CdnFox Posted Monday at 01:19 AM Report Posted Monday at 01:19 AM 43 minutes ago, Hodad said: No, you're a partisan without principles, so I have no expectation that you would let gross negligence and incompetence nudge you off the part line. As long as you think you are getting your way, you cannot be bothered about the corners cut to get there. My hypocrisy meter just blew up Quote
robosmith Posted Monday at 07:46 PM Report Posted Monday at 07:46 PM 18 hours ago, Legato said: Petard hoist. ^Troll toast. Quote
CdnFox Posted Monday at 10:05 PM Report Posted Monday at 10:05 PM 2 hours ago, robosmith said: ^Troll toast. ^loser lost 1 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted Tuesday at 01:19 AM Report Posted Tuesday at 01:19 AM I love how angry libs can get over unknown information reported by an unknown source. It's literally "someone told us Pete said some things in a group chat." It's pathetic. Whatever. Get all angry over this and ignore the fact that Democrats are spending more tax dollars and political capital dealing with a proven MS13 gang member that was here illegally and was ordered to leave, than any of their own constituents...any AMERICANS. They couldn't be bothered to stand or clap for girls raped and murdered or a terminally ill boy, but they are appaplectic that a man that is a known wife beater, illegal alien, and gang banger got deported to his home country because a judge bought the b.s. claim that he was in danger from a rival gang. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Hodad Posted Tuesday at 04:28 AM Report Posted Tuesday at 04:28 AM (edited) 3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: I love how angry libs can get over unknown information reported by an unknown source. It's literally "someone told us Pete said some things in a group chat." It's pathetic. Whatever. Get all angry over this and ignore the fact that Democrats are spending more tax dollars and political capital dealing with a proven MS13 gang member that was here illegally and was ordered to leave, than any of their own constituents...any AMERICANS. They couldn't be bothered to stand or clap for girls raped and murdered or a terminally ill boy, but they are appaplectic that a man that is a known wife beater, illegal alien, and gang banger got deported to his home country because a judge bought the b.s. claim that he was in danger from a rival gang. As a fan of the network upon which Pete Hegseth was recently a pundit--another job for which he had no real qualifications, but at dramatically lower stakes--it's clear that you have no idea of journalistic standards. If multiple outlets are confirming it from multiple sources, it happened. And the irony of your post is over the top hilarious. You "knowing" and it being "proven" that Garcia is a gang member based on a tip--no evidence. You call him a wife beater? Hegseth's own mother called him an abuser in writing. Abrego Garcia has been in this country 16 years with steady employment, no criminal record and a lasting marriage. While Hegseth has been certainly accused of rape, sexual harassment, alcoholism and more. And Abrego Garcia has never put our military at risk. Maybe Hegseth should be deported? He should definitely be fired. --and let's not let it go unmentioned that you're trying to hand-wave away a court order in favor of executive fiat. Poo-poo to the rule of law! Bring on the dictator! Edited Tuesday at 04:30 AM by Hodad 2 Quote
robosmith Posted Tuesday at 06:51 AM Report Posted Tuesday at 06:51 AM 2 hours ago, Hodad said: As a fan of the network upon which Pete Hegseth was recently a pundit--another job for which he had no real qualifications, but at dramatically lower stakes--it's clear that you have no idea of journalistic standards. If multiple outlets are confirming it from multiple sources, it happened. And the irony of your post is over the top hilarious. You "knowing" and it being "proven" that Garcia is a gang member based on a tip--no evidence. You call him a wife beater? Hegseth's own mother called him an abuser in writing. Abrego Garcia has been in this country 16 years with steady employment, no criminal record and a lasting marriage. While Hegseth has been certainly accused of rape, sexual harassment, alcoholism and more. And Abrego Garcia has never put our military at risk. Maybe Hegseth should be deported? He should definitely be fired. --and let's not let it go unmentioned that you're trying to hand-wave away a court order in favor of executive fiat. Poo-poo to the rule of law! Bring on the dictator! Anyone who states "facts" based on the what they hear from FOS LIES has ZERO understanding about PROVEN NO CREDIBILITY of a source that has been convicted for a MASSIVE LIBEL JUDGEMENT. FOS LIES clearly has NO journalistic ethical standards and neither does Hegseth. