From the people who brought you covid lockdowns, All people banned from wilderness (now with snitch line!)

[CdnFox]

37 minutes ago, eyeball said:

What degree though?

I answered that above. 

Organized groups who are prepared to fight back tend to be more immune.

That's one of the reasons the racial supremacists are gaining traction. Many young men and even women realize that if there's nobody to stick up for them they'll be abused and repressed. And people like you will simply cheer the gov't on while simutaneously claiming that oct 7 was justified because 'human right not to be oppressed".  That makes them easy pickings for more radical groups who say they'll stand up for them. 

[Shady]

This country is so f**ked up.

 

 

[User]

3 minutes ago, Shady said:

This country is so f**ked up.

 

 

Its the same BS leftists push in America too. 

They don't want to actually punish the thug gang bangers who actually engage in gun crime... they want to punish and target everyone else for merely owning a firearm. 
 

 

[LinkSoul60]

4 hours ago, Army Guy said:

The only thing that has changed about the liberals is Justin is gone and carney is in, for the most part Justins MP are still in place...What have they learned, certainly nothing about the logistics portion of this whole thing, that we are terribly unprepared for the next one, .....So we what is it they have learned...and it is one thing to learn a lesson, it is another to do something to make sure we don't follow that same route...

Today NB just followed NS example no one is allowed in the woods, nothing like overreacting.......all in the name of public safety....other than covid, this is the first time they have banned people from the woods...it's not public safety it is plain overreacting...this is government telling the public you can't be trusted so stay away.... 

I gave you an example young teenagers getting the cerg while living at home with parent making more than 150 k all this was a huge money give away...even working CRA members were collecting CERB while working...i mean come on..saving lives through massive spending....what a joke...But then again it is just public tax dollars why should we be worried....spend , spend spend...do you run your household like that ? 

There was not just a few mistakes it was one big goat rodeo, a perfect example of what not to do...And we have done this plenty of times through our history, massive well run vaccination programs for all kinds of virus, polio, measles, chicken pox...

Is that what your basing your augment on, it cost to much so we won't be fixing anything, a lot of these measures we learned were short or non existence will effect almost any other emergency action required by emergency planning and preparation....part of DND...I guess the government answer would be it cost to much to protect Canadians and throw their hands up...thats what your saying right now...    

 

We're not talking about the past, we're talking about the present.  You said Carney has disregarded the pandemic and has moved on.  Again, where and when did he or any cabinet minister say this?  The fact of the matter is that this hasn't even been topic of conversation given the other sh*t going on right now so any conclusion you have, is nothing but your political  bias.  

Yes, saw the news this am that said NB was banning people from the woods.  So what if it's overeating?  They want to error on the side of caution and it's within their power to do that.  If it's a getting to the outdoors thing, you'll be okay staying out of it for a couple/few weeks.  If it's a taking away your rights thing, you'll get over it.

You did, and lots of abuse with covid/cerb payments. To say though that the government shouldn't have done what they thought at the time was the right thing to do to save lives and help people stay afloat is being way too partisan.  Do you not understand the medical community had little idea what this virus was, and the factual impact it was having on the economy?  Hell yeah I can look back and say a lot of things should have been different, but that's hindsight.  

Yes, said earlier there were a lot of mistakes and I think you'd agree that never experiencing a pandemic in our lifetimes probably had to do something with that...?  Do you think the conservative leader at the time, O'Toole, would have done anything differently... if so what?   Pointless questions because it is what it is.... liberals were in power, and NO, I did not agree with many of the restrictions as time moved on.  

My only 'argument' is that it's our governments responsibility is to be the caretakers of our citizens health and safety.  Your argument appears to be a bias in thinking/assuming this government has forgotten the pandemic.  Maybe they have, but I'd doubt it.

 

[eyeball]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

That's one of the reasons the racial supremacists are gaining traction. Many young men and even women realize that if there's nobody to stick up for them they'll be abused and repressed. And people like you will simply cheer the gov't on while simutaneously claiming that oct 7 was justified because 'human right not to be oppressed".  That makes them easy pickings for more radical groups who say they'll stand up for them. 

