gatomontes99 Posted July 27, 2025 Report Posted July 27, 2025 19 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said: He might also like young girls. Not difficult to see that he's regretting starting this 'conspiracy' for his own benefit, don't you think.... 😂 Not even sure what you are saying. Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
CdnFox Posted July 27, 2025 Report Posted July 27, 2025 12 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said: Like I've said.... My children had more intellect than you when they were 6 years old. Yes, we know you like to argue with 6-year-olds. As has been pointed out to you we all realize that was probably the last time you won an argument Keep yapping Chihuahua boy you're doing great 26 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said: He might also like young girls. Not difficult to see that he's regretting starting this 'conspiracy' for his own benefit, don't you think.... 😂 You're the only one who here who keeps obsessing about 6-year-olds so frankly I'd be worried about you before I worry about him Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
LinkSoul60 Posted July 27, 2025 Report Posted July 27, 2025 13 minutes ago, User said: Perhaps, but they certainly did not get any of it from you. In all sincerity.... You should be the last person talking about intellect. I've yet to see even a semblance of that from you. Quote
LinkSoul60 Posted July 27, 2025 Report Posted July 27, 2025 5 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Yes, we know you like to argue with 6-year-olds. As has been pointed out to you we all realize that was probably the last time you won an argument Keep yapping Chihuahua boy you're doing great You're the only one who here who keeps obsessing about 6-year-olds so frankly I'd be worried about you before I worry about him lol... what a loser 😂 Quote
BeaverFever Posted July 27, 2025 Report Posted July 27, 2025 49 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Uh huh. That's why liberals just all of a sudden decided the Epstein files where a big deal even though Biden had 4 years to do something about it? You’re still gaslighting. It wasn’t “liberals” who brought up the Epstein files It was PAM BONDI who has been telling the media for months she was going to release the Epstein files and a “client list” as the MAGA conspiracy kooks had convinced themselves and each other that there was a list containing democrats and elites. Instead ee learn that Trump’s name is all over the documents, there may or may not be a list at all and suddenly the Trump administration has changed their minds without explanation and decided they’re not releasing anything Thats how it happened Quote
User Posted July 27, 2025 Report Posted July 27, 2025 18 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said: In all sincerity.... You should be the last person talking about intellect. I've yet to see even a semblance of that from you. Why would you when you are not capable? Quote
CdnFox Posted July 27, 2025 Report Posted July 27, 2025 25 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said: In all sincerity.... You should be the last person talking about intellect. I've yet to see even a semblance of that from you. Kid nobody's buying your shit. @User Has made better and more intelligent arguments than you every time you interacted and everybody can see it! Everybody can see that as soon as you are outclassed you fall back on cheesy little insults and whine and cry in your corner. You're dumb. We can see it. And it obviously bothers you which is why you spend all of your time insisting that you're smart when it's painfully obvious that while you're not the stupidest lefty here you are not that far off 24 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said: lol... what a loser 😂 ROFLMAO!! Me: "we can see that you're dumb and scared because all you do is insult rather than make intelligent arguments" you: "Uhh... ahhh.... YOU A LOSER!!!!" LOL well i guess that proves the point nicely 2 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
User Posted July 27, 2025 Report Posted July 27, 2025 1 minute ago, CdnFox said: Kid nobody's buying your shit. Am I the only one who thinks @LinkSoul60 is a Hodad Alt account so that he can save face from putting everyone on ignore and just come back to fail at talking crap? Quote
Nationalist Posted July 27, 2025 Report Posted July 27, 2025 1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said: Now that is funny! And actually sad that people view him that way, or even remotely close to that... He's deporting the same number as Biden was. Difference here is they try to make it made for TV events to get his minions excited. That's an accomplishment? The US has led the world in oil production for the past 8 years. Coal....seriously. End of the day the guy is an epic grifter and self-serving narcissist. Yep, that about sums him up.... That's incorrect. I find you to be a monumental joke. The rest of your typical childish rant is not even worthy of a reply.... And I find you to be both a monumental liar and a complete TDS infected fool who refuses to see reality through your hatred. I feel sorry for you. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