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted Tuesday at 10:01 AM Report Posted Tuesday at 10:01 AM 5 hours ago, Hodad said: As a fan of the network upon which Pete Hegseth was recently a pundit--another job for which he had no real qualifications, but at dramatically lower stakes--it's clear that you have no idea of journalistic standards. If multiple outlets are confirming it from multiple sources, it happened. As far as I know, the only publication to make the claim based on their own investigation is the NYT. Everyone else is reporting that the NYT reported it. BTW, I don't watch news other than local and then it is NBC. 5 hours ago, Hodad said: You "knowing" and it being "proven" that Garcia is a gang member based on a tip--no evidence. Dude has a tattoo on his knuckles that says MS13 Link Dude used his affiliation with MS13 as the reason he wouldn't be safe going back to El Salvador. He claimed he was afraid a rival gang would kill him. Two judges ruled he was a MS13 member. Link 5 hours ago, Hodad said: Abrego Garcia has been in this country 16 years with steady employment, no criminal record and a lasting marriage. He was picked up for loitering. He, and the other two MS13 members he was with, claimed to be waiting for day labor. But, if what you said was true, he's been stealing work from citizens and legal residents. Thats no excuse for letting him stay. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Deluge Posted Tuesday at 03:56 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 03:56 PM On 4/5/2025 at 3:23 PM, herbie said: No, dummy. By posting that as a topic it made YOU look like a dummy for using a fakenews.com as a reference. Include [/sarc] or unless the reader is so oblivious they've never heard of beaverton or theonion.com it's a lame DUH I was 'joking' after comment. With your history of posting the stupidest most bullshit topics it merely looks like another. Sorry, herpes, but it's the pervert leftists that are the leading bullshitters, and it's not even close. Every f*cking thing you degenerates post is either left-wing propaganda or manufactured bullshit or both. In this case, humor is truer than your woke cultism. 1 Quote
Hodad Posted Tuesday at 05:36 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 05:36 PM 3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: As far as I know, the only publication to make the claim based on their own investigation is the NYT. Everyone else is reporting that the NYT reported it. And the Guardian (linked in original update), and NBC, and the AP, and ABC, and on and on... It's real. The guy's a total flop. The Houthi's have shot down two of our drones, and Hegseth, the buffoon, is texting his buddies--and a journalist--about the attack flight times of piloted aircraft. He has to go. Quote Dude has a tattoo on his knuckles that says MS13 Link Dude used his affiliation with MS13 as the reason he wouldn't be safe going back to El Salvador. He claimed he was afraid a rival gang would kill him. Two judges ruled he was a MS13 member. Link He was picked up for loitering. He, and the other two MS13 members he was with, claimed to be waiting for day labor. But, if what you said was true, he's been stealing work from citizens and legal residents. Thats no excuse for letting him stay. He does not have a tattoo that says MS13. A pathological liar told you that his tattoos should be interpreted as MS13. The same guy who used a sharpie to "edit" the path of a hurricane to be more convenient. Photos taken at the same desk, even. So that's not worth much. Judges did not "rule" that, though they may have believed it. And he was picked up at Home Depot with the other day laborers... in 2019. Again, wife, kids and no criminal record. AND NONE OF THAT REALLY MATTERS. Whether he was at one time or even is affiliated with MS13--which seems like a stretch to conclude--he was protected against deportation by a court order and is entitled to due process. That's the crux of it. I don't know Abrego Garcia at all and have no investment in him, but I care deeply that we have a nation of laws and due process. Everyone should care about that essential element of our democracy. But Dear Leader did something obviously illegal again, and you'll choose him over the law every time. When the executive admits it made a mistake, is court ordered to correct the mistake, and even escalated to the SCOTUS to correct the mistake, AND STILL WON'T CORRECT THE MISTAKE then we have a constitutional crisis. Like a toddler testing boundaries, he's trying to see if there are still functional restraints-- if there are still checks an balances. To see if they've sufficiently undermined checks and balances enough to do whatever they want. