CdnFox Posted Wednesday at 05:40 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 05:40 PM 15 minutes ago, cougar said: Only a madman would ask for more pipelines! Or, y'know, someone who wanted the country to succeed and wanted to make life better for all canadians. Which i realize is pretty much your definition of "Madman". Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
eyeball Posted Wednesday at 06:33 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 06:33 PM 20 hours ago, blackbird said: I'm just said the coast guard is managed by coast guard officials in B.C. And coast guard officials in BC take their orders from officials in Ottawa. Why are you trying to make it sound like it's the other way around? Do you seriously imagine officials in BC tell bureaucrats and politicians in Ottawa how much funding to provide and where to allocate resources and assets? LMAO! Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
blackbird Posted Wednesday at 07:49 PM Author Report Posted Wednesday at 07:49 PM 1 hour ago, eyeball said: And coast guard officials in BC take their orders from officials in Ottawa. Why are you trying to make it sound like it's the other way around? Do you seriously imagine officials in BC tell bureaucrats and politicians in Ottawa how much funding to provide and where to allocate resources and assets? LMAO! No, you make it sound like bureaucrats run the day to day coast guard. They don't. You or someone said there was a buoy light not working or a lighthouse. Bureaucrats don't run those things. Ottawa politicians provide the funding but coast guard officials in B.C. would do the actual managing any problems with lights or buoys. Simple really. Quote
eyeball Posted Wednesday at 08:26 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 08:26 PM 28 minutes ago, blackbird said: No, you make it sound like bureaucrats run the day to day coast guard. They don't. You or someone said there was a buoy light not working or a lighthouse. Bureaucrats don't run those things. Ottawa politicians provide the funding but coast guard officials in B.C. would do the actual managing any problems with lights or buoys. Simple really. Well all I can say is that between Ottawa and the west coast, someone is running a really loose ship. These buoys are often down for months and should serve as the first indication of just how loose things are to Canadians. But you're all set to plow on in the dark without the first clue what's going on out there. It's interesting how awfully trusting of the governments abilities you suddenly seem to be. And we're supposed to trust your judgement because...? Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
cougar Posted Wednesday at 10:40 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 10:40 PM 4 hours ago, CdnFox said: Or, y'know, someone who wanted the country to succeed and wanted to make life better for all canadians. It is already "better" for most Canadians! Quote
CdnFox Posted Wednesday at 10:43 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 10:43 PM Just now, cougar said: It is already "better" for most Canadians! That's not possible, we've been paying carbon tax for 10 years, surely Global warming has been solved by now! The issue is not who sells the oil, the issue is who burns the oil. Right now we can sell oil to those who are going to burn oil one way or another and our oil is about as environmentally friendly as you can get also dictator free. Our natural gas is an excellent way to reduce emissions until more permanent solutions can be found So your little map means absolutely nothing at all. Giving money to Russia for example to fund more wars is dumb, and forcing people to go to them will not change the amount of carbon emissions at all I know math is hard, but surely even you can work out but if the same number of liters of oil are going to be burned regardless of who sells it that being the people selling it does not affect climate change 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
cougar Posted Wednesday at 11:43 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 11:43 PM 57 minutes ago, CdnFox said: The issue is not who sells the oil, the issue is who burns the oil. Right now we can sell oil to those who are going to burn oil one way or another and our oil is about as environmentally friendly as you can get also dictator free. You take BlackTurd by the hand and also jump in the nearest fire. The Nefarious Banana will follow you blindly, so no need to give him directions. Quote
cougar Posted Wednesday at 11:47 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 11:47 PM 6 hours ago, Nefarious Banana said: You've teased the forum members with your welcomed threat to leave your adoptive country and return to the sh!thole country you came from . . . or was that just more of your drival? Keep in mind I came from a country while you never got a chance to be born or live in one. Quote
blackbird Posted Wednesday at 11:48 PM Author Report Posted Wednesday at 11:48 PM 1 hour ago, CdnFox said: That's not possible, we've been paying carbon tax for 10 years, surely Global warming has been solved by now! The issue is not who sells the oil, the issue is who burns the oil. Right now we can sell oil to those who are going to burn oil one way or another and our oil is about as environmentally friendly as you can get also dictator free. Our natural gas is an excellent way to reduce emissions until more permanent solutions can be found So your little map means absolutely nothing at all. Giving money to Russia for example to fund more wars is dumb, and forcing people to go to them will not change the amount of carbon emissions at all I know math is hard, but surely even you can work out but if the same number of liters of oil are going to be burned regardless of who sells it that being the people selling it does not affect climate change He's not interested in rational debate. He earned promotion to the ignore list. 1 Quote