gatomontes99 Posted July 27, 2025 Report Posted July 27, 2025 34 minutes ago, BeaverFever said: You’re still gaslighting. It wasn’t “liberals” who brought up the Epstein files It was PAM BONDI who has been telling the media for months she was going to release the Epstein files and a “client list” as the MAGA conspiracy kooks had convinced themselves and each other that there was a list containing democrats and elites. Instead ee learn that Trump’s name is all over the documents, there may or may not be a list at all and suddenly the Trump administration has changed their minds without explanation and decided they’re not releasing anything Thats how it happened I didnt say they brought it up. But all of a sudden, they decided that the files must come out and that they must be bad for Trump. They didnt have some new revelation. They wanted a distraction and what better distraction than something part of his base is pushing for? It helps their cause that there are victims' rights that have to be considered here as well. They don't need to get anything from this other than a distraction from the Obama scandal. Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
LinkSoul60 Posted July 27, 2025 Report Posted July 27, 2025 30 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Kid nobody's buying your shit. @User Has made better and more intelligent arguments than you every time you interacted and everybody can see it! Everybody can see that as soon as you are outclassed you fall back on cheesy little insults and whine and cry in your corner. You're dumb. We can see it. And it obviously bothers you which is why you spend all of your time insisting that you're smart when it's painfully obvious that while you're not the stupidest lefty here you are not that far off ROFLMAO!! Me: "we can see that you're dumb and scared because all you do is insult rather than make intelligent arguments" you: "Uhh... ahhh.... YOU A LOSER!!!!" LOL well i guess that proves the point nicely Yes, you're a loser. There is no doubt about that. 30 minutes ago, User said: Am I the only one who thinks @LinkSoul60 is a Hodad Alt account so that he can save face from putting everyone on ignore and just come back to fail at talking crap? That all you got dumb f*ck? Because you can't read I'm talking crap 😂 Quote
LinkSoul60 Posted July 27, 2025 Report Posted July 27, 2025 26 minutes ago, Nationalist said: And I find you to be both a monumental liar and a complete TDS infected fool who refuses to see reality through your hatred. I feel sorry for you. I have TDS because of facts? Your TDS (Trump deification Syndrome) is actually quite comical.... Quote
robosmith Posted July 27, 2025 Report Posted July 27, 2025 On 7/25/2025 at 10:08 PM, SpankyMcFarland said: Same old, same old. Trump is saying he hasn’t even thought about pardoning Maxwell, oh, no…but he has that power. Ring any bells? https://www.rawstory.com/trump-pardons-2673761222/ Yep, he's said the same about all his cronies whom he pardoned a short time later. But in a way he's probably right: he doesn't think about most of the things he does; just reflex. Quote
robosmith Posted July 27, 2025 Report Posted July 27, 2025 On 7/26/2025 at 6:44 AM, LinkSoul60 said: You seem to be missing the point that is was TRUMP who perpetuated this 'conspiracy' for his benefit and now it's HIS MAGA minions that want the files released. The orange pervert obviously doesn't want the files released for whatever the reason, but sure hope we get to find out what he's trying to hide. If the birthday letter is accurate, Trump is trying to hide "the wonderful secrets" that he and Epstein had "in common." On 7/26/2025 at 8:12 AM, Nationalist said: Well that's abject chickenshit. Here's the bottom line. Trump knew and indeed socialized with Epstein. So did Slick-Willy and a whole bunch of wealthy men. Is there any proof of improper sexual acts? No. Did Trump eventually turf Epstein? Yes. So are the Libbies creating a mountain out of a mole hill? Obviously. So while you limp noodles whine about chickenshit, Columbia University caved to pressure and made a deal with Trump...Alligator Alcatraz is now in full swing...the administration is sueing NYC and LA over sanctuary policies...men can no longer play in women's sports...etc...etc...etc... So yes...Tweenkie-Poo...your precious little feelings are butt-hurt. Your losses are stacking up...your party is now in the dumpster...and in response, you try to prove the unprovable with stupid accusations...and run a blatant communist Muslim for mayor of NYC. In the inevitable words of @robosmith... DUH! Duh doesn't work when you write 5 paragraphs of YOUR FANTASIES. LMAO Quote
CdnFox Posted July 27, 2025 Report Posted July 27, 2025 2 hours ago, BeaverFever said: You’re still gaslighting. It wasn’t “liberals” who brought up the Epstein files It was PAM BONDI who has been telling the media for months she was going to release the Epstein files and a “client list” as the MAGA conspiracy kooks had convinced themselves and each other that there was a list containing democrats and elites. Instead ee learn that Trump’s name is all over the documents, there may or may not be a list at all and suddenly the Trump administration has changed their minds without explanation and decided they’re not releasing anything Thats how it happened Actually you're half right, which means you're only being semi stupid about it now It's absolutely true that pam bondi grossly oversold. She got everyone hyped up about releasing all this information and it was going to be a big deal and so on and so forth. And it turned out that it really isn't. And this isn't the first time we've seen this kind of thing from trump's team. But after that you fall in a hole. Trump was always aware that his name came up during the investigations, tons and tons of famous people's names came up during the Investigations. Remember that the Epstein files are not files kept by Epstein but the file compiled by the investigators which included a bunch of Epstein's documents but also include tons of testimony, people