CARNEY LIED ABOUT PHONE CALL WITH TRUMP!

CITIZEN_2015 · Sunday at 08:13 PM

3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

I didn't lose. I guess you could say I'm a sore winner?

You did say it before you lying sack of crap. And I posted where you said it. Now you're trying to twist and turn and pretend you didn't say what you very clearly said and what I posted you saying.

And nobody cares what a loser like you is determined to do. The conservatives or the liberals will win the election and you won't make a damn bit of difference because you're a pathetic lying little scud bag.

The next time you want respect on a forum, may I suggest that instead of coming on and acting disrespectful and insulting people you show respect and then you will get it back. But you did call him a sore loser and you called me a liar and neither of those were true all the while crying to the heavens demanding that people treat you civilly.

You have the morals and personality of a dung beetle who's lost interest in life and really let itself go downhill.

Go to hell piece of worthless sh*t. You are a low class hooligan and the only reason they haven't banned you is because you may a lot of sh*tty posts all garbage like yourself. You don't even deserve disrespect. You should be avoided like trash. I bet in your real like too you are disliked or hated by most and avoided.

Moonbox · Sunday at 08:35 PM

3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Also you weren't actually responding to me with that. You were responding directly to Army Guy. I take it you think he ISN"T a 'thoughtful, serious poster'?

I know who I was responding to, and no, I don't. How could I take someone telling us we should care whether or not a candidate lies, when he's blindly ra-ra-ra for a guy who's spent the last 2-3 years lying, bullshitting and circling the conspiracy vortex?

3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

How's your math lessons going jr? LOLOLOL

Last time I checked you were telling me I miscalculated the constant in a math equation. 🤣

3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

you'll do so much better in life when the day comes when you realize that owning your mistakes and improving from them is it better choice than doubling down and presenting yourself to the world as a c*nt.

If I didn't know better, I'd think this was your latest diary entry. Literally nobody on this forum has less self-awareness than you. 🤡👌

herbie · Sunday at 09:03 PM

WestCanMan · Sunday at 10:35 PM

Chat GPT: a perfact example of just how unintelligent artificial intelligence still is:

"Did Mark Carney lie to Canadians about Brookfield:

"1. Brookfield Headquarters Relocation
Conservative critics assert that Carney misrepresented his involvement in Brookfield Asset Management's decision to relocate its headquarters from Toronto to New York City. They point to a December 2024 letter where Carney, as chair, endorsed the move and recommended it to shareholders. However, Carney later stated that he had no role in the decision, claiming he had resigned from the board before the formal vote in January 2025. This discrepancy has led to accusations of dishonesty.

^Chat GPT just lied.^

It's not a mere "discrepancy", it's a complete discrepancy between the truth and his portrayal of events.

Fact: Conservative critics didn't "assert that carney misrepresented" anything. They proved that he lied. Full stop.

"Carney stated that he had no role in the decision" - yes, 100%
The Brookfield board unanimously voted to move Brookfield to NY on Oct 31st while Carney was its chairman, months before Carney left. The move was announced on Nov 1st 2024, months before Carney left. In no way shape or form is that "no role in the decision", so he 100% lied.
The naked truth is that he said that he had no involvement but we was not only involved, he was the absolute leader of the charge. There is not 1 single person on this planet who played as big a role in moving Brookfield's HQ as Mark Carney.

In addition to Carney's lie about whether or not he played a role in moving Brookfield's HQ:

Carney also lied about his phone call to Trump.
Carney also lied about helping Martin balance the budget in the 1990s.
Carney also lied about the extent of his role in helping Canada avert a recession in 2008, vastly exaggerating his own role and understating the roles of key players above him.
Carney not only lied about the fact that he met with the JCCC, he slandered the Globe and Mail when they called him out for it, saying "You can't believe everything you see in the Globe and Mail."

1 hour ago, herbie said:

Everyone on this site is fully aware of the fact that Carney is the biggest liar in North American politics. No one has ever told bigger lies than him, except maybe the Russian collusiontards on CNN.

And there's not a single leftard here than can find an example of Poilievre telling even one lie that compares to any of the top 5 lies on Carney's laundry list.

That ship has sailed herbie, you can take your disinformation elsewhere, child.