Nefarious Banana Posted Thursday at 12:02 AM Report Posted Thursday at 12:02 AM 10 minutes ago, cougar said: Keep in mind I came from a country while you never got a chance to be born or live in one. Keep in mind that your screwed up ideas and values don't work in the country I was born in. Should I send you a bus ticket so you can ride in class back to your sh!thole country? Quote
CdnFox Posted Thursday at 02:13 AM Report Posted Thursday at 02:13 AM 2 hours ago, cougar said: You take BlackTurd by the hand and also jump in the nearest fire. The Nefarious Banana will follow you blindly, so no need to give him directions. Awwww muffin Are you crying? You sound like you're crying. Did those pesky truths hurt your feelings agian? Here, have a soyburger And also if @blackbird @Nefarious Banana and I jumped into a fire.... wouldn't that be releasing carbon? Tsk Tsk Tsk, what a hypocrite you are 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
cougar Posted yesterday at 06:55 PM Report Posted yesterday at 06:55 PM On 6/11/2025 at 7:13 PM, CdnFox said: And also if @blackbird @Nefarious Banana and I jumped into a fire.... wouldn't that be releasing carbon? Tsk Tsk Tsk, what a hypocrite you are You would release a bit of carbon, which is negligible compared to the alternative of you continuing to burn fossil fuels and derail climate conservation efforts. Just jump and do not ask more questions. Quote
CdnFox Posted yesterday at 06:59 PM Report Posted yesterday at 06:59 PM 2 minutes ago, cougar said: You would release a bit of carbon, which is negligible compared to the alternative of you continuing to burn fossil fuels and derail climate conservation efforts. Just jump and do not ask more questions. Did you get confused again? We're not talking about burning fossil fuels, the people who are going to consume fossil fuels are going to do so regardless of what we do. We're talking about who's going to sell it to them, but the amount of it gets used will be the same either way So that would be your entire argument completely out the window. Maybe next time think for more than 8 seconds before you type Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Legato Posted yesterday at 07:08 PM Report Posted yesterday at 07:08 PM 12 minutes ago, cougar said: You would release a bit of carbon, which is negligible compared to the alternative of you continuing to burn fossil fuels and derail climate conservation efforts. Just jump and do not ask more questions. Are yoy carbon or sillycone based? Quote
Nefarious Banana Posted yesterday at 07:15 PM Report Posted yesterday at 07:15 PM 18 minutes ago, cougar said: You would release a bit of carbon, which is negligible compared to the alternative of you continuing to burn fossil fuels and derail climate conservation efforts. Should I send the bus ticket? Quote
CdnFox Posted yesterday at 07:19 PM Report Posted yesterday at 07:19 PM 10 minutes ago, Legato said: Are yoy carbon or sillycone based? With him, two things can be true. Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
herbie Posted yesterday at 08:09 PM Report Posted yesterday at 08:09 PM Our usual gang of cretins pat each other's backs for endlessly repeating their nonsense and the country burns around them. All so deluded they think there's a personal benefit to swallowing the corporate load. The people who live here don't know anything about the province they live in, so do tell us how we're all wrong. We're lost in the belief people can decide themselves rather than their 'right' definition of democracy that you do what you're told. I mean if you even recognize the fact the corporate agenda does not line up 100% with either the worker's nor the people at large, you must be a socialist. Or that the classes of humanity are now defined not by heredity but economically you must be an extreme Marxist. The dotards that live with blinders on think recognition of either is a failing. You're not one of their flock of sheeple. 1 Quote
cougar Posted yesterday at 08:26 PM Report Posted yesterday at 08:26 PM 1 hour ago, Nefarious Banana said: Should I send the bus ticket? No need - you follow BlackTurd and CumFux into the fire. "We can make each other happy" - you into the fire ; me saving the planet from you. Quote
Nefarious Banana Posted yesterday at 08:34 PM Report Posted yesterday at 08:34 PM 4 minutes ago, cougar said: No need - you follow BlackTurd and CumFux into the fire. "We can make each other happy" - you into the fire ; me saving the planet from you. Foreigner with a messiah complex . . . the bus is waiting. 1 Quote
Nefarious Banana Posted yesterday at 08:37 PM Report Posted yesterday at 08:37 PM 26 minutes ago, herbie said: Our usual gang of cretins pat each other's backs for endlessly repeating their nonsense and the country burns around them. All so deluded they think there's a personal benefit to swallowing the corporate load. The people who live here don't know anything about the province they live in, so do tell us how we're all wrong. We're lost in the belief people can decide themselves rather than their 'right' definition of democracy that you do what you're told. I mean if you even recognize the fact the corporate agenda does not line up 100% with either the worker's nor the people at large, you must be a socialist. Or that the classes of humanity are now defined not by heredity but economically you must be an extreme Marxist. The dotards that live with blinders on think recognition of either is a failing. You're not one of their flock of sheeple. Having yet another of your wtf moments little man? Get well soon. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.