speculating, all kinds of stuff much of which is unsubstantiated So it doesn't look like there is a client list at all. In fact at this point it doesn't look like he was selling the girls to other people. At most he appears to have offered them as a side benefit if you will to some of the people he was trying to get close to politically and for power. So there isn't going to be a pimps list And releasing everything also means releasing the details on the victims and suspected victims, many of which have apparently expressed that they absolutely do not want that to happen So the only story here is that trump built something up to be an insanely big huge massive Issue and now that it isn't people are not believing that he doesn't have everything and assume he's holding back, when by all evidence he just doesn't have what he said he was going to have. But that's really the story here. If there was anything in there that actually implicated trump in any real way biden would have already pulled it 2 minutes ago, robosmith said: If the birthday letter is accurate, Trump is trying to hide "the wonderful secrets" that he and Epstein had "in common." Just as a side note, you know they met through their connection to the guy who owns victoria's secret. Play on words? The idea that somehow the only thing he could possibly be talking about is pedophilia is childish Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
robosmith Posted July 27, 2025 Report Posted July 27, 2025 22 hours ago, SpankyMcFarland said: I’m not accusing Trump of any criminal acts. What I’m saying is that his known long association with Epstein is already damaging and can only get worse as more details naturally emerge. We may never know exactly what he knew but saying he was just in the ‘friends and family’ category lets him off lightly. Trump wasn’t a golf-playing acquaintance of Epstein’s or an aunt either. They partied together for more than a decade and, as videos already demonstrate, they shared a keen interest in young women when middle-aged themselves. They were two very big fish in the same little pond. This fiasco DOES lend credence to the 13 yo girl who sued Trump TWICE claiming rape. I'm sure he paid her off BOTH times which is why the claims disappeared. Quote
robosmith Posted July 27, 2025 Report Posted July 27, 2025 19 hours ago, SpankyMcFarland said: The decision by the Deputy AG, and Trump’s former personal lawyer, to meet Maxwell is ‘most unusual’ as they say. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/to-former-prosecutors-everything-about-the-justice-dept-interview-with-ghislaine-maxwell-looked-unorthodox/ It looks terrible. Yep. Looks exactly like Blanche negotiating a pardon for Maxwell in exchange for her throwing some under the bus and giving Trump exoneration. Quote
Nationalist Posted July 27, 2025 Report Posted July 27, 2025 1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said: I have TDS because of facts? Your TDS (Trump deification Syndrome) is actually quite comical.... I'm glad you enjoy it. Enjoy your Sunday... Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
CdnFox Posted July 27, 2025 Report Posted July 27, 2025 (edited) 55 minutes ago, robosmith said: This fiasco DOES lend credence to the 13 yo girl who sued Trump TWICE claiming rape. I'm sure he paid her off BOTH times which is why the claims disappeared. They were found to be non-credible. And a fake story now does not somehow give credence to a fake story in the past That's like saying "this claim about santa sure proves that the Tooth fairy stories were real" Edited July 27, 2025 by CdnFox Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
BeaverFever Posted July 27, 2025 Report Posted July 27, 2025 4 hours ago, CdnFox said: Trump was always aware that his name came up during the investigations, tons and tons of famous people's names came up during the Investigations. Remember that the Epstein files are not files kept by Epstein but the file compiled by the investigators which included a bunch of Epstein's documents but also include tons of testimony, people speculating, all kinds of stuff much of which is unsubstantiated So it doesn't look like there is a client list at all. In fact at this point it doesn't look like he was selling the girls to other people. At most he appears to have offered them as a side benefit if you will to some of the people he was trying to get close to politically and for power. So there isn't going to be a pimps list And releasing everything also means releasing the details on the victims and suspected victims, many of which have apparently expressed that they absolutely do not want that to happen So the only story here is that trump built something up to be an insanely big huge massive Issue and now that it isn't people are not believing that he doesn't have everything and assume he's holding back, when by all evidence he just doesn't have what he said he was going to have. But that's really the story here. If there was anything in there that actually implicated trump in any real way biden would have already pulled it I agree almost completelY. I also doubt there’s anything incriminating in there about Trump. So then why not release it. Names of other people can always be redacted. Governments do this routinely. The documents may not incriminate him but they likely document in detail how closely associated he was with Epstein and will likely raise other questions like what did he know and when did he know and probably also detail his martial infidelity and other debauched behaviour that he is reputed to have engaged in when partying with Epstein. Quote
