Comey To Be Indicted For Lying To Congress

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

Go fck yourself Tweenkie-poo.

I like having you around to exemplify the Libbie mind.

Thanks for proving you're all mouth, WITHOUT the courage of your convictions.

[WestCanMan]

7 hours ago, robosmith said:

You've NEVER PROVEN me to have lied ONCE, so ^this is just ONE MORE of YOUR LIES.

I can't say for sure that you're a liar, it's possible that you're such a stupid cultist that you believed everything you ever said here. 

Either way, you're 100.0% unlucky when it comes to telling the truth. 

[Hodad]

8 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Lmao...you are incorrect. Comey did, in fact, lie under oath about revealing classified material to a friend. That material was fabricated by the CIA, under the direction of Obama, and known to be false. It was later used as evidence in the impeachment of Donald J Trump and the false nature of the documents were concealed by the CIA and Comey during both congressional investigations. 

Suuuuuure he did. You might wanna to stop confusing random Twitter posts for journalism. That's not remotely what the clown case is about. And it's going to end in another Trump legal pratfall. This behavior would be hilarious if it weren't rapidly dissolving the fabric of America. 

 

The New Yorker Thursday’s indictment of the former F.B.I. director James Comey bore a single, telling signature: that of Lindsey Halligan, installed by President Donald Trump just three days earlier to serve as the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia. Halligan is an insurance lawyer turned Trump attorney and White House aide; in March, Trump appointed her to remove “improper ideology” from the Smithsonian. She has scant experience in federal courts and none as a prosecutor. Her predecessor in the position, a seasoned prosecutor nominated by Trump, was forced out last Friday, according to numerous news reports, after balking at demands to concoct cases against Comey, in addition to New York’s attorney general, Letitia James, and others...

Prosecutors in Halligan’s office reportedly submitted a memorandum to Halligan outlining the weakness of the Comey case. None of those concerns mattered, apparently. Trump finally secured the indictment he had long been calling for...

The indictment alleges that “that statement was false,” because, as Comey “then and there knew, he in fact had authorized PERSON 3 to serve as an anonymous source in news reports regarding an F.B.I. investigation concerning PERSON 1.” This was presumably Hillary Clinton, because the leak at issue related to the F.B.I.’s investigation into Clinton’s e-mails and the Clinton Foundation...

 

And the IG report already determined that Comey was likely telling the truth.

 

 

 

 

 

[gatomontes99]

29 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Suuuuuure he did. You might wanna to stop confusing random Twitter posts for journalism. That's not remotely what the clown case is about. And it's going to end in another Trump legal pratfall. This behavior would be hilarious if it weren't rapidly dissolving the fabric of America. 

 

The New Yorker Thursday’s indictment of the former F.B.I. director James Comey bore a single, telling signature: that of Lindsey Halligan, installed by President Donald Trump just three days earlier to serve as the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia. Halligan is an insurance lawyer turned Trump attorney and White House aide; in March, Trump appointed her to remove “improper ideology” from the Smithsonian. She has scant experience in federal courts and none as a prosecutor. Her predecessor in the position, a seasoned prosecutor nominated by Trump, was forced out last Friday, according to numerous news reports, after balking at demands to concoct cases against Comey, in addition to New York’s attorney general, Letitia James, and others...

Prosecutors in Halligan’s office reportedly submitted a memorandum to Halligan outlining the weakness of the Comey case. None of those concerns mattered, apparently. Trump finally secured the indictment he had long been calling for...

The indictment alleges that “that statement was false,” because, as Comey “then and there knew, he in fact had authorized PERSON 3 to serve as an anonymous source in news reports regarding an F.B.I. investigation concerning PERSON 1.” This was presumably Hillary Clinton, because the leak at issue related to the F.B.I.’s investigation into Clinton’s e-mails and the Clinton Foundation...

 

And the IG report already determined that Comey was likely telling the truth.

 

 

 

 

 

Where is the part about the case you promised? All you did was try to cast down on the sig.

Also, the IG report did not have the all the information that Patel recently declassified.

[Hodad]

4 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Where is the part about the case you promised? All you did was try to cast down on the sig.

Also, the IG report did not have the all the information that Patel recently declassified.

??? I can't read it for you. 🤦‍♂️

[LinkSoul60]

 

13 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Lol...dont like your own tactics turned on your heroes eh?

Comey will be utterly destroyed.!

