Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, DUI_Offender said:

01-hyenas-nationalgeographic_1742911.jpg

 

The MAGA hyenas are up early, yapping their nonsense today.

Please don't clutter the board with this nonsense.

Posted
1 minute ago, Legato said:

Please don't clutter the board with this claptrap

DUI_Offender is just a troll, he never contributes anything of value to the forum. 

 :)  

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
9 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said:

The MAGA hyenas are up early, yapping their nonsense today.

How dishonest are you?

You were the one who resurrected this thread to start posting a bunch of BS. 

  • Like 1

 

 

Posted

The leftists are really being dishonest in the hearings today 

The only qualifications for the SOD is that they are a civilian who's been in combat. 

Vile people

  • Like 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, West said:

The leftists are really being dishonest in the hearings today 

The only qualifications for the SOD is that they are a civilian who's been in combat. 

Vile people

Sure, any civilian who has been in combat is qualified to run an organization of nearly 3 million people with nearly a trillion dollars in budget. 

 

You're a buffoon. 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Sure, any civilian who has been in combat is qualified to run an organization of nearly 3 million people with nearly a trillion dollars in budget. 

 

You're a buffoon. 

It's funny that most Democrats in the senate have not ran any organization but feel they are qualified to determine who's qualified to run an organization 

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, User said:

How dishonest are you?

You were the one who resurrected this thread to start posting a bunch of BS. 

The American people are getting confirmation today for why they rejected wokeism in the last election

Posted
On 11/22/2024 at 10:45 AM, Black Dog said:

Oh no a drag queen singing? Get those kids out of there and to a church where they can be actually raped by their pastor!

Defend the pedophiles at all cost, even through projecting onto conservatives!!!

-- the Left

Posted
46 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Sure, any civilian who has been in combat is qualified to run an organization of nearly 3 million people with nearly a trillion dollars in budget. 

 

You're a buffoon. 

You guys keep playing these dishonest games... Hegseth is not running the organization; he is there to carry out the vision of the President and has a small army of people under him to run the organization. 

No one other than a previous SecDef has the "experience" to be "qualified" to do this job with the logic of your argument. 

 

 

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

I'm sorry that it was normal for adults to put on sexy clothing to do "things" with you when you were a little kid, but we weren't raised by leftists, so our parents protected us from that kind of thing. The Santa that we went to see didn't have a skirt and a hard-on. 

Still, I'm sad to find out that there's a whole generation of leftists who will be encouraging their young children to interact with adults in sexual clothing.

Were you by chance an altar boy or a boy scout?

Why are you replying to a bunch of posts from three months ago anyway, you senile c*nt? Eight dogshit replies to posts from last year, lol, take ya meds.

 

Edited by Black Dog
  • Haha 1
Posted

I think the Bee might be leaving satire and becoming more journalistic.

 

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
4 hours ago, Black Dog said:

Were you by chance an altar boy or a boy scout?

I'm not giving you any info that you can jerk off to, sorry.

Quote

Why are you replying to a bunch of posts from three months ago anyway,

DUI bumped the thread up, ask him why it came back to the top of the page.

Maybe he was just watching the video of the guy with the shorts wedged up his crack dancing for the elementary school child. Over and over again, like any normal Dem. 

Quote

Eight dogshit replies 

Oh calm down, Li'l racist. I'd never get in your lane. 

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted

I'd have a tiny bit more respect for MAGAtards if they would just admit "yeah this hesgeth guy is a drunk and a rapist and a Christofascist who is unqualified to run a hot dog stand but we don't care because we know it pisses you liberals off" instead of going through all the tiresome and transparent kayfabe.

  • Thanks 1
  • Downvote 2
Posted (edited)
43 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

I'd have a tiny bit more respect for MAGAtards if they would just...

regurgitate leftard drivel.

Do you know that he's a drunk? He seems pretty healthy for a drunk, don't ya think? 

Do you have some rape convictions to show us that we were unaware of, or just another Blasey Ford/E J Caroll slander? There are no leftards here who consider Bill Clinton a rapist, and that leaves you no room to accuse others based on 1) less evidence 2) less specific accusations 3) less witnesses.

Quote

unqualified to run a hot dog stand

Joe Biden just called, but it was a wrong number. He was trying to order an ice cream cone from Home Depot. 

Edited by WestCanMan
  • Downvote 1

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
22 hours ago, West said:

It's funny that most Democrats in the senate have not ran any organization but feel they are qualified to determine who's qualified to run an organization 

They all say "Hegseth isn't capable of running the DoD". Meanwhile:

ScreenShot2025-01-15at8_48_04AM.png.ec46f836f705d5880ad06fcda000bcbb.png

 

  • Haha 1

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
46 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

I'd have a tiny bit more respect for MAGAtards if they would just admit "yeah this hesgeth guy is a drunk and a rapist and a Christofascist who is unqualified to run a hot dog stand but we don't care because we know it pisses you liberals off" instead of going through all the tiresome and transparent kayfabe.

Well, buddy, ain't no one here looking for your respect. And, buddy, ain't no one caring about your bullshìt anonymous claims. And, buddy, where you pissed off at Jimmy Carter's funeral?

 

  • Like 2

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted

Yesterday, I was joking when I said they asked Hegseth when he stopped beating his wives. Honestly, I'm shocked that they did. The TDS is so strong they don't see it anymore

 

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
5 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Well, buddy, ain't no one here looking for your respect. And, buddy, ain't no one caring about your bullshìt anonymous claims. And, buddy, where you pissed off at Jimmy Carter's funeral?

what the f*ck are you blubbering about, you crack brained shitbird?

