Trump has officially entered the psychotic emperor phase.

[Hodad]

On 5/21/2025 at 3:28 PM, herbie said:

This is a posting of a sane man? More like a post from an absolute a$$hole going off the deep end.

Fairly sure this is fake, but you'll forgive me a moment's hesitation on the matter as Trump is objectively stupid and morally repugnant. 

[BeaverFever]

The shameless private sale of access to president continues unabated  Now with more foreigners!  Orgy of corruption indeed 

 

Top $TRUMP holders head to crypto dinner with president that Democrats call ‘orgy of corruption’

 

KEY POINTS

• The $TRUMP token contest drew $148 million in global purchases, with top-ranked wallets gaining direct access to the president.
• Most top wallets appear to be linked to offshore exchanges, and blockchain data suggests many high-value holders are likely not U.S. citizens.

 

….The $TRUMP coin, which has no attached asset or underlying value, was launched just ahead of the president’s inauguration in January and has drawn heavy scrutiny from Democratic lawmakers who say Trump is profiting from his position of power.

The dinner was announced in April and promised to reward the top 220 token owners with “the most exclusive invitation in the world.” The top 25 finishers were also told they would get a private reception with the president, as well as a “special VIP tour.” The coin jumped 50% after the dinner announcement.

Just now, BeaverFever said:

The shameless private sale of access to president continues unabated  Now with more foreigners!  Orgy of corruption indeed 

 

 

Top $TRUMP holders head to crypto dinner with president that Democrats call ‘orgy of corruption’

 

KEY POINTS

• The $TRUMP token contest drew $148 million in global purchases, with top-ranked wallets gaining direct access to the president.
• Most top wallets appear to be linked to offshore exchanges, and blockchain data suggests many high-value holders are likely not U.S. citizens.

 

 

….The $TRUMP coin, which has no attached asset or underlying value, was launched just ahead of the president’s inauguration in January and has drawn heavy scrutiny from Democratic lawmakers who say Trump is profiting from his position of power.

The dinner was announced in April and promised to reward the top 220 token owners with “the most exclusive invitation in the world.” The top 25 finishers were also told they would get a private reception with the president, as well as a “special VIP tour.” The coin jumped 50% after the dinner announcement.

What do you mean no attached asset?  The corrupt president is the attached asset. 

[herbie]

Watch his Quislings rally to claim it's not corruption and perfectly okay to use his Presidency to profit personally.

[CdnFox]

9 minutes ago, herbie said:

Watch his Quislings rally to claim it's not corruption and perfectly okay to use his Presidency to profit personally.

Clinton did and so did Biden. I don't recall you being outrageously outraged at that point  

[BeaverFever]

6 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Clinton did and so did Biden. I don't recall you being outrageously outraged at that point  

No they didn’t. Rewarding political donors, which is bad enough, is completely different. This is just selling access for his own private profit not a donation to his campaign…buying Trump crypto isn’t a legit political donation

[CdnFox]

48 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

No they didn’t. Rewarding political donors, which is bad enough, is completely different. This is just selling access for his own private profit not a donation to his campaign…buying Trump crypto isn’t a legit political donation

Well they both did that too.  Clinton refused to agree to weapons sales under obama until those people just happened to make a huge donation to the charity the clintons control and bill draws pay from  Then magically... approval! 

And we know biden's kid was selling influence.  The evidence is pretty strong. 

And to be honest, i don't really see the difference you claim between political donations and this. Personal gain is personal gain. 

Now i happen to think all THREE examples are in the wrong. I think what trump is doing is wrong i think what the clinton's and bidens did is wrong.   But the thing is if you're going to let the first two get away with it without a murmur it's really hard at this point to say trump shouldn't be doing  that.  Either we all decide that kind of thing is wrong and treat it as such, OR we accept that anyone in power is going to do it, and that's precisely what the people in power will do as well

I mean why on earth would you expect someone to watch the dems do it scott free and then NOT do it when they get into power?

Fair for one fair for all, firm for one firm for all.  That's just the way it works. 

[BeaverFever]

21 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Clinton refused to agree to weapons sales under obama until those people just happened to make a huge donation to the charity the clintons control and bill draws pay from  Then magically... approval! 

Sorry thats just another unproven Republican allegation bases on zero evidence m, which I think even you have embellished further. There’s no evidence that Hillary first “refused” or was directly involved in any way. The only ACTUAL facts are that 1) countries who have been  purchasing weapons from the USA LONG BEFORE Obama and Hillary continued to do so during their time and 2) they also made donations to the Clinton foundation. 

