robosmith Posted Saturday at 07:59 PM Report Posted Saturday at 07:59 PM 1 hour ago, Deluge said: The proof is that they're standing in this country without papers. They have papers that PROVE they have an ASYLUM HEARING SCHEDULED. Duh 1 hour ago, Deluge said: Bye bye, illegal aliens, robomarx will miss you. ^Tripling down on BULLSHIT as USUAL. 🤮 Quote
Deluge Posted Saturday at 08:32 PM Report Posted Saturday at 08:32 PM 31 minutes ago, robosmith said: They have papers that PROVE they have an ASYLUM HEARING SCHEDULED. Duh ^Tripling down on BULLSHIT as USUAL. 🤮 robomat says he has verified all the documents and TDA, MS-13 and the the other 30 million illegal aliens are good to go. Thank you, f*ckface for instilling confidence in no one. Your dumbass post is yet another reason to make sure "wait in Mexico" goes and stays in effect. Quote
BeaverFever Posted Saturday at 09:58 PM Report Posted Saturday at 09:58 PM (edited) Meanwhile back at clown headquarters even the Mad King’s advisors have no idea what Dictator On Day One will decree on his “liberation day” Trump officials, allies grow anxious about April 2 tariffs The president continues to throw curveballs at businesses — and even his own team. Just days out from Trump’s April 2 announcement of global tariffs, which he has hailed as “Liberation Day,” even those closest to the president — from Vice President JD Vance to his chief of staff Susie Wiles and his own Cabinet officials — have privately indicated that they’re unsure exactly what the boss will do, according to three people who have spoken with them. While some details of the administration’s plan for what Trump has dubbed “reciprocal tariffs” on global trading partners are starting to trickle out, the president has at times upended them or floated contradictory policies that are keeping everyone — even his inner circle — guessing. “No one knows what the f-ck is going on,” said one White House ally close to Trump’s inner circle, granted anonymity to speak freely. “What are they going to tariff? Who are they gonna tariff and at what rates? Like, the very basic questions haven’t been answered yet.” Indeed, while the White House is projecting confidence publicly, multiple administration officials, as well as top allies on the outside, are privately concerned that next week’s roll-out could be as rocky as when he imposed tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China on March 4, worsening a rout on stocks that began in mid-February. Though the S&P 500 has since regained some ground, all of its previous gains since Election Day have been erased. Part of that is because Trump continues to threaten to plow ahead with an expansive tariff rollout, siding with the trade protectionists in his administration despite warnings from other advisers of the negative economic impacts. Inflation rose at a higher-than-expected rate last month, the Commerce Department disclosed on Friday, even before the potential onslaught of higher prices from the sweeping tariffs. But it’s also because the president continues to throw curveballs at businesses — and even his own team. Case in point: Wednesday’s decision to slap the auto industry with 25 percent tariffs. While expected in some fashion in the near future, the announcement came together so last minute that the White House wasn’t fully prepared and had to delay afternoon programming as they sought to finalize the plan, according to two people familiar with the roll-out. The White House also didn’t brief industry stakeholders in the U.S. or abroad beforehand — though a White House official argued that if they were “smart” they would have known it was coming, since Trump himself issued a public warning. Part of the uncertainty stems from the president seeming to undermine his own team at times. After Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Trump economic adviser Kevin Hassett said in recent weeks that only about 10 or 15 countries — or the “dirty 15,” as Bessent put it — would face reciprocal tariffs, Trump said Wednesday that actually every country will be hit with a tariff. The president similarly undercut Lutnick earlier this month, after the Commerce secretary suggested Canada and Mexico might avoid the full 25 percent Trump had threatened over border security and fentanyl — though two people close to the president said Lutnick was freelancing and has since been told to stay on message. Trump went ahead and slapped that duty on the two North American neighbors on March 4, but then paused much of it a day later and exempted certain goods — a rollercoaster of announcements that left many businesses and investors unsure about how the new tariffs would work. Indeed, Trump has continued to shift the scope, targets and timeline of his tariffs at a whiplash-inducing pace. The duties he promised, pre-inauguration, to levy on Canada and Mexico his first day in office shifted to Feb. 1, then Feb. 4, then March 4, before being largely rolled back until April 2. There is little clarity about what parts of those tariffs — which could hit more than $1 trillion worth