WestCanMan Posted May 8 Author Report Posted May 8 43 minutes ago, ExFlyer said: Like Carney told PP during the debate...Trudeau is gone. Canada voted for the person they though would do best. Move on, time to live in the present. If you weren't so f'king stupid you'd realize that your post was an admission of Trudeau's failure. Left4rds: "Trudeau is gone, but his economic advisor is here to run the country, along with the exact same Chinese-agent MP's as before. It's a brand new day 🥰. CBC even said so." 1 Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
ExFlyer Posted May 8 Report Posted May 8 3 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: If you weren't so f'king stupid you'd realize that your post was an admission of Trudeau's failure. Left4rds: "Trudeau is gone, but his economic advisor is here to run the country, along with the exact same Chinese-agent MP's as before. It's a brand new day 🥰. CBC even said so." 3 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: If you weren't so f'king stupid you'd realize that your post was an admission of Trudeau's failure. Left4rds: "Trudeau is gone, ... Duhh, for sure Trudeau failed...that is why he quit and did not run for office again... Unlike the 3 conservatives PM's that failed and are still in parliament. Woo Hoo 3 conservative losers in parliament. Says a lot about conservatives...worship the LOSERS LOL Quote Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.
CdnFox Posted May 8 Report Posted May 8 1 hour ago, ExFlyer said: Like Carney told PP during the debate...Trudeau is gone. But his people aren't. His legacy of a destroyed economy isn't. The divisions he created aren't. And all the people in power right now supported his ideas and voted for him and approved of him. Including carney. He's "gone" in name only 51 minutes ago, ExFlyer said: Duhh, for sure Trudeau failed...that is why he quit and did not run for office again... So that the man who advised him how to fail can take over and continue the fail. How is that a good thing. Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
ExFlyer Posted May 8 Report Posted May 8 20 minutes ago, CdnFox said: But his people aren't. His legacy of a destroyed economy isn't. The divisions he created aren't. And all the people in power right now supported his ideas and voted for him and approved of him. Including carney. He's "gone" in name only So that the man who advised him how to fail can take over and continue the fail. How is that a good thing. Get over it LOSER. There is a new Sheriff in town. LOL Quote Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.
CdnFox Posted May 8 Report Posted May 8 4 hours ago, ExFlyer said: Nope, double checked LOL how? we already know you don't know which way is up Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
ExFlyer Posted May 8 Report Posted May 8 Just now, CdnFox said: LOL how? we already know you don't know which way is up Nice try but, like always, a big FAIL from a big LOSER LOL Quote Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.
CdnFox Posted May 8 Report Posted May 8 48 minutes ago, ExFlyer said: Get over it LOSER. There is a new Sheriff in town. LOL New rule: You have to wait at least one post before having a meltdown and no, there isn't, these are the same sheriffs we've always had. It's the same ministers it's the same party was a part of this for the last 5 years, it's like those people who are afraid someone's going to trash their Tesla so they put honda on it instead and think people will believe it's a completely different car It's the same car. Or perhaps I should say, it's the same short bus Just now, ExFlyer said: Nice try but, like always, a big FAIL from a big LOSER LOL ROFLMAO!!!! Awww muffin! LOL that was really terrible. You seem to be losing your shit pretty early today, didn't you get much sleep? Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
ExFlyer Posted May 8 Report Posted May 8 1 minute ago, CdnFox said: New rule: . ...these are the same sheriffs we've always had>.. Ok new rule: You need to make sense before you post so...I guess we won't be hearing from you or reading you for a long time LOL See what I mean, you don't even know there is only one sheriff per town. To reiterate "like always, a big FAIL from a big LOSER LOL" LOSER!!! Ha Ha Ha Quote Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.
CdnFox Posted May 8 Report Posted May 8 14 minutes ago, ExFlyer said: Ok new rule: You're violating the first rule already! Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
ExFlyer Posted May 8 Report Posted May 8 (edited) 46 minutes ago, CdnFox said: You're violating the first rule already! Rule?? You have a rule??? For what? LOSERS don't have rules...they LOST !! LOL The worst thing about a LOSER is when he does not realize he is a LOSER LOL So, I will tell you again...you are a LOSER Edited May 8 by ExFlyer Quote Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.