As for Biden, again more unproven claims we don’t need to go down that road again  

Second of all, making a charitable donation to registered charity that is open to public scrutiny where there’s no clear direct benefit to the Clintons is definitely different than openly and brazenly giving cash directly to Trump through these crypto and private club schemes and clearly and openly getting special access to POTUS as a reward.  Unlike your claims about Clinton and Biden it’s not an unproven rumour that that Trump is doing it, he’s doing it in the open for everyone to see 

Edited yesterday at 03:20 AM by BeaverFever

[CdnFox]

Just now, BeaverFever said:

Sorry thats just another unproven Republican allegation bases on zero evidence  

That's not true. In fact we know that it did happen absolutely. There's no rumor about it, the facts are clear and the timelines are public record.

There is no contesting that Hillary oversaw the arms deals. That is a matter of record. 

There is no contesting the donations from the saudis.  That is a matter of record. 

There is no disputing that they applied, they were not granted the weapons sale and it dragged a bit, they donated and the approval came through. That time line is public record. 

What CAN"T be proven beyond a reasonable doubt is that this is the reason the sale went through. They cant' PROVE in a court of law a crime was committed. 

But the evidence EASILY passes the burden of proof for 'clear and convincing" or "balance of probabilities' (preponderance of the evidence in the states).  These are lower civil evidence levels and far more suitable for the discussion. 

Yet you utterly dismiss even the possibility. 

Same with biden. While the evidence does not yet reach teh 'beyond reasonable doubt' stage there's more than enough for the lesser legal proofs. 

Yet even tho trump has been convicted of no crime in this and we cannot PROVE that attending these events will produce ANY undue influence (there's no criminal level evidence they will),  you're prepared to condemn it. 

 

Which makes you a lying hypocrite who's willing to completely ignore the truth to promote his echo chamber. What he's doing is no different. And he's innocent if you use the same burden of proof for all, and they're ALL guilty if you use the same burden of proof for all that allows for that conclusion. 

So why on earth would anyone pay attention to you? You can't even be a tiny bit honest about it, and you're entirely fine with the corruption as long as people you like do it. 

 

[gatomontes99]

6 hours ago, CdnFox said:

That's not true. In fact we know that it did happen absolutely. There's no rumor about it, the facts are clear and the timelines are public record.

There is no contesting that Hillary oversaw the arms deals. That is a matter of record. 

There is no contesting the donations from the saudis.  That is a matter of record. 

There is no disputing that they applied, they were not granted the weapons sale and it dragged a bit, they donated and the approval came through. That time line is public record. 

What CAN"T be proven beyond a reasonable doubt is that this is the reason the sale went through. They cant' PROVE in a court of law a crime was committed. 

But the evidence EASILY passes the burden of proof for 'clear and convincing" or "balance of probabilities' (preponderance of the evidence in the states).  These are lower civil evidence levels and far more suitable for the discussion. 

Yet you utterly dismiss even the possibility. 

Same with biden. While the evidence does not yet reach teh 'beyond reasonable doubt' stage there's more than enough for the lesser legal proofs. 

Yet even tho trump has been convicted of no crime in this and we cannot PROVE that attending these events will produce ANY undue influence (there's no criminal level evidence they will),  you're prepared to condemn it. 

 

Which makes you a lying hypocrite who's willing to completely ignore the truth to promote his echo chamber. What he's doing is no different. And he's innocent if you use the same burden of proof for all, and they're ALL guilty if you use the same burden of proof for all that allows for that conclusion. 

So why on earth would anyone pay attention to you? You can't even be a tiny bit honest about it, and you're entirely fine with the corruption as long as people you like do it. 

 

Reality: enemy of the left since 1995

[Nationalist]

23 hours ago, Hodad said:

Fairly sure this is fake, but you'll forgive me a moment's hesitation on the matter as Trump is objectively stupid and morally repugnant. 

"I HATE TRUMP! NO MATTER HOW GOOD THE RESULTS ARE...I HATE HIM I HATE HIM I HATE HIM!"

You Libbies are childish little twits.

[robosmith]

3 hours ago, Nationalist said:

"I HATE TRUMP! NO MATTER HOW GOOD THE RESULTS ARE...I HATE HIM I HATE HIM I HATE HIM!"

You Libbies are childish little twits.

Childish ^twit quotes something that ONLY SHE SAID. LMAO

[Hodad]

10 hours ago, Nationalist said:

"I HATE TRUMP! NO MATTER HOW GOOD THE RESULTS ARE...I HATE HIM I HATE HIM I HATE HIM!"

You Libbies are childish little twits.

We've yet to have any noteworthy good results. 

We've got an economy he's quickly tipping into recession, a constitutional crisis, a government waging war on journalism, science and education, an insane tariff policy and the volatile market to match. There's pretty much nothing the orange buffoon can't turn to shit in just 100 days.