Whos really to blame for the LA wildfire? Donnie or Gavin Newscum who diverts water from its natural path into the ocean and refuses to do any sort of wildfire/forestry management because of faulty woke ideology?

[robosmith]

On 1/10/2025 at 11:14 AM, Legato said:

Just goggle it, there lots of info on fire dept dei.

I typed in goggle and got a lesson on motorcycle riding. LMAO

On 1/10/2025 at 11:14 AM, Deluge said:

The evidence is right in front of your face:

Latina with an accent + DEI = Boxes checked, automatic hire. 

^Nothing but BULLSHIT. 🤮

[robosmith]

On 1/10/2025 at 11:33 AM, Legato said:

$1.7m That could have gone into actual firefighting instead of a DEI agenda.

Do you understand the fighting fires is NOT a full time job? 

Training is much closer to full time, and training to get along with colleagues is part of that.

[Venandi]

26 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Stop LYING. No one is, nor should be, listening to me about climate, except those of YOU who are too stupid to read and UNDERSTAND the peer reviewed RESEARCH JOURNALS, which is where I get my info.

It doesn't matter whether you're right or not DUH. Things like:

The brush pile matter DUH.

The Hydrants matter DUH,

LAFD manning and funding matters DUH, 

Even if I agreed with your assessment of cause, even if I wrote the damn peer reviewed research journals, I'd still want to see incremental progress being made on fuel loading and suppression efforts because I know what's in store for us.

Even I can walk around, identify the threats, read a map, identify worst case scenarios and try to head them off at the pass.

You might not want to admit it but I bet you wouldn't voluntarily get on an airplane with a Capt who refused to do that.

  

 

 

Ooops, almost forgot to say

DUH

 

Edited January 11 by Venandi

[Venandi]

6 minutes ago, robosmith said:

training to get along with colleagues is part of that.

You're fired.

[robosmith]

9 minutes ago, West said:

Reports are Newscum slashed 100 million from wildfire preparedness even as they yell about climate change. 

Post the "reports" then.

9 minutes ago, West said:

Probably redirecting funds to pay for tampons for men. 

You mean trans-women?

Your IGNORANCE about trans-women menstruating is pathetic. Doctors never install a uterus.

[robosmith]

6 minutes ago, Venandi said:

It doesn't matter whether you're right or not DUH. Things like:

The brush pile matter DUH.

The Hydrants matter DUH,

LAFD manning and funding matters DUH, 

Even if I agreed with your assessment of cause, even if I wrote the damn peer reviewed research journals, I'd still want to see incremental progress being made on fuel loading and suppression efforts because I know what's in store for us.

Even I can walk around, identify the threats, read a map, concur worst case scenarios and try to head them off at the pass. You might not want to admit it but I bet you wouldn't voluntarily get on an airplane with a Capt who refused to do that.

  

 

 

Ooops, almost forgot to say

DUH

 

Are you still fantasizing about your claim that  I've ignored MITIGATION? LMAO

Wake UP, lDIOT!

[West]

40 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Post the "reports" then.

You mean trans-women?

Your IGNORANCE about trans-women menstruating is pathetic. Doctors never install a uterus.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/gov-newsom-cut-fire-budget-020119384.html

 

[robosmith]

2 minutes ago, West said:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/gov-newsom-cut-fire-budget-020119384.html

 

So you're pretending that a $100M cut just months before the fire had an impact on performance after six years of dramatic increases?

From your cite:

Quote

California Gov. Gavin Newsom cut funding for wildfire and forest resilience by more than $100 million just months before the wildfires currently ravaging Los Angeles broke out, according to a report.

However, a review of the state's annual budgets under Newsom shows that direct spending on fire prevention has increased dramatically over the last six years.

Seems you're delusional about how rapidly a $100M investment in fire fighting facilities can be spent. Like how long it takes to build reservoirs and pumping stations. LMAO

 

 

[eyeball]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Do you understand the fighting fires is NOT a full time job? 

