Jump to content

Democrat lawyers who used lawfare against Trump and his supporters now worried about sweet sweets revenge and retribution


Recommended Posts

Posted
38 minutes ago, Hodad said:

I'm quoting a Republican-led senate report, Dummy. 

And that is not what Mueller concluded. Hence why you are quoting nothing at all. 

And for the honest folks playing along, the Senate report followed the Mueller report by quite some time and includes additional information. 

Yes he concluded after his racketeering scam that he could not establish a connection between any American and the Russian government. 

It's likely a racketeering scam where they use government resources to create tabloid bullshit, give it to CNN for ratings in turn profit. It's dirty to the core and why millions of Americans rejected it last election 

Posted
25 minutes ago, West said:

Except there's no evidence the guy was a Russian spy. He was a business guy. 

Polling and census data is used for alot of things including marketing.

No evidence, except, you know, for all the evidence that lead US intelligence services to conclusively determine that Kilimnik did work for Russian intelligence. And that he was formally sanctioned for taking Manafort's information directly to Russian intelligence. 🙄

Again, what's happening here is that you, a know-nothing internet rando want to assert without evidence that the official conclusions of US intelligence are wrong. That you have better information.

Forgive us if we think you're a clown.

28 minutes ago, West said:

Yes he concluded after his racketeering scam that he could not establish a connection between any American and the Russian government. 

It's likely a racketeering scam where they use government resources to create tabloid bullshit, give it to CNN for ratings in turn profit. It's dirty to the core and why millions of Americans rejected it last election 

You're simply lying. Again, the fact that you're lying is why you cannot cite any such conclusion. 

 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Hodad said:

No evidence, except, you know, for all the evidence that lead US intelligence services to conclusively determine that Kilimnik did work for Russian intelligence. And that he was formally sanctioned for taking Manafort's information directly to Russian intelligence. 🙄

Again, what's happening here is that you, a know-nothing internet rando want to assert without evidence that the official conclusions of US intelligence are wrong. That you have better information.

Forgive us if we think you're a clown.

You're simply lying. Again, the fact that you're lying is why you cannot cite any such conclusion. 

 

Heavy charge. Either you are a troll or just stupid. 

"did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government"

https://www.americanbar.org/news/abanews/aba-news-archives/2019/03/mueller-concludes-investigation/

Retract your statement you pos

Posted
17 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Go find the actual trial done by the Texas Senate to impeach Paxton. It was a beat down.

You didn't say impeached, you said prosecuted.

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, West said:

Heavy charge. Either you are a troll or just stupid. 

"did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government"

https://www.americanbar.org/news/abanews/aba-news-archives/2019/03/mueller-concludes-investigation/

Retract your statement you pos

That's not the Mueller report, you clown. FFS. 

You're quoting an ABA site that's quoting William Barr's bogus summary of the Mueller report. Which Mueller specifically rejected. 

 

Again, you are lying--shamelessly lying--which is exactly why you can't quote any such conclusion from Mueller. You've been challenged multiple times, and have even gone to the effort of quoting OTHER sources, but cannot manage to quote the Mueller report. (Hint: because you're making it up.) 

Because you are not very bright and because you are wildly dishonest I'm going to spare the folks playing along at home the an-ti-ci-pation. This is what the Mueller report says about Kilimnik. 

"The FBI, however, assesses that Kilimnik has ties to Russian intelligence. Several pieces of the Office’s evidence—including witness interviews and emails obtained through court authorized search warrants—support that assessment"

Essentially everyone knew that Kilimnik was Russian intelligence. It wasn't a secret. And indeed he passed Manafort's targeting intel to the agency running the interference campaign. 

Edited by Hodad
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, Hodad said:

That's not the Mueller report, you clown. FFS. 

You're quoting an ABA site that's quoting William Barr's bogus summary of the Mueller report. Which Mueller specifically rejected. 

 

Again, you are lying--shamelessly lying--which is exactly why you can't quote any such conclusion from Mueller. You've been challenged multiple times, and have even gone to the effort of quoting OTHER sources, but cannot manage to quote the Mueller report. (Hint: because you're making it up.) 

Because you are not very bright and because you are wildly dishonest I'm going to spare the folks playing along at home the an-ti-ci-pation. This is what the Mueller report says about Kilimnik. 

