gatomontes99 Posted January 18 Report Posted January 18 Everyone always wondered why Epstein got away with what he was doing for so long. The most logical explanation was that he was being protected by powerful people. So why did he get arrested when he got arrested? This might be a clue: Quote Former cop and convicted killer Nicholas Tartaglione shared a cell with Epstein at the Manhattan MCC weeks before his death in August 2019. Tartaglione, in a call with with Jessica Reed Kraus, said the King of Pedophiles told him about the proposal after one meeting with the feds. New York Post reported: “[Epstein] said [to Tartaglione ‘They told me they’d let me plead out something small, and I’ll do just a couple of years in a camp, if I can give them something on Trump to get him impeached. […] The government told me I don’t have to prove what I say about Trump, as long as Trump’s people can’t disprove it’, Tartaglione said — adding that Epstein considered ‘making stuff up’ to save his skin. Tartaglione never said what Epstein ultimately planned to do.” https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/01/jeffrey-epsteins-cellmate-alleges-late-pedophile-was-offered/ Did Epstein get arrested to put pressure on him to out Trump? That would explain why they didn't release his client list. That would explain why he "committed suicide" with the cameras not working and the guards not watching. 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
robosmith Posted January 18 Report Posted January 18 NYP and Gateway Pundit 🤮 Did you scrape those off the floor of your bird cage? LMAO 1 1 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 19 Author Report Posted January 19 1 hour ago, robosmith said: NYP and Gateway Pundit 🤮 Did you scrape those off the floor of your bird cage? LMAO Dude said it to NYP. If he didn't, it'd be easy to produce the audio showing he didnt say it. 2 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
West Posted January 19 Report Posted January 19 2 hours ago, robosmith said: NYP and Gateway Pundit 🤮 Did you scrape those off the floor of your bird cage? LMAO This guy won't even criticize CNNs targeting of a minor and war veteran. No reason to believe he's made a point here ^^^^^ 2 Quote
NAME REMOVED Posted January 19 Report Posted January 19 3 hours ago, robosmith said: NYP and Gateway Pundit 🤮 Did you scrape those off the floor of your bird cage? LMAO The Gateway Pundit?? That "news" source, is not even worthy enough to cover your floor in case of paint droppings, if painting one's home. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 19 Author Report Posted January 19 (edited) You guys are all over the anonymous bull shit about Hegseth but when a guy puts his name on a very high profile case that led to one person dying, suddenly the credibility is an issue? Edited January 19 by gatomontes99 2 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
robosmith Posted January 19 Report Posted January 19 (edited) 2 hours ago, West said: This guy won't even criticize CNNs targeting of a minor and war veteran. No reason to believe he's made a point here ^^^^^ In REALITY, I did, you just didn't understand what you read. 2 hours ago, West said: Sorry, I guess you're STILL not familiar with the right wing propaganda sites and the fact they have no credibility. You should also cancel your subscription the The National Enquirer. LMAO Edited January 19 by robosmith 1 Quote
NAME REMOVED Posted January 19 Report Posted January 19 1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said: You guys are all over the anonymous bull shit about Hegseth Even Pete Hegseth's own mother has gone public about her son's abhorrent behaviour. Quote
robosmith Posted January 19 Report Posted January 19 3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: You guys are all over the anonymous bull shit about Hegseth but when a guy puts his name on a very high profile case that led to one person dying, suddenly the credibility is an issue? The thing is, NONE of the allegations are anonymous, cause the Senators all know their names. Esp the one who filed rape charges with the police. They just aren't PUBLICLY KNOWN. Quote
Hodad Posted January 19 Report Posted January 19 18 minutes ago, robosmith said: The thing is, NONE of the allegations are anonymous, cause the Senators all know their names. Esp the one who filed rape charges with the police. They just aren't PUBLICLY KNOWN. I didn't think they understand anything about reporting either. "Anonymous" doesn't mean the reporter doesn't know, and it doesn't mean it isn't fact checked. It simply means the person doesn't want to be targeted by the goddamn crazies or face retribution at work. One anonymous report doesn't get published unless they produce evidence. Usually around 3 corroborating reports becomes a story. Hegseth is way beyond that. The guy has a drinking problem, a women problem, a complete lack of experience or qualification and no viable reason to have been selected whatsoever. Just move on to a qualified nominee and skip the baggage. It's a serious job, and he is not a serious nominee. 1 Quote