Yup, yer certifiable for sure there bud. I guess for some getting a grip just isn't an option anymore.

[Army Guy]

53 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

We're not talking about the past, we're talking about the present.  You said Carney has disregarded the pandemic and has moved on.  Again, where and when did he or any cabinet minister say this?  The fact of the matter is that this hasn't even been topic of conversation given the other sh*t going on right now so any conclusion you have, is nothing but your political  bias.  

Yes, saw the news this am that said NB was banning people from the woods.  So what if it's overeating?  They want to error on the side of caution and it's within their power to do that.  If it's a getting to the outdoors thing, you'll be okay staying out of it for a couple/few weeks.  If it's a taking away your rights thing, you'll get over it.

You did, and lots of abuse with covid/cerb payments. To say though that the government shouldn't have done what they thought at the time was the right thing to do to save lives and help people stay afloat is being way too partisan.  Do you not understand the medical community had little idea what this virus was, and the factual impact it was having on the economy?  Hell yeah I can look back and say a lot of things should have been different, but that's hindsight.  

Yes, said earlier there were a lot of mistakes and I think you'd agree that never experiencing a pandemic in our lifetimes probably had to do something with that...?  Do you think the conservative leader at the time, O'Toole, would have done anything differently... if so what?   Pointless questions because it is what it is.... liberals were in power, and NO, I did not agree with many of the restrictions as time moved on.  

My only 'argument' is that it's our governments responsibility is to be the caretakers of our citizens health and safety.  Your argument appears to be a bias in thinking/assuming this government has forgotten the pandemic.  Maybe they have, but I'd doubt it.

 

Carney liberals are the same as Justin liberals with a few exceptions....Have you seen any evidence that Justin or carneys liberals have taken any action on the pandemic lessons learned, have they replenished medical equipment and supplies held at emergency preparedness, have they addressed any of the hospital and medical staffs recommendations,  assisted living quarters and staffing....you could go through the huge list that were recommendations brought to the government by dozens of organizations, and they are filed under oops forgot to file that...You can make excuses all day,but that crises is done, it is yesterday problems....never to be seen again...Your want proof, well i think the lack of any action speaks volumes....Thats not partisan, that's fact 

The medical community knew exactly what it was, finding a counter to it was the problem, again our government dicked around until it was to late and then paid top dollar because we were desperate for a vaccine...

It is OK for you to say, your on the other side of the country, it does not effect you...so it goes in one ear out the other....and why would it not...nothing BC does really affects me, what works in BC does not work for the ROC, comparing them is not the same...

This is not the government first kick at a pandemic...or fighting a virus outbreak...the people in charge had no experience and no one did any research, on how they handle the last one...instead they panicked...

Your argument falls short, in many areas, if the government took it's responsibilities seriously there would have been something done to correct the hundreds of things that went wrong...the lack of any action is a red flag...it shows that they are past all of it now, and are onto something new...trumps invasion...you say maybe they have and yet no real proof they are doing something about it...my argument is based on what action has the government taken to date, which is not much if not at all.......to say this is not going to happen again is just wishful thinking....

[LinkSoul60]

10 minutes ago, Army Guy said:

.Have you seen any evidence that Justin or carneys liberals have taken any action on the pandemic lessons learned, have they replenished medical equipment and supplies held at emergency preparedness

Again, Trudeau is gone so he has nothing to do with now.  No I haven't seen evidence, but can't remember it as being a topic of conversation this past 90 days (?).  Have you seen any evidence they haven't taken any action in preparedness?  

13 minutes ago, Army Guy said:

have they addressed any of the hospital and medical staffs recommendations,  assisted living quarters and staffing

No they haven't.  That's a provincial responsibility.  

15 minutes ago, Army Guy said:

Your want proof, well i think the lack of any action speaks volumes....Thats not partisan, that's fact 

Show the facts that no emergency preparedness has been dealt with.  If no facts, it's a partisan take only.... agree?

