Donnie strikes three Iranian nuclear sites

[West]

2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

YOUR MEMES ARE LIES and you are completely IGNORANT about that.

^LIES NOT DOUBT!

 

This is who you are sticking up for. Sad

[robosmith]

3 hours ago, CITIZEN_2015 said:

Well done US.

It must not end here. The attacks must continue till regime collapses by the people otherwise this regime can resume making the bomb as they have the knowledge and accelerate fast towards a bomb in revenge.

Israel must heavily bomb the security forces and the oppressive Sepah until such time that the people of Iran are empowered to rise up without being massacred and topple this murderous terrorist regime and free Iran and the whole world from this cancerous organ in the world. 

Are YOU a CITIZEN of Israel? 

1 minute ago, West said:

 

This is who you are sticking up for. Sad

No it's what you're LYING ABOUT.

You STILL have NOT proven Iran has nukes. 🤮

[robosmith]

7 minutes ago, West said:

There is a reason they were frozen and that's cuz the guy is a complete homicidal maniac who would nuke the Jews because Allah promised him a few virgins with armpit hair and a couple of goats to bone if he did. Sick people and Obama just loves them 

So what's the REASON? All you ^have is fantasies.

[CITIZEN_2015]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Are YOU a CITIZEN of Israel? 

No it's what you're LYING ABOUT.

You STILL have NOT proven Iran has nukes. 🤮

YOU are the damn liar not him. It is very true. teenage girls belonging to the opposition group and the night before their execution they were raped because according to f*cking Ayatollah if a virgin girl dies she goes to heaven.

I had a family friend whose daughter had this fate. They let her parents to see her and she told them they are about to execute her because she was raped last night. F*ck those who support this brutal regime out of ignorance or self interest.

Teenage girls as young as 11 or 12 belonging to an opposition who actually help to bring these bastards to power later in the 80's were arrested simply for supporting the opposition and distributing their newspapers and for that they were condemned to execution 

F*ck them all.

Edited 15 hours ago by CITIZEN_2015

[CITIZEN_2015]

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

Are YOU a CITIZEN of Israel? 

My citizenship is none of your business but I can tell you it is not Israelis. As a clue I tell you that the people of Iran (not the f*cking hated regime) and Israeli people have a long history and are friends. Islamic Republic is their common enemy.

Edited 14 hours ago by CITIZEN_2015

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

She's going to show that Trump is good at ONE THING: getting IMPEACHED.

Considering every time he winds up getting off and doesn't actually get impeached, hes' ACTUALLY really good at kicking their ass when they try  

They haven't got the numbers this time either unless the republicans take a hit at the midterms.  But she'll have to wait till then at least.

[gatomontes99]

8 hours ago, Aristides said:

Look it up dumbass, he has been peddling that line for 13 years. 

So what? The IAEA is the one that made the determination that led to this airstrike. If it was BN, we would have bombed Iran 13 years ago. 

5 hours ago, robosmith said:

YOUR MEMES ARE LIES and you are completely IGNORANT about that.

^LIES NO DOUBT!

You also said my list of left wing terrorists wasn't valid, but I proved i was correct. 

[Venandi]

10 hours ago, Aristides said:

Well why wouldn't they? Trump shitcanned the deal that had them giving it up and dumped a bunch of sanctions on them instead. 

An interesting perspective... are you're suggesting the regime wouldn't (or didn't) pursue their enrichment goals in the absence of sanctions? If he didn't hold a similar opinion, Roboduh would likely say "prove it duh."  

As to the threat assessment / threshold, it's a bit like Dalton's Law in that the total is equal to the sum of the pieces... and there are a lot of pieces here and most of them don't make the news.

If you're going to suggest that removing the capability for Iran to develop / deploy offensive nuclear weapons is a bad idea, I think you should at least outline why you think they can be trusted with one; I can't think of least trustworthy nation. 

He said, she said, he did, she did, and most other historical issues are (IMO of course) interesting but largely irrelevant in the here and now...  and they're certainly subordinate to the issue of Iran developing and deploying a nuclear capability. That's the issue you need to address in order to prevail here (I think).

Nothing in their actions to date convinces me that they're only kidding about their own rhetoric and if you want to convince anyone that this was a bad idea, I think you'll have to address it directly whilst not confusing that issue with the idea of regime change.

Iran possessing a nuclear capability is worse for the region (by orders of magnitude) than what entity replaces the current one. That's a whole separate thread. 

