The View Scared to Make False Accusations Now

[Legato]

4 minutes ago, Aristides said:

They won't sue because they can't prove they have been slandered. Trump is the most litigious president in history and more litigious than 90% of business men but he won't go after the View or any news outlet. Why would that be?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_and_business_legal_affairs_of_Donald_Trump

They are not my go to news sources, I rarely watch the View or CNN and never watch MSNBC. I also don't consider social media or talk shows to be legitimate news sources, quite the contrary. My main sources are Canadian and European.

MAGAS are very thin skinned, they love to dish it out but when it comes the other way, they want to shut it down and cheer anyone who wants to restrict anyones free speech but their own.

Trump doesn't care, he toys with them. Even they know they're lying, anything for a click. Yet a large majority of the public takes their word as gospel.

Are your "main" sources honest? Have you done due diligence?

You talk about thin skinned, that's a laugh when the internet if full of crying Democrats and not full of crying Republicans.

Your crowd has been shutting down free speech for years so go cry me a river.

[Aristides]

6 minutes ago, Legato said:

Trump doesn't care, he toys with them. Even they know they're lying, anything for a click. Yet a large majority of the public takes their word as gospel.

Are your "main" sources honest? Have you done due diligence?

You talk about thin skinned, that's a laugh when the internet if full of crying Democrats and not full of crying Republicans.

Your crowd has been shutting down free speech for years so go cry me a river.

My news sources have real names and are accountable for what they say. No one is accountable for anything on social media.

Trump isn't toying, he just knows he can't testify under oath and win. The same reason FOX shelled out $780 million and that's why the ladies laugh whenever they read one of his stupid legal notes.

Edited November 26, 2024 by Aristides

[CdnFox]

37 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Claims made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence, which is why I don't bother much with your opinion-casting disguised as debating.

Says the man who just presented no evidence  

I present evidence all the time, but then you pull the second common lefty trip which is to pretend that evidence isn't evidence and lie your ass off about it.

As far as evidence of this goes I just pointed out you did it again. And the evidence of that is in this very thread where you did it again. So there you go.

[WestCanMan]

25 minutes ago, Aristides said:

They 

Buddy, describe for me how you feel about the following...

• Fauci knew that he himself had provided funding for GoF research on that bat coronavirus to make it transmissible among humans, and that in fact it had resulted in the development of a coronavirus that was transmissible between human cells
• BEFORE he started telling the story of the coronavirus most likely coming from a chance interaction between a bat and an intermediary species, such as a pangolin, where it mutated to become transmissible to humans. 
• Then Fauci inexplicably surmised/postulated/theorized that only the pangolin virus itself was transmissible to humans, and that the virus that was transmissible between cells within humans wasn't transmissible to other humans (back when Trump was banning non-Americans from flying in from China)
• People were banned from social media outlets for even talking about the BSL4 lab while Fauci was pimping the bat-pangolin-human tale. It was members of TNI who banned people from social media for talking about the BSL4 lab, and people from TNI who decided to only go with the B-P-H fantasy and ignore the possibility that it may have originated from the BSL4 lab
• The BSL4 lab is now considered to be the source of the covid virus

In your own words, I want you to tell me what you think about the integrity and trustworthiness of Fauci and these TNI members before I ever listen to another f'ing word out of your mouth about "who is and isn't a liar". 

I'll tell you somethin' for nothin': if Fauci was a lawyer or Realtor or some other professional who had a fiduciary relationship with their client, and they talked to their client with Fauci's lack of disclosures and low level of integrity - as described above - they'd lose their license for certain.

You know who isn't held to that level of professionalism at all? Doctors. And drug manufacturers. Weird, hey? Doctors "can't be sued" for prescribing the jab, and they weren't allowed to promote other possible preventive measures. Your doctor had no fiduciary relationship with you whatsoever as long as they were saying "vaccine". 

I know that you don't see a problem with any part of that. Your opinion doesn't mean jack shit to me, Aristedes. If you told me that the sun was going to come up tomorrow, I would consider that as a reason why it might not.  

[Black Dog]

37 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Says the man who just presented no evidence  

I haven't made any claims requiring evidence, I've just been mocking the brain damaged right wing losers freaking out over a daytime talk show.

Quote

I present evidence all the time, but then you pull the second common lefty trip which is to pretend that evidence isn't evidence and lie your ass off about it.

As far as evidence of this goes I just pointed out you did it again. And the evidence of that is in this very thread where you did it again. So there you go

Except you made the following claims without any evidence to support them.

