Deluge Posted Monday at 11:41 PM Report Posted Monday at 11:41 PM 26 minutes ago, Barquentine said: China's in deep shit, comrade. Haven't you shemales had enough? Perhaps you could cozy up with another communist regime. Quote
User Posted Monday at 11:49 PM Report Posted Monday at 11:49 PM 42 minutes ago, Barquentine said: Like you did by just saying something wrong? You make an absurd baseless assertion, I reject it. The onus is still on you. Quote
Barquentine Posted Tuesday at 01:01 AM Report Posted Tuesday at 01:01 AM 1 hour ago, User said: The onus is still on you. No. You made a statement (that was just opinion) with no proof. I disagreed. It's your move. Are you able to follow the posts or do you need some help? Quote
Barquentine Posted Tuesday at 01:04 AM Report Posted Tuesday at 01:04 AM 1 hour ago, Deluge said: China's in deep shit, comrade. Haven't you shemales had enough? Perhaps you could cozy up with another communist regime What the hell are you even talking about? Look at your last post in this thread. Quote
Nationalist Posted Tuesday at 02:55 AM Report Posted Tuesday at 02:55 AM (edited) Qatar's royal family...government...whatever leaders they gave...just bought Trump a jumbo jet. The last American hostage just got released. LOL. Edited Tuesday at 03:10 AM by Nationalist Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted Tuesday at 03:45 AM Report Posted Tuesday at 03:45 AM 47 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Qatar's royal family...government...whatever leaders they gave...just bought Trump a jumbo jet. The last American hostage just got released. LOL. Funny that you don't know it's completely ILLEGAL for government employees, including the POTUS, to accept gifts from foreign sovereigns. ESP the POTUS, due to the EMOLUEMENTS CLAUSE in the Constitution. Of course that's just ONE of the MAJOR things you don't know about. LMAO 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted Tuesday at 04:28 AM Report Posted Tuesday at 04:28 AM 3 hours ago, Barquentine said: No. You made a statement (that was just opinion) with no proof. I disagreed. It's your move. Are you able to follow the posts or do you need some help? Kid. You can do better than that. Do better. You've been slacking off a lot here lately. He made a point and made an argument, If you disagree make a reasoned response in reply. Explain why he's wrong or why you disagree or what you feel he's missing or something. He was quite right to call you out on that, and you are perfectly capable of articulating a position when you try, so do better than that. Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Aristides Posted Tuesday at 04:56 AM Report Posted Tuesday at 04:56 AM (edited) Anything that is worth $500,000,000 isn't a gift, it's a bribe. Edited Tuesday at 04:57 AM by Aristides 1 3 Quote
CdnFox Posted Tuesday at 05:00 AM Report Posted Tuesday at 05:00 AM 3 minutes ago, Aristides said: Anything that is worth $500,000,000 isn't a gift, it's a bribe. I don't think he gets to keep the plane does he? I think he accepts it on behalf of America Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Nationalist Posted Tuesday at 11:59 AM Report Posted Tuesday at 11:59 AM 8 hours ago, robosmith said: Funny that you don't know it's completely ILLEGAL for government employees, including the POTUS, to accept gifts from foreign sovereigns. ESP the POTUS, due to the EMOLUEMENTS CLAUSE in the Constitution. Of course that's just ONE of the MAJOR things you don't know about. LMAO It's a gift to the airforce you silly sh1t. 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Barquentine Posted Tuesday at 03:08 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 03:08 PM 10 hours ago, CdnFox said: He made a point and made an argument You didn't read his post that I quoted, did you? No argument, no proof, just a couple of opinions I disagreed with. 10 hours ago, CdnFox said: He was quite right to call you out on that, and you are perfectly capable of articulating a position when you try, so do better than that. I'm quite right to call you both out on that, and you are perfectly capable of articulating a position when you try, so do better than that. Quote
CdnFox Posted Tuesday at 03:55 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 03:55 PM (edited) 49 minutes ago, Barquentine said: You didn't read his post that I quoted, did you? No argument, no proof, just a couple of opinions I disagreed with. There was an argument but there doesn't need to be proof. Proof strengthens an argument but it is not necessary to make one. For example those last two sentences are an example of me making an argument even though I've provided no proof. I'm telling you you can do a hell of a lot better, stop being so goddamn lazy like you've been in the last week or two and start making coherent arguments. You don't need to offer cites or proof every time but you do need to use logic and reason and not just say 'no' everytime someone says "yes". That's not an argument and this isn't a monty python skit. (BONUS CONTENT: From monty python's the argument clinic sketch) Mr. Vibrating: Look, if I argue with you, I must take up a contrary position. Man: Yes, but that's not just saying 'No it isn't.' Mr. Vibrating: Yes it is! Man: No it isn't! Edited Tuesday at 03:58 PM by CdnFox Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
robosmith Posted Tuesday at 07:58 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 07:58 PM 7 hours ago, Nationalist said: It's a gift to the airforce you silly sh1t. Unfortunate you missed the rest of the conditions, lDIOT. It's going to Trump's "Presidential Library" fund for HIS OWN USE. Like the 727 that's in Reagan's library, but unlike that jet, it will be flight ready and available which is why he wants it so bad. IF you weren't MAGA CULT, you'd see the glee in his eyes. 1 1 Quote
