Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

In this time where the US is threatening Canadian identity, it's nice to be reminded that we are part of a very cool group of nations: The Commonwealth. 

I'm sure many think we should just become a run-of-the-mill Republic, but being part of this club based on the British form of government is a desirable trait to the Canadian identity. 

The last time the true head of state gave a throne speech in Canada was in 1977. I think the gesture of having him speak to usher in this new government is a powerful symbol of Canadians true identity. 

Edited by Boges
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Incredibly, Canada was last visited by its monarch fifteen years ago. That’s not a normal state of affairs. Our head of state should live here and should be able to speak freely and at length every day about the wonders of this country. 

Posted (edited)
23 minutes ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

Our head of state should live here

Don't forget King Charles III reigns over about fifteen countries.  He can't be everywhere.  We have a governor general who represents the King here.   The GG carries out the duties as necessary. The system works fine.

Edited by blackbird
Posted
3 hours ago, Boges said:

In this time where the US is threatening Canadian identity, it's nice to be reminded that we are part of a very cool group of nations: The Commonwealth. 

I'm sure many think we should just become a run-of-the-mill Republic, but being part of this club based on the British form of government is a desirable trait to the Canadian identity. 

The last time the true head of state gave a throne speech in Canada was in 1977. I think the gesture of having him speak to usher in this new government is a powerful symbol of Canadians true identity. 

How has trump threaten our identity ?...Liberals have been saying for years we really don't have a Canadian identity...Even Canadians struggle to identify our own identity....what makes Canada unique from others....lets not start with maple syrup

Many Canadians have not thought twice about the royals, 

Quote

 In 2023, Ipsos polling found 67 per cent of Canadians believed the King and the Royal Family should have no formal role in Canadian society, seeing them as “celebrities and nothing more.”

https://globalnews.ca/news/11193948/royals-canada-monarchy-king-charles-revival/ 

and today those numbers are much lower, for some reason....it is almost like Canadians can't make up their minds...until there is some advantage to be had....we are still part of the club, because the majority are to lazy to change it...who would we put on our money, most of the past Canadians have done something to insult someone....and we've already torn done most statues anyways...

your last statement is telling since 1977, say alot about how much Canadians value our king and Queen...the last time someone from the royal family did visit we complained who was going to pay for all of it....that sends an inviting message does it not...Again what is our true identity ? 

We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.

Posted
22 minutes ago, Army Guy said:

How has trump threaten our identity ?...Liberals have been saying for years we really don't have a Canadian identity...

Hey now...  donald can still be a threat to our identity!  Just because the liberals are a far WORSE threat to our identity doesn't change that! 

I mean so they let  a few (hundred) churches get burnt down, so what if they tried to cancel canada day, who cares if they declared our modern day version of martial law on people with a bouncy castle and horns, big deal if they insisted we committed a genocide that never happened while denying an actual genocide that's currently happening because they heart china, who gives a fark if they let john a's statues get pulled down,  what does it matter if they sold our oil and gas industries down the road for... 

....er..  where was I going with that again? Any way orange man bad! 

  • Like 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
1 hour ago, Army Guy said:

Again what is our true identity ? 

Loyalist Orangemen of Upper Canada,

Guardians of Confederation,

more British than the British in the face of an American menace at the gates,

Victoria Queen & Empress ; Mother Canada,

from Queenston Heights to Juno Beach,

Cuidich n' Righ

  • Like 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Nefarious Banana said:

Aaaahhhhhh . . . not everyone is an 'Orange man' my friend.

Or familiar with Cucumber on Rye

Bison burgers comming right up!

William Prince of Orange is the founder of Parliamentary Supremacy,

it's the Canadian system of governance,

so if you're not Orange, you would be rendered into an American republican by default therein,

which is fair enough, perhaps you are an American republican, and so be it,

but to be Canadian, one must be Orange by definition upon the Parliament Hill founded by the Dutch Regent in 1690

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
41 minutes ago, Nefarious Banana said:

Some of us are red by defination . . . and laugh at your 'classifications'

Cucumber on Rye . . . you must be a vegetarian, and so be it.

well, suit yourself,

but Canada doesn't have an alternative system of governance and it's not going to invent one,

basically, you can defend & uphold Westminster Parliamentary Supremacy as founded by the Prince of Orange,

or you can be an American,

those are the realistic choices, there's no third option in play,

which, if you prefer to be an American. we will welcome you with open arms,

just bear in the mind the consequences therein ;

there's no imperial parent coming to your rescue if you are an American,

if you are an American, it's live free or die, by your own hand, nobody else is coming to save you,

you are all alone against the world; that's what it is to be an American,

you are the centre of attention, everything is about you,

there's nowhere to hide on the sidelines like Canadians do

Edited by Dougie93
Posted
29 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

well, suit yourself,

but Canada doesn't have an alternative system of governance and it's not going to invent one,

basically, you can defend & uphold Westminster Parliamentary Supremacy as founded by the Prince of Orange,

or you can be an American,

those are the realistic choices, there's no third option in play,

which, if you prefer to be an American. we will welcome you with open arms,

just bear in the mind the consequences therein ;

there's no imperial parent coming to your rescue if you are an American,

if you are an American, it's live free or die, by your own hand, nobody else is coming to save you,

you are all alone against the world; that's what it is to be an American,

you are the centre of attention, everything is about you,

there's nowhere to hide on the sidelines like Canadians do

This is stuff that canadians can worry about, and as you've said many times that's not you.  Which saves us at least ONE national embarrasment.