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted Tuesday at 06:14 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 06:14 PM 9 minutes ago, Hodad said: And the Guardian (linked in original update), and NBC, and the AP, and ABC, and on and on... I talked about out how the Guardian only verified the existence of the chat group, not the information. No one knows what the information was. The rest piggy backed on the NYT. NBC: The New York Times first reported the existence of the second Signal chat. AP: The New York Times reported that... ABC: The New York Times was first to report As I said, only the NYTs has done their own investigation (aka fabrication). Your lie that multiple outlets have investigated this is absolutely exposed. 27 minutes ago, Hodad said: He does not have a tattoo that says MS13. https://elsalvadorinfo.net/ms-13-gang-tattoos-explained-the-inked-language-of-fear-and-loyalty/ The knuckles tattoo fits their m.o. 31 minutes ago, Hodad said: Judges did not "rule" that, though they may have believed it. No. They ruled he was an MS13 member and that he was in the country illegally. One of them said he couldn't be deported to El Salvador BECAUSE HIS GANG AFFILIATION PUT HIM IN DANGER. 36 minutes ago, Hodad said: he was protected against deportation by a court order and is entitled to due process. He was not protected from deportation. He was protected from deportation to El Salvador because his gang affiliation endangered him. He had his due process. He had two hearings. He was ORDERED DEPORTED, just not to El Salvador. That was the only mistake. What exactly are you watching and/or reading that is so factually inaccurate? Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Hodad Posted Wednesday at 04:02 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 04:02 PM (edited) 21 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: I talked about out how the Guardian only verified the existence of the chat group, not the information. No one knows what the information was. The rest piggy backed on the NYT. NBC: The New York Times first reported the existence of the second Signal chat. AP: The New York Times reported that... ABC: The New York Times was first to report Jeebus. I can post links, but I can't make you be honest about what's in them. It says the NYT was the first to report because the NYT was the first to report. That's how journalism works. Rather than just repeating the NYT story, each of those outlets has independently confirmed that the second chat is real AND confirmation that the contents were as described. It's right there in each article. You just deny, deny, deny while the world moves by. Hope Trump is worth your dignity! These are the exact same goddamn links. AP A person familiar with the contents and those who received the messages, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters, confirmed the second chat to The Associated Press. ABC Department of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth shared details about an imminent attack on Houthis in Yemen in March in a second group chat using the messaging app Signal that included his wife, his brother and his personal lawyer, two sources familiar with the contents of the chat told ABC News. NBC Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth used his personal phone to send information about U.S. military operations in Yemen to a 13-person Signal group chat, including his wife and his brother, two sources with knowledge of the matter confirmed to NBC News. 21 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: https://elsalvadorinfo.net/ms-13-gang-tattoos-explained-the-inked-language-of-fear-and-loyalty/ The knuckles tattoo fits their m.o. No. They ruled he was an MS13 member and that he was in the country illegally. One of them said he couldn't be deported to El Salvador BECAUSE HIS GANG AFFILIATION PUT HIM IN DANGER. He was not protected from deportation. He was protected from deportation to El Salvador because his gang affiliation endangered him. He had his due process. He had two hearings. He was ORDERED DEPORTED, just not to El Salvador. That was the only mistake. What exactly are you watching and/or reading that is so factually inaccurate? A. This is America. We don't arrest people for what other people think their tattoos might mean. B. Again, a judicial ruling is the formal decision on a specific legal question. It is not comprehensive of the rationale that led there. And his order of withholding was based on threats against himself and his family, not on gang affiliation. He has consistently denied any gang affiliation. -- He's a man with a family, legally living in the US, working a union job as a tradesman, with no criminal record whatsoever. A nation of laws does NOT just put this man on a plane to another country. C. Deportees are almost always sent back to their home country. This idea of, essentially outsourcing undesirables to third-party nations is rather novel. What an amazing invention by this upstanding administration. And, again, NONE OF THAT MATTERS. We are a nation of laws, for the moment at least. And this administration is breaking both the spirit and letter of those laws. While you clap and fawn over it. Edited Wednesday at 04:03 PM by Hodad Quote