What are you talking about....  what heroes - Comey?  Seriously.... I don't think I've thought of his name since he got replaced 8 years ago.  Trump's just being a punk kid. More embarrassment coming his way when the case is dismissed. 

[robosmith]

5 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

I can't say for sure that you're a liar, it's possible that you're such a stupid cultist that you believed everything you ever said here. 

Either way, you're 100.0% unlucky when it comes to telling the truth. 

Of course I pwned you when you tried to claim you've disproven all 30,000+ Trump LIES as documented by WAPO. 

Your own evidence showed it rained during Trump inauguration 1, so your credibility is completely DESTROYED. LMAO

[Nationalist]

12 hours ago, Hodad said:

No, dummy. Nothing will happen to him aside from the nuisance harassment. 

You enjoy your geriatric wet dream though. 

 

We will see.

[Nationalist]

4 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

 

What are you talking about....  what heroes - Comey?  Seriously.... I don't think I've thought of his name since he got replaced 8 years ago.  Trump's just being a punk kid. More embarrassment coming his way when the case is dismissed. 

I have to wonder...did you think Brandon was "just being a punk kid" when he had a DOJ attorney go to NY to prosecute Trump for nonsense?

Or the judge who gave the jury a multiple choice question in order to make it easy to convict? Was he "being a punk kid" too?

Edited September 27, 2025 by Nationalist

[Nationalist]

10 hours ago, robosmith said:

Thanks for proving you're all mouth, WITHOUT the courage of your convictions.

Sweetie...if you left, who would be the village id1ot?

[robosmith]

8 hours ago, Nationalist said:

I have to wonder...did you think Brandon was "just being a punk kid" when he had a DOJ attorney go to NY to prosecute Trump for nonsense?

YOU'RE LYING. The "DoJ attorney" quit the DoJ and went to work for NYS. Duh 

The PROSECUTION was for VIOLATION of NYS LAWS and your LYING is not going to change that.

8 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Or the judge who gave the jury a multiple choice question in order to make it easy to convict? Was he "being a punk kid" too?

No, HE WAS FOLLOWING NYS LAW. And your amateur legal OPINION means NOTHING.

8 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Sweetie...if you left, who would be the village id1ot?

YOU, just as you've ALWAYS BEEN. Duh

[Nationalist]

58 minutes ago, robosmith said:

YOU'RE LYING. The "DoJ attorney" quit the DoJ and went to work for NYS. Duh 

The PROSECUTION was for VIOLATION of NYS LAWS and your LYING is not going to change that.

No, HE WAS FOLLOWING NYS LAW. And your amateur legal OPINION means NOTHING.

YOU, just as you've ALWAYS BEEN. Duh

Lol...wanna buy a bridge?

[robosmith]

38 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Lol...wanna buy a bridge?

Too bad ^this BULLSHIT is the ONLY "evidence" you have. 

Why do you keep PRETENDING you KNOW NYS LAW? LMAO

[Nationalist]

3 hours ago, robosmith said:

Too bad ^this BULLSHIT is the ONLY "evidence" you have. 

Why do you keep PRETENDING you KNOW NYS LAW? LMAO

Evidence? Sweetie...that chickenshit verdict will be overturned by the SCOTUS. They already had to issue an unconditional discharge. It was absolutely an abuse of the legal system and anyone with even a quarter of a brain knows it.

Which...leaves you out but...

You think Trump is one to forgive and forget? Huh...I hope he fcks Bragg and Merchan good.

[LinkSoul60]

14 hours ago, Nationalist said:

I have to wonder...did you think Brandon was "just being a punk kid" when he had a DOJ attorney go to NY to prosecute Trump for nonsense?

Or the judge who gave the jury a multiple choice question in order to make it easy to convict? Was he "being a punk kid" too?

"Brandon' didn't charge Trump, the Manhattan district attorney did.  He falsified business records to pay off a porn star and keep his adultery quiet. Falsifying business records is illegal, which is why he was found guilty and is a convicted felon. His entire life is one big grift and I thought it was perfect justice to see him get charged. Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy...

 

[CdnFox]

16 hours ago, Nationalist said:

We will see.

If we're being honest I think that In the end comey will win the case. But it will probably cost him tens if not hundreds of thousands of dollars to do so. Which is exactly what happened to trump and most of his cases

[User]

51 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

"Brandon' didn't charge Trump, the Manhattan district attorney did.  He falsified business records to pay off a porn star and keep his adultery quiet. Falsifying business records is illegal, which is why he was found guilty and is a convicted felon. His entire life is one big grift and I thought it was perfect justice to see him get charged. Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy...