There's little reason wildfire fighters and other disaster relief workers as well shouldn't be rolled into dedicated federal and provincial/state Environmental Works Departments.

When not attending to disaster relief these professionals would be at work restoring watersheds and wetlands, cleaning forest floors, cleaning oil spills, planting trees...there is no end to the remedial work that needs doing. Preventing, mitigating, restoring, and adapting to environmental disasters is an occupation that should be gainfully employing hundreds of thousands of people.

It should simply be a cost of having an economy. But like the Joker it'll probably cost about half now.

It didn't have to be that much but that's what we get for singing ribbit like a frog in a pot of water...with our fingers in our ears.

 

[West]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

So you're pretending that a $100M cut just months before the fire had an impact on performance after six years of dramatic increases?

From your cite:

Seems you're delusional about how rapidly a $100M investment in fire fighting facilities can be spent. Like how long it takes to build reservoirs and pumping stations. LMAO

 

 

I suspect because you are an apologist for DEI governance you don't understand that spending money doesn't necessarily equate to positive outcomes. If

As I've already said, their priority is diversity, equity and inclusion. That means, in ICS LANGUAGE that's where they divert the resources to. Democrats are funding social engineering so that they can continue to control with tax payers resources and often times taxpayers are funding vile shit against their beliefs. 

 

[robosmith]

3 minutes ago, West said:

I suspect because you are an apologist for DEI governance you don't understand that spending money doesn't necessarily equate to positive outcomes. If

Then why are YOU citing a $100M CUT? Government is not in the habit of wasting resources your denigration of DEI spending notwithstanding.

3 minutes ago, West said:

As I've already said, their priority is diversity, equity and inclusion.

You saying that doesn't make it true. As ALWAYS, the first priority of the Fire Dept is fighting fires.

MAYBE NOW, DEI is a little higher than it WAS.

3 minutes ago, West said:

 

That means, in ICS LANGUAGE that's where they divert the resources to. Democrats are funding social engineering so that they can continue to control with tax payers resources and often times taxpayers are funding vile shit against their beliefs. 

 

Your FOS LIES conspiracy theories mean NOTHING. Prove it, or shut it.

[Deluge]

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

Certainly ^YOU DON'T

LA is on fire. Where the f*ck have you been, pervert? 

[Deluge]

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

^Nothing but BULLSHIT. 🤮

You mean nothing but truth. 

The fire department is run by lesbians. I wonder how they're doing with the fires? 

[WestCanMan]

44 minutes ago, godzilla said:

what? yeah, i don't get how any of that has anything to do with whether climate change is happening or not or to what degree.

Id10t.

I just reminded you that the climate change hoax that you believe in comes from two primary sources:

1. the lying Dems and their corrupt media, and
2. elite hypocrites who cruise in yachts, fly around in private jets, and have mansions with carbon footprints but criticize peons for driving minivans

Someone has you blaming these fires on global warming, and they free up a lot of prime real estate for the elite hypocrite crowd.

[West]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Then why are YOU citing a $100M CUT? Government is not in the habit of wasting resources your denigration of DEI spending notwithstanding.

You saying that doesn't make it true. As ALWAYS, the first priority of the Fire Dept is fighting fires.

MAYBE NOW, DEI is a little higher than it WAS.

Your FOS LIES conspiracy theories mean NOTHING. Prove it, or shut it.

1. DEI/stakeholder capitalism or whatever the woketards try to rebrand it as is vile and totally a waste of resources. 

2. It's not ME who's saying that. It's the officials responsible for fire relief and emergency planning stating their priorities there jackass.  

You fly into a fit of rage, refuse to think about the facts, and then lash out. Typical of a raging leftist 

[robosmith]

7 minutes ago, West said:

1. DEI/stakeholder capitalism or whatever the woketards try to rebrand it as is vile and totally a waste of resources. 

Sorry but YOU'RE NOT any kind of expert in sociology NOR political science so ^this OPINION means NOTHING.