gatomontes99 Posted Wednesday at 06:53 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 06:53 PM (edited) 4 hours ago, Hodad said: Jeebus. I can post links, but I can't make you be honest about what's in them. Lmao...so QUOTING your links is dishonest? Oh please do tell what is honest then. This I've got to hear. 4 hours ago, Hodad said: AP A person familiar with the contents and those who received the messages, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters, confirmed the second chat to The Associated Press. ABC Department of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth shared details about an imminent attack on Houthis in Yemen in March in a second group chat using the messaging app Signal that included his wife, his brother and his personal lawyer, two sources familiar with the contents of the chat told ABC News. NBC Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth used his personal phone to send information about U.S. military operations in Yemen to a 13-person Signal group chat, including his wife and his brother, two sources with knowledge of the matter confirmed to NBC News. Confirming the chat exists with an unnamed source about unknown information (that is somehow also comfirmed) is not reporting. It is tabloid speculation at best. 4 hours ago, Hodad said: A. This is America. We don't arrest people for what other people think their tattoos might mean. He wasn't arrested for his tats. But his tats were KNOWN to police and his affiliation was known by a CI. Further, HIS ARGUMENT THAT HE COULDN'T GO TO EL SALVADOR WAS BECAUSE HIS GANG AFFILIATION PUT HIM IN DANGER WITH A RIVAL GANG. His own damn arguments admit he was and is a gang member. 4 hours ago, Hodad said: And, again, NONE OF THAT MATTERS. We are a nation of laws, for the moment at least. And this administration is breaking both the spirit and letter of those laws. While you clap and fawn over it. Actually, they aren't. While a judge can rule that the MS13 member can't be removed to El Salvador, the judge can be over ruled by the AG. Edited Wednesday at 08:07 PM by gatomontes99 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Aristides Posted Wednesday at 07:04 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 07:04 PM 3 hours ago, Hodad said: Jeebus. I can post links, but I can't make you be honest about what's in them. It says the NYT was the first to report because the NYT was the first to report. That's how journalism works. Rather than just repeating the NYT story, each of those outlets has independently confirmed that the second chat is real AND confirmation that the contents were as described. It's right there in each article. You just deny, deny, deny while the world moves by. Hope Trump is worth your dignity! Trumpetts have no dignity, all they have is faith. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted Wednesday at 08:10 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 08:10 PM 1 hour ago, Aristides said: Trumpetts have no dignity, all they have is faith. Faith? You guys are fawning unnamed sources with unknown information that is unverified and you have the gall to claim we operate on faith? Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
gatomontes99 Posted Wednesday at 09:15 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 09:15 PM 34 minutes ago, Legato said: #perspective 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Hodad Posted Wednesday at 10:54 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 10:54 PM 3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Lmao...so QUOTING your links is dishonest? Oh please do tell what is honest then. This I've got to hear. Confirming the chat exists with an unnamed source about unknown information (that is somehow also comfirmed) is not reporting. It is tabloid speculation at best. He wasn't arrested for his tats. But his tats were KNOWN to police and his affiliation was known by a CI. Further, HIS ARGUMENT THAT HE COULDN'T GO TO EL SALVADOR WAS BECAUSE HIS GANG AFFILIATION PUT HIM IN DANGER WITH A RIVAL GANG. His own damn arguments admit he was and is a gang member. Actually, they aren't. While a judge can rule that the MS13 member can't be removed to El Salvador, the judge can be over ruled by the AG. No, quoting irrelevant portions of my links back to me is stupid, but not dishonest. The dishonest part is that you claimed those articles confirmed the existence of the chat but not the content of the chat, which is untrue. Every on of those articles also stated that their respective outlets had confirmed the content. You lied about it, and then tried to cover it up with bogus citations. Abrego Garcia has maintained all along that he is not in a gang. You are making up the idea that he argued otherwise. His position was that he and his family had been threatened by a gang, not that he was in one. And WTF are you even talking about. No, the AG cannot overrule a judge. They aren't even in the same goddamn branch of government, FFS. Do you not have any idea of how our government operates? Quote
