Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 minutes ago, taxme said:

I watch FOX NEWS and all i ever saw were non-white people trying to enter America illegally at the Mexican border. Of all the asylum seekers that i have noticed over the years, trying to enter America, Canada ,Britain and Europe were all non-white people. I never see hoards of white people trying to enter another country illegally. 

I know that lieberals, like you, love to throw the word racist around anytime you/they can, but this has nothing to do with racism at all. It has more to do with trying to stop an invasion of people who are trying to enter a country illegally. It is believed that over ten million or more of brown illegals entered America illegally. 

Did you ever see a bunch of white people trying to enter a country illegally by the tens of thousands? 

You are the dumbass lieberal here. You believe everything that CNN or CBC tells you, if they tell you at all about the truth, as to what is really going on at all borders in all white countries. I only all of this news from FOX NEWS or other conservative alternative news websites, who btw, never preach racism at all. 

Orange people? Is there another race of orange colored skin people out there? I did not know that? 😁 

That's a lot of word salad to say that you agree with me that people crossing the southern border are almost entirely non-white. Which is an easy and plain fact to verify.

Tell @gatomontes99 to pull his head out of Trump's ass for a minute and recognize the fact.

 

Posted
On 5/25/2025 at 8:21 AM, Hodad said:

Lol. So, it's your official position that the people illegally crossing the southern border are not overwhelmingly non-white, primarily Mexican and Latin American? 

You're going on record with that? 

You really are shameless in your eagerness to carry water. No bar too low. No claim too dishonest.

They are of every color under the sun, except for white people, that are entering America illegally. As i have said before, i have never seen any white colored skin people enter at the Mexican border illegally at all. I would like to see some pictures of dozens or massive amounts of white people entering America from Mexico illegally if you are able to produce anything at all. I await those pictures from you.  

Those South African white people were allowed into America because they already asked for asylum long ago because they have been having to live a life under tyranny and murder ever since apartheid was abolished. At least those SA did not try and enter America illegally, racist. 

I believe that you are anti-white hater because if the reverse were done, you would have no problem with it, right white hater? You prefer to only show your love for non-white illegals entering America. White people be dammed. 😛

Posted
9 minutes ago, robosmith said:

@taxme CNN and CBC never had pay an $800M libel penalty for LYING to their viewers.

But they did have to pay hundreds of millions for lying to their viewers AND editing film to do it

  • Like 2

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
5 minutes ago, taxme said:

They are of every color under the sun, except for white people, that are entering America illegally. As i have said before, i have never seen any white colored skin people enter at the Mexican border illegally at all. I would like to see some pictures of dozens or massive amounts of white people entering America from Mexico illegally if you are able to produce anything at all. I await those pictures from you.  

Those South African white people were allowed into America because they already asked for asylum long ago because they have been having to live a life under tyranny and murder ever since apartheid was abolished. At least those SA did not try and enter America illegally, racist. 

I believe that you are anti-white hater because if the reverse were done, you would have no problem with it, right white hater? You prefer to only show your love for non-white illegals entering America. White people be dammed. 😛

No, I think asylum and refugee considerations should not be based on race at all. 

Trump disagrees. He's aggressively shut down the legal routes that non-whites were using at the southern border, while opening up a special path for white "refugees" fleeing a fictional genocide. It's blatantly racist, and you're eager to defend it.

You know, like the whites only rules we used to have all over the southern US. 

After restoring statues and renaming parks and monuments to honor Confederate generals, I'm sure he'll get around to editing the dedication for the Statue of Liberty: "Give us your tired, your poor, your huddled WHITE masses yearning to breathe free." 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Hodad said:

No, I think asylum and refugee considerations should not be based on race at all. 

Trump disagrees. He's aggressively shut down the legal routes that non-whites were using at the southern border, while opening up a special path for white "refugees" fleeing a fictional genocide. It's blatantly racist, and you're eager to defend it.

You know, like the whites only rules we used to have all over the southern US. 

After restoring statues and renaming parks and monuments to honor Confederate generals, I'm sure he'll get around to editing the dedication for the Statue of Liberty: "Give us your tired, your poor, your huddled WHITE masses yearning to breathe free." 

