User Posted July 12, 2025 Report Posted July 12, 2025 2 minutes ago, robosmith said: Says who? You? LMAO Ever THINK? That a loop can be interrupted by appropriate ACTION. ROFL, you are the one posting doom loop fear mongering that once it starts it won't stop. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted July 12, 2025 Report Posted July 12, 2025 4 minutes ago, robosmith said: Sorry your "definition" is NOT OFFICIAL. LMAO Good gawd! You don't have any idea what peer-review is, do you? Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
User Posted July 12, 2025 Report Posted July 12, 2025 6 minutes ago, robosmith said: Sorry your "definition" is NOT OFFICIAL. LMAO I did not even offer one, just pointing out your stupidity as usual. Quote
robosmith Posted July 12, 2025 Author Report Posted July 12, 2025 On 6/18/2025 at 1:22 PM, Nationalist said: Are you gonna be wrong again? G'head G'head... Tell us about the thermodynamics course you took, dropout. Go ahead and google thermodynamics; we'll wait. LMAO Quote
User Posted July 12, 2025 Report Posted July 12, 2025 2 minutes ago, robosmith said: Tell us about the thermodynamics course you took, dropout. Go ahead and google thermodynamics; we'll wait. LMAO Why do you pretend to be smarter than you actually are in your comments here? We can see what you post here. If you were half as smart as you brag about being, your comments certainly do not reflect it. Quote
WestCanMan Posted July 12, 2025 Report Posted July 12, 2025 18 hours ago, robosmith said: Scientists 25,000 years ago, your "scientists" were called shamans. As in, "shaman you for listening to those quacks." Quote Not really buying "baffled" Yet you constantly are. It's part of being a cultist. Quote the melting of permafrost has been a KNOWN possible positive feedback loop for MANY YEARS. 25,000 years ago a shaman said to his protege: "I just told them that the Sun God was going to stop shining on them if they didn't send me 5 virgins and it worked." Protege: "It can't possibly work again, can it? No one's that stupid." Shaman: "It only works on the left side of the village for some reason, but I'm on year 6 now. Let's see how long we can keep this going." Protege: "But what if there's an ice age? Then they'll know we were lying." Shaman: "Then we say 'it's because the virgins were too ugly, the Sun God like big tits' and double the price." Protege: "Do you think this could work until the information age?" Shaman: "In the 'information' age they will call CNN "news". It will be like clubbing fish in a barrel." Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. "I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul "It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot
robosmith Posted July 12, 2025 Author Report Posted July 12, 2025 8 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: 25,000 years ago, your "scientists" were called shamans. As in, "shaman you for listening to those quacks." Yet you constantly are. It's part of being a cultist. 25,000 years ago a shaman said to his protege: "I just told them that the Sun God was going to stop shining on them if they didn't send me 5 virgins and it worked." Protege: "It can't possibly work again, can it? No one's that stupid." Shaman: "It only works on the left side of the village for some reason, but I'm on year 6 now. Let's see how long we can keep this going." Protege: "But what if there's an ice age? Then they'll know we were lying." Shaman: "Then we say 'it's because the virgins were too ugly, the Sun God like big tits' and double the price." Protege: "Do you think this could work until the information age?" Shaman: "In the 'information' age they will call CNN "news". It will be like clubbing fish in a barrel." Thanks for proving you KNOW NOTHING about the science of climate and atmospheric chemistry/physics We know you work for the fossil fuel industry but are too scared to admit it since you've been asked several times and never answered. Quote
CdnFox Posted July 12, 2025 Report Posted July 12, 2025 1 hour ago, robosmith said: Thanks for proving you KNOW NOTHING about the science of climate and atmospheric chemistry/physics We know you work for the fossil fuel industry but are too scared to admit it since you've been asked several times and never answered. It's pretty obvious he knows more than you. At least he understands what peer review means Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
robosmith Posted July 12, 2025 Author Report Posted July 12, 2025 (edited) 2 hours ago, CdnFox said: It's pretty obvious he knows more than you. At least he understands what peer review means Peer review means reviewed by peers. Duh Quote Dictionary Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more peer re·view /ˌpi(r) rəˈvyo͞o/ verb past tense: peer-reviewed; past participle: peer-reviewed; past tense: peer reviewed; past participle: peer reviewed subject (someone or something) to a peer review. "a peer-reviewed journal" I've done peer review; have you? Edited July 12, 2025 by robosmith Quote
CdnFox Posted July 13, 2025 Report Posted July 13, 2025 2 hours ago, robosmith said: Peer review means reviewed by peers. Duh Well no, it doesn't. If that was the case his buddy's sitting next to him at the office could review it and call it peer reviewed. It's a very specific process and obviously that hasn't happened here. As I thought, you're not aware of what peer-reviewed means. Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
User Posted July 13, 2025 Report Posted July 13, 2025 4 hours ago, robosmith said: Peer review means reviewed by peers. Duh No, in the sense you are using this terminology, it means a professional paper has been presented to their peers for further scientific review and scrutiny. You are trying to dishonestly use this as if a dog catcher wrote a letter and his fellow peer, another dog cather who works with him happened to look over it to, so BOOM, that dog cather has just published a "peer reviewed" paper. Stop being so dumb. Quote
Nationalist Posted July 13, 2025 Report Posted July 13, 2025 9 hours ago, robosmith said: Tell us about the thermodynamics course you took, dropout. Go ahead and google thermodynamics; we'll wait. LMAO It's fascinating that you continue to point out i dropped out of collage, when I am constantly having to yell you how wrong you are. 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted July 13, 2025 Author Report Posted July 13, 2025 8 minutes ago, Nationalist said: It's fascinating that you continue to point out i dropped out of collage, when I am constantly having to yell you how wrong you are. Your "yelling" doesn't make me wrong, dropout. Quote
Aristides Posted July 13, 2025 Report Posted July 13, 2025 1 hour ago, User said: No, in the sense you are using this terminology, it means a professional paper has been presented to their peers for further scientific review and scrutiny. You are trying to dishonestly use this as if a dog catcher wrote a letter and his fellow peer, another dog cather who works with him happened to look over it to, so BOOM, that dog cather has just published a "peer reviewed" paper. Stop being so dumb. If his peers disagreed with it, they would say so. That is the point of peer reviews. Quote
Army Guy Posted July 13, 2025 Report Posted July 13, 2025 On 6/18/2025 at 4:44 PM, Michael Hardner said: All the cackling chuds out there will be long dead when people ask... Why was nothing done? Why has nothing been done to date....and please don't tell us Canada or her government has done much in regards to climate change...and if our government has done little to nothing, Canadians have done even less....it looks like there are a lot of chuds in this country...Why has nothing been done ? because it cost to much for Canadians... Quote We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.