suds Posted May 8 Report Posted May 8 On 5/7/2025 at 1:50 PM, cougar said: Did she rebuilt Jasper yet? Nothing more than a puppet of the oil and gas industry she is. We can grow in all kinds of other directions , just not the one she has in mind. Jasper, being a 'National Park' (and not a Provincial Park) is the responsibility of Parks Canada. As such, Parks Canada is responsible for land use planning, development, and environmental matters. Alberta's responsibilities are generally in education, healthcare, and the licensing of drivers. I noticed that one of your interests was 'fighting economic growth', yet you claim we can grow in all kinds of other directions. An explanation perhaps? 1 Quote
Nationalist Posted May 8 Report Posted May 8 (edited) 3 hours ago, ExFlyer said: Get over it LOSER. There is a new Sheriff in town. LOL Who? This liar and thief? This is the economic advisor to Pixie-Dust. Canada's economy suffered endless inflation while this twit was advising Pixie-Dust. He outright stole the CPC election platform and lied endlessly. For whatever insane reason, the carney won a minority government. His slogan..."Elbows Up". Mark Carney is an Irish citizen, a British citizen and a Canadian citizen. Quite the confusing set of allegiances...for a PM. He's in business with Jarred Kushner. But..."Elbows Up...Elbows Up". Canada...you been had. Edited May 8 by Nationalist Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
ExFlyer Posted May 8 Report Posted May 8 (edited) 46 minutes ago, Nationalist said: This is the economic advisor The one who is PRIME MINISTER for the next 4 to 5 years...Nope, He is a WINNER Here is a LOSER And then there is confux... he has always been a LOSER. Ya seem to wanna join him ? LOL Edited May 8 by ExFlyer Quote Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.
CdnFox Posted May 8 Report Posted May 8 3 hours ago, ExFlyer said: Rule?? You have a rule??? For what? ROFMAO!!!! OH right i forgot about your 30 second attention span. Here's a rule Ex - Ok Remember the rule? Ex - What rule? Goldfish look at you and think you've got Alzheimer's LOLOL it actually explains a lot about why you're wrong so often, no wonder you can't remember the facts Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Benz Posted May 8 Report Posted May 8 (edited) 19 hours ago, Army Guy said: It's true,but lets not forget,the feds have the last word, they do not have to change the constitution, which does not allow a province to leave without changing the constitution which requires the feds to do that...along with following the clarity act...Everything is negotiated, federal lands, borders, currency, military the whole thing..... Quebecs has already opted out of some programs, with compensation.... Senators would be easy enough....but what party is the question....in Quebecs case do you really want liberal or conservative or green party...? I thought most judges in Quebec were from Quebec? or french speaking... the other two i'm not sure on.... the referendum is but one small part, Ottawa does not have to approve separation...there is no clause that says they have to amend the constitution...to allow for separation....and there is no rules or policy they have to give that province what they ask for....and say if Quebec says they are separating anyways, then it would be hard for that province to gain international recognition from the UN or rest of the globe.... The fededral has the last word because it is the sovereign of all provinces. If one or more provinces get its sovereignty, the federal has no longer the last word. The federal is forced to negociate, otherwise it gives the legitimity to the province to seperate unilaterally. The Clarity Act is a joke. It does not define what is a clear majority, therefore its utility is comparable to a toilet rolled paper. Anyway, Québec is safe because it did not sign the 1981's constitution. It is a little bit more complicated for Alberta. But the UN or international community never refuse the right for autodetermination to the people, unless it has serious reasons to doubt that it reflects the will of the people. Unless Québec or Alberta have a question so complicated that an observe can't understand it, there won't be an issue there. Senators: There are no green party in Quebec. That question should regard the National Assembly of Quebec and it does not have to be the same method as Alberta. Let's say Alberta wants an election of senetors from the citizens, so be it. And if Quebec prefers a vote among the mps, so be it as well. Quebec judges: The PM of Canada decides who are selected among the candidates in Quebec. Hard to get recognitions?: I am older than the indepedence of more than 50 independent countries. To name few, Solvaquia 1993, Bruneï 1984, Belize 1981, South Suddan 2011, Montenegro 2006, Surinam 1975, Papua New Guinea 1975. I am born in 1973. It is the opposite. It is rare that a country is not recognized. Edited May 8 by Benz Quote
CdnFox Posted May 8 Report Posted May 8 4 minutes ago, Benz said: The fededral has the last word because it is the sovereign of all provinces. If one or more provinces get its sovereignty, the federal has no longer the last word. The federal is forced to negociate, otherwise it gives the legitimity to the province to seperate unilaterally. The Clarity Act is a joke. It does not define what is a clear majority, therefore its utility is comparable to a toilet rolled paper. Anyway, Québec is safe because it did not sign the 1981's constitution. It is a little bit more complicated for Alberta. But the UN or international community never refuse the right for autodetermination to the people, unless it has serious reasons to doubt that it reflects the will of the people. Unless Québec or Alberta have a question so complicated that an observe can't understand it, there won't be an issue there. Senators: There are no green party in Quebec. That question should regard the National Assembly of Quebec and it does not have to be the same method as Alberta. Let's say Alberta wants an election of senetors from the citizens, so be it. And if Quebec prefers a vote among the mps, so be it as well. Quebec judges: The PM of Canada decides who are selected among the candidates in Quebec. Hard to get recognitions?: I am older than the indepedence of more than 50 independent countries. To name few, Solvaquia 1993, Bruneï 1984, Belize 1981, South Suddan 2011, Montenegro 2006, Surinam 1975, Papua New Guinea 1975. I am born in 1973. It is the opposite. It is rare that a country is not recognized. That is absolutely untrue. The constitution does not make the federal government higher than the provincial governments at all. In no way shape or form is the federal government sovereign to the provinces. The constitution treats them as equals and does not give one precedent over the other It is true to say that the Canadian Constitution does not have an exit clause. There is nothing in there that would allow a province to break that commitment. However as you know the UN absolutely does and I doubt very much that ontario would be interested in a civil war over the matter. I'm more interesting question is what about the first nations? If it is fair to say that Alberta has the power to leave confederation because the will of the people, then it must also be true that the first nations have the right to leave alberta. But that kind of gets messy. 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
ExFlyer Posted May 8 Report Posted May 8 40 minutes ago, CdnFox said: ROFMAO!!!! .... I am so sorry for your affliction. There is help available. Your constant banter of nothingness only demonstrates your personal issues. While I am living rent free in your head, perhaps I can rummage in the trash heap of your mind and find the thing that makes you what you are..disjointed, disorganized, uninformed, paranoid, obsessive. Quote Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.
