Donnie vows to end woke, calls it Bullshit

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, eyeball said:

Donnie vows to end woke, calls it Bullshit

What does that even mean?

A sarcastic epithet, the left, daylight savings time...?

 

Oh look, a woke leftie shows up to pretend nobody knows what woke means again because he can't address the points.  Yawn. 

[Nationalist]

9 hours ago, eyeball said:

Donnie vows to end woke, calls it Bullshit

What does that even mean?

A sarcastic epithet, the left, daylight savings time...?

 

For one thing, I bet it means this confused soul;

Has a very short runway left.

[eyeball]

3 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Has a very short runway left.

And then what, criminal charges, imprisonment, execution?

What will be ended and how exactly? Has anyone thought this through, at all?

[gatomontes99]

12 hours ago, Politics1990 said:

donnie is gonna do nothing but  try to give tax breaks to his rich friends  and then scream election fraud when he loses the house in 2026 midterms lol  then maybe  throw a tantrum in 2028 when he's forced to leave

Ok. Whatever you say skippy.

[impartialobserver]

Sorry but can't happen. If you have the first amendment, you are going to have a sect of society that believes and expresses woke ideas. 

[Nationalist]

2 hours ago, eyeball said:

And then what, criminal charges, imprisonment, execution?

What will be ended and how exactly? Has anyone thought this through, at all?

No little snowflake. I realize these would be the first options for you Libbies but, more than likely some will be fired and the cross-dressers will be told to wear the proper uniform.

[Nationalist]

1 hour ago, impartialobserver said:

Sorry but can't happen. If you have the first amendment, you are going to have a sect of society that believes and expresses woke ideas. 

Let 'em express.

We'll laugh at them and set proper boundaries for their expressions. 

[impartialobserver]

15 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Let 'em express.

We'll laugh at them and set proper boundaries for their expressions. 

and furthermore.. Trump and his crew do not and can not control every outlet for this. They will have to pick and choose their battles and be ok with it existing in some way. 

[Nationalist]

14 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

and furthermore.. Trump and his crew do not and can not control every outlet for this. They will have to pick and choose their battles and be ok with it existing in some way. 

I think you grossly overestimate the numbers of truly "woke".

I think you also grossly underestimate the resolve of the majority to put an end to all this madness.

When the dust settles, the extremes of social engineering...on both sides...will return to their proper place in society.

As a joke for public ridicule.

[impartialobserver]

1 minute ago, Nationalist said:

I think you grossly overestimate the numbers of truly "woke".

I think you also grossly underestimate the resolve of the majority to put an end to all this madness.

When the dust settles, the extremes of social engineering...on both sides...will return to their proper place in society.

As a joke for public ridicule.

Well, all we can do is "estimate" because it is not exactly we have a public registry where folks are mandated to enter their information and check a box for "woke". The more liberal minded folks are going to be "woke" by your definition and without abolishing the first amendment, you can't legislate them away. 

[Nationalist]

6 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Well, all we can do is "estimate" because it is not exactly we have a public registry where folks are mandated to enter their information and check a box for "woke". The more liberal minded folks are going to be "woke" by your definition and without abolishing the first amendment, you can't legislate them away. 

True. You can't bring reasonable legislation that says they can't be Trannies. Nor can you legislate that one cannot be a racist, bigot, religious zealot, etc.

You can however, fully enforce the law. For instance, indecent exposure, public lewdness, illegal demonstration , civil disobedience , resisting arrest , arson , etc.

[eyeball]

53 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

No little snowflake. I realize these would be the first options for you Libbies but,

Why? I'm not triggered by trannies I'm amused by the way they make you guys react. And again there's next to nothing in terms of a policy for ending woke, just a vow that's quite vague on details.

53 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

more than likely some will be fired and the cross-dressers will be told to wear the proper uniform.

Fired for what exactly? Levine appears to be wearing a proper Admirals uniform. How much will taxpayers need to pay for compensation/severance? 

This is what I meant when I asked if anyone has thought through the details about ending woke.

[impartialobserver]

1 minute ago, Nationalist said:

True. You can't bring reasonable legislation that says they can't be Trannies. Nor can you legislate that one cannot be a racist, bigot, religious zealot, etc.

You can however, fully enforce the law. For instance, indecent exposure, public lewdness, illegal demonstration , civil disobedience , resisting arrest , arson , etc.

and you think that Trump can mandate that the laws are fully enforced in every instance across all cities/towns/areas? Yes, there will be press releases saying "we will not put up with this" and that will satiate you. That's fine. There will be a relatively few instances where the law is more strictly applied but the key word is "few". Largely, what we will see is Trump reacting after the fact and condemning it. 

[eyeball]

4 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

You can however, fully enforce the law. For instance, indecent exposure, public lewdness, illegal demonstration , civil disobedience , resisting arrest , arson , etc.

You see any of that here?

[Nationalist]

10 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Why? I'm not triggered by trannies I'm amused by the way they make you guys react. And again there's next to nothing in terms of a policy for ending woke, just a vow that's quite vague on details.

Replace "trannie" with "Trump" or "MAGA" or "Republican" or "Conservative" or in some circles, "white"...and you limp lilies are on it like flies to sh1t.

16 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Fired for what exactly? Levine appears to be wearing a proper Admirals uniform. How much will taxpayers need to pay for compensation/severance? 

This is what I meant when I asked if anyone has thought through the details about ending woke.

Levine is out of uniform. He's a "he" not a "she". If he wants to LARP about in the privacy of his home or at a nightclub...fine...but he is out of uniform and does not deserve his position. He can try to hold onto his military pay and pension, after being removed from his present office and return to duty with the proper uniform on. Otherwise...perhaps a dishonourable discharge would be in order.

