Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Trump announces 90-day pause on tariffs for non-retaliating countries

Sure looks like his people got to him and said this is going to be a disaster and he realized he'd have to back off. 

The problem is by keeping the tariffs in a paused state instead of saying we're going to stop the talk of tariffs until negotiations are complete he doesn't resolve the fears of the marketplace who will continue to keep their money on the sideline till they see what he does. And of course he's still got the ongoing war with china

  • Like 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted

This is what he did with Canada and Mexico on a larger scale. Threaten tariffs and within a day pause them. He can rinse and repeat this act over and over again. 

Hopefully the world realizes dealing with Trump is like dealing with a toddler trying to get candy and looks for alternatives to their market. 

  • Like 2
Posted

Clown in Chief just lost his game of chicken with the world. 

With the price of eggs, it seems so wasteful to wear them on his face. Imagine if someone with a three-digit IQ had been elected. We could have avoid losing trillions of dollars of value to unnecessary economic chaos and kept a shred of our national dignity. Ah, the road not taken.  

Posted
2 hours ago, robosmith said:

Well, it looks like I made 20% on my investments in 5 days.

Wonder if I should bail now and take the money and run. Never know what mess Trump will create.

So basically you bought 5 dollars worth of Mexican slave zucchini and sold it to a neighbor for 5.10 and you're wondering if it's time to get out? 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted

He got 90 countries to agree to negotiate when they had no interest in negotiating. Did he lose? Uh no.

  • Haha 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
5 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

He got 90 countries to agree to negotiate when they had no interest in negotiating. Did he lose? Uh no.

They had every interest in negotiation. Some of them even had scheduled negotiations. Canada in the US were supposed to enter negotiations about free trade agreement along with Mexico in a handful of months. There's not a country on that list that wouldn't have happily sat down and negotiated with the united states.

Sorry. That might be the response republicans are trying to give in order to explain the sudden turnaround or make it look like a victory but the reality is he got nothing he wouldn't have had already

Seriously, which of those nations did he reach out to and they said 'we won't negotiate'? None. 

  • Like 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

They had every interest in negotiation. Some of them even had scheduled negotiations. Canada in the US were supposed to enter negotiations about free trade agreement along with Mexico in a handful of months. There's not a country on that list that wouldn't have happily sat down and negotiated with the united states.

Sorry. That might be the response republicans are trying to give in order to explain the sudden turnaround or make it look like a victory but the reality is he got nothing he wouldn't have had already

Seriously, which of those nations did he reach out to and they said 'we won't negotiate'? None. 

How many countries negotiated new trade agreements under Biden? None.

They had no interest in negotiating.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

How many countries negotiated new trade agreements under Biden? None.

 

How many did he ask? 

None 

Every single country he asked negotiated a new trade deal

 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
42 minutes ago, Aristides said:

image.thumb.png.484c614ab830371b287198028f420fdd.png

Art of the Steal was declared mostly LIES by the Ghost writer author.

Quote

Trump is also an inveterate liar, so there’s not much point in parsing the details of some triumphant deal as he recounts them: They have inevitably been altered to reflect favorably on him, so to try to figure out where he’s fudging is to engage in a useless and tedious fact-checking exercise. His Art of… books are works of advertisement—or, as we should say now with the benefit of hindsight, works of propaganda, the production of which is perhaps his main gift. And although these books are all nominally memoirs, Trump is not one for introspection, so we can’t hope to learn much about his inner depths, mostly because he has none: He’s a self-admittedly shallow person.

 

Posted
8 hours ago, CdnFox said:

How many did he ask? 

None 

Every single country he asked negotiated a new trade deal

 

No one was willing to negotiate UNTIL Trump threatened Tariffs. Any assertion to the contrary is void of facts.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
18 hours ago, robosmith said:

Well, it looks like I made 20% on my investments in 5 days.

Wonder if I should bail now and take the money and run. Never know what mess Trump will create.

Bail now and move to China. It's more in line with your thinking anyways. 

Posted
18 hours ago, robosmith said:

Well, it looks like I made 20% on my investments in 5 days.

Wonder if I should bail now and take the money and run. Never know what mess Trump will create.

One day blip. Markets on the way down again today.

Posted
1 hour ago, Aristides said:

One day blip. Markets on the way down again today.

Oh, well. It was fun while it lasted.

I guess you'd best get back to the forest and touch trees...

 

11 hours ago, Aristides said:

image.thumb.png.484c614ab830371b287198028f420fdd.png

We're nothing without death, destruction and failure. 