of trade — will go into effect next week. …. Needless to say, the president’s shifting desires have made it difficult to plan, as Cabinet officials have indicated in private. In recent days, Lutnick told U.S. trading partners seeking clarity that he would try to give them a heads up the day before April 2, telling them that the details are too fluid at the moment to preview. Bessent has also admitted to people that the final tariff regime remains a moving target, according to a person who has spoken to him. The internal uncertainty also stems in part from an ongoing administration divide on the tariff strategy and the tug of war to influence Trump in recent weeks. All of the president’s aides have vociferously defended his tariff drive, which has at times surprised Wall Street. But there are still differences of opinion over approach; Bessent, Wiles and even Vance — who has aspirations to run for president himself in 2028 — have been pushing for either a narrower tariffs regime, or for the president to make final decisions quickly and in an orderly way so that businesses can plan. On the other hand, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Navarro are said to be encouraging Trump’s long-standing tariff fixation. The divisions have caused tensions. While Navarro is a genuine tariff believer, Lutnick — who has a close relationship with Trump and enjoys influence that others in the Cabinet do not, as of yet — is widely seen as supporting whatever Trump wants to ingratiate himself with the president, a dynamic that has infuriated others in the administration. “He goes into the Oval and tells the president whatever he wants to hear,” said the first White House ally, who called Lutnick a “f-cking nightmare” and argued he does so without consideration of the economic consequences. Over the past few weeks, the more tariff-cautious faction in the administration has tried gently to pull Trump back from blanket, indiscriminate tariffs. … https://www.politico.com/news/2025/03/29/trump-aides-tariffs-liberation-day-fears-00259081 Edited Saturday at 09:59 PM by BeaverFever 1 Quote
User Posted Saturday at 10:02 PM Report Posted Saturday at 10:02 PM 3 minutes ago, BeaverFever said: Meanwhile back at clown headquarters even the Mad King’s advisors have no idea what Dictator On Day One will decree on his “liberation day” You know, you don't have to spam the thread? Just highlight a relevant section or a comment or two of interest. Provide the link, we can go read the rest if we want to. Quote
CdnFox Posted Saturday at 10:29 PM Report Posted Saturday at 10:29 PM 3 hours ago, Deluge said: The proof is that they're standing in this country without papers. Bye bye, illegal aliens, robomarx will miss you. And your zucchini! 1 Quote
Deluge Posted Sunday at 06:33 PM Report Posted Sunday at 06:33 PM (edited) 20 hours ago, CdnFox said: And your zucchini! The zucchini stys here if it's fresh. Edited Sunday at 06:33 PM by Deluge 1 Quote
BeaverFever Posted Sunday at 07:57 PM Report Posted Sunday at 07:57 PM (edited) 21 hours ago, User said: You know, you don't have to spam the thread? Just highlight a relevant section or a comment or two of interest. Provide the link, we can go read the rest if we want to. Nah the MAGAs don’t click the link so I repost the relevant parts Edited Sunday at 07:58 PM by BeaverFever Quote
CdnFox Posted Sunday at 08:56 PM Report Posted Sunday at 08:56 PM 58 minutes ago, BeaverFever said: Nah the MAGAs don’t click the link so I repost the relevant parts You mean you can't really read and don't know what's relevant so you just throw everything up and hope there's something in there you can use. Yeah. We know. Quote
BeaverFever Posted Sunday at 09:36 PM Report Posted Sunday at 09:36 PM 38 minutes ago, CdnFox said: You mean you can't really read and don't know what's relevant so you just throw everything up and hope there's something in there you can use. Yeah. We know. No I clearly said I post only the relevant parts You are the one who admitted you don’t read and you’ve just demonstrated it again with your response above. . Nice try Quote
CdnFox Posted Sunday at 11:36 PM Report Posted Sunday at 11:36 PM 1 hour ago, BeaverFever said: No I clearly said I post only the relevant parts You are the one who admitted you don’t read and you’ve just demonstrated it again with your response above. . Nice try You posted almost the entire article. That's not the 'relevant bits', that's just spamming the board which is what he complained about. And you're lying again, i've never "admitted" that i "don't read". I actually read quite a bit. More than you apperently. and my response proves i do. Jezuz kid, no wonder people don't respect you. IF you're going to lie that brazenly at least try not to do it where the proof you're wrong is a few posts above And stop spamming the site and next time whatever quote or paragraph you think is really relevant then go ahead but don't post the whole thing and expect people to dig through it and try to guess what your point is. IF you have a brain use it, only the stupid just mass spam and hope people figure out what the hell they're talking about. 1 Quote