18 minutes ago, Army Guy said:

The medical community knew exactly what it was, finding a counter to it was the problem, again our government dicked around until it was to late and then paid top dollar because we were desperate for a vaccine...

Not following...  If I remember correctly (?) when specific vaccines became available Canada purchased them, albeit some had wait times because of age group.  Were there better priced deals to be had with this?

28 minutes ago, Army Guy said:

This is not the government first kick at a pandemic...or fighting a virus outbreak...the people in charge had no experience and no one did any research, on how they handle the last one...instead they panicked...

Canada had the second lowest covid death rate among G10 countries.  What is your argument of panic?

 

You keep saying your argument is because we've heard nothing, that must mean they've done nothing.  That's not a factual conclusion, it's partisan thinking.  And I never said it wouldn't happen again... I said hopefully it doesn't happen again any time soon.  

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

Yup, yer certifiable for sure there bud.

Forget you catch offer any kind of rebuttal and as soon as somebody's gives you a truth you don't like you cower like a child, throw a few insults, and run away

Quote

I guess for some getting a grip just isn't an option anymore.

You don't need to guess, go look in a mirror. 

Everything I said was true. If it isn't it would be easy to robot. You know it's accurate same as I do. You just don't like it which quite frankly is a you problem rather than anyone else

[Venandi]

9 hours ago, CdnFox said:

That's one of the reasons the racial supremacists are gaining traction. 

Couldn't agree more.

That's my fear going forward because their message had no chance of resonating in the absence of radical progressive cheerleaders with a temporary political advantage.

Put another way, I'd say "fear the see-saw"... weaponize the law with ideological malice and expect to see a direct line equal and opposite reaction at some later date. Throw in taunts, name calling and obnoxious behaviour on the part of "winners" (ya hear me Flybaby?), and you have a recipe for retaliation with a level of polarized malice that could never have happened without it. Bad idea and much to be avoided IMO.

What used to be "over there" is now coming "over here,"

What you previously had to dress in blue to see is now visible out your window.

That could only happen with the direct approval of people who cherish the notion of living in a "post national state with no core values."

Like a reformed smoker pulling an oxygen cart, regrets will only start once the damage is done.... not only will it be too late at that point, it will be someone else's fault.

PNR isn't a theory or a matter of opinion, it's a function of time, speed, distance and fuel consumption.... hard realities that remain unmoved by caustic and ill informed comments from the likes of Roboturd and Eyehole.

 

 

Edited August 11, 2025 by Venandi

[Barquentine]

10 hours ago, Shady said:

This country is so f**ked up.

No, but that guy just getting probation is!

[eyeball]

9 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Everything I said was true. If it isn't it would be easy to robot.

Doing so would merely encourage your descent into insanity.

The way you people seamlessly weave your grievances into a single thread...COVID mandates...fire bans...racism... I'm surprised you didn't throw Hunters laptop into the mix.

You're a mess.

[Legato]

13 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Doing so would merely encourage your descent into insanity.

The way you people seamlessly weave your grievances into a single thread...COVID mandates...fire bans...racism... I'm surprised you didn't throw Hunters laptop into the mix.

You're a mess.

What's that about Hunters laptop?

It has been said it didn't exist, so how can one mix something that does not exist.

[Army Guy]

11 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

 

You keep saying your argument is because we've heard nothing, that must mean they've done nothing.  That's not a factual conclusion, it's partisan thinking.  And I never said it wouldn't happen again... I said hopefully it doesn't happen again any time soon.  

And you think that your line of thinking is not partisan,"i hope they did something", you pretty good at holding me to account,show me the proof...which is all good and yet your relying on government good will, and a few prayers...and i'm the partisan thinker...come on...

Liberal government had already forgotten to replenish medical stocks that were time expired, they had in warehouses before the pandemic... which were thrown out and not reordered...what makes you think these warehouses are full waiting for the next disaster....when historically they have been neglected...