CdnFox Posted July 27, 2025 Report Posted July 27, 2025 (edited) 12 minutes ago, BeaverFever said: I agree almost completelY. I also doubt there’s anything incriminating in there about Trump. So then why not release it. Names of other people can always be redacted. No they can't. Any name redacted will be considered a conspiracor who was covered up. You have to remember that most of this stuff is already out there. Very little of it is new. But there are the names of lots of people who are essentially victims who don't want their names put out there and there are a lot of accusations which have proven to be baseless but the moment you put them out there some people (you maybe? ) Will insist that the allegations are true regardless no matter what you put in front of them. Trump has said that they should release more "credible" file information and they're looking into it. Which is basically what you're suggesting. But that's not quite as easy as it sounds, and it'll take some time im 'sure and it won't satisfy people because it will be stuff that's boring and already known or not cared about. He and his team have shot themselves in the foot with this by over promising and overselling, and from the sounds of it once you pull out stuff that shouldn't be released for good reason what you're left with isn't much. And his base is never going to believe that there isn't much so they will always assume something is being withheld. There's probably nothing he can do or release that's going to get him out of this mess, what the people want just isn't there but they will never believe that edit: In many ways this has to be very shocking for trump. He's very used to being able to say one thing last week and then say something absolutely completely different tomorrow and have no consequences in the slightest doing that. He does that all the time. But in this case he said something "last week" so to speak about epstien and for the first time nobody will let it go. No matter what he says now they won't let him change his story. this must be frustrating beyond belief for him, partially because he's not used to it but also because without this he had a really good series of things happen to brag about and they're all being totally overshadowed by this. Edited July 27, 2025 by CdnFox 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
robosmith Posted July 29, 2025 Report Posted July 29, 2025 On 7/27/2025 at 1:09 PM, CdnFox said: They were found to be non-credible. And a fake story now does not somehow give credence to a fake story in the past That's like saying "this claim about santa sure proves that the Tooth fairy stories were real" You don't know what you're talking about. The anonymous now young lady just disappeared and the the case went nowhere. Say it with me "PAY OFF"! Woman suing Trump over alleged teen rape drops suit, again Politico https://www.politico.com › story › 2016/11 › donald-tr... Nov 4, 2016 — Woman suing Trump over alleged teen rape drops suit, again ... A woman who accused Donald Trump of raping her two decades ago when she was a 13- ... Rape Allegations Refiled Against Trump Courthouse News Service https://www.courthousenews.com › rape-allegations-refi... Rape Allegations Refiled Against Trump ... MANHATTAN (CN) — A woman who says Donald Trump raped her at a private sex party when she was 13 years old refiled a ... Missing: twice | Show results with: twice Woman who accused Donald Trump of raping her at 13 ... The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com › us-news › nov › donald... Nov 4, 2016 — ... woman accuses Donald Trump of sexual misconduct. 20 Oct 2016. Congressman apologizes for saying he might back Trump even if he condoned rape. Missing: twice | Show results with: twice Quote
CdnFox Posted July 29, 2025 Report Posted July 29, 2025 5 minutes ago, robosmith said: You don't know what you're talking about. The anonymous now young lady just disappeared and the the case went nowhere. She disappeared because the case was found to be not credible. If she had proceeded She would have lost. But I love that you've turned it into a conspiracy theory instead of the obvious easy answer Why are you wrong so often? Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
TreeBeard Posted July 31, 2025 Report Posted July 31, 2025 Trump holds the cards. He will pardon his child rapist friend. She will testify that it was some democrats who did the diddling. She will testify that it wasn’t Trump. Quote
Nationalist Posted July 31, 2025 Report Posted July 31, 2025 Good Lord are you all still debating this? 1. The investigation into the russia hoax has been brewing for 8 years. More in fact. Personally...I hope all the perpetrators get to spend old age in fcking cages. This is not a distraction! It's necessary! 2. Jeffery Epstein was a CIA, MOSAD, MI6 OPERATIVE! He was also very unscrupulous, as was/is Don Maxwell's daughter Gizz-lane. He used sex with pretty young girls to entrap wealthy clients. He had learned how to hide money for these wealthy clients...many of whom were in the arms business in one way or another. It appears that Trump got wise to ol' Jeffrey's games and turfed him from his home. This is what we know to be true. The rest is pure conjecture. Personally...I think Jeffery "flew too close to the sun" if you will. He wasn't bright enough to know when to quit...when it's gotten dangerous... He was a slimeball who got what he deserved. But should any "list" of names with sorted details to ever come out...power structures all over the world would lose all credibility. Not a bad reason to bury it and hope all those involved learn the lesson. Ya...I like to hope... 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.