User Posted Monday at 12:19 AM Report Posted Monday at 12:19 AM 4 hours ago, BeaverFever said: Nah the MAGAs don’t click the link so I repost the relevant parts Do it or don't, it was just an observation that what you are doing is spam. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted Monday at 01:34 AM Report Posted Monday at 01:34 AM (edited) Let's talk about out the untouched topic here. If Goldberg thought he was seeing classified information: Why didn't he notify those in the chat and leave? Why did he keep screenshots? It seems to me that Goldberg used the opportunity of this mistake to gather information he thought he wasn't allowed to have with the intent of disseminating that information to the public. That would be a major violation of federal law. The fact that he was wrong about it being classified is immaterial. He intended to keep classified information and sell it via his magazine. Edited Monday at 01:46 AM by gatomontes99 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Hodad Posted Monday at 04:44 AM Author Report Posted Monday at 04:44 AM (edited) 9 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Let's talk about out the untouched topic here. If Goldberg thought he was seeing classified information: Why didn't he notify those in the chat and leave? Why did he keep screenshots? It seems to me that Goldberg used the opportunity of this mistake to gather information he thought he wasn't allowed to have with the intent of disseminating that information to the public. That would be a major violation of federal law. The fact that he was wrong about it being classified is immaterial. He intended to keep classified information and sell it via his magazine. That's nonsense in all regards. A. Those plans are always classified because if the information gets out missions fail and our people die. Hegseth was even boasting about operational security while breaking it. Goldberg was not wrong about the nature of the information. The Trump administration is telling you an incredibly obvious lie, and you're willing to swallow it down--along with your dignity. B. Goldberg followed all ethical standards and did not release any information that would jeopardize military operations or the nation. He actively chose to not publish harmful information. He also voluntarily left the chat after confirming that it was real. Let's be clear: he could have stayed there and watched those oblivious buffoons for months. Hell, he probably should have. But he took a very high road instead. C. Every shit bag on that chat knows the rules for sharing classified information outside of secure channels. Every one of them. And still, when they saw Hegseth doing exactly what they knew to be wrong, not a single one of them spoke up and said, "Hey, let's move this to a secure channel." That's what you should be worried about. Edited Monday at 11:17 AM by Hodad 1 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted Monday at 11:51 AM Report Posted Monday at 11:51 AM 7 hours ago, Hodad said: That's nonsense in all regards. A. Those plans are always classified because if the information gets out missions fail and our people die. Hegseth was even boating about operational security. Goldberg was not wrong about the nature of the information. The Trump administration is telling you an incredibly obvious lie, and you're willing to swallow it down--along with your dignity. B. Goldberg followed all ethical standards and did not release any information that would jeopardize military operations or the nation. He actively chose to not publish harmful information. He also voluntarily left the chat after confirming that it was real. Let's be clear: he could have stayed there and watched those oblivious buffoons for months. Hell, he probably should have. But he took a very high road instead. C. Every shit bag on that chat knows the rules for sharing classified information outside of secure channels. Every one of them. And still, when they saw Hegseth doing exactly what they knew to be wrong, not a single one of them spoke up and said, "Hey, let's move this to a secure channel." That's what you should be worried about. Oh he was soooo ethical? Bullshit. He had a story and his greedy ass published the story. If it is classified information, as you say, then he stole and disseminated that information for money. At the minimum he violated laws about classified information. At worst, he committed treason. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Nationalist Posted Monday at 12:23 PM Report Posted Monday at 12:23 PM 16 hours ago, BeaverFever said: Nah the MAGAs don’t click the link so I repost the relevant parts That's because losers never post anything relevant. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Hodad Posted Monday at 12:24 PM Author Report Posted Monday at 12:24 PM 27 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Oh he was soooo ethical? Bullshit. He had a story and his greedy ass published the story. If it is classified information, as you say, then he stole and disseminated that information for money. At the minimum he violated laws about classified information. At worst, he committed treason. Lol. He did not "steal" it, dummy. Hegseth literally gave it to him, by choosing to post it in that chat against all standards for handling information of that nature. They invited him to the chat. It's the digital equivalent of speaking about classified topics after you invite a journalist into the room. Goldberg broke no laws. He behaved ethically. Don't try to shift the blame to someone else just because Trump's clown posse is exactly as incompetent as we told you they were. Quote
