Jump to content
A Note on Topic Titles – Be Clear & Descriptive!

No Charges on Submarine Sandwich Guy

TreeBeard
 Share

Recommended Posts

TreeBeard Grand Master

TreeBeard

Posted
Posted

Grand jury acquitted the guy who threw his sandwich at the troops in DC.  Can this lead to 2nd amendment remedies to push back against an authoritarian regime without fear of reprisals?  This is why the 2nd Amendment is there, right?   Sure, it’s just a sandwich now, but could it be a bullet next time?
 

https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/dc-sandwich-thrower-grand-jury-not-indicted-trump-rcna227651
“…the Grand Jury Clause encountered no such resistance, because the framers, leery of resurrecting the tyranny they just fought against, well understood the need to prevent palpably unjust prosecutions.”

Deluge Grand Master

Deluge

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, TreeBeard said:

Grand jury acquitted the guy who threw his sandwich at the troops in DC.  Can this lead to 2nd amendment remedies to push back against an authoritarian regime without fear of reprisals?  This is why the 2nd Amendment is there, right?   Sure, it’s just a sandwich now, but could it be a bullet next time?
 

https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/dc-sandwich-thrower-grand-jury-not-indicted-trump-rcna227651
“…the Grand Jury Clause encountered no such resistance, because the framers, leery of resurrecting the tyranny they just fought against, well understood the need to prevent palpably unjust prosecutions.”

No. the piece of shit should've been thrown in the slammer. I would do everything in my power to make sure that America hating psychopath rots in prison. 

  • Confused 1
robosmith Grand Master

robosmith

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, TreeBeard said:

Grand jury acquitted the guy who threw his sandwich at the troops in DC.  Can this lead to 2nd amendment remedies to push back against an authoritarian regime without fear of reprisals?  This is why the 2nd Amendment is there, right?   Sure, it’s just a sandwich now, but could it be a bullet next time?
 

https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/dc-sandwich-thrower-grand-jury-not-indicted-trump-rcna227651
“…the Grand Jury Clause encountered no such resistance, because the framers, leery of resurrecting the tyranny they just fought against, well understood the need to prevent palpably unjust prosecutions.”

Must not have been a ham hoagie cause they've always said that prosecutors CAN INDICT A HAM SANDWICH. LMAO

herbie Grand Master

herbie

Posted
Posted

Maybe Donnie Dorko will step in and spend millions of tax dollars on appeals. Then Deluded can achieve relief when people are punished. Punished to the maximum!

Punish everyone else even more! Stole a loaf of bread -cat 'o' nine tails! Everyone must suffer! Good Chrisschun Cornservative justice

Deluge Grand Master

Deluge

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, herbie said:

Maybe Donnie Dorko will step in and spend millions of tax dollars on appeals. Then Deluded can achieve relief when people are punished. Punished to the maximum!

Punish everyone else even more! Stole a loaf of bread -cat 'o' nine tails! Everyone must suffer! Good Chrisschun Cornservative justice

Punish the criminals. Start with the sandwich throwing shit stain. 

-- Delude

WestCanMan Grand Master

WestCanMan

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, TreeBeard said:

Grand jury acquitted the guy who threw his sandwich at the troops in DC.  Can this lead to 2nd amendment remedies to push back against an authoritarian regime without fear of reprisals?  This is why the 2nd Amendment is there, right?   Sure, it’s just a sandwich now, but could it be a bullet next time?
 

https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/dc-sandwich-thrower-grand-jury-not-indicted-trump-rcna227651
“…the Grand Jury Clause encountered no such resistance, because the framers, leery of resurrecting the tyranny they just fought against, well understood the need to prevent palpably unjust prosecutions.”

Sometimes the police/prosecutors take themselves too seriously, and this was just such an instance. 

Sure it was an assault - of sorts lol - but a very minor one. The lowest level possible. 

Unfortunately for sub-thrower, he should end up with a record for that, and maybe a few days of community service, because that type of behaviour can't be condoned, but that's about it. 

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

WestCanMan Grand Master

WestCanMan

Posted
Posted
Just now, WestCanMan said:

Sometimes the police/prosecutors take themselves too seriously, and this was just such an instance. 

Sure it was an assault - of sorts lol - but a very minor one. The lowest level possible. 

Unfortunately for sub-thrower, he should end up with a record for that, and maybe a few days of community service, because that type of behaviour can't be condoned, but that's about it. 

Further to this, people who are busy organizing resistance to the ICE agents doing their job need to be careful: organizing resistance to the gov't on a large enough scale becomes textbook sedition. 

I would posit that if someone organizes enough protesters to come to an area, using harsh enough rhetoric, and ICE officers are truly assaulted there, it is an open-and-shut case of sedition.

  • sedition /sĭ-dĭsh′ən/
    1. Conduct or language inciting rebellion against the authority of a state.
    2. Insurrection; rebellion.
    3. The raising of commotion in a state, not amounting to insurrection; conduct tending to treason, but without an overt act; excitement of discontent against the government, or of resistance to lawful authority.

I mean, it's right there in black and white. That kind of behaviour is exactly what the word "sedition" was created to cover. 

That's just a basic definition, it's not from the US constitution, but the constitution has their own definitions and levels of sedition which are all based on that general premise, and sedition is no trifling crime.  

I would laugh and laugh and laugh and laugh if some dummy like AOC crossed the line and ended up in the crowbar hotel. 

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Nationalist Grand Master

Nationalist

Posted
Posted
56 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Nope, big win for those calling out Trump's TREASONOUS PLANS.

Son...you got issues.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,015
    • Most Online
      2,945
    agackibal
    Newest Member
    agackibal
    Joined

  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...