"The FBI, however, assesses that Kilimnik has ties to Russian intelligence. Several pieces of the Office’s evidence—including witness interviews and emails obtained through court authorized search warrants—support that assessment"

Essentially everyone knew that Kilimnik was Russian intelligence. It wasn't a secret. And indeed he passed Manafort's targeting intel to the agency running the interference campaign. 

Yes it is. Are you f'ing dumb or just a troll? 

Edited by West
Posted
3 minutes ago, West said:

Yes it is. Are you f'ing dumb or just a troll? 

Holy shit, man. Every single person on this forum can see that you've linked to an ABA news release. It's right there in the URL for everyone to read. 

And the text you are quoting is from Trump's AG, William Barr, not the Mueller report. 

You are not fooling anyone. Just because you're dumb does not mean that everyone else on this forum suffers from the same condition. 

Just give it up, you buffoon.

Posted
4 hours ago, West said:

You are quoting the leftist propaganda. 

Mueller concluded that no American (including Manafort) coordinated with Russia. 

No HE DID NOT. IF he did, you could quote it here, BUT YOU CANNOT.

4 hours ago, West said:

You are pretty pathetic to be peddling this conspiracy theory even after being thoroughly debunked by a report that cost taxpayers millions in the sad, pathetic little swindle and racketeering campaign of the US government..

Post the EVIDENCE. Duh

4 hours ago, West said:

True. 

Also criminal prosecutions if they could prove they acted with malice. 

Apparently Judge Merchan was taking bribes from some reports. Which is a crime

You mean new smacks reports? LMAO

You have NO EVIDENCE and therefore NO CREDIBILITY.

4 hours ago, Deluge said:

That's a good point. 

And it's not even revenge, really, it's defanging the pit vipers and punishing them to the full extent of the law. 

It is NOTHING BUT BULLSHIT.

Posted
37 minutes ago, Hodad said:

That's not the Mueller report, you clown. FFS. 

You're quoting an ABA site that's quoting William Barr's bogus summary of the Mueller report. Which Mueller specifically rejected. 

 

Again, you are lying--shamelessly lying--which is exactly why you can't quote any such conclusion from Mueller. You've been challenged multiple times, and have even gone to the effort of quoting OTHER sources, but cannot manage to quote the Mueller report. (Hint: because you're making it up.) 

Because you are not very bright and because you are wildly dishonest I'm going to spare the folks playing along at home the an-ti-ci-pation. This is what the Mueller report says about Kilimnik. 

"The FBI, however, assesses that Kilimnik has ties to Russian intelligence. Several pieces of the Office’s evidence—including witness interviews and emails obtained through court authorized search warrants—support that assessment"

Essentially everyone knew that Kilimnik was Russian intelligence. It wasn't a secret. And indeed he passed Manafort's targeting intel to the agency running the interference campaign. 

“The investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities,” the special counsel wrote in his findings

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/03/24/breaking-news-barr-to-release-summary-of-mueller-report-1233771

So I'll ask you a second time.. are you going to retract your statement calling me a liar? Your credibility is in the toilet. You can bolster it a little bit by admitting that you are mistaking about the contents of the Mueller report. 

Posted
3 hours ago, West said:

Yes he concluded after his racketeering scam that he could not establish a connection between any American and the Russian government. 

Other than the numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump Campaign you mean?

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit

Posted
41 minutes ago, West said:

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/03/24/breaking-news-barr-to-release-summary-of-mueller-report-1233771

There was no established connection. 

Only dishonest people and those struggling with delusions suggest otherwise 

Quote the report, NOT Barr's BULLSHIT. And the Senate Intel Committee Report, which has been posted HERE many times.

Try to be HONEST for once.

Manafort has long had DEEP TIES to Russian intelligence.

  • Haha 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Quote the report, NOT Barr's BULLSHIT. And the Senate Intel Committee Report, which has been posted HERE many times.

Try to be HONEST for once.

Manafort has long had DEEP TIES to Russian intelligence.

Barr quoted the Mueller report, duh dumbass

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, West said:

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/03/24/breaking-news-barr-to-release-summary-of-mueller-report-1233771

There was no established connection. 

Only dishonest people and those struggling with delusions suggest otherwise 

You are very dumb:

As set forth in detail in this report, the Special Counsel’s investigation established that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election principally through two operations. First, a Russian entity carried out a social media campaign that favored presidential candidate Donald J. Trump and disparaged presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. Second, a Russian intelligence service conducted computer-intrusion operations against entities, employees, and volunteers working on the Clinton Campaign and then released stolen documents. The investigation also identified numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump Campaign. 