You just can't help with the racism, can you?

What was legal about what happened at the southern border? Asylum claims must come at the first country of departure. Let's say you leave Panama and come to Costa Rica. That's where you apply for asylum. But if you fly from Panama to the US you can apply in the US.

What was really happening at the US is that the Biden admin invented procedures that don't exist to do things that aren't legal. As a result, we know that thousands (if not millions) of illegal aliens received SSNs, registered to vote and voted. We know millions used Medicaid, SCHIP and housing resources that were for American citizens, and we know thousands of them broke multiple federal laws even after admission (to include, but not limited to: rape, murder, trafficking, and selling drugs).

So, I'll ask again, what was legal about what happened at the southern border?

Receipts:

Biden's 'catch and release' border policy struck down by US judge

How many migrants are receiving Social Security numbers?

How non-citizens are getting voter registration forms across the US — and how Republicans are trying to stop it

How Undocumented Immigrants Sometimes Receive Medicaid Treatment

5 Key Facts About Immigrants and Medicaid

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
5 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Every thing that border judges approved when analyzing asylum claims. Duh

Thrown out by a federal judge.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/bidens-catch-release-border-policy-struck-down-by-us-judge-2023-03-08/

Biden's 'catch and release' border policy struck down by US judge

March 8 (Reuters) - A federal judge in Florida on Wednesday agreed with the state's Republican attorney general that the policy of President Joe Biden's administration to release many people who illegally cross the U.S.-Mexican border rather than detaining them violates U.S. immigration law.


U.S. District Judge T. Kent Wetherell in Pensacola blocked the administration from continuing to implement a 2021 Department of Homeland Security (DHS) memo that had authorized "alternatives to detention" to ease overcrowding in detention facilities. These alternatives included ankle bracelets, phone monitoring or check-ins by immigration officers. Republican critics have called the policy "catch and release."

  • Like 2

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
21 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Thrown out by a federal judge.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/bidens-catch-release-border-policy-struck-down-by-us-judge-2023-03-08/

Biden's 'catch and release' border policy struck down by US judge

March 8 (Reuters) - A federal judge in Florida on Wednesday agreed with the state's Republican attorney general that the policy of President Joe Biden's administration to release many people who illegally cross the U.S.-Mexican border rather than detaining them violates U.S. immigration law.


U.S. District Judge T. Kent Wetherell in Pensacola blocked the administration from continuing to implement a 2021 Department of Homeland Security (DHS) memo that had authorized "alternatives to detention" to ease overcrowding in detention facilities. These alternatives included ankle bracelets, phone monitoring or check-ins by immigration officers. Republican critics have called the policy "catch and release."

Still being litigated. Duh

A federal appeals court is looking at whether Florida could legally challenge Biden administration immigration policies, after a district judge sided with the state in a fight spearheaded by Attorney General Ashley Moody and Gov. Ron DeSantis.

Posted
10 hours ago, robosmith said:

Since that ruling was regarding a policy held by the White House and the White House has since reversed the policy, that case is moot and won't be ruled on. The lower court ruling will stand. What Biden's handlers were doing was illegal.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
18 hours ago, Hodad said:

Trump disagrees. He's aggressively shut down the legal routes that non-whites were using at the southern border, while opening up a special path for white "refugees" fleeing a fictional genocide. It's blatantly racist, and you're eager to defend it.

I see Hodad is over here pushing his usual dishonest BS. 

You see, what he is doing here is blurring history together as if Trump, in one edict, said no one gets in except these few white people over here. 

Clearly dishonest framing. 

Trump ended ALL refugee programs at the outset of his administration. There was nothing racist or racial about it. 

As time went on, later in his administration, this was one of the first revisions to that initial pause. Focused on this specific situation, not on race. This doesn't apply to white people from other places. 

Nothing blatantly racist about it. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

 

 

Posted
On 5/26/2025 at 12:46 PM, gatomontes99 said:

You just can't help with the racism, can you?