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
4 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

This is stuff that canadians can worry about, and as you've said many times that's not you.  Which saves us at least ONE national embarrasment.

"Canadian" is a meaningless distinction, just another colony of the British Empire

Posted
11 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

"Canadian" is a meaningless distinction, just another colony of the British Empire

Sure kid. Anyway not your problem seeing as you're not a canadian. Thank god. 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

Sure kid. Anyway not your problem seeing as you're not a canadian. Thank god. 

no worries, Canada hands out passports to anyone, so I'm as Canadian as the next Punjabi Sikh or whomever,

Posted
8 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

no worries, Canada hands out passports to anyone, so I'm as Canadian as the next Punjabi Sikh or whomever,

Sure sure.  Still not as embarrassing as having a stolen valor loser like you as part of the team so at least we've got that. 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
Just now, CdnFox said:

Sure sure.  Still not as embarrassing as having a stolen valor loser like you as part of the team so at least we've got that. 

I actually applied for and received my UK passport,

so now I'm like Mark Carney was ; three passport holding Citoyen du Monde,

Liberal Party of Canada Laurentian Elite FTW

Posted

The Liberals are mostly Papist Liberals and they rule the country to a large extent.  They are also backed by Quebec.

 Ironically, we still have that small lifeline, the Constitutional Monarchy, King Charles III.  Not sure how long it will last.

If Rome can find away to take that away from us, they will.

Posted
Just now, blackbird said:

The Liberals are mostly Papist Liberals and they rule the country to a large extent.  They are also backed by Quebec.

 Ironically, we still have that small lifeline, the Constitutional Monarchy, King Charles III.  Not sure how long it will last.

If Rome can find away to take that away from us, they will.

actually, King Charles III is a Greek Orthodox Christian, like his father before him

Posted
6 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

actually, King Charles III is a Greek Orthodox Christian, like his father before him

No.  King Charles III 's father, Prince Philip was baptized into the Greek Orthodox Church but King Charles III, his son, was not.

"Prince Philip was baptized in the Greek Orthodox Church as a baby, but by the time he married Queen Elizabeth, he identified as an Anglican.  However, unless he was officially received into the Church of England, he remained a member of the Greek Orthodox Church."

Google head of Church of England.

quote

The supreme governor of the Church of England is the titular head of the Church of England, a position which is vested in the British monarch.  Although the monarch's authority over the Church of England is largely ceremonial and is mostly observed in a symbolic capacity,[2] the position is still relevant to the established church. As the supreme governor, the monarch formally appoints high-ranking members of the church on the advice of the prime minister of the United Kingdom, who in turn acts on the advice of the Crown Nominations Commission.[1] Since the Act of Settlement of 1701, all Supreme Governors have been members of the Church of England.  unquote

Supreme Governor of the Church of England - Wikipedia

That means KIng Charles III is the titular head of the Church of England.

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, blackbird said:

No.  King Charles III 's father, Prince Philip was baptized into the Greek Orthodox Church but King Charles III, his son, was not.

it's well known that Charles followed his father into Orthodox Mary worshipping.

despite being the titular head of the Anglican Church now,

"titular" meaning formality without any authority,

never mind that the Anglican Church should be an abomination to any devout Protestant,

since the Anglican church is Popery by any other name,

no man nor office between a sinner and his Saviour after all

Edited by Dougie93
Posted
43 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

I actually applied for and received my UK passport,

 

Thank god, they can have you.  Off you go then. 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
4 minutes ago, Nefarious Banana said:

Dougie93  . . .  are you living in the past?  Daydreaming of old battles?  Clashing swords, armour and fire?  Kneeling before some long forgotten 'king' . . . ?

what do you mean ?

I'm holding three passports like a Neoliberal central banker in the 21st century,

I'm a Citoyen du Monde, coming & going as I please,

what is more modern than that ?

who is daydreaming of old battles except the Canadian holding one passport swearing allegiance only to Ottawa ?

  • Downvote 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Boges said:

In this time where the US is threatening Canadian identity, it's nice to be reminded that we are part of a very cool group of nations: The Commonwealth.

Binding Nations into Countries and Countries into a Commonwealth moves the planet in a direction that suits me just fine.

I was raised watching Star Trek so a Federation just naturally makes sense to me I guess.

Sci-fi aside...the US seems more... well, let's just say reality is even stranger than fiction.

image.thumb.jpeg.82639ac48be6fb0f08d9413a82a036a9.jpeg

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,915
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    MDP
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • MDP earned a badge
      First Post
    • DrewZero earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • BlahTheCanuck went up a rank
      Explorer
    • derek848 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Benz earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...