CdnFox · Sunday at 11:37 PM

3 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

Let’s be clear: What’s come out is that Trump tried to sell Carney on the 51st state idea and Carney shut it down as something that will never happen, period

Let's be clear, what has come out is that Kearney grossly misrepresented the nature of the call and trump's attitude. Additional information has come out to suggest that At several points trump did not respect our sovereignty despite the fact that carney insisted that he respected our sovereignty

Everybody across Canada realizes this. If you feel differently you are in the wrong

He lied. And that was day one. That's what has come out

CdnFox · Sunday at 11:41 PM

3 hours ago, Moonbox said:

I know who I was responding to, and no, I don't.

But you don't know who you were responding to. You seem very confused. You said you were responding to the original title but then you were responding to army and now you're not so sure either way apparently

This sounds like another case of you doing something dumb and then trying to dance around it by changing what you said after the fact

Quote

How could I take someone telling us we should care whether or not a candidate lies, when he's blindly ra-ra-ra for a guy who's spent the last 2-3 years lying, bullshitting and circling the conspiracy vortex?

Are you still talking about army guy?

And are you now claiming that somehow somebody else's actions make it okay for you to lie or be deceptive, remember you weren't replying to me and I don't remember army guy being involved in a lot of conspiracy stuff.

Quote

Last time I checked you were telling me I miscalculated the constant in a math equation. 🤣

You mean that time when you miscalculated the variable in a math equation?

You understand that it's a variable right? Are you still confused about that LOLOLOL Holy shit kid they have entire tables so that you can see that number. You totally were in the wrong there it is not a constant it is a variable. I can prove it to you if you feel the need to look especially stupid again

Quote

If I didn't know better, I'd think this was your latest diary entry. Literally nobody on this forum has less self-awareness than you. 🤡👌

You literally just lied and pretended that you were speaking to me when you very clearly were responding to army guy. You very clearly miscalculated something that even a basic web search will tell you was a variable and you have taken and admitted that you thought was a constant And you chase me all over the forum whenever you lose one of these debates and cry like a baby for attention

Kid. If someone here has a problem with self-awareness it isn't me

WestCanMan · Monday at 12:24 AM

4 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

Let’s be clear: What’s come out is that Trump tried to sell Carney on the 51st state idea and Carney shut it down as something that will never happen, period

Regardless of what you say, or how hard you try to form a new narrative around this topic, it remains an absolute established fact that Carney lied to Canadians about the tone and overall messaging from that meeting; full stop.

It doesn't really matter what Trump said now.

It doesn't really matter what the Carney said now.

All that matters is we're going to end up with a new 4-year mandate on the 28th, and we will either sink or swim as a country.

I think that there's a really strong possibility that this is the last time we're all voting in the same federal election if the Liberals win. Or at least I hope that's the case, because Canada is obviously broken if the bribery-gorged CBC has managed to thwart democracy once again.

I'm absolutely not interested in another election in 2028. I'm as open to the prospect of Canada under the LPOC gov't as I am to an islamic theocracy.

CdnFox · Monday at 12:39 AM

13 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Regardless of what you say, or how hard you try to form a new narrative around this topic, it remains an absolute established fact that Carney lied to Canadians about the tone and overall messaging from that meeting; full stop.

And that's not just conservative saying that. That is the opinion of professionals even pro liberal professionals news media and pretty much everybody.

This isn't a contentious opinion. It has been accepted by the vast majority of people. Those arguing against it are desperate holdouts.

WestCanMan · Monday at 01:14 AM

33 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

And that's not just conservative saying that. That is the opinion of professionals even pro liberal professionals news media and pretty much everybody.

This isn't a contentious opinion. It has been accepted by the vast majority of people. Those arguing against it are desperate holdouts.

Hmmmm. Kinda like the desperate holdouts from the Russian collusion farce. I wonder who that could beave...

CdnFox · Monday at 01:41 AM

23 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Hmmmm. Kinda like the desperate holdouts from the Russian collusion farce. I wonder who that could beave...

LOL

I mean we all get how personal preference and bias can colour anyone's thinking, but you do need to be able to set that aside and look at things at least mostly objectively.

Objectively he portrayed his call in a light that was very different to the way it was, and did so in order to give the false impression that he had trump in hand and could "deal" with him to canada's benefit and that trump was setting aside his nonsense bout 51'st states etc and such, and that wasn't the nature of the call.

Further it's reported he advised trump he would be able to help him more after teh election but would have to 'talk tough ' in the meantime.

Reminds me of a certain black president who got caught on an open mike telling the russians he could 'do a lot more' for them if they just backed off till after the election.