Quote

The view has had a powerful impact in spreading this information and disinformation. The left considered it a powerful tool to attack their enemies.

The typical pattern with you is:

1. Present dogshit opinions as facts without supporting evidence

2. Lie and say you provided evidence and whine about being asked to back up your arguments

3. Go back to 1 and repeat ad nauseam.

The pattern has repeated itself countless times and frankly, I'm bored of it. You're boring.

[Aristides]

13 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Buddy, describe for me how you feel about the following...

• Fauci knew that he himself had provided funding for GoF research on that bat coronavirus to make it transmissible among humans, and that in fact it had resulted in the development of a coronavirus that was transmissible between human cells
• BEFORE he started telling the story of the coronavirus most likely coming from a chance interaction between a bat and an intermediary species, such as a pangolin, where it mutated to become transmissible to humans. 
• Then Fauci inexplicably surmised/postulated/theorized that only the pangolin virus itself was transmissible to humans, and that the virus that was transmissible between cells within humans wasn't transmissible to other humans (back when Trump was banning non-Americans from flying in from China)
• People were banned from social media outlets for even talking about the BSL4 lab while Fauci was pimping the bat-pangolin-human tale. It was members of TNI who banned people from social media for talking about the BSL4 lab, and people from TNI who decided to only go with the B-P-H fantasy and ignore the possibility that it may have originated from the BSL4 lab
• The BSL4 lab is now considered to be the source of the covid virus

In your own words, I want you to tell me what you think about the integrity and trustworthiness of Fauci and these TNI members before I ever listen to another f'ing word out of your mouth about "who is and isn't a liar". 

I'll tell you somethin' for nothin': if Fauci was a lawyer or Realtor or some other professional who had a fiduciary relationship with their client, and they talked to their client with Fauci's lack of disclosures and low level of integrity - as described above - they'd lose their license for certain.

You know who isn't held to that level of professionalism at all? Doctors. And drug manufacturers. Weird, hey? Doctors "can't be sued" for prescribing the jab, and they weren't allowed to promote other possible preventive measures. Your doctor had no fiduciary relationship with you whatsoever as long as they were saying "vaccine". 

I know that you don't see a problem with any part of that. Your opinion doesn't mean jack shit to me, Aristedes. If you told me that the sun was going to come up tomorrow, I would consider that as a reason why it might not.  

Misdirection is all you have because you still can't explain what any of this crap you bring up has to do with the View, which is the subject of this topic,

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Black Dog said:

I haven't made any claims requiring evidence, I've just been mocking the brain damaged right wing losers freaking out over a daytime talk show.

you made a number of claims, including that right wing losers are freaking out about a daytime talk show    

That's pretty much your imagination. Kind of sounds like you're pretty upset about it though. Maybe you think it's a lot more important than even we do   

 

 

Quote

Except you made the following claims without any evidence to support them.

The evidence was right in the original article. It's common knowledge the view is popular, and the article mentioned that they had to be corrected for legal reasons a number of times in one show and that they are now concerned about it

Quote

 

The typical pattern with you is:

1. Present dogshit opinions as facts without supporting evidence

2. Lie and say you provided evidence and whine about being asked to back up your arguments

3. Go back to 1 and repeat ad nauseam.

The pattern has repeated itself countless times and frankly, I'm bored of it. You're boring.

 

No, that's the pattern you like to lie about whenever you can't actually make an argument.

dismiss any facts or evidence that you don't like

Insist that others don't present evidence or facts when they do in order to prevent having to form an argument yourself

Lie your ass off until you get caught

Then insult everybody and pretend that you're stupid is their fault

You say somebody is boring what you really mean is your emotionally distraught and buthurt about them having shot down another one of your false statements.

 

Hey, if you actually thought I was wrong about any of it you to presented your own evidence to the contrary.    So it's pretty obvious that you're just buthurt that I'm right yet again    You are endlessly hilarious  

[impartialobserver]

The obsession with The View is a bit peculiar. I have watched it once and that was 10+ years ago and it was only because I was bored out of my skull. 

[WestCanMan]

2 hours ago, Aristides said:

Misdirection is all you have because you still can't explain what any of this crap you bring up has to do with the View, which is the subject of this topic,

Your integrity - or startling lack thereof - is germane to this discussion, Aristedes.

You're a huge liar and snake and you always have been.

All you do is lie here, so why should anyone listen to you?