CdnFox Posted July 13, 2025 Report Posted July 13, 2025 26 minutes ago, robosmith said: Your "yelling" doesn't make me wrong, dropout. That's true, you were wrong before he showed up Dude we literally just had to explain to you what peer-reviewed means 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
User Posted July 13, 2025 Report Posted July 13, 2025 1 hour ago, Aristides said: If his peers disagreed with it, they would say so. That is the point of peer reviews. --------------------------------POINT-----------------------------------------------> Your Head Quote
Nationalist Posted July 13, 2025 Report Posted July 13, 2025 (edited) 10 hours ago, robosmith said: Your "yelling" doesn't make me wrong, dropout. True. You make you wrong. Edited July 13, 2025 by Nationalist Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted July 13, 2025 Author Report Posted July 13, 2025 2 hours ago, Nationalist said: True. You make you wrong. My EVIDENCE makes me right. And you being a dropout makes you IGNORANT. Quote
Nationalist Posted July 13, 2025 Report Posted July 13, 2025 (edited) 29 minutes ago, robosmith said: My EVIDENCE makes me right. And you being a dropout makes you IGNORANT. Lol...your evidence is nothing more that fear-porn full of "could". Meanwhile...zucchini everywhere lives in fear of your attention. Edited July 13, 2025 by Nationalist Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
CdnFox Posted July 13, 2025 Report Posted July 13, 2025 1 hour ago, robosmith said: My EVIDENCE makes me right. And you being a dropout makes you IGNORANT. Your EVIDENCE is always BUPKIS!! Whatever you post evidence it never says what you think it says. None of your evidence is actually related to what you are talking about. It's kind of a running gag. You claim that trump has been caught selling Russian secrets and then post a link to an article explaining how to correctly use dental floss. 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
WestCanMan Posted July 13, 2025 Report Posted July 13, 2025 2 hours ago, robosmith said: My EVIDENCE makes me right. And you being a dropout makes you IGNORANT. You don't have evidence. You have talking points from the biggest liars on the planet. Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. "I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul "It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot
robosmith Posted July 13, 2025 Author Report Posted July 13, 2025 3 hours ago, Nationalist said: Lol...your evidence is nothing more that fear-porn full of "could". Because YOU don't understand the SCIENCE which proves MMGW, dropout. 3 hours ago, Nationalist said: Meanwhile...zucchini everywhere lives in fear of your attention. Your ^BULLSHIT just further proves your IGNORANCE. 1 hour ago, WestCanMan said: You don't have evidence. You have talking points from the biggest liars on the planet. IF you believe climate scientists are liars, PROVE IT. Of course YOU CANNOT because all you know is statistics. AKA NOT atmospheric chemistry/physics. Quote
Nationalist Posted July 13, 2025 Report Posted July 13, 2025 2 hours ago, robosmith said: Because YOU don't understand the SCIENCE which proves MMGW, dropout. Your ^BULLSHIT just further proves your IGNORANCE. IF you believe climate scientists are liars, PROVE IT. Of course YOU CANNOT because all you know is statistics. AKA NOT atmospheric chemistry/physics. Sure I understand the science. I also know the difference between conjecture and definitive. You, on the other hand, don't. Either you are lying, or stupid. I'm thinking a bit o' both. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted July 13, 2025 Author Report Posted July 13, 2025 26 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Sure I understand the science. I also know the difference between conjecture and definitive. You, on the other hand, don't. Either you are lying, or stupid. I'm thinking a bit o' both. You DO NOT KNOW the LAWS of Physics. They are definitive, NOT "conjecture." Duh IF you EVER read a climate science journal, you'd know there a MEASUREMENTS to PROVE MMGW. LMAO Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.