18 minutes ago, eyeball said:

You see any of that here?

I see a man out of uniform. I believe that's an chargable offence?

[eyeball]

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

Replace "trannie" with "Trump" or "MAGA" or "Republican" or "Conservative" or in some circles, "white"...and you limp lilies are on it like flies to sh1t.

This gives me a chuckle just like it does you. How do you explain that?

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

Levine is out of uniform. He's a "he" not a "she". If he wants to LARP about in the privacy of his home or at a nightclub...fine...but he is out of uniform and does not deserve his position. He can try to hold onto his military pay and pension, after being removed from his present office and return to duty with the proper uniform on. Otherwise...perhaps a dishonourable discharge would be in order.

Okay, but these are just sentiments. Nothing you said here is a legislated rule or regulation that formally captures or enshrines them in a law that can be applied on Jan 21. There's a legislative process that has to be followed and then the legislated solution will very likely need to be tested in court.

How likely is it Donnie will come up against many of the same issues everytime he trys to end woke?

Take your time...think it through.

It'll be the same thing btw when it comes to unleashing the economy. Doing so will mean putting a legislative end to hundreds if not thousands of 'woke' regulations and laws - many of which are enshrined as such at the state level - it will take years to unleash.

The real problem of course is that you people have attached the term woke to everything you don't like without really thinking through how much that actually encompasses.

[Michael Hardner]

53 minutes ago, eyeball said:

This gives me a chuckle just like it does you. How do you explain that?

Okay, but these are just sentiments. Nothing you said here is a legislated rule or regulation that formally captures or enshrines them in a law that can be applied on Jan 21. There's a legislative process that has to be followed and then the legislated solution will very likely need to be tested in court.

How likely is it Donnie will come up against many of the same issues everytime he trys to end woke?

Take your time...think it through.

It'll be the same thing btw when it comes to unleashing the economy. Doing so will mean putting a legislative end to hundreds if not thousands of 'woke' regulations and laws - many of which are enshrined as such at the state level - it will take years to unleash.

The real problem of course is that you people have attached the term woke to everything you don't like without really thinking through how much that actually encompasses.

Wow. A good summary. 

 

What will really happen is... Not much of anything. Trump will make some statements and the people who like him will celebrate that Wokeness is now defeated.

 

Those of us who never cared will continue to not care. 

 

What I'm really worried about is what they're going to turn to when the economy refuses to respond to the 25% tariff idea...

[Nationalist]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

This gives me a chuckle just like it does you. How do you explain that?

Okay, but these are just sentiments. Nothing you said here is a legislated rule or regulation that formally captures or enshrines them in a law that can be applied on Jan 21. There's a legislative process that has to be followed and then the legislated solution will very likely need to be tested in court.

How likely is it Donnie will come up against many of the same issues everytime he trys to end woke?

Take your time...think it through.

It'll be the same thing btw when it comes to unleashing the economy. Doing so will mean putting a legislative end to hundreds if not thousands of 'woke' regulations and laws - many of which are enshrined as such at the state level - it will take years to unleash.

The real problem of course is that you people have attached the term woke to everything you don't like without really thinking through how much that actually encompasses.

Dude...

"UCMJ includes a general provision for "bad conduct" or "discrediting the armed forces." Engaging in dishonest, fraudulent, or dishonorable conduct can result in discharge. This broad category encompasses actions that bring dishonor or disgrace to the military, diminishing the trust and integrity needed for the military’s success.

Dishonorable Discharge.

 

Edited December 23, 2024 by Nationalist

[eyeball]

1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

What I'm really worried about is what they're going to turn to when the economy refuses to respond to the 25% tariff idea...

The Deepstate, especially Trudeau's. That's a horse everyone and their dog, especially PP's, will be flogging until 2029-30.

Of course looking for the Deepstate will be like digging a hole to China and for that fail they'll blame China.

[eyeball]

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

Dishonorable Discharge.

Which is a punishment that can only be meted out following a court martial. There's nothing Levine is doing that isn't allowed under existing laws so before you have the court martial you need to come up with new laws not to mention charges and penalties that courts can rule on and impose.

Maybe you figure there's no need to think anything through and that a simple letter to someone should do the trick.

[Michael Hardner]

1 minute ago, eyeball said:

 Maybe you figure there's no need to think anything through and that a simple letter to someone should do the trick.

Too hard.

Just posting on here is enough.

[Nationalist]

35 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Which is a punishment that can only be meted out following a court martial. There's nothing Levine is doing that isn't allowed under existing laws so before you have the court martial you need to come up with new laws not to mention charges and penalties that courts can rule on and impose.

Maybe you figure there's no need to think anything through and that a simple letter to someone should do the trick.

No need at all. He has engaged in fraudulent and dishonorable conduct.

[eyeball]

21 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

No need at all. He has engaged in fraudulent and dishonorable conduct.

Lol! It's easy to see why you folks believe tariffs will make America rich and how a 5% carbon tax is a WAY bigger deal than a 25% tariff.

Heck, tariffs will probably make us rich too.

 

[eyeball]

30 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

No need at all. He has engaged in fraudulent and dishonorable conduct.

And to be sure, I get a chuckle out of this Admiral too.

I certainly don't cry myself to sleep at night thinking about woke the way you guys do. I fail to understand how you manage to even get out of bed in the mornings.

[herbie]

Used to teach my kids that it is easy to be an a$$hole, it's the measure of a decent person to work hard to avoid being one.
Worked on them, seems to be an exercise in futility for an awful lot of people.