gatomontes99 Posted Wednesday at 11:37 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 11:37 PM 13 minutes ago, Hodad said: No, quoting irrelevant portions of my links back to me is stupid, but not dishonest. The dishonest part is that you claimed those articles confirmed the existence of the chat but not the content of the chat, which is untrue. Every on of those articles also stated that their respective outlets had confirmed the content. You lied about it, and then tried to cover it up with bogus citations. What content?! There is no known content! Just some general bullshit about it being similar to the other group chat. There is no known content. If there is, quote it. Until then, it is nothing more than unnamed sources claiming unknown content was shared and even that is unverified. 27 minutes ago, Hodad said: Abrego Garcia has maintained all along that he is not in a gang. You are making up the idea that he argued otherwise. His position was that he and his family had been threatened by a gang, not that he was in one. He started out saying he wasn't a gang member, but the court ruled other wise: After considering the infonnation provided by both parties, the Court concluded that no bond was appropriate in this matter. The Court first reasoned that the Respondent failed to meet his burden of demonstrating that his release from custody would not pose a danger to others, as the evidence shows that he is a verified member ofMS-13. Matter ofSiniauskas, 27 I&N Dec. at 210; Matter ofAdeniji, 22 I&N Dec. at 1111-13; 8 C.F.R. § 1003.19(h)(3). The BIA has held that, absent any indication that the infonnation therein is incorrect or was the result of coercion or duress, Fann 1-213 is "inherently trustworthy and admissible." https://www.justice.gov/ag/media/1396906/dl?inline He did, however, claim he would be victim to gang violence in El Salvador because the rival gang would harm him. He's not a smart man. On one hand he says he's not a gang member and on the other he says he can't be sent back because the other gang might hurt him. 35 minutes ago, Hodad said: And WTF are you even talking about. No, the AG cannot overrule a judge. They aren't even in the same goddamn branch of government, FFS. Do you not have any idea of how our government operates? 8 CFR § 1003.10 - Immigration judges. (d) Governing standards. Immigration judges shall be governed by the provisions and limitations prescribed by the Act and this chapter, by the decisions of the Board, and by the Attorney General (through review of a decision of the Board, by written order, or by determination and ruling pursuant to section 103 of the Act). https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/8/1003.10 It's the LAW. Bondi can strike down any decision by an immigration judge. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
WestCanMan Posted yesterday at 12:01 AM Author Report Posted yesterday at 12:01 AM That gives me an idea for building our army: Just let the libs keep importing jihadis until America has to go to war against them, and then broker a peace deal with a GOP president right before his last term, and then when the Demi wins we chase the American army out and keep their shit. Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. "If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"
gatomontes99 Posted yesterday at 12:05 AM Report Posted yesterday at 12:05 AM 2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: That gives me an idea for building our army: Just let the libs keep importing jihadis until America has to go to war against them, and then broker a peace deal with a GOP president right before his last term, and then when the Demi wins we chase the American army out and keep their shit. Hey! Stop using stupid democrats against us! Or we will send back all the PBR and that will be the only beer you will be able to drink! 2 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Hodad Posted yesterday at 02:13 AM Report Posted yesterday at 02:13 AM 2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: What content?! There is no known content! Just some general bullshit about it being similar to the other group chat. There is no known content. If there is, quote it. Until then, it is nothing more than unnamed sources claiming unknown content was shared and even that is unverified. He started out saying he wasn't a gang member, but the court ruled other wise: After considering the infonnation provided by both parties, the Court concluded that no bond was appropriate in this matter. The Court first reasoned that the Respondent failed to meet his burden of demonstrating that his release from custody would not pose a danger to others, as the evidence shows that he is a verified member ofMS-13. Matter ofSiniauskas, 27 I&N Dec. at 210; Matter ofAdeniji, 22 I&N Dec. at 1111-13; 8 C.F.R. § 1003.19(h)(3). The BIA has held that, absent