 

 

Edited 9 hours ago by Venandi

[Legato]

10 hours ago, Aristides said:

Israel and the US will completely destabilize Iran. The Revolutionary Guard will form the nucleus of whatever new ISIS is formed like the Saddam's Republican Guard did in Iraq. You will spend years trying to keep a lid on it, then leave the mess like you did in Iraq and a few hundred thousands of Iranians will die or become refugees. You id*ots never learn.

Which episode of Star Wars did you write the script for?

[Deluge]

12 hours ago, West said:

https://www.foxnews.com/live-news/israel-iran-conflict-june-21-2025

Too bad Barry Obama funded Iranian terrorism. Sad.

Barry & Michael both should be banished to Iran to help with cleanup. 

[Aristides]

12 hours ago, User said:

You might as well work for Iran in their state media agency. They have been bragging about striking Israel for the last week as each night their ability to launch ballistic missiles dwindles more and more. 

IF Iran chooses to do anything else, we will quickly and decisively deal with that. 

Iran can easily close the Straight of Hormuz to tanker traffic. How will you decidedly deal with that, invade?

[Aristides]

This wouldn’t be happening if President Dumshit hadn’t trashed the nuclear agreement. Why would Iran expect President Dumshit to honour any future agreements? Canada already knows how he keeps the agreements he signs.

[Aristides]

1 hour ago, Legato said:

Which episode of Star Wars did you write the script for?

Which episode of actually history did you miss. It's well known that former Republican Guard members provided ISIS with many of its best commanders and fighters. Why would you expect Iran to be any different? Iran also shares a long border with Afghanistan making cooperation with the Taliban almost a given. The f*cking place is a minefield and you id*ots keep wanting to play in it.

[Aristides]

2 hours ago, Venandi said:

An interesting perspective... are you're suggesting the regime wouldn't (or didn't) pursue their enrichment goals in the absence of sanctions? If he didn't hold a similar opinion, Roboduh would likely say "prove it duh."  

As to the threat assessment / threshold, it's a bit like Dalton's Law in that the total is equal to the sum of the pieces... and there are a lot of pieces here and most of them don't make the news.

If you're going to suggest that removing the capability for Iran to develop / deploy offensive nuclear weapons is a bad idea, I think you should at least outline why you think they can be trusted with one; I can't think of least trustworthy nation. 

He said, she said, he did, she did, and most other historical issues are (IMO of course) interesting but largely irrelevant in the here and now...  and they're certainly subordinate to the issue of Iran developing and deploying a nuclear capability. That's the issue you need to address in order to prevail here (I think).

Nothing in their actions to date convinces me that they're only kidding about their own rhetoric and if you want to convince anyone that this was a bad idea, I think you'll have to address it directly whilst not confusing that issue with the idea of regime change.

Iran possessing a nuclear capability is worse for the region (by orders of magnitude) than what entity replaces the current one. That's a whole separate thread. 

 

 

The nuclear deal was in place to control Iran's development of nuclear weapons.

https://api.politifact.com/article/2025/jun/18/Iran-nuclear-deal-Obama-Trump-Israel/

[West]

56 minutes ago, Aristides said:

This wouldn’t be happening if President Dumshit hadn’t trashed the nuclear agreement. Why would Iran expect President Dumshit to honour any future agreements? Canada already knows how he keeps the agreements he signs.

You assume the agreement was a good thing. I assume its a bad thing to give billions to a terrorist group who've openly expressed wanting to kill Jewish people in exchange for raping virgins in the afterlife. 

These folks are irrational and its moronic to drop them a pallet full of billions of dollars to spend on murdering others 

[robosmith]

11 minutes ago, West said:

You assume the agreement was a good thing. I assume its a bad thing to give billions to a terrorist group who've openly expressed wanting to kill Jewish people in exchange for raping virgins in the afterlife. 

These folks are irrational and its moronic to drop them a pallet full of billions of dollars to spend on murdering others 

NOTHING was "given" to Iran. 

And YOU STILL have not proven that Iran has a SINGLE NUKE. IF they do, expect to see it delivered to Israel SOON.

But they clearly DO NOT and you just make up CRAP all the time.

[West]

5 minutes ago, robosmith said:

NOTHING was "given" to Iran. 

And YOU STILL have not proven that Iran has a SINGLE NUKE. IF they do, expect to see it delivered to Israel SOON.

But they clearly DO NOT and you just make up CRAP all the time.

Iran has been enriching uranium way past approved levels for some time, refused to let inspectors in, and the Israeli intelligence suggests they had plans to make nukes. 