You can't even go out on a limb and say that you think ABC News has integrity because you know that they're shit, and as soon as you speak in favour of them you'll get steamrolled.

All you wanna say here is "Fox was sued by Dominion", but the American justice system is as bad as in any tinpot dictatorship anywhere on the planet right now.

Trump had to pay a settlement for calling E Jean Caroll a lying lunatic and E Jean Caroll absolutely is a lying lunatic: she was never raped by Trump. Not even according to her own story. 

1. She consented to modelling lingerie for him
2. She brought him into the change-room with her
3. She giggled when he pushed her against the wall and kissed her
4. She giggled when he put his fingers in her cooter
5. Then, with one hand, while wearing high heels, she was able to leave. 

At what point does that sound 'rapey' to you, Aristedes? FYI it doesn't even come close to meeting any criteria for "rape". None at all. Yet Trump lost that case. The stupid bimbo couldn't even remember what year it happened, all she could venture to guess was "late 1995 or early 1996. FYI that means "winter". And seriously, what kind of woman wears 4" heels in the NYC winter? 

When you say "Someone who's deemed to be right-leaning was accused of something and had to pay a settlement" that's meaningless. The US justice system is a moon-cast shadow of a respectable institution. 

Edited November 27, 2024 by WestCanMan

[Aristides]

49 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Your integrity - or startling lack thereof - is germane to this discussion, Aristedes.

You're a huge liar and snake and you always have been.

All you do is lie here, so why should anyone listen to you?

You can't even go out on a limb and say that you think ABC News has integrity because you know that they're shit, and as soon as you speak in favour of them you'll get steamrolled.

All you wanna say here is "Fox was sued by Dominion", but the American justice system is as bad as in any tinpot dictatorship anywhere on the planet right now.

Trump had to pay a settlement for calling E Jean Caroll a lying lunatic and E Jean Caroll absolutely is a lying lunatic: she was never raped by Trump. Not even according to her own story. 

1. She consented to modelling lingerie for him
2. She brought him into the change-room with her
3. She giggled when he pushed her against the wall and kissed her
4. She giggled when he put his fingers in her cooter
5. Then, with one hand, while wearing high heels, she was able to leave. 

At what point does that sound 'rapey' to you, Aristedes? FYI it doesn't even come close to meeting any criteria for "rape". None at all. Yet Trump lost that case. The stupid bimbo couldn't even remember what year it happened, all she could venture to guess was "late 1995 or early 1996. FYI that means "winter". And seriously, what kind of woman wears 4" heels in the NYC winter? 

When you say "Someone who's deemed to be right-leaning was accused of something and had to pay a settlement" that's meaningless. The US justice system is a moon-cast shadow of a respectable institution. 

You still can't explain what any of this has to do with the View.

[Nationalist]

IMO...

The View is trash. Rust for the mind. It will either be dropped by ABC, or it will get a truth enema.

MSNBC is trash. Comcast is dumping it because it's a money pit. Nobody but the most disturbed, watch the channel. 

The public has "woke" to the lies and fear porn of the Libbies and spoken. Now the Libbies are scrambling and doubling down on the very sh1t that has destroyed them. Yet they insist they are the intelligent portion of the population. 

Meh...stupid is as stupid does.

[CdnFox]

4 hours ago, impartialobserver said:

The obsession with The View is a bit peculiar. I have watched it once and that was 10+ years ago and it was only because I was bored out of my skull. 

It certainly not my taste, and wouldn't be if it was of a different political persuasion either. But it's very popular with a lot of Americans and a key demographic that democrats usually pursue and do well in. But absolutely nobody was buying into it this time

[Black Dog]

14 hours ago, CdnFox said:

you made a number of claims, including that right wing losers are freaking out about a daytime talk show    

As evidenced by this thread and others where you retarded chimp-people lose your minds over a daytime talk show. QED.

Quote

The evidence was right in the original article. It's common knowledge the view is popular, and the article mentioned that they had to be corrected for legal reasons a number of times in one show and that they are now concerned about it

Again, "the View is popular" is not related to the claims you made. You seem to really lack confidence in your own arguments given how frequently you backpedal away from them. Again your actual claims were 

1. The view has had a powerful impact in spreading this information and disinformation. 

2. The left considered it a powerful tool to attack their enemies.

1. requires showing at least a correlation between the view making a claim and that claim being spread or repeated afterwards while 2. requires evidence of someone from the "left" saying or suggesting such a thing.