Army Guy Posted May 8 Report Posted May 8 26 minutes ago, Benz said: The fededral has the last word because it is the sovereign of all provinces. If one or more provinces get its sovereignty, the federal has no longer the last word. The federal is forced to negociate, otherwise it gives the legitimity to the province to seperate unilaterally. The Clarity Act is a joke. It does not define what is a clear majority, therefore its utility is comparable to a toilet rolled paper. Anyway, Québec is safe because it did not sign the 1981's constitution. It is a little bit more complicated for Alberta. But the UN or international community never refuse the right for autodetermination to the people, unless it has serious reasons to doubt that it reflects the will of the people. Unless Québec or Alberta have a question so complicated that an observe can't understand it, there won't be an issue there. Senators: There are no green party in Quebec. That question should regard the National Assembly of Quebec and it does not have to be the same method as Alberta. Let's say Alberta wants an election of senetors from the citizens, so be it. And if Quebec prefers a vote among the mps, so be it as well. Quebec judges: The PM of Canada decides who are selected among the candidates in Quebec. Hard to get recognitions?: I am older than the indepedence of more than 50 independent countries. To name few, Solvaquia 1993, Bruneï 1984, Belize 1981, South Suddan 2011, Montenegro 2006, Surinam 1975, Papua New Guinea 1975. I am born in 1973. It is the opposite. It is rare that a country is not recognized. That's true the constitution would already been changed to allow the first province to separate...But lets be real here, if one province separates it is game over, the rest will fall, like Quebec, other western province will band together, to form a larger group with better resources, etc...So i don't think the feds will entertain any ideas of separation as they is a good chance confederation will end... Clarity act is one more road block for the provinces....design to make it difficult...And yes Quebec is subjected to the clarity act it was written after the last separation referendum in quebec... And yes Quebec still must deal with the feds for many things, like borders, currency, federal lands/ infrastructure, Indigenous lands/ rights etc...They still control whether Quebec leaves or stays constitution or no constitution.......The UN does care if you have not followed procol, meaning just decided to separate without any negotiations...Canada would have rights to seize any unlawful gains a province may take, say like military bases, infra structures,equipment, federal buildings, federal lands indigenous lands, etc... Quote We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.
TreeBeard Posted May 8 Report Posted May 8 2 minutes ago, Army Guy said: if one province separates it is game over, the rest will fall Then why would Canada ever agree to changing the borders? We just might have to rent a few cruise ships to get rid of the separatists. Quote
Army Guy Posted May 8 Report Posted May 8 Because it is part of the process....your the expert tell us why the need to change borders ? you didn't hear....Alberta is not separating from Canada, Canada is separating from the left.... we had a vote and ya you guessed it the left lost........one suit case per person......bring lots of winter gear, Antarctic is going to be your new home....you'll love it... 1 Quote We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.