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit

Posted
33 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

You are very dumb:

As set forth in detail in this report, the Special Counsel’s investigation established that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election principally through two operations. First, a Russian entity carried out a social media campaign that favored presidential candidate Donald J. Trump and disparaged presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. Second, a Russian intelligence service conducted computer-intrusion operations against entities, employees, and volunteers working on the Clinton Campaign and then released stolen documents. The investigation also identified numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump Campaign. 

So? 

They spent like 100k on Facebook ads and also staged protests outside of Trump Tower. 

Probably in retaliation to Clinton's interference in European politics moreso than the delusional conspiracy theory peddled on CNN for four years. 

Posted
21 minutes ago, West said:

So? 

They spent like 100k on Facebook ads and also staged protests outside of Trump Tower. 

Probably in retaliation to Clinton's interference in European politics moreso than the delusional conspiracy theory peddled on CNN for four years. 

So you said "he could not establish a connection between any American and the Russian government" except the actual report "identified numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump Campaign."

IOW you're wrong.

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit

Posted (edited)

I have so enjoyed watching lefty heads explode from the Oval Office, Senate and House triumverate I wish it would never stop....and to some extent, it won't.  Thing is: the Uniparty is delighted to have everyone focused and split over partisan BS so they can continue to rape and pillage taxpayers present and many decades into the future as they continue to fill their pockets.  The notion that the US economy was, is or ever will be great again is similarly ridiculous. $35 trillion of Federal debt alone means the average family of four is out about $340,000 for that debt alone.   The productive economy has almost totally collapsed - replaced by a speculative and "service" economy that produces no wealth but inflates the money supply resulting in runaway inflation - some realized but much still latent.  You can't run a country on baseball players, drug trading, lawsuits, holidays, hobbies, government bureaucracy, unions holding everyone to ransome, etc.   Somebody....closer to everybody....needs to actually do and REWARD productive work.   Instead we now reward the least productive the most. 

And do you hear Trump, Biden, Camel Hair, Kennedy or any other politician speak of such things?  At least the MAGA lot will double down on the immigration mess created by the Dummycrats.  Beyond that: Trump can not drain the swamp, since hi is indeed one of the alligators.

Edited by cannuck
Posted
18 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

So you said "he could not establish a connection between any American and the Russian government" except the actual report "identified numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump Campaign."

IOW you're wrong.

It wasn't me who said that dummy..it was Mueller. 

 

Posted
26 minutes ago, West said:

It wasn't me who said that dummy..it was Mueller. 

Lol I literally quoted his report. You quoted Bill Barr's spin. I'm right, you're wrong.

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit

Posted
43 minutes ago, cannuck said:

I have so enjoyed watching lefty heads explode from the Oval Office, Senate and House triumverate I wish it would never stop....and to some extent, it won't.  Thing is: the Uniparty is delighted to have everyone focused and split over partisan BS so they can continue to rape and pillage taxpayers present and many decades into the future as they continue to fill their pockets.  The notion that the US economy was, is or ever will be great again is similarly ridiculous. $35 trillion of Federal debt alone means the average family of four is out about $340,000 for that debt alone.   The productive economy has almost totally collapsed - replaced by a speculative and "service" economy that produces no wealth but inflates the money supply resulting in runaway inflation - some realized but much still latent.  You can't run a country on baseball players, drug trading, lawsuits, holidays, hobbies, government bureaucracy, unions holding everyone to ransome, etc.   Somebody....closer to everybody....needs to actually do and REWARD productive work.   Instead we now reward the least productive the most. 

And do you hear Trump, Biden, Camel Hair, Kennedy or any other politician speak of such things?  At least the MAGA lot will double down on the immigration mess created by the Dummycrats.  Beyond that: Trump can not drain the swamp, since hi is indeed one of the alligators.

deficit-7a479f.png

If Americans really cared about bringing down the deficit, they would always elect democrats, considering deficits rise when Republicans are in office, and fall when Democrats are leading the country,

It's amazing that it took me less than 5 minutes to find this out, yet many of the MAGA fanatics refuse to do the most basic economic research when it comes to US deficits. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,844
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    beatbot
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Radiorum went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • SkyHigh went up a rank
      Mentor
    • Venandi earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • Politics1990 went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • Venandi went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...