7 minutes ago, West said:

2. It's not ME who's saying that. It's the officials responsible for fire relief and emergency planning stating their priorities there jackass.  

Prove it with a published list of priorities or shut it.

7 minutes ago, West said:

You fly into a fit of rage, refuse to think about the facts, and then lash out. Typical of a raging leftist 

LMAO, you're an ASS.

[gatomontes99]

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

Sorry but YOU'RE NOT any kind of expert in sociology NOR political science so ^this OPINION means NOTHING.

In a democracy, one vote is no more or less valuable than another. So his opinion on DEI is every bit as valuable as those of a sociologists. Further, as you are not a sociologist, you are not qualified to tell him his opinion is wrong.

Edited January 12 by gatomontes99

[Legato]

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

Sorry but YOU'RE NOT any kind of expert in sociology NOR political science so ^this OPINION means NOTHING.

Prove it with a published list of priorities or shut it.

LMAO, you're an ASS.

LMAO's an ass? What's LMAO done to conjure such a loud conjecture?

[West]

20 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

In a democracy, one vote is no more or less valuable than another. So his opinion on DEI is every bit as valuable as those of a sociologists. Further, as you are not a sociologist, you are not qualified to tell him his opinion is wrong.

And he has no clue on my background so there's that. 

Certainly in my opinion hiring someone because of characteristics like race or trans is improper and should be outlawed. Merit is the only way to go

[gatomontes99]

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

Prove it with a published list of priorities or shut it.

How about the deputy fire chief saying it in a promo video?

 

[West]

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

Sorry but YOU'RE NOT any kind of expert in sociology NOR political science so ^this OPINION means NOTHING.

Prove it with a published list of priorities or shut it.

LMAO, you're an ASS.

https://saraacarter.com/la-fire-chief-warned-18-million-budget-cuts-would-impact-wildfire-response-in-dec-4-memo/

More evidence that you'll just refuse to acknowledge. Meanwhile peoples homes burned down cause of DEI Democrats. Sad

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, West said:

And he has no clue on my background so there's that. 

I can easily tell your background cause an expert would easily have EVIDENCE at hand and you never do, beyond right wing propaganda sites.

2 hours ago, West said:

Certainly in my opinion hiring someone because of characteristics like race or trans is improper and should be outlawed. Merit is the only way to go

Of course that is NEVER the sole factor, which you would know if you were ANY KIND OF EXPERT.

Thanks for proving you're NOT.

[West]

3 minutes ago, robosmith said:

I can easily tell your background cause an expert would easily have EVIDENCE at hand and you never do, beyond right wing propaganda sites.

Of course that is NEVER the sole factor, which you would know if you were ANY KIND OF EXPERT.

Thanks for proving you're NOT.

We are engaging in a political discussion board where you've been provided newspaper articles on current events 

Instead of being a pathetic troll maybe add something of substance rather than your usually retarded "duh" or whatever other bs you fling around 

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, West said:

https://saraacarter.com/la-fire-chief-warned-18-million-budget-cuts-would-impact-wildfire-response-in-dec-4-memo/

It's hilarious that you believe a ^campaign "memo" written "By Carter Staff Writer" is any kind of objective evidence.

1 hour ago, West said:

More evidence that you'll just refuse to acknowledge.

 

Just cause you've been fooled does not mean your allegations are true.

1 hour ago, West said:

Meanwhile peoples homes burned down cause of DEI Democrats. Sad

^Still no published list of Democrats priorities mentioning DEI. Duh

[robosmith]

3 minutes ago, West said:

We are engaging in a political discussion board where you've been provided newspaper articles on current events 

You mean you believe that SARACARTER.COM is newspaper article? You're even dumber than I thought.

3 minutes ago, West said:

Instead of being a pathetic troll maybe add something of substance rather than your usually retarded "duh" or whatever other bs you fling around 

You first. Prove that Democrats top priority in hiring is DEI and their hires are less competent as a result. YOU CANNOT.