-- The Left

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

No one was willing to negotiate UNTIL Trump threatened Tariffs. Any assertion to the contrary is void of facts.

Everyone was willing.  Name ONE country who wasn't willing.  Other than china who's still not willing. Canada actually had dates scheduled for negotiations early next year and always said they were happy to negotiate early if there was a need for it.  Every single country except china was entirely willing to negotiate even before trump became president and would have afterwards. 

The tariff thing gained him absolutely nothing in that regard. Who ever turned him down? Britian? germany? France? Nope. 

Edited by CdnFox

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
39 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Canada actually had dates scheduled for negotiations early next year and always said they were happy to negotiate early if there was a need for it. 

They already had tariffs levied against them and THEN they decided to negotiate. Same with Mexico. They wouldn't negotiate either.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

They already had tariffs levied against them and THEN they decided to negotiate. 

Absolutely not.

Every single country that is currently prepared to negotiate was absolutely prepared to negotiate before the tariffs and in fact before trump.

Like I said, point to one other than china that said they wouldn't. Can you show me where England said they wouldn't negotiate with trump? Can you show me where Canada said that especially considering they'd already had talk scheduled? How about France, when did he ask France to come to the negotiating table and they said no?

I've asked several times and you can't provide an answer because you know what you're saying is wrong. Every single one of those countries would have been happy to sit down and talk if trump had said we need to renegotiate something. Every single one. Absolutely nothing has changed.

And in actuality they haven't even agreed to anything, they all reached out to the US and basically said what the hell is going on and let's talk about this, but they haven't agreed to any specific negotiations or any specific topics at all. I'm sure they will and I'm sure they would have before tariffs

I can't stress this enough, the whole idea that somehow trump push them into something they wouldn't be willing to do otherwise is nonsense. The only people that weren't willing to do it were china and they're still not willing.

So what really happened is his advisor sat down with him and showed him what was happening with the stock market and with business investment and the job numbers and he realized this was going too far too fast and he pulled back. 

Seriously what he needs to do is drop the whole '90 days' thing and just say 'we're going to be working directly with our trade partners who are now at the table to work out a fair arrangement" and leave it at that.  He's going to put the us into a recession at this rate if he doesn't course correct in the next month or so. 

Look at this performance: That kind of performance can't continue for much longer:

image.thumb.png.34e96b20ee890f676f9a8591a2372f17.png

 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
3 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Lol...it's unorthodox but...the whole tariff thing might just work.

It's not working at all though. As i noted every single country beside china would have happily responded if he had trade issues to discuss, Canada for example was already booked for negotiations to update the trade agreement HE negotiated with us last time, and not one would have said no, 

All he's done is trash his own stocks and economy and get people to agree to come to the table who'd have been perfectly willing to do so before if he'd asked. 

How is this 'working'?  I like lots of things trump wants to do and i can respect wanting to push manufacturing back to your own country but this is NOT going well. 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

It's not working at all though. As i noted every single country beside china would have happily responded if he had trade issues to discuss, Canada for example was already booked for negotiations to update the trade agreement HE negotiated with us last time, and not one would have said no, 

All he's done is trash his own stocks and economy and get people to agree to come to the table who'd have been perfectly willing to do so before if he'd asked. 

How is this 'working'?  I like lots of things trump wants to do and i can respect wanting to push manufacturing back to your own country but this is NOT going well. 

It's working for all the Trump insiders who are illegally trading on inside information. Like MTG for one....

  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Lol...it's unorthodox but...the whole tariff thing might just work.

Yeah, just memory hole everything he's been saying for the past month and pretend this is intentional. 

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

They already had tariffs levied against them and THEN they decided to negotiate. Same with Mexico. They wouldn't negotiate either.

That's pure crap. Any of those countries would have negotiated tariffs--and tried to. And the Trump tariff formulas were not based on tariffs, so clearly that was not the sticking point. 

You're trying to fanboy retcon maybe the biggest economic blunder in history as 4D chess. It's nonsense.  

  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

It's not working at all though. As i noted every single country beside china would have happily responded if he had trade issues to discuss, Canada for example was already booked for negotiations to update the trade agreement HE negotiated with us last time, and not one would have said no, 

All he's done is trash his own stocks and economy and get people to agree to come to the table who'd have been perfectly willing to do so before if he'd asked. 

How is this 'working'?  I like lots of things trump wants to do and i can respect wanting to push manufacturing back to your own country but this is NOT going well. 

Ya he gave the stock markets a wake-up call. If good deals come of this, I'm not sure it can be condemned. Especially with the manufacturing returning.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,903
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    LinkSoul60
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dave L earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...