TDS is a good thing, sorry your TDS blocks any coherent thought.

You got no point cause you're a clown. AKA NOT serious.

Edited September 29, 2025 by robosmith

[robosmith]

11 hours ago, Legato said:

Not a Trump supporter, never have been, don't like him at all, and yet I don't hate the guy.

So you're not COMPLETELY BLIND to his COMPLETELY DEFECTIVE CHARACTER.

You might hate him if he was YOUR PM instead of OUR EMBARRASSMENT.

11 hours ago, Legato said:

Your commonplace fall back rhetoric is nothing more than a worn out hackneyed cop out.

Do try to do better

He's doing far better than you. LMAO

10 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Or...you cant face the entire truth of the matter. But...the American electorate evidently can.

The "American electorate" is CLUELESS like you.

The half of them that support Trump still believe FOS LIES despite their credibility being DESTROYED.

[robosmith]

6 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

You're not the only left4rd saying such things. 

And you're not the only lDIOT saying ^these things.