Quote

No, that's the pattern you like to lie about whenever you can't actually make an argument.

dismiss any facts or evidence that you don't like

Yeah it turns out that the rare time you bother to provide sources they seldom actually prove your argument. that's not about me "not liking them" that's you sucking at arguing.

Quote

Insist that others don't present evidence or facts when they do in order to prevent having to form an argument yourself

Well you usually don't and I'm far from the only person to notice this.

Also don't forget the part where you cry and whine all the time about the burden having to back up your bullshit.

Quote

Lie your ass off until you get caught

Projection, given you're lying in this very post.

Quote

Then insult everybody and pretend that you're stupid is their fault

LOL you're gonna cry about insults? You?

Quote

You say somebody is boring what you really mean is your emotionally distraught and buthurt about them having shot down another one of your false statements.

No it just means you're boring. 

Quote

Hey, if you actually thought I was wrong about any of it you to presented your own evidence to the contrary.    So it's pretty obvious that you're just buthurt that I'm right yet again    You are endlessly hilarious  

Proving you wrong here would require you provide evidence in the first place that I could rebut. Without that I'd just be  responding to a subjective opinion.

The fact the copemojis are out so early is never a good sign for you.

Edited November 27, 2024 by Black Dog

[NAME REMOVED]

22 hours ago, Deluge said:

braindead dog in crisis:

 

OMG that video is cringe. 

That has to be parody.

[Deluge]

10 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said:

OMG that video is cringe. 

That has to be parody.

Is it? 

You'd better check with your therapist to make sure.  

[Black Dog]

55 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said:

OMG that video is cringe. 

That has to be parody.

It is. 

Funny how so many right wingers seem to have so much time on their hands that they can do this kind of dumb shit to "own the libs" but no lefties bother doing the opposite. 

Edited November 27, 2024 by Black Dog

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, Black Dog said:

As evidenced by this thread and others where you retarded chimp-people lose your minds over a daytime talk show. QED.

LOL Oh yes, your usual admission that you're wrong by attacking people instead of the point   Well it's nice to see that you've come to realize it anyway.

 

Quote

Again, "the View is popular" is not related to the claims you made. You seem to really lack confidence in your own arguments given how frequently you backpedal away from them. Again your actual claims were 

It is literally A fundamental characteristic of the claim I made

 

Quote

1. The view has had a powerful impact in spreading this information and disinformation. 

Glad we agree

Quote

2. The left considered it a powerful tool to attack their enemies.

Again, I concur. Looks like we're both on the same page

 

Quote

1. requires showing at least a correlation between the view making a claim and that claim being spread or repeated afterwards while 2. requires evidence of someone from the "left" saying or suggesting such a thing.

Nope. This is common knowledge. And considering your own comment it's pretty stupid that you would start off by suggesting that the fact that the show is popular and therefore able to spread information isn't relevant. Just shows how desperate you are

 

Quote

Yeah it turns out that the rare time you bother to provide sources they seldom actually prove your argument. that's not about me "not liking them" that's you sucking at arguing.

Nope it's just you not liking them. Everybody else gets it, but your only way to try and defend your useless points of view is to lie about what other people have said or pretend that facts and information aren't facts and information.

Quote

 

Well you usually don't and I'm far from the only person to notice this.

Also don't forget the part where you cry and whine all the time about the burden having to back up your bullshit.

Projection, given you're lying in this very post.

LOL you're gonna cry about insults? You?

No it just means you're boring. 

Proving you wrong here would require you provide evidence in the first place that I could rebut. Without that I'd just be  responding to a subjective opinion.

The fact the copemojis are out so early is never a good sign for you.

 

Sorry kiddo, but the only people who "notice it" Our people that employ the same dishonest tactics as you, specifically a couple of lefty losers on the board who can't make it actual argument so attempt to claim that I never post links or information. I do constantly. And when I don't it's because it's easily verifiable information with a 3-second search like if I say the sun comes up in the east in Canada I don't need to actually provide a cite.  But of course you'll demand one

And plenty of others have noticed your sea lioning and commented on it as well

You're a self delusional little loser lefty who can't make an argument to save his life. So you fall back on sea lioning and pretending that other people haven't given you information.

And of course your other trick is to then focus on the information and trying to deny it rather than addressing the original part of the discussion because you're afraid of it and you can't

Discussion here is about the impact of you has on spreading information and misinformation in America. The original story addresses some of that. So if you have other information you're welcome to present it or another argument to make go ahead

But if all you've got is lying about people sources then I'm afraid what you're admitting is that you are wrong and you have lost yet again