WestCanMan · Monday at 02:36 PM

12 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Objectively he portrayed his call in a light that was very different to the way it was, and did so in order to give the false impression that he had trump in hand and could "deal" with him to canada's benefit and that trump was setting aside his nonsense bout 51'st states etc and such, and that wasn't the nature of the call.

Objectively, CBC sat on that story and pushed that narrative themselves, I'm just shocked that they let the cat out of the bag before the election. Like I said earlier, it must have been coming out in a leak or they never would have let the truth out.

CdnFox · Monday at 03:43 PM

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

Objectively, CBC sat on that story and pushed that narrative themselves, I'm just shocked that they let the cat out of the bag before the election. Like I said earlier, it must have been coming out in a leak or they never would have let the truth out.

Well Radio Canada released it and they're the only ones that Poilievre is saying he still considering funding so...

But it's a very common tactic with dishonest media sources that they will release negative information either at the last millisecond or slightly after the last millisecond or election so that they can give the impression that they were actually honest and unbiased all along, see they posted a negative story right here! But they do it in a way that minimizes damage.

Let's be honest if it was Poilievre and the roles were reversed they would have given him three or four days to talk up how great the call went and then they would have gone for his throat and never let up

WestCanMan · Monday at 03:48 PM

3 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Well Radio Canada released it and they're the only ones that Poilievre is saying he still considering funding so...

But it's a very common tactic with dishonest media sources that they will release negative information either at the last millisecond or slightly after the last millisecond or election so that they can give the impression that they were actually honest and unbiased all along, see they posted a negative story right here! But they do it in a way that minimizes damage.

Let's be honest if it was Poilievre and the roles were reversed they would have given him three or four days to talk up how great the call went and then they would have gone for his throat and never let up

It was interesting to see all the CBC commentators trying to explain why that most recent Carney lie shouldn't matter to voters, when what they really meant was "I wanna keep my job."

They're such vile filth.

Moonbox · Monday at 04:01 PM

15 hours ago, CdnFox said:

But you don't know who you were responding to. You seem very confused. You said you were responding to the original title but then you were responding to army and now you're not so sure either way apparently

I was responding to Army Guy, and then I was responding to you, when you quoted me. This isn't complicated. The only confusion is your own.

15 hours ago, CdnFox said:

You mean that time when you miscalculated the variable in a math equation?

I mean the time you tried to argue that I miscalculated a chosen constant in a math equation. That was so absurdly dumb I would have put it past even you, but you keep surprising me. There's literally is no floor on how belligerently stupid you can make yourself look.

WestCanMan · Monday at 04:17 PM

12 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

There's literally is no floor on how belligerently stupid you can make yourself look.

Aren't you the guy who posts the snot pictures?

FYI no one's trying to impress you: near as I can tell you're a low-IQ, gr-7 stoner.

CdnFox · Monday at 04:29 PM

22 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

I was responding to Army Guy, and then I was responding to you, when you quoted me.

Are you sure? Is that your final answer? When I Mentioned your reply to army guy you said that it was about the OP title, then it was me, now it's back to army guy. And so you were saying Army Guy is not a thoughtful or decent poster and is a conspiracy nut?

Maybe you should have a nap and take your pills before we go any further.

Quote

This isn't complicated. The only confusion is your own.

I agree it shouldn't be complicated but I have absolutely no confusion. You're the one that keeps changing your story.

Quote

I mean the time you tried to argue that I miscalculated a chosen constant in a math equation. That was so absurdly dumb I would have put it past even you, but you keep surprising me. There's literally is no floor on how belligerently stupid you can make yourself look.

ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It's NOT a constant dumbass!! It's the z score! It changes based on confidence! You have to look it up in a table, you accidentally THOUGHT it was a constant and f*cked up your equation!!!! AHAAHAHAAH!!!! And you're STiLL BRAGGUNG ABOUT HOW STUPID YOU ARE!

Here you go, read up on it the number you gave (1.96 i believe?) is for a poll with a 95 percent confidence which is not the confidence of the poll we were discussing You f*cked up out of the gate, tried to correct and f*cked up, then tried to figure out the math and f*cked up and your'e STILL F*CKING UP!!!! LOLOLO

Imagine being so stupid you think the Z value is a CONSTANT!!! the formula wouldn't even make sense if that were true LOLOLOOL

Here you go. read up on the z value

How to calculate margin of error (free calculator with examples)

Margin of error - Wikipedia

Microsoft Word - STU Z Table.doc

Z SCORE TABLE - Z Table and Z score calculation

LOLOL you are officially retarded Not only were you stupid enough to screw it up in the first place you were dumb enough to bring it up again

Moonbox · Monday at 05:55 PM

50 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

LOLOL you are officially retarded Not only were you stupid enough to screw it up in the first place you were dumb enough to bring it up again

You brought it up again, you donkey.