Michael Hardner Posted January 19 Report Posted January 19 4 hours ago, Hodad said: It's a serious job, and he is not a serious nominee. The populists reject the label of unserious. They view serious people as being part of the elite. 1 Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
gatomontes99 Posted January 19 Author Report Posted January 19 8 hours ago, DUI_Offender said: Even Pete Hegseth's own mother has gone public about her son's abhorrent behaviour. No she didn't. It was an email that was leaked and she said she regretted writing it because it wasn't true. Chalk it up to words said in anger. 6 hours ago, robosmith said: The thing is, NONE of the allegations are anonymous, cause the Senators all know their names. Esp the one who filed rape charges with the police. They just aren't PUBLICLY KNOWN. So Hitler wasnt Hitler and Trump isn't Hitler so Trump is Hitler. And now it's not anonymous, people just don't know who it is. If you have any more of these, I'm going to have to start writing them down. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
I am Groot Posted January 19 Report Posted January 19 I doubt Epstein was much different from Hefner. Pretty young girls were a commodity, and both of them made use of them. This idea that it's child molesting to have consensual sex with 17 and 16-year-olds didn't exist in previous decades. Hell, the age of consent in Canada was 14 up until Stephen Harper changed it. And girls as young as 15 appeared in British men's magazines naked. Topless page 3 girls were often 16. And I doubt you can find a rock star from the 60s, 70s, 80s or 90s who hasn't slept with girls that age and younger MANY, MANY times while on the road. If they had the body and were willing (or drunk or drugged out) few in the entertainment industry had much of an issue with it. I think Epstein was just the victim of changing times and an eager lawyer who wanted to make a lot of money, along with mercenary old whores who resented no longer being attractive and who wanted some of that cash themselves. 2 Quote
NAME REMOVED Posted January 19 Report Posted January 19 (edited) 17 minutes ago, I am Groot said: I doubt Epstein was much different from Hefner. Pretty young girls were a commodity, and both of them made use of them. This idea that it's child molesting to have consensual sex with 17 and 16-year-olds didn't exist in previous decades. Hell, the age of consent in Canada was 14 up until Stephen Harper changed it. And girls as young as 15 appeared in British men's magazines naked. Topless page 3 girls were often 16. And I doubt you can find a rock star from the 60s, 70s, 80s or 90s who hasn't slept with girls that age and younger MANY, MANY times while on the road. If they had the body and were willing (or drunk or drugged out) few in the entertainment industry had much of an issue with it. I think Epstein was just the victim of changing times and an eager lawyer who wanted to make a lot of money, along with mercenary old whores who resented no longer being attractive and who wanted some of that cash themselves. Enough about Epstein. Let's talk about Chef's mom and dad's encounter with the Lockness Monster. Edited January 19 by DUI_Offender Quote
I am Groot Posted January 19 Report Posted January 19 3 hours ago, DUI_Offender said: Enough about Epstein. Let's talk about Chef's mom and dad's encounter with the Lockness Monster. This topic is ABOUT Epstein, in case you never noticed. Quote
Nationalist Posted January 19 Report Posted January 19 Libbies... @robosmith, @DUI_Offender and @Hodad have no argument so they denigrate the news agencies that reported this. They are generally good with "unnamed sources" and the likes of CNN and MSNBC because they will tell them what they want to hear. The problem they have is...the NYP is proven correct more often than not, as is Gateway Pundit. Their chosen news sources are...well...less than correct more often than not. Poor Libbies...they live lives of lies and "misinformation". 