What was legal about what happened at the southern border? Asylum claims must come at the first country of departure. Let's say you leave Panama and come to Costa Rica. That's where you apply for asylum. But if you fly from Panama to the US you can apply in the US.

What was really happening at the US is that the Biden admin invented procedures that don't exist to do things that aren't legal. As a result, we know that thousands (if not millions) of illegal aliens received SSNs, registered to vote and voted. We know millions used Medicaid, SCHIP and housing resources that were for American citizens, and we know thousands of them broke multiple federal laws even after admission (to include, but not limited to: rape, murder, trafficking, and selling drugs).

So, I'll ask again, what was legal about what happened at the southern border?

Receipts:

Biden's 'catch and release' border policy struck down by US judge

How many migrants are receiving Social Security numbers?

How non-citizens are getting voter registration forms across the US — and how Republicans are trying to stop it

How Undocumented Immigrants Sometimes Receive Medicaid Treatment

5 Key Facts About Immigrants and Medicaid

 

Indeed, we are dealing with a Marxist imbecile racist called hodad. Marxist lieberals like hodad prefer to see North America become a third world like communist hell hole. North America would not be where it is today if it were not for the white people by them founding, settling and creating a great homeland for white people here in North America. All Marxists like hodad want is to do is to tear down our great freedom loving white society and replace it with a communist tyranny society. 

If Camela had won the election, tens of millions of many more illegal aliens would be able to enter America illegally in the next four years. Americans would probably be looking at approx. 20 million entering America illegally. Thank God for Trump for putting an end to this insane democrat immigration policy. 😇

Posted
On 5/26/2025 at 12:19 PM, Hodad said:

No, I think asylum and refugee considerations should not be based on race at all. 

Trump disagrees. He's aggressively shut down the legal routes that non-whites were using at the southern border, while opening up a special path for white "refugees" fleeing a fictional genocide. It's blatantly racist, and you're eager to defend it.

You know, like the whites only rules we used to have all over the southern US. 

After restoring statues and renaming parks and monuments to honor Confederate generals, I'm sure he'll get around to editing the dedication for the Statue of Liberty: "Give us your tired, your poor, your huddled WHITE masses yearning to breathe free." 

So, who says that the American immigration policy is race based? Where do you get this insane lieberal idea from? Show us some facts that Trump's immigration policy is race based? Just because Trump has allowed in 59 South Africans into America, which you appear to hate, is somehow to you race based immigration? 

By you saying the words "give us your WHITE masses" tells me that you are a white hating racist. 

Admit it will you? You despise white people. So, come on, give me something here, lefty? 😁

Posted
3 hours ago, taxme said:

So, who says that the American immigration policy is race based? Where do you get this insane lieberal idea from? Show us some facts that Trump's immigration policy is race based? Just because Trump has allowed in 59 South Africans into America, which you appear to hate, is somehow to you race based immigration? 

By you saying the words "give us your WHITE masses" tells me that you are a white hating racist. 

Admit it will you? You despise white people. So, come on, give me something here, lefty? 😁

No one can "give" you the intelligence you clearly lack. LMAO

Posted
On 5/24/2025 at 11:58 AM, herbie said:

They're happy to keep fooling themselves.
Dropping bombs on people's head is not genocide, but redistributing the land of the wealthy is genocide.
Fleeing economic predicaments is not grounds for refugee status, unless you're a white S African
Favouring immigration of only the white citizens of a country is not racist.
I know you are but what am I?

All the usual responses from the Ignoroids.

 

Listen up, stupid...

Israel has several times the military might of Hamas, and they've been at this for 600 days now. 

If they were trying to kill people, they could easily match Hamas's pace of 1,400 people per day. They could be killing that many per hour if they wanted to.

But they've killed about 80/day, dummy. 3 people per hour, with all of their "bombs that were targeted at civilians".

If the Israelis killed 1,400 people per day they would have killed over 800,000 people by now. 

And FYI the vast majority of the people killed were actual Hamas terrorists. Even a large portion of the ones recorded as "children" were actually terrorists. A 16 yr old who joins Hamas is basically a late starter. 

