Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Nationalist said:

Only Congress eh? I guess we'll see.

The Impoundment Act was passed by Congress. The only way Trump can legally change items budgeted by Congress is if the SCOTUS finds the Impoundment Act unconstitutional.

The Impoundment Control Act of 1974 created the procedural means by which the Congress considers and reviews executive branch withholdings of budget...

 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Legato said:

Whether one admires or distrusts Elon Musk’s disruptive style, his appointment to review government expenditures and advise about them is clearly within U.S. law—and it reflects the vision that voters supported when they elected Trump president again.

https://www.city-journal.org/article/elon-musk-doge-legal-democracy

Your cite starts off with a LIE. His own people have admitted that at least one of Musk's minions had full access to the Treasury Dept payment system.

Quote

Elon Musk’s latest frontier isn’t cars or rockets; it’s a “read-only” glimpse into the federal payment system. According to news reports, he and his team at the Trump administration’s Department of Government Efficiency have reviewed a variety of payments, so far focusing on those coming from USAID and Medicare.

 

Edited by robosmith
Posted
1 hour ago, robosmith said:

The Impoundment Act was passed by Congress. The only way Trump can legally change items budgeted by Congress is if the SCOTUS finds the Impoundment Act unconstitutional.

The Impoundment Control Act of 1974 created the procedural means by which the Congress considers and reviews executive branch withholdings of budget...

 

We will see won't we.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
42 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

I say this in all seriousness: I hope every person who voted Trump because he would look out for the regular joe gets gouged within an inch of their lives by their banks and credit card companies.

The CFPB was already defanged by Trump. When first established, the Banks were afraid to cross them. Later under Trump, they didn't care because it was toothless.

Posted
7 hours ago, Nationalist said:

USAID has been "frozen". Trump is well within his presidential rights to freeze is and to let employees go.

One by one, the agencies draining US tax dollars are being scrubbed clean of swamp material.

Will there be a USAID in the aftermath? Who knows. But one thing's for sure. Americans won't be paying to teach South American men how to properly apply eye shadow anymore.

Next stop...The Department of Education.

By LAW you're required to say "I am not a lawyer" before pretending to give legal advice here, DROPOUT.

6 hours ago, Legato said:

479324453_9189639427787240_8744743753797957312_n.thumb.jpg.06978965f017dd7a399675cc458afe2f.jpg

Oh look, ^TROLL without a name is back again. 🤮

Posted
5 hours ago, robosmith said:

The Impoundment Act was passed by Congress. The only way Trump can legally change items budgeted by Congress is if the SCOTUS finds the Impoundment Act unconstitutional.

The Impoundment Control Act of 1974 created the procedural means by which the Congress considers and reviews executive branch withholdings of budget...

 

Send it back to congress and a simple majority vote can cancel the spending.

Or the impoundment act also says:

Quote

Proponents of the Impoundment Control Act argue presidents have always had limited power to cancel federal spending and the act just clarified existing restrictions on presidents’ authority—a view that’s been backed up by the courts—while Trump and his allies argue presidents have broad power to withhold funds and the Impoundment Control Act unlawfully limited their constitutional authority.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2025/01/28/can-trump-cancel-government-funds-through-impoundment-what-to-know-as-he-pauses-all-federal-assistance/

 

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
31 minutes ago, robosmith said:

By LAW you're required to say "I am not a lawyer" before pretending to give legal advice here, DROPOUT.

Oh look, ^TROLL without a name is back again. 🤮

Rule #2

Posted
5 hours ago, robosmith said:

Your cite starts off with a LIE. His own people have admitted that at least one of Musk's minions had full access to the Treasury Dept payment system.

 

What part of "read only" is beyond your grasp? Is it because there are no caps?

Posted
17 minutes ago, Legato said:

Rule #2 sucks

ftty, TROLL

15 minutes ago, Legato said:

What part of "read only" is beyond your grasp? Is it because there are no caps?

What part of LIE do you not understand? Full access is NOT "read only" Duh

Posted
On 2/12/2025 at 7:07 AM, Nationalist said:

2. What's he doing for working Americans?

It's a foreign concept for Dems lol. 

  • Like 1

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted (edited)

Something strange happening in DC as Trump starts to drain the swamp.

There has been a substantial increase in the number of people searching for criminal defense attorneys.

https://www.independentsentinel.com/people-in-dc-are-in-desperate-need-of-criminal-defense-attorneys/

There has been a substantial increase in the number of homes being listed for sale.

https://reventureapp.blog/washington-dc-sees-35-8-surge-in-inventory-reaching-7825-homes-for-sale-in-2025/

Maybe it's all just a crazy coincidence as DOGE keeps uncovering more and more waste(corruption?) in USAID.😉

 

 

Edited by ironstone

"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,903
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    LinkSoul60
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dave L earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...