If you want to respond to my last post in that thread rather than tuck tail after clowning yourself as you did, bring it. I'm always game to watch you make a fool out of yourself, as you're doing even here.

These unhinged, spastic rants where you insist on fantasy re-imaginings of your past humiliations, however, are useless. Nobody reads them. Nobody even know what you're talking about except me, and I'm just laughing at you.

CdnFox · Monday at 06:03 PM

5 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

You brought it up again, you donkey.

You did first. I didn't mention it after that thread till you brought it up.

You now bring up again the idea that a variable is a constant And continue to look like a tard

Quote

If you want to respond to my last post in that thread rather than tuck tail after clowning yourself as you did, bring it. I'm always game to watch you make a fool out of yourself, as you're doing even here.

Sure. Which thread was that again? Honestly you're just not that important to me and I didn't notice you replied again. But I'm happy to go back and make you look like a complete tard. As I posted here it's a variable and literally every single mathematician agrees so I'm happy to go there and say it as well. Give me the title again and I'll go take care of it

taxme · Monday at 06:33 PM

On 4/24/2025 at 9:37 AM, CdnFox said:

Carney had said specifically that the president respected Canada's sovereignty but it turns out trump had told him that he still wanted Canada as the 51st state. further carney told him that they would agree to disagree, not that it was off the table.

Trump talked about the '51st state' during call with Carney: Radio-Canada sources | CBC News

Blanchet is reacting to this news strongly

Corney was born a liar. 👎

taxme · Monday at 06:39 PM

On 4/24/2025 at 10:38 AM, Politics1990 said:

trump is an fool who cares? lol PP platform with his made up numbers is the real laughable thing this week

Well, look who we have here. Another Marxist pro-Corney lieberal. Another big laugh. Trump is worth billions and he is no fool. So, what is your net worth, lieberal?

What is your Politics 1990 suppose to mean?

Moonbox · Monday at 07:56 PM

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

You did first. I didn't mention it after that thread till you brought it up.

LOLOL

Yep that was me bringing up math first again.

CdnFox · Monday at 09:02 PM

1 hour ago, Moonbox said:

LOLOL

Yep that was me bringing up math first again.

Nobody said anything about mentioning math lessons - i said you brought up that equation again AND YOU DID, YOU LITERALLY JUSTA POSTED THE PROOF!!!!!!!!!!!! THERE IS YOU - "last lime i checked you were telling me.... " that's you bringing it up LOLOLOL

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAAHAAHA!!!!! You are frikkin' HILARIOUS!!!

SO you were WRONG about the equasion and thought that a variable was a constant as i've posted proof of ANNNND you literally just provided proof YOU were the one who brought it up again!!!!!

Oh My GOD i'm just freaking dying I forget sometimes how dumb you are LOLOL

cougar · Monday at 09:14 PM

21 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Let's be clear, what has come out is that Kearney grossly misrepresented the nature of the call and trump's attitude. Additional information has come out to suggest that At several points trump did not respect our sovereignty despite the fact that carney insisted that he respected our sovereignty

Everybody across Canada realizes this. If you feel differently you are in the wrong

He lied. And that was day one. That's what has come out

If he lied this is still perfectly fine with me. I am sure most Canadian were happy at the news that our sovereignty was respected and I am sure Trump was pissed that he was not able to have his insult passed on to the Canadian public.

CdnFox · Monday at 09:30 PM

15 minutes ago, cougar said:

If he lied this is still perfectly fine with me. I am sure most Canadian were happy at the news that our sovereignty was respected and I am sure Trump was pissed that he was not able to have his insult passed on to the Canadian public.

But our sovereignty wasn't respected and Trudeau was happy that the possible future Prime Minister wasn't disagreeing with him and might do what he's told.

And I just don't know what to say about the fact that you're happy to be lied to by your politicians. If that's all you're looking for then the liberal party is absolutely the party for you

WestCanMan · Monday at 10:22 PM

On 4/27/2025 at 1:13 PM, CITIZEN_2015 said:

Go to hell piece of worthless sh*t. You are a low class hooligan and the only reason they haven't banned you is because you may a lot of sh*tty posts all garbage like yourself. You don't even deserve disrespect. You should be avoided like trash. I bet in your real like too you are disliked or hated by most and avoided.

Class, class, class...