any indication that the infonnation therein is incorrect or was the result of coercion or duress, Fann 1-213 is "inherently trustworthy and admissible." https://www.justice.gov/ag/media/1396906/dl?inline He did, however, claim he would be victim to gang violence in El Salvador because the rival gang would harm him. He's not a smart man. On one hand he says he's not a gang member and on the other he says he can't be sent back because the other gang might hurt him. 8 CFR § 1003.10 - Immigration judges. (d) Governing standards. Immigration judges shall be governed by the provisions and limitations prescribed by the Act and this chapter, by the decisions of the Board, and by the Attorney General (through review of a decision of the Board, by written order, or by determination and ruling pursuant to section 103 of the Act). https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/8/1003.10 It's the LAW. Bondi can strike down any decision by an immigration judge. Sure, just keep on pretending that what's been confirmed by multiple independent new outlets didn't happen. You weren't IN the chat so there's no possible way for you to gain information about it. No dignity. A. Bondi did not refer the case for reversal or appeal or change of status or anything else. They simply scooped up a man who was legally living and working in the United States and shipped him to a prison in El Salvador. The exact same due process that protects every American citizen applies to Abrego Garcia. And if he can be disappeared to a foreign gulag then anyone can. There is no question that they broke the law. B. The order to return him is NOT from an immigration judge, but from a district court judge. In no way, shape or form can the AG overrule a district court judge. Again, not even in the same branch of government. They are breaking the law. C. The SCOTUS has confirmed that the administration is breaking the law, upholding the district court ruling but asking for clarification of one word. The administration is refusing to comply. They are breaking the law. They ignoring the SCOTUS. We are watching a constitutional crisis unfold in real time. Quote
robosmith Posted 23 hours ago Report Posted 23 hours ago 7 hours ago, Legato said: It is unfortunate that you put your FAITH in a completely dishonest MEME. IF you bothered to research the matter instead of just TROLLING, you would know that all of that equipment was destroyed or disabled and that is SOP when it is NOT worth shipping the equipment back to the US. IOW FCK YOU. Quote
CdnFox Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago 1 hour ago, robosmith said: It is unfortunate that you put your FAITH in a completely dishonest MEME. IF you bothered to research the matter instead of just TROLLING, you would know that all of that equipment was destroyed or disabled and that is SOP when it is NOT worth shipping the equipment back to the US. IOW FCK YOU. No it wasn't, and we've been through this with you before as well. As we have provided proof many times that most of the equipment was either operational or easily made operational with limited effort including several Blackhawk helicopters. 1 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago 7 hours ago, Hodad said: Sure, just keep on pretending that what's been confirmed by multiple independent new outlets didn't happen. You weren't IN the chat so there's no possible way for you to gain information about it. No dignity. A. Bondi did not refer the case for reversal or appeal or change of status or anything else. They simply scooped up a man who was legally living and working in the United States and shipped him to a prison in El Salvador. The exact same due process that protects every American citizen applies to Abrego Garcia. And if he can be disappeared to a foreign gulag then anyone can. There is no question that they broke the law. B. The order to return him is NOT from an immigration judge, but from a district court judge. In no way, shape or form can the AG overrule a district court judge. Again, not even in the same branch of government. They are breaking the law. C. The SCOTUS has confirmed that the administration is breaking the law, upholding the district court ruling but asking for clarification of one word. The administration is refusing to comply. They are breaking the law. They ignoring the SCOTUS. We are watching a constitutional crisis unfold in real time. Actually, the both judges were immigration judges. The first was an immigration judge, the second was an appellate court immigration judge. Nothing you have said has been in line with reality. Who is feeding you these lies? Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Nationalist Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago 16 hours ago, Aristides said: Trumpetts have no dignity, all they have is faith. And both houses of congress and the Whitehouse. Bye... 1 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.