1 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted January 19 Report Posted January 19 4 hours ago, I am Groot said: I doubt Epstein was much different from Hefner. Pretty young girls were a commodity, and both of them made use of them. This idea that it's child molesting to have consensual sex with 17 and 16-year-olds didn't exist in previous decades. Hell, the age of consent in Canada was 14 up until Stephen Harper changed it. And girls as young as 15 appeared in British men's magazines naked. Topless page 3 girls were often 16. And I doubt you can find a rock star from the 60s, 70s, 80s or 90s who hasn't slept with girls that age and younger MANY, MANY times while on the road. If they had the body and were willing (or drunk or drugged out) few in the entertainment industry had much of an issue with it. I think Epstein was just the victim of changing times and an eager lawyer who wanted to make a lot of money, along with mercenary old whores who resented no longer being attractive and who wanted some of that cash themselves. Statutory rape has been a serious crime as long as I've been alive and conscious of the matter. 1 Quote
robosmith Posted January 19 Report Posted January 19 1 minute ago, Nationalist said: Libbies... @robosmith, @DUI_Offender and @Hodad have no argument so they denigrate the news agencies that reported this. NYP and Gateway Pundit denigrate THEMSELVES all the time. Time for YOU to cancel your National Enquirer subscription, too. 1 minute ago, Nationalist said: They are generally good with "unnamed sources" and the likes of CNN and MSNBC because they will tell them what they want to hear. I am fine with not knowing the identities of anyone who fears the Trump MAGA CULT CRAZY GOONS. You should be, too, before the next David Depape comes looking for YOU. 1 minute ago, Nationalist said: The problem they have is...the NYP is proven correct more often than not, as is Gateway Pundit. Their chosen news sources are...well...less than correct more often than not. "More often than not," is a really shitty standard for ANY reputable news organization. As is NOT ISSUING CORRECTIONS. 1 minute ago, Nationalist said: Poor Libbies...they live lives of lies and "misinformation". You're the one defending a "more often than not" and very few if any corrections standard. 🤮 1 1 Quote
Nationalist Posted January 19 Report Posted January 19 (edited) 28 minutes ago, robosmith said: NYP and Gateway Pundit denigrate THEMSELVES all the time. Time for YOU to cancel your National Enquirer subscription, too. I am fine with not knowing the identities of anyone who fears the Trump MAGA CULT CRAZY GOONS. You should be, too, before the next David Depape comes looking for YOU. "More often than not," is a really shitty standard for ANY reputable news organization. As is NOT ISSUING CORRECTIONS. You're the one defending a "more often than not" and very few if any corrections standard. 🤮 Robo...please. there is no comparison between the accuracy of where you get your info and the NYP and Gateway Pundit. Hence you make such frivolous and strangely juvenile comments. Edited January 19 by Nationalist Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
WestCanMan Posted January 19 Report Posted January 19 20 hours ago, robosmith said: NYP and Gateway Pundit 🤮 Did you scrape those off the floor of your bird cage? LMAO Robo: "OF COURSE THAT'S ALL BS OR CNN WOUD BE ALL OVER IT 🤮!!! AND YOU CAN NEVER TRUST SOURCES UNLESS THEY'RE ANONYMOUS!!!! DUHHHHH!!!! LMAO" 16 hours ago, DUI_Offender said: The Gateway Pundit?? That "news" source, is not even worthy enough to cover your floor in case of paint droppings, if painting one's home. Did the Gateway Pundit ever have to settle a lawsuit for slandering a teenager by calling him a racist? If they did, would that be enough for them to earn your respect? Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. "If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"
WestCanMan Posted January 19 Report Posted January 19 5 hours ago, I am Groot said: I doubt Epstein was much different from Hefner. Pretty young girls were a commodity, and both of them made use of them. This idea that it's child molesting to have consensual sex with 17 and 16-year-olds didn't exist in previous decades. Hell, the age of consent in Canada was 14 up until Stephen Harper changed it. And girls as young as 15 appeared in British men's magazines naked. Topless page 3 girls were often 16. And I doubt you can find a rock star from the 60s, 70s, 80s or 90s who hasn't slept with girls that age and younger MANY, MANY times while on the road. If they had the body and were willing (or drunk or drugged out) few in the entertainment industry had much of an issue with it. I think Epstein was just the victim of changing times and an eager lawyer who wanted to make a lot of money, along with mercenary old whores who resented no longer being attractive and who wanted some of that cash themselves. You make a lot of good points. Just