Nationalist Posted Monday at 12:52 PM Report Posted Monday at 12:52 PM 25 minutes ago, Hodad said: Lol. He did not "steal" it, dummy. Hegseth literally gave it to him, by choosing to post it in that chat against all standards for handling information of that nature. They invited him to the chat. It's the digital equivalent of speaking about classified topics after you invite a journalist into the room. Goldberg broke no laws. He behaved ethically. Don't try to shift the blame to someone else just because Trump's clown posse is exactly as incompetent as we told you they were. It always makes me chuckle to hear any filthy Libbie claim to have ethics. You lost. You will continue to do so. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Hodad Posted Monday at 12:57 PM Author Report Posted Monday at 12:57 PM 5 minutes ago, Nationalist said: It always makes me chuckle to hear any filthy Libbie claim to have ethics. You lost. You will continue to do so. I'm sure this makes sense in you decrepit little mind. Quote
Nationalist Posted Monday at 01:01 PM Report Posted Monday at 01:01 PM 2 minutes ago, Hodad said: I'm sure this makes sense in you decrepit little mind. It makes perfect sense. Even to a degenerate like you. 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
User Posted Monday at 01:18 PM Report Posted Monday at 01:18 PM 46 minutes ago, Hodad said: Goldberg broke no laws. He behaved ethically. Don't try to shift the blame to someone else just because Trump's clown posse is exactly as incompetent as we told you they were. Eh.... he initially claimed that the information he had was too sensitive to share, tried to characterize it as "war plans", but then turned around and shared it the next day. I wouldn't say he behaved ethically as a journalist at all. His interest was sensationalization and creating a big story. Quote
BeaverFever Posted Monday at 01:22 PM Report Posted Monday at 01:22 PM 57 minutes ago, Nationalist said: That's because losers never post anything relevant. ….Except their top secret military plans, evidently. 1 Quote
Nationalist Posted Monday at 01:28 PM Report Posted Monday at 01:28 PM 5 minutes ago, BeaverFever said: ….Except their top secret military plans, evidently. Top secret? Who categorized them as top secret? Oh wait...nobody. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
gatomontes99 Posted Monday at 02:16 PM Report Posted Monday at 02:16 PM 1 hour ago, Hodad said: Lol. He did not "steal" it, dummy. Hegseth literally gave it to him, by choosing to post it in that chat against all standards for handling information of that nature. They invited him to the chat. It's the digital equivalent of speaking about classified topics after you invite a journalist into the room. Goldberg broke no laws. He behaved ethically. Don't try to shift the blame to someone else just because Trump's clown posse is exactly as incompetent as we told you they were. It's not against standards. In fact, there is a Biden era memo that endorses using Signal. However, you are trying to dismiss the fact that Goldberg had a responsibility to inform and dismiss himself from the chat and his retention of materials he believed were classified is a violation of law. His selling of that information (that he believed was classified) is also illegal. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Deluge Posted Monday at 02:37 PM Report Posted Monday at 02:37 PM On 3/24/2025 at 6:10 PM, Hodad said: Guardian Senior members of Donald Trump’s cabinet have been involved in a serious security breach while discussing secret military plans for recent US attacks on the Houthi armed group in Yemen. In an extraordinary blunder, key figures in the Trump administration – including the vice-president, JD Vance, the defence secretary Pete Hegseth, the secretary of state, Marco Rubio, and the director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard – used the commercial chat app Signal to convene and discuss plans – while also including a prominent journalist in the group. Signal is not approved by the US government for sharing sensitive information. Buttery males!!🤣 I love it. The economy's in the shitter, and we have 30 million illegal aliens roaming the country as guests of the democrat party (all thanks to Biden), and all you diapered cultists can do is cry about a nothing burger. Well done, comrades, WELL done! lol 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.