And a left4rd like you must surely be able to acknowledge that just because a person is female, doesn't mean that they weren't soldiers or terrorists. 

When you take into account the % of the dead who were actual grown-male terrorists, and then factor out people that were classified as "women and children" but were also actual terrorists, in that extremely crowded urban environment, it becomes crystal clear that Israel's ability to target terrorists and avoid civilian casualties is unmatched in modern warfare.

It's so ironic that you spoke of ignorance, considering your ultra-low awareness of what's going on over there.

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
On 5/26/2025 at 12:19 PM, Hodad said:

white "refugees" fleeing a fictional genocide. It's blatantly racist, and you're eager to defend it.

You know, like the whites only rules we used to have all over the southern US. 

Try to tell us you're a stupid, racist piece of shit without actually saying it...

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
6 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

take into account the % of the dead who were actual grown-male terrorists

Tell us what percentage that was. 100%? 90% or you gonna just pull numbers out your butt?
We'll just ignore the women and children altogether, they don't count in your world.
And you call others stupid....

Posted

No doubt a racist loser like Hodad just nods his hateful little head when he sees crap like this:

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
3 minutes ago, herbie said:

Tell us what percentage that was. 100%? 90% or you gonna just pull numbers out your butt?
We'll just ignore the women and children altogether, they don't count in your world.
And you call others stupid....

OMG you're stupid. And ignorant. And dishonest. 

FYI the civilian/soldier casualty rate in urban environments is usually between 50-65%, and Gaza is an extremely crowded area with piles of bombs frequently stored in and under high-density civilian areas, so 50% would be a lofty target. 

As of Oct last year the Israelis were claiming to have killed 17,000 Hamas terrorists among the 41,000 people killed in Gaza. That's over 40%, but once you factor in how many of the 60% were either non-uniformed combatants or active supporters, that "civilian" number is likely well below 50%.

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
15 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

OMG you're stupid. And ignorant. And dishonest. 

OMG the irony, the irony. A f*cking right wing fascist Trumpoid toady telling me I'm ignorant and dishonest,
Just about burst my guts laughing at you. A turd telling a rose that it's the stinky thing.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 5/28/2025 at 3:03 PM, robosmith said:

No one can "give" you the intelligence you clearly lack. LMAO

So, what you are saying here is that Trump's immigration policy is not race based, eh? Lieberals like you are such frauds and liars. You lie and expect people to believe your lies. No facts, just fiction with you. 

That is what i despise about Marxist lieberal cowards like you. You never answer a question that is asked of you. You always come back with more silly nonsense replies. It is plain to see that you are just another Trump hater, right comrade? 

I hope that Trump brings in thousands more white South Africans from SA. Those 59 SA people are willing to come to America and work for a living, while the 3rd world ones that you prefer to come to America are the ones that like to come to America for the free benefits that America offers or come to America to commit crimes. Lieberals. 🤮

Posted
3 hours ago, herbie said:

OMG the irony, the irony. A f*cking right wing fascist Trumpoid toady telling me I'm ignorant and dishonest,
Just about burst my guts laughing at you. A turd telling a rose that it's the stinky thing.

It's not irony when it's the truth, Mr "I tripled the value of my house by renovating it with money from my CC" 😂

  • Haha 1

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
1 hour ago, taxme said:

So, what you are saying here is that Trump's immigration policy is not race based, eh?

It is CLEARLY race based in the SA Executive Order case:

Quote

     (b)  the United States shall promote the resettlement of Afrikaner refugees escaping government-sponsored race-based discrimination, including racially discriminatory property confiscation.

In case you don't know, Afrikaner refers to WHITES. 

Allegations of "government-sponsored race-based discrimination" completely lack evidence.

In fact there is plenty of evidence it's NOT TRUE.

Posted
5 hours ago, herbie said:

OMG the irony, the irony. A f*cking right wing fascist Trumpoid toady telling me I'm ignorant and dishonest,
Just about burst my guts laughing at you. A turd telling a rose that it's the stinky thing.

That post sounds like you got smacked on the side of the head with a smoothing irony.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,914
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    MDP
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...