This is the thread for maga brain-dead bunch to explain, cry and confess how Epstein files never existed

[LinkSoul60]

20 minutes ago, User said:

What "deification?"

His association with Epstein has been known since before he first ran for President...

 

The obvious deification you have of him....  That's obvious.  

Yes, his association was known before but seems to have got to a new level now hasn't it.  Makes a person wonder.....what exactly is he trying to hide.

[User]

Just now, LinkSoul60 said:

The obvious deification you have of him....  That's obvious.  

So obvious, you are unable to articulate what you are talking about. 

1 minute ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Yes, his association was known before but seems to have got to a new level now hasn't it.  Makes a person wonder.....what exactly is he trying to hide.

How so? How is he trying to hide anything?

Just more of your conspiratorial BS.

[LinkSoul60]

1 minute ago, User said:

So obvious, you are unable to articulate what you are talking about. 

How so? How is he trying to hide anything?

Just more of your conspiratorial BS.

Get out from under your rock and read or watch the news....   

Your devotion of Trump borders between comical and pathetic.

[User]

1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Get out from under your rock and read or watch the news....   

Still can't back up your garbage.

1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Your devotion of Trump borders between comical and pathetic.

What devotion?

[CdnFox]

9 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Your bias has now gone to yet another asinine level...  You are some kind of f'd up with your partisanship.  Stay away from the computer today and go get some fresh air...

Oh look, it's your usual admission that you have no revital or intelligent argument and are there for aware that you're wrong but p*ssed about it  

There's absolutely no partisanship on my part. Everything I've stated is absolutely neutral and factual. A picture does not indicate that trump was part of any wrongdoing on Epstein's part any more than it would if it was Carney in the picture.

That's a simple fact.

The rest of it is smoke and mirrors as well. People just don't know what they're talking about. Children like you probably think that the Epstein file is a file that was compiled by Epstein. It isn't. It's the name of the file the authorities used and collected from and on Epstein. All of the papers that they seized from him, and he interviewed, any accusations made by anybody about any person no matter whether they were found to be complete bullshit or not. It's not Epstein's file. It's the Epstein file the police made.

So of course trump's name is going to be on it, virtually every single person of any note that Epstein ever met is going to be in there. It's not a client list

 

And there's other interesting elements as well, people always assume that Epstein was trafficking in child slaves, but the reality is of the five people who have come forward as victims not one of them has ever suggested that they were traded or trafficked to anyone else. That's kind of a rumor that blew up around the whole thing but it's not actually like there was some sort of sex trafficking ring as is often thought. THat was not part of the allegation or the testimony. 

 

 

Sorry but all of this is actually your bias and hatred along with those like you who hates trump. I think presented so far actually speaks to trump as a pedophile one way or another

6 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

The obvious deification you have of him....  That's obvious.  

Yes, his association was known before but seems to have got to a new level now hasn't it.  Makes a person wonder.....what exactly is he trying to hide.

No it doesn't seem to have gotten to a new level at all. It hasn't budged a millimeter. Absolutely nothing has changed.

[LinkSoul60]

2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

No it doesn't seem to have gotten to a new level at all. It hasn't budged a millimeter. Absolutely nothing has changed.

How and why did you interpret that I was talking to you?  Not hard to figure out, but I wasn't so rather than being a fool who simply has to say something for the sake of talking, just say nothing if people aren't talking to you.  That's a challenge for you though, isn't it....

2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

There's absolutely no partisanship on my part

Funniest thing I've heard all day!  You're a political hack....end of story.  

[CdnFox]

49 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

How and why did you interpret that I was talking to you?  

Awwww poor babeee....   did the mean man with the nasty facts and argument hurt your feelings again?!!?

LOL hey dipshit, this is a discussion forum.  if you want to have a private talk PM the guy. 

And I made an intelligent argument that you can't refute. All you did was get angry and call me partisan  

That would make you the partisan kiddo  

As to the rest, it's just fun to kick you around because you're such a bloviated airbag. As I have said you are like a Chihuahua barking at the big dogs and it's funny to see you race to your corner and hide when one of the big dogs barks back   

 

 

[LinkSoul60]

Just now, CdnFox said:

Awwww poor babeee....   did the mean man with the nasty facts and argument hurt your feelings again?!!?

Actually, no... not even remotely close to that.  I've find you to be a joke that if anything, makes me laugh.  No hurt feeling there.

[CdnFox]

Just now, LinkSoul60 said:

Actually, no... not even remotely close to that.  I've find you to be a joke that if anything, makes me laugh.  No hurt feeling there.