 

OMG, you guys will never stop lying. 

Falsifying business records is not a felony and the statute of limitations had long been passed on such a crime. 

 

[CdnFox]

36 minutes ago, User said:

OMG, you guys will never stop lying. 

Falsifying business records is not a felony and the statute of limitations had long been passed on such a crime. 

 

it's not any kind of crime at all, even a misdemeanor, outside of new york.  No other state has that law, it's not considered 'falsifying' anywhere else.  "Falsifying' would mean putting down something that's not true but what he put down is considered true anywhere else in canada or the us.  It's not like he paid less tax or it made any difference to his overall books at all, and it's not like his buisiness had a General Ledger code for 'paying off prostitute".   So what do you put it under?  Advertising?  HE put it under legal and that's not unreasonable anywhere else. 

It's such a fake charge it's not even funny.  Not to mention that the only way it's a felony is if you 'believe' another crime took place without ANY proof, or even any agreement on what crime.  Just "another crime" and "as long as you really really believe", just like tinkerbell from peter pan.

As to biden's involvement, his personal attourney who worked for him with the dems quit that job specifically to go work on this case  directly and a month or so after he got to new york and started working with them the charges were laid.  Sorry but by any reasonable standard that's proof enough. 

[Legato]

1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

it's not any kind of crime at all, even a misdemeanor, outside of new york.  No other state has that law, it's not considered 'falsifying' anywhere else.  "Falsifying' would mean putting down something that's not true but what he put down is considered true anywhere else in canada or the us.  It's not like he paid less tax or it made any difference to his overall books at all, and it's not like his buisiness had a General Ledger code for 'paying off prostitute".   So what do you put it under?  Advertising?  HE put it under legal and that's not unreasonable anywhere else. 

It's such a fake charge it's not even funny.  Not to mention that the only way it's a felony is if you 'believe' another crime took place without ANY proof, or even any agreement on what crime.  Just "another crime" and "as long as you really really believe", just like tinkerbell from peter pan.

As to biden's involvement, his personal attourney who worked for him with the dems quit that job specifically to go work on this case  directly and a month or so after he got to new york and started working with them the charges were laid.  Sorry but by any reasonable standard that's proof enough. 

and the half wits keep on bring up that bullshit. They lost and straw clutching is now the norm.

Must be Harpers fault.

[CdnFox]

3 minutes ago, Legato said:

and the half wits keep on bring up that bullshit. They lost and straw clutching is now the norm.

Must be Harpers fault.

There is a research study out that shows that faith in the doj has been going downhill somewhat for quite some time but it took a major plunge in 2020 and has gone down since then. That was during Biden's time when people began to watch what the democrats were doing with Russia gate and with persecution involved with january 6th and other similar things.

If anything they're misuse of the legal system is one of the things that helped trump to win again.

[LinkSoul60]

33 minutes ago, Legato said:

and the half wits keep on bring up that bullshit. They lost and straw clutching is now the norm.

Must be Harpers fault.

What part do you disagree with.... him paying a porn star, falsifying business records, or being a convicted felon?  

Your admiration leaves you ignorant of fact.

Edited September 28, 2025 by LinkSoul60

[Legato]

5 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

What part do you disagree with.... him paying a porn star, falsifying business records, or being a convicted felon?  

Your admiration leaves you ignorant of fact.

All of it. All manufactured by those suffering from 4th stage TDS. Every sane person knows it.

Your TDS leaves you extremely ignorant of fact. In fact your fact less claims are bereft of any factual premise.

[User]

8 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

What part do you disagree with.... him paying a porn star, falsifying business records, or being a convicted felon?  

Your admiration leaves you ignorant of fact.

Paying a porn star is not a crime. Falsifying business records... required someone to be defrauded, it is also not a felony, and the statute of limitations long expired. 

 

[LinkSoul60]

6 minutes ago, Legato said:

All of it. All manufactured by those suffering from 4th stage TDS. Every sane person knows it.

Your TDS leaves you extremely ignorant of fact. In fact your fact less claims are bereft of any factual premise.

Using 'TDS' is nothing more than saying 'I got nothing'.

What's your version of the facts?

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said:

What part do you disagree with.... him paying a porn star, falsifying business records, or being a convicted felon?  

Your admiration leaves you ignorant of fact.

the  last two.  the first one isn't any of our business, the last two are completely made up bullshit. 

And everyone knew it, which is why his polling numbers when UP after his "conviction"