CdnFox Posted May 8 Report Posted May 8 34 minutes ago, ExFlyer said: I am so sorry for your affliction. I don't really think of you as an affliction. But I could certainly see why you would think others would think of you that way. Like a rash or something Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
taxme Posted May 8 Report Posted May 8 On 5/5/2025 at 3:44 PM, blackbird said: That was a very frugal trip compared with the Trudeau trips and spending years. Take a look at the 2015 Paris Climate Conference for example. Canada sent 383 people. The massive Canadian contingent at the UN climate-change conference in Paris was originally estimated at 350 people, but it appears the trans-Atlantic road trip has expanded. The “provisional list of participants” just released by the UN has an amazing 383 names from Canada, ranking us among the largest entourages in the entire confab. Smyth: Canadian contingent at the UN climate-change conference has expanded Don’t nitpick over the newly bloated number, as it’s understandable some jet-setting bureaucrats may have been initially overlooked during such a busy travel period. If you’ve ever seen the classic Christmas film “Home Alone” you’ll know how easy it is to get the head count wrong during a mad dash to Paris. “Canada is back, my good friends,” Prime Minister Justin Trudeau told the conference, and he wasn’t just blowing greenhouse gases. Canada has sent more people to Paris than Australia (46), the U.K. (96), the U.S. (148), Russia (313) and almost as many as host-country France (396). Not a bad turnout for a country that emits just 1.6 per cent of the planet’s greenhouse gases, eh? Or maybe it’s not something to admire when you consider how much polluting fossil fuel was burned to fly so many hundreds of people across the ocean to talk about burning less. unquote Smyth: Canada sent 383 people to the UN climate conference, more than Australia, the U.K. and U.S. together | National Post I will never be happy until Turdeau is arrested and charged with crimes against humanity and crimes against Canadians. What that sob did to Canada cannot be forgotten. While he destroyed Canada he laughed about it. Now he runs off into the world enjoying his unearned pension, with great perks, while Canada and the Canadians that he destroyed lost their jobs and homes and put all Canadians into financial debt that can never be paid off. The Turds climate green and covid bull chit nonsense cost Canadians billions of their tax dollars and sent those tax dollars down into the drain. Yet some lieberals here think that all is okay, no [problems here. It's no wonder that i have no use for this country anymore. It is full of useless lieberal supporting air breathers who could careless about Canada. Some of the lieberals that i know have shown me many times that they are all in for themselves. If it means Canada must suffer and go woke and broke then so be it, as long as i am alright, it's screw the other guy and gal. Stop trying to save a dying country any longer. Only fools believe that Canada can be saved and keep preaching that we must try to get along nonsense. Alberta is starting to show that Canada will not survive if Alberta goes. It is getting serious now, especially in Alberta. Alberta will dictate as to whether Canada survives or not. Just saying. Quote
CdnFox Posted May 8 Report Posted May 8 30 minutes ago, TreeBeard said: Then why would Canada ever agree to changing the borders? We just might have to rent a few cruise ships to get rid of the separatists. Because the alternative is war. That's how it is in history It will be bloody and I don't know that it would ever stop. You would get armed groups going to Ontario to commit terrorist attacks and they would be largely Unstoppable. Guaranteed that the rail lines would be disrupted and billions of dollars a day would go out the window. Our military couldn't handle trying to seize territory as large as Alberta, it just doesn't have the gear. Not to mention a reasonable portion of the may very well side with the province. As an alternative redrawing the borders might look very tempting 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
taxme Posted May 8 Report Posted May 8 7 hours ago, ExFlyer said: Get over it LOSER. There is a new Sheriff in town. LOL Yup, we are once again stuck with another corrupt, thieving, cheating and lying WEF globalist dictator in Ottawa who plans to make Canada even worse than what the other arse hole did already to Canada. I will never understand as to why a stoopid mf imbecile like you would ever think that now having a new sheriff in town is going to make everything goody-goody again has to be the real loser here. Lieberals like you are mentally ill and need to be put down for your own good and for the rest of the country's good. Lieberals commies like you only know how to destroy all things normal and decent and moral. You living in a communist country would work out well for you, commie. Even you will end up being a loser in the end because what will effect me will also effect you, stunned. If you think that the WEF globalists fascists ilk care about you and your well being, then you must really be bloody stoopid alright. When your not needed any longer, they will get rid of you. And that would sure work out well for me to see you go first, commie.🤣 Quote
taxme Posted May 8 Report Posted May 8 15 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Because the alternative is war. That's how it is in history It will be bloody and I don't know that it would ever stop. You would get armed groups going to Ontario to commit terrorist attacks and they would be largely Unstoppable. Guaranteed that the rail lines would be disrupted and billions of dollars a day would go out the window. Our military couldn't handle trying to seize territory as large as Alberta, it just doesn't have the gear. Not to mention a reasonable portion of the may very well side with the province. As an alternative redrawing the borders might look very tempting It sure is a waste of precious time to have to try and put some common sense and logic into those lieberal brain dead heads. They are beyond help. I personally believe that just maybe those liberals that come on here are out to breakup Canada because they sure are not trying to help fix and save Canada. Those meat head lieberals here that voted for Corney have to be all in for destroying this once great white English speaking country and they are hoping to eventually turn Canada into a WEF globalist fascist third world hell hole. That is the only conclusion that i can come up with. Just saying. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.