 

Just now, LinkSoul60 said:

Actually, no... not even remotely close to that. 

It's obviously exactly that. You're so juvenile that reading you is easier than a dr seuss book.

You're pathetic little wannabe who dreams of being more intelligent than others around him but in reality is aware that he's struggling to be average. And it leads you to lash out rather than to make intelligent arguments.

There are people here who are partisan hacks to a degree but could still make it intelligent argument or at least a semi-structured one. But you can't even manage that, I don't think I've seen you make an argument in the entire time you're here. You just make a number of false statements and when challenged on it freak out and start insulting people

So actually yes, I was bang on the money. You're a toddler who gets his feelings hurt and throws temper tantrums and everybody here can see it.

 

[LinkSoul60]

2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

 

It's obviously exactly that. You're so juvenile that reading you is easier than a dr seuss book.

You're pathetic little wannabe who dreams of being more intelligent than others around him but in reality is aware that he's struggling to be average. And it leads you to lash out rather than to make intelligent arguments.

There are people here who are partisan hacks to a degree but could still make it intelligent argument or at least a semi-structured one. But you can't even manage that, I don't think I've seen you make an argument in the entire time you're here. You just make a number of false statements and when challenged on it freak out and start insulting people

So actually yes, I was bang on the money. You're a toddler who gets his feelings hurt and throws temper tantrums and everybody here can see it.

 

Your typical default....  a pathetic little man

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Your typical default....  a pathetic little man

Talking to your mirror again I see  

I can hear the tears from here. You're angry and furious that we see through you and you're just not that smart.

Sorry to break it to you kid, but better people than you have come through trying what you're trying and left discouraged. You just not in our league here. Even Robo Smith could smack you around  

[LinkSoul60]

23 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Sorry to break it to you kid, but better people than you have come through trying what you're trying and left discouraged. 

Damn, now that is funny!  Seriously... 😂   

28 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

You just not in our league here

True. I'm not in your league...

[SpankyMcFarland]

Same old, same old. Trump is saying he hasn’t even thought about pardoning Maxwell, oh, no…but he has that power. Ring any bells? 
 

https://www.rawstory.com/trump-pardons-2673761222/

 

 

 

 

[SpankyMcFarland]

It’s not the lefties that are Trump’s problem. Many of the true believers are getting confused and restive this week. He promised too much on the Epstein case and is suffering the consequences. 

[SpankyMcFarland]

Looks like we’ll find out if there’s a birthday book and what’s in it. 

Quote

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/25/democrats-epstein-birthday-book

 

 

Edited July 26, 2025 by SpankyMcFarland

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Damn, now that is funny!  Seriously... 😂   

 

Kid, we can hear you crying from here. Like I said you're about as hard to read as dr seuss  

 

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

Looks like we’ll find out if there’s a birthday book and what’s in it. 

 

 

They had a copy of the book. They've had these files under Obama and under Biden.

And I believe Clinton invited Epstein to the white house 17 times. They might want to be careful about how much they poke  

Joking aside I took some time to dig into this a little bit to see what there really is, and I have to admit even I had a lot of misconceptions about the situation. I thought there was a big child sex slavery trafficking ring, but in reality it doesn't look like anyone's ever actually made that accusation including the victims. It was all more just about Epstein. The more you look at the testimony and stuff it doesn't look like he was trading girls to tons of guys or anything like that. It's theoretically possible some of the people he dealt with may have slept with underage girls that he arranged and then were blackmailed but there's not even much evidence of that

I'd be a lot more curious about the money. He made a lot of money and some of it makes sense and can be accounted for it and other parts of it aren't really obvious to see how he earned it. Which doesn't mean it was earned illegally but it's suspicious

[Venandi]

3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

They had a copy of the book. They've had these files under Obama and under Biden.

And I believe Clinton invited Epstein to the white house 17 times. They might want to be careful about how much they poke  

Joking aside I took some time to dig into this a little bit to see what there really is, and I have to admit even I had a lot of misconceptions about the situation. I thought there was a big child sex slavery trafficking ring, but in reality it doesn't look like anyone's ever actually made that accusation including the victims. It was all more just about Epstein. The more you look at the testimony and stuff it doesn't look like he was trading girls to tons of guys or anything like that. It's theoretically possible some of the people he dealt with may have slept with underage girls that he arranged and then were blackmailed but there's not even much evidence of that

I'd be a lot more curious about the money. He made a lot of money and some of it makes sense and can be accounted for it and other parts of it aren't really obvious to see how he earned it. Which doesn't mean it was earned illegally but it's suspicious

Agreed, always seemed to me that people were clamouring for a "contact list" without the slightest consideration of  context or culpability. I'm guessing the list is huge and any response to it would be highly(meaning HIGHLY) partisan in nature

Any exhaustive list would surely include victims, perpetrators and an abundance of casual contacts with no connection to any wrong doing what so ever. In my brief tenure here I've come to believe that  the Robos  and Herbs of the world are utterly lacking in the discretion it takes to recognize the difference between them.