31 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

regurgitate leftard drivel.

Do you know that he's a drunk? He seems pretty healthy for a drunk, don't ya think? 

How do you know? Are you looking at his shirtless twink thirst traps hoping to feel the slightest stirring in your shrivelled little pecker?

 

  • Haha 1
  • Downvote 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

what the f*ck are you blubbering about, you crack brained shitbird?

 

 

Carter used the same Jerusalem Cross that you call Christofascist:

20250115_113250.thumb.jpg.f027b7bff97352b73502a7aa9becfb81.jpg20250115_113220.thumb.jpg.1687be03157253f6eea2c16f91d601c2.jpg

  • Like 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
2 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Carter used the same Jerusalem Cross that you call Christofascist:

20250115_113250.thumb.jpg.f027b7bff97352b73502a7aa9becfb81.jpg

1. Context is everything.

2. That wasn't the symbol in question, it was this "Deus Vult" ink.

3. Again, I don't understand why you guys bother with the performance instead of admitting the fact he's a piece of shit is the appeal for you (same as Trump).

Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

1. Context is everything.

2. That wasn't the symbol in question, it was this "Deus Vult" ink.

3. Again, I don't understand why you guys bother with the performance instead of admitting the fact he's a piece of shit is the appeal for you (same as Trump).

Oh, ok. So we are moving the goal posts again. I didn't realize that God wills it was suddenly controversial. Do you want to explain how that is controversial now?

Edited by gatomontes99

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
15 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Oh, ok. So we are moving the goal posts again.

Nope.

Quote

I didn't realize that God wills it was suddenly controversial. Do you want to explain how that is controversial now?

Good lord man why are you bothering to weigh in if you don't have even the most basic grasp of the subject?

Deus vult has been adopted as a slogan by a variety of Christian right and Christian nationalist groups,[8][26] as well as alt-right and white supremacist groups.[7][9] This usage was disseminated widely online,[9] through hashtags and internet memes.[7] Crusader memes (such as an image of a Knight Templar accompanied by the caption "I'll see your jihad and raise you one crusade") are popular on far-right internet pages.[27] It is one of several pieces of Crusader imagery used by groups characterized in The Washington Post as far-right Christian nationalists and dominionists.[26] One perspective is that racist movements co-opt the slogans and iconography of the European medieval period, to evoke a fantasy of a "pure" white European heritage, a nostalgic view that is historically inaccurate, and has been denounced by medievalist scholars[who?] as a gross distortion of history.[7][9][dubious  discuss]

The "Deus vult" slogan has been used by perpetrators of right-wing terrorism; it was repeatedly used by the perpetrator of the 2017 Quebec City mosque shooting[28] and was one of the tattoos on the body of the perpetrator of the 2023 Allen, Texas outlet mall shooting.[29] Deus Vult was among the slogans and symbols used during the violent far-right riot in Charlottesville, Virginia in 2017.[30]

The slogan, as well as other Knights Templar imagery, has also been associated with far-right subgroups in the U.S. that merge Christian nationalism with gun culture; a Florida gun manufacturer engraved the slogan on its "Crusader" model of AR-15-style rifle.[31] The motto is also used by Christian nationalist groups in Europe; the phrase was portrayed on large banners carried by unspecified groups characterized by The Guardian as far-right marchers in 2017 in Warsaw, Poland.[26][32][33]

Posted
5 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Nope.

Good lord man why are you bothering to weigh in if you don't have even the most basic grasp of the subject?

Deus vult has been adopted as a slogan by a variety of Christian right and Christian nationalist groups,[8][26] as well as alt-right and white supremacist groups.[7][9] This usage was disseminated widely online,[9] through hashtags and internet memes.[7] Crusader memes (such as an image of a Knight Templar accompanied by the caption "I'll see your jihad and raise you one crusade") are popular on far-right internet pages.[27] It is one of several pieces of Crusader imagery used by groups characterized in The Washington Post as far-right Christian nationalists and dominionists.[26] One perspective is that racist movements co-opt the slogans and iconography of the European medieval period, to evoke a fantasy of a "pure" white European heritage, a nostalgic view that is historically inaccurate, and has been denounced by medievalist scholars[who?] as a gross distortion of history.[7][9][dubious  discuss]

The "Deus vult" slogan has been used by perpetrators of right-wing terrorism; it was repeatedly used by the perpetrator of the 2017 Quebec City mosque shooting[28] and was one of the tattoos on the body of the perpetrator of the 2023 Allen, Texas outlet mall shooting.[29] Deus Vult was among the slogans and symbols used during the violent far-right riot in Charlottesville, Virginia in 2017.[30]

The slogan, as well as other Knights Templar imagery, has also been associated with far-right subgroups in the U.S. that merge Christian nationalism with gun culture; a Florida gun manufacturer engraved the slogan on its "Crusader" model of AR-15-style rifle.[31] The motto is also used by Christian nationalist groups in Europe; the phrase was portrayed on large banners carried by unspecified groups characterized by The Guardian as far-right marchers in 2017 in Warsaw, Poland.[26][32][33]

And they drank water and spoke english just like you. So you are a white supremacist!

Your side is so pathetic.

 

  • Like 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
2 hours ago, Black Dog said:

I'd have a tiny bit more respect for MAGAtards if they would just admit "yeah this hesgeth guy is a drunk and a rapist and a Christofascist who is unqualified to run a hot dog stand but we don't care because we know it pisses you liberals off" instead of going through all the tiresome and transparent kayfabe.

Why would we admit to any of those things?

 

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Popular Now

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,900
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Ana Silva
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dave L earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • CDN1 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...