Barquentine Posted Tuesday at 08:24 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 08:24 PM 4 hours ago, CdnFox said: There was an argument but there doesn't need to be proof. So let me get this straight. If I say only "Trump is an A$$hole.", you can't just disagree - you have to have proof or at least an argument that he isn't. One side can have opinions but the other side needs proof. That sum it up? Quote
Barquentine Posted Tuesday at 08:26 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 08:26 PM 4 hours ago, CdnFox said: I'm telling you you can do a hell of a lot better, stop being so goddamn lazy like you've been in the last week or two Lazy? It's spring. Lots to do and I like having a life off the internet. Besides, "Brevity is the soul..." Quote
Deluge Posted Tuesday at 08:29 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 08:29 PM 19 hours ago, Barquentine said: What the hell are you even talking about? Look at your last post in this thread. I'm talking about you and your friends in China, comrade. Have you found a new communist regime to cozy up with? Quote
herbie Posted Tuesday at 08:46 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 08:46 PM 20 minutes ago, Barquentine said: So let me get this straight. If I say only "Trump is an A$$hole.", you can't just disagree - you have to have proof or at least an argument that he isn't. One side can have opinions but the other side needs proof. That sum it up? Deliver all the proofs you want, they'll still argue otherwise. Just can't ever accept that facts matter if it interferes with what they want to believe. Quote
Deluge Posted Tuesday at 09:07 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 09:07 PM 20 minutes ago, herbie said: Deliver all the proofs you want, they'll still argue otherwise. Just can't ever accept that facts matter if it interferes with what they want to believe. herpes thinks facts are whatever the f*ck the left says is facts. lol Quote
CdnFox Posted Tuesday at 09:37 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 09:37 PM 1 hour ago, Barquentine said: So let me get this straight. If I say only "Trump is an A$$hole.", you can't just disagree - you have to have proof or at least an argument that he isn't. One side can have opinions but the other side needs proof. That sum it up? You're the one calling for proof. I explicitly said that proof isn't necessary in all cases. Arguably it's not Really required in most cases. Opinion matters. What I'm saying is articulate your opinion rather than just saying nuh uh! You can agree or disagree with that proposition and support your position. "I don't think he is an a-hole, I think he's a hard-nosed hard-hitting business person who is out there to get things done and isn't paid to be worried about your feelings".. Or "I agree, his stance on XXXX is unnecessarily punitive and serves no point other than self aggrandizement. " Its' not complicated and I know you know this stuff. And it is not just this one instance you've been like this for a couple of weeks now. If we want braindead responses with no substance we have robosmith in Myata. If we want mindless blathering insults without any substantive reply we have exflyer. Nobody's expecting you to come out with genius level commentary, but you can do better than Nuh uhhhh and we both know it. 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
BeaverFever Posted Wednesday at 01:00 AM Report Posted Wednesday at 01:00 AM (edited) On 5/11/2025 at 12:13 PM, WestCanMan said: According to Forbes, that club is the American version of the Trudeau/Carney PMO: In the president’s first term, the Trump International Hotel served as the de facto MAGA lounge. But the Trump family sold that asset in 2022, creating an opportunity for a place like Executive Branch to establish itself as the second-term spot to relax, schmooze and scoff at ethics. Honest to God, that sounds like page 1 from the soon-to-be-released autobiography: "CBC, SNC, WE, The AG, Big Pharma & Me... and Moneeeeeyyyy 😁". In other words you have no defence for Trump’s shameless grift so you’re just regurgitating a random mix of your completely unrelated and irrelevant past diatribes. You forgot “but her emails!” Edited Wednesday at 01:01 AM by BeaverFever 1 1 Quote
BeaverFever Posted Wednesday at 01:03 AM Report Posted Wednesday at 01:03 AM (edited) 20 hours ago, CdnFox said: I don't think he gets to keep the plane does he? I think he accepts it on behalf of America The deal is when he leaves it gets donated to “the Trump presidential library” which undoubtedly will just operate as another one of his sleazy scam businesses. Edited Wednesday at 01:05 AM by BeaverFever 1 Quote
BeaverFever Posted Wednesday at 01:06 AM Report Posted Wednesday at 01:06 AM 13 hours ago, Nationalist said: It's a gift to the airforce you silly sh1t. Wrong it is not. Quote
Aristides Posted Wednesday at 01:08 AM Report Posted Wednesday at 01:08 AM 20 hours ago, CdnFox said: I don't think he gets to keep the plane does he? I think he accepts it on behalf of America You mooks would have been apoplectic if Biden or Obama had accepted something like thist. No one does that without a quid pro quo, it isn't like this is a f*cking charity.. Coming from a government it isn't even tax deductible. 1 Quote
BeaverFever Posted Wednesday at 01:08 AM Report Posted Wednesday at 01:08 AM On 5/6/2025 at 9:12 PM, User said: Yeah, he should have taken up finger painting instead. Sure if that keeps him from taking bribes and selling access like to total scumbag 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.