For them it's as simple as my guy good, your guy bad. In their hands any list becomes a bludgeon for doxing MAGATs and harassing their children on the way to school. I'm now of the opinion that keeping the list under wraps and prosecuting the bad guys individually is the best case scenario.

Here's the fun part of that opinion though, for good or ill I wouldn't have thought about it in those terms prior to joining this forum. The thread title itself only serves to amplify my concern.

Edited July 26, 2025 by Venandi

[LinkSoul60]

2 hours ago, Venandi said:

Agreed, always seemed to me that people were clamouring for a "contact list" without the slightest consideration of  context or culpability. I'm guessing the list is huge and any response to it would be highly(meaning HIGHLY) partisan in nature

Any exhaustive list would surely include victims, perpetrators and an abundance of casual contacts with no connection to any wrong doing what so ever. In my brief tenure here I've come to believe that  the Robos  and Herbs of the world are utterly lacking in the discretion it takes to recognize the difference between them.

For them it's as simple as my guy good, your guy bad. In their hands any list becomes a bludgeon for doxing MAGATs and harassing their children on the way to school. I'm now of the opinion that keeping the list under wraps and prosecuting the bad guys individually is the best case scenario.

Here's the fun part of that opinion though, for good or ill I wouldn't have thought about it in those terms prior to joining this forum. The thread title itself only serves to amplify my concern.

You seem to be missing the point that is was TRUMP who perpetuated this 'conspiracy' for his benefit and now it's HIS MAGA minions that want the files released.  The orange pervert obviously doesn't want the files released for whatever the reason, but sure hope we get to find out what he's trying to hide. 

[Nationalist]

11 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Actually, no... not even remotely close to that.  I've find you to be a joke that if anything, makes me laugh.  No hurt feeling there.

Well that's abject chickenshit.

Here's the bottom line.

Trump knew and indeed socialized with Epstein. So did Slick-Willy and a whole bunch of wealthy men. Is there any proof of improper sexual acts? No. Did Trump eventually turf Epstein? Yes.

So are the Libbies creating a mountain out of a mole hill? Obviously. 

So while you limp noodles whine about chickenshit, Columbia University caved to pressure and made a deal with Trump...Alligator Alcatraz is now in full swing...the administration is sueing NYC and LA over sanctuary policies...men can no longer play in women's sports...etc...etc...etc...

So yes...Tweenkie-Poo...your precious little feelings are butt-hurt. Your losses are stacking up...your party is now in the dumpster...and in response, you try to prove the unprovable with stupid accusations...and run a blatant communist Muslim for mayor of NYC.

In the inevitable words of @robosmith...

DUH!

[CdnFox]

4 hours ago, Venandi said:

Agreed, always seemed to me that people were clamouring for a "contact list" without the slightest consideration of  context or culpability. I'm guessing the list is huge and any response to it would be highly(meaning HIGHLY) partisan in nature

Any exhaustive list would surely include victims, perpetrators and an abundance of casual contacts with no connection to any wrong doing what so ever. In my brief tenure here I've come to believe that  the Robos  and Herbs of the world are utterly lacking in the discretion it takes to recognize the difference between them.

For them it's as simple as my guy good, your guy bad. In their hands any list becomes a bludgeon for doxing MAGATs and harassing their children on the way to school. I'm now of the opinion that keeping the list under wraps and prosecuting the bad guys individually is the best case scenario.

Here's the fun part of that opinion though, for good or ill I wouldn't have thought about it in those terms prior to joining this forum. The thread title itself only serves to amplify my concern.

Very true. 

Like I said previously, I think most of these guys don't even realize that the Epstein files weren't something that belonged to Epstein. They're just the police file that the investigators compiled over time including any papers they found any interviews they had etc, including speculation and theories from various people and witnesses interviewed that turned out to be false or extremely implausible, which is why they didn't want to release the files in the first place.  It would smear the innocent and expose victims who didn't want the attention

And like I said, even I believed that epstein was this guy who had this island where truckloads of girls were brought in wearing rags, sold at auction and shipped off to be pleasure slaves for rich slimeballs.