If you think the government response to the pandemic was good then that is your opinion...mine and many others think the government response was poor ,strictly reactive, they scrambled to get anything done right and one time, this was not one of their best hours....They got very lucky to have things work out the way they did...they failed in controlling expenditures, there was not control even CRA had said that, and when they did find people taking advantage of the situation they shrugged and said it's ok keep it... 

[eyeball]

1 hour ago, Legato said:

It has been said it didn't exist, so how can one mix something that does not exist.

Are you kidding? That's how the delusional paranoics around here roll.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

Doing so would merely encourage your descent into insanity.

In other words you can't and you want it to be my fault   LOLOL  never change big guy  

 

Quote

The way you people seamlessly weave your grievances into a single thread...COVID mandates...fire bans...racism... I'm surprised you didn't throw Hunters laptop into the mix.

And yet you can't argue against any of it apperently   Despite having so many different opportunities the best you could come up with was "Well....  i have to stop for trafific signals sooo...... "   LOLOL

Anyone with a brain would realize we're talking about the same thing.  Gov't overreach that represses the rights of individuals. 

You've said it's a basic human right to fight back against repression, would you be more inclined to agree with us if we killed a bunch of women and children first?  We want to be relatable to you after all  

[eyeball]

10 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Anyone with a brain would realize we're talking about the same thing.  Gov't overreach that represses the rights of individuals. 

Including roadside safety checks even.

LMAO!

[CdnFox]

Just now, eyeball said:

Including roadside safety checks even.

???  LOL you get more and more delusional and weird  I thought you couldn't get dumber after the stoplight comment but here we are..... 

[Shady]

Just now, eyeball said:

Including roadside safety checks even.

LMAO!

Keep supporting authoritarianism.   When did you become a fascist?

[CdnFox]

2 minutes ago, Shady said:

Keep supporting authoritarianism.   When did you become a fascist?

He's been saying it for decades now   (inside joke)

[CdnFox]

Is Nova Scotia going too far by banning people from woods during dry weather? Some think so | CBC News

 

Wayne MacKay is professor emeritus of constitutional law at Dalhousie's Schulich School of Law. He said he's not surprised that some people are thinking of challenging the province's ban because it is a significant restriction on people's liberty and mobility.

He said all Charter rights are subject to reasonable limits. In this case, the policy objective is to prevent or at least reduce the number of serious forest fires.

"It's a pretty compelling objective. And then the only real question becomes, is it proportionate?

"Is what they're doing restricting more than is necessary to achieve that objective? And that's really a kind of factual debate that would go on in the court challenge," MacKay said.

"Is this the kind of thing that's really needed to achieve the results which everybody wants, which is to limit or eliminate forest fires before they get started. But is this the necessary way to do it, or does it sacrifice too much in doing it?

"Almost certainly that would be the Charter question that would be raised, and it's hard always to predict what a court would do with that."

[Legato]

38 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Are you kidding? That's how the delusional paranoics around here roll.

How many members does your club have?

[Chrissy1979]

16 hours ago, CdnFox said:

In select areas especially areas of actual fire.  Not preemptive blanket province wide bans. 

Manitoba had one under the PC government years ago, and they had one again this year. 

[LinkSoul60]

1 hour ago, Army Guy said:

what makes you think these warehouses are full waiting for the next disaster....when historically they have been neglected...

I'll ask, again....  where is the link/proof that vaccine stockpiles haven't been replenished?   

1 hour ago, Army Guy said:

If you think the government response to the pandemic was good then that is your opinion...mine and many others think the government response was poor

Facts are facts and it shows Canada had the second least amount of covid deaths amongst G10 countries.  Do you dispute that?

[eyeball]

1 hour ago, Shady said:

Keep supporting authoritarianism.   When did you become a fascist?

When I passed my driver's licence exam and started obeying the law I suppose.

[eyeball]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

???  LOL you get more and more delusional and weird  I thought you couldn't get dumber after the stoplight comment but here we are..... 

I bet you dingbats think of me every time you stop at a traffic light now don't you?

LMAO!

1 hour ago, Legato said:

How many members does your club have?

BCAA has over a million members.