a few random comments spring to mind: I don't even know if there were any accusations about 16 yr olds, was that really a thing? The specific allegations I saw were about 17-yr olds. I get that consensual sex with a 17-yr-old was totally legal in Canada back then (even 14 before Harper), 17 was probably legal in most western countries, but bringing them to an island and pimping them out that young was probably still quite illegal lol. I do get your point though, there are 17-yr-olds that look 25 and 25-yr-olds that look 17, and I don't see how any man could judged a pedo for sleeping with a 17-yr-old unless they knew their age, or requested someone that young from a pimp, or especially if they were in a position of power over that minor through work or school or therapy or something. What happened to Prince Andrew was completely random and unfair... Aside from Epstein and Ghislaine, I don't know of any other adults who were tried and convicted by the MSM. And there was also the obligatory accusation against Trump, of course, but the MSM finds him guilty of everything back to the kidnapping of the Lindbergh baby. "I think Epstein was just the victim of changing times" - there's a word for that now: "presentism", and it has to be used hypocritically in order to be used correctly. For example: US presidents can be found guilty of growing up in a household where there were slaves present, but you can still be considered a truly decent prophet if you forced children into sex-slavery when you were 50+ years old (and this is several centuries after Christ and Buddha set far better examples). Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. "If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"
WestCanMan Posted January 19 Report Posted January 19 7 hours ago, Michael Hardner said: The populists reject the label of unserious. They view serious people as being part of the elite. Kamala just called. She wants to know if it's considered "unserious" to treat your job as border czar like a holiday weekend at a rave and then just laugh about it when reporters ask you if you ever intend to actually do it. Do you have an answer, MH? I didn't think so. Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. "If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"
WestCanMan Posted January 19 Report Posted January 19 13 hours ago, robosmith said: The thing is, NONE of the allegations are anonymous, cause the Senators all know their names. Esp the one who filed rape charges with the police. They just aren't PUBLICLY KNOWN. OMG, the congenital liars who have a publicly funded slush fund to pay off sexual assault accusers are pretending to know the names of some victims that they're not releasing? And there are charges filed with the police but none of the perennial rape-accusing Dem senators are bringing those names to light? Please tell us more, robotard. Your "evidence" is always so compelling. And thank you for that cite(?). Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. "If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"
WestCanMan Posted January 19 Report Posted January 19 23 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: “[Epstein] said [to Tartaglione ‘They told me they’d let me plead out something small, and I’ll do just a couple of years in a camp, if I can give them something on Trump to get him impeached. […] The government told me I don’t have to prove what I say about Trump, as long as Trump’s people can’t disprove it’, That's the most "FBI" story I've heard in a while. They coerced every other person they could get behind bars for false testimony against Trump, of course they would have done it to Epstein. Apparently he didn't play his hand correctly though. What he thought was his trump card looked like this: but they would accept no less than this: 1 Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. "If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"
robosmith Posted January 19 Report Posted January 19 2 hours ago, Nationalist said: Robo...please. there is no comparison between the accuracy of where you get your info and the NYP and Gateway Pundit. Hence you make such frivolous and strangely juvenile comments. You can say "please" all you want but it won't change the FACT they are right wing propaganda outlets. NYP is even worse than than PROVEN LIARS at FOS. 1 hour ago, WestCanMan said: Robo: "OF COURSE THAT'S ALL BS OR CNN WOUD BE ALL OVER IT 🤮!!! AND YOU CAN NEVER TRUST SOURCES UNLESS THEY'RE ANONYMOUS!!!! DUHHHHH!!!! LMAO" IF you're trying to claim ^this is what I said or believe, YOU'RE LYING. Quote
.thumb.jpg.9a49e1b2f22a6d34a345152c50044aa9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.