And yes Obama and Biden dropped them some cash while Clinton provided the uranium. This is fact

Thats good enough for me to make their nuclear program go bye bye

Edited 6 hours ago by West

[Aristides]

27 minutes ago, West said:

You assume the agreement was a good thing. I assume its a bad thing to give billions to a terrorist group who've openly expressed wanting to kill Jewish people in exchange for raping virgins in the afterlife. 

These folks are irrational and its moronic to drop them a pallet full of billions of dollars to spend on murdering others 

Why, because Obama signed it? No one gave Iran anything, they just unfrozen Iranian assets. 

The rest of your diatribe just says this isn't about nukes at all. 

[Aristides]

11 hours ago, robosmith said:

You blaming Obama for unfreezing Iranian assets is ENTIRELY DISINGENUOUS when it was Trump who tore up that JPOA agreement and UNLEASHED Iran's nuclear enrichment. 🤮

When are you going to stop believing FOS LIES?

Actually Bibi been LYING ABOUT imminent Iranian bombs since the '90s

He said Iran was weeks away in 2012, 2015 and 2018 as well

[Aristides]

16 minutes ago, West said:

Iran has been enriching uranium way past approved levels for some time, refused to let inspectors in, and the Israeli intelligence suggests they had plans to make nukes. 

And yes Obama and Biden dropped them some cash while Clinton provided the uranium. This is fact

Thats good enough for me to make their nuclear program go bye bye

Yes they started accelerating enrichment a year after Trump trashed the agreement, not before.

[Venandi]

58 minutes ago, Aristides said:

The nuclear deal was in place to control Iran's development of nuclear weapons.

Are you're suggesting that they were compliant with it?

Even if you decide to ignore the fact that they weren't or even convince me that they were,  I'd have to argue that it doesn't matter in the least unless you have a time machine. You need to get into the here and now even if you don't like it... the situation is what it is and it's all ya got to work with.

I think it falls to you to convince people that Iran can be trusted despite their previous actions and rhetoric. It's not me you need to convince either... because you can't.

I'd still like to hear why you find them so trustworthy though. 

 

[Legato]

1 hour ago, Aristides said:

Which episode of actually history did you miss. It's well known that former Republican Guard members provided ISIS with many of its best commanders and fighters. Why would you expect Iran to be any different? Iran also shares a long border with Afghanistan making cooperation with the Taliban almost a given. The f*cking place is a minefield and you id*ots keep wanting to play in it.

No, just remove the playground.

Why are you supporting Iran?

[robosmith]

33 minutes ago, West said:

Iran has been enriching uranium way past approved levels for some time, refused to let inspectors in, and the Israeli intelligence suggests they had plans to make nukes. 

"Approved" by whom? Trump? LMAO

Trump tore up the JPOA so NO LIMITS remain. 

60% is FAR FROM the 90+% required to make a nuke so YOU LOSE.

33 minutes ago, West said:

And yes Obama and Biden dropped them some cash while Clinton provided the uranium. This is fact

Nope and you have NO EVIDENCE of any URANIUM "provided." 

The cash that Obama sent was IRAN'S property. The funds that Biden approved were NEVER DELIVERED despite it being Iran's property. AKA NOTHING "GIVEN.." DUH 

33 minutes ago, West said:

Thats good enough for me to make their nuclear program go bye bye

You mean it's "good enough" for you to believe Trump's BULLSHIT. 🤮

His OWN DNI said they need a year or two IF they decide to build a bomb.

Trump was CONNED by Netanyahu and decided it was a POLITICAL winner for HIM. 

Edited 5 hours ago by robosmith

[robosmith]

21 minutes ago, Aristides said:

He said Iran was weeks away in 2012, 2015 and 2018 as well

Yes, ROUTINELY since the '90s

[robosmith]

17 minutes ago, Venandi said:

Are you're suggesting that they were compliant with it?

Even if you decide to ignore the fact that they weren't or even convince me that they were,  I'd have to argue that it doesn't matter in the least unless you have a time machine. You need to get into the here and now even if you don't like it... the situation is what it is and it's all ya got to work with.

I think it falls to you to convince people that Iran can be trusted despite their previous actions and rhetoric. It's not me you need to convince either... because you can't.

I'd still like to hear why you find them so trustworthy though. 

 

I'd still like to hear why you find Trump trustworthy AT ALL, since he is a pathological LIAR. 

He said he would decide in 2 weeks when he'd already made the decision. That was just his latest LIE.

15 minutes ago, Legato said:

No, just remove the playground.

Why are you supporting Iran?

Why are YOU supporting a war with Iran? Because you believe Netanyahu's LIES?