And truth it was nothing like that apparently and the whole thing is a lot smaller than I thought. It's still Tony Bernardo levels of evil and both he and Ghislaine should rot in the fiery depths of hell, but it doesn't sound like there will be some long list of guys who  "Bought" girls from him. 

Sure he had a reputation for liking younger women but so did Hugh Hefner. A guy in his 40's likes 20 year olds and he'll get a rep, but that's not the same as knowing someone is a pedophile. 

 

The big problem for trump though is he hyped this up so much. He oversold this in the worst way, making it sound like he was about to throw the curtain back On some giant diabolical conspiracy involving for an intelligence operatives, left-wing billionaires from all over, and possibly the pope.

Now the truth is turning out to be that it's a bit of a nothing burger and that well something horrible happened and there may yet B criminals out there associated with this that need to be caught it's probably not anywhere near as extensive as people thought

 

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said:

You seem to be missing the point that is was TRUMP who perpetuated this 'conspiracy' for his benefit and now it's HIS MAGA minions that want the files released.  The orange pervert obviously doesn't want the files released for whatever the reason, but sure hope we get to find out what he's trying to hide. 

Well you got it half right, which is 100% Improvement over your normal comments  

The problems he's experiencing right now are of his own making. He oversold this whole issue so badly. He made it sound like there was this giant cabal of Mega Rich 1 percenters who correctly control the entire world and we're made up entirely of kiddy-diddlers and lolicons and HE was going to EXPOSE THEM ALLLLLLLL!!!!!! 

If you actually take the time to read through the various materials and listen to experts who have studied the subject it becomes very quickly apparent that what he is hiding is basically nothing. And NOBODY is going to believe that after all the fuss he made, so everyone thinks he's hiding something huge!!  It must be MEGA huge or he'd release it!!! 

LOL, hoisted by his own petard it would seem. The dems had these files all through obama and biden, if there was any dirt on trump they'd have released it. And if there was any dirt on the dems trump would release it. 

There's some questions about money, and where Epstein made some of his cash. They're speculation he may have some rich people to sleep with is underage girls and then blackmailed them. But even that's not clear at this point. And it would have nothing to do with trump or Clinton

This whole thing was just severely overblown and the guy who overblew it it's currently paying a price

 

[CdnFox]

30 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

 

Trump knew and indeed socialized with Epstein. So did Slick-Willy and a whole bunch of wealthy men. Is there any proof of improper sexual acts? No. Did Trump eventually turf Epstein? Yes

 

Worth mentioning at this point how they gloss over the fact that clinton invited him to the white house 17 times

[SpankyMcFarland]

45 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Worth mentioning at this point how they gloss over the fact that clinton invited him to the white house 17 times

On the other hand, I don’t see too many people actively defending Clinton. This is a bipartisan scandal - Trump was a Democrat at the time. How serious it is remains to be seen but I think any association with Epstein is poison for a reputation these days. At the very least, it’s hard to dismiss the suspicion that his buddies knew what he was doing to some extent and turned a blind eye. 

Edited July 26, 2025 by SpankyMcFarland

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

On the other hand, I don’t see too many people actively defending Clinton.

That's because nobody is out there claiming that the fact he knew Epstein means he's a pedophile.

I'm sure trump will bring it up before long because why wouldn't he but republicans aren't sitting there going oh look a picture of these two together he must diddle children.

That particular piece of illogic and stupidity it's probably in the hands of the democrats at the moment. Clinton has pictures aplenty with Epstein, Clinton is mentioned in the Epstein files. Trump has pictures with Epstein Trump is in the files

So this leads the democrats to conclude that obviously trump is a pedophile and Clinton shouldn't be mentioned

It just highlights the stupidity in hypocrisy of this. I don't think having their picture took or knowing the guy makes either of them a pedophile. Tonnes of People knew this guy well and I doubt any of them except a tiny handful ever knew what he was up to.

But you can't tell that to a left Winger. The pictures in the friendship are absolute proof.

But not with Clinton. They leave that alone

Quote

At the very least, it’s hard to dismiss the suspicion that his buddies knew what he was doing to some extent and turned a blind eye. 

It's very easy. If you do a little research into actual pedophiles that we catch in Canada and the US The friends and often even the family of even the very active ones are completely oblivious to the activity. Why wouldn't they be? Again the activity is a much smaller scale than most people think. You think he advertised it?

I think trump knew he liked younger women, and I think probably Clinton did too, and I think they both also like younger women. But they probably both define women as being 18 or 20 year olds or 25 year olds. It doesn't mean they want to bang some 14 year old kid. And certainly doesn't mean that they do anything about what he was doing