Kamala's new latest bizarre line of attack: Donnie will ban your porn

[NAME REMOVED]

11 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

At least she's not preaching to the choir for once, or she would have said "He'll enforce the bans on child pornography."

Her base would have been infuriated by that. 

 

This is perhaps the most bizarre post I have seen on the forum. Give your head a shake. 

[gatomontes99]

8 hours ago, Hodad said:

Yep. The party of small government (down with the nanny state!) is forcing people to "show their papers" to look at boobies. 

And, of course, you'll attempt to justify it. 

You mean, they put in protections to keep children from being exposed to porn and you are against that.

Edited October 14, 2024 by gatomontes99

[Hodad]

1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

You mean, they put in protections to keep children from being exposed to porn and you are against that.

No, I mean exactly what I said. 

In ass-backward Texas the bible thumpers will force citizens to show verifiable (and therefore trackable) ID to look at naked people online.

But you can buy a pile of guns out of the trunk of some guy's car without so much as a library card. 

Like the people of Uvalde surely say, pictures of naked people pose a real threat to children. 

 

--Here's an idea. How about instead of hassling everyone over free speech (for the sake of the children!) you could try being a parent. If you don't want your horny son to see boobies, block his access and leave your adult neighbor alone.  

[Nationalist]

This is ridiculous. Trump has not proposed a ban on porn. Trump has nothing to do with a wish list from the Heritage Foundation.

Now they want Trump to have his chlorestoral tested.

The Libbies have gone off the rails with desperation folks.

Edited October 14, 2024 by Nationalist

[Deluge]

16 hours ago, robosmith said:

Tell it to all the Trump CRONIES who wrote that in Project 2025. 

You'll understand when those people are re-hired to work in Trump's WH IF he's re-elected.

Until then, it is perfectly logical to hang Project 2025 on Trump AND his CRONIES.

 

Project 2025 isn't Trump's thing, but I don't see anything wrong with it. Democrats hate America, so of course they see lots of thing wrong with it. But for normal Americans? There's nothing to worry about.  

Edited October 14, 2024 by Deluge

[SkyHigh]

14 hours ago, West said:

Pretty sure there was a pervert from Australia that just fled the US after being accused of trafficking girls in the porn industry. 

Dude, Trump's spiritual advisor, take that in for a second Trump's Spiritual Advisor recently admitted to inappropriate behavior with a minor. 

Not some random person with no actual ties to any party, but Trump's Spiritual Advisor.

Do you not see how empty your silly accusations are?

[Hodad]

Just now, SkyHigh said:

Dude, Trump's spiritual advisor, take that in for a second Trump's Spiritual Advisor recently admitted to inappropriate behavior with a minor. 

Not some random person with no actual ties to any party, but Trump's Spiritual Advisor.

Do you not see how empty your silly accusations are?

Let's pump the brakes on this. Does anyone actually believe that Trump has a spiritual advisor? That would imply that he has some concern for right, wrong, justice, morality, etc.  And we all know that Trump's ethical philosophy boils down to one question: "Does it benefit Trump?"

[SkyHigh]

1 minute ago, Hodad said:

Let's pump the brakes on this. Does anyone actually believe that Trump has a spiritual advisor? That would imply that he has some concern for right, wrong, justice, morality, etc.  And we all know that Trump's ethical philosophy boils down to one question: "Does it benefit Trump?"

Agreed , the idea was to illustrate the difference in proximity of the pedos to Trump (MAGA) as compared to Harris (D)

 

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, SkyHigh said:

Agreed , the idea was to illustrate the difference in proximity of the pedos to Trump (MAGA) as compared to Harris (D)

 

But in fairness Harris's husband got the babysitter pregnant and beat a woman fairly badly apparently. 

That's gone very underreported in the press i notice.  I would tend to argue that it's not relevant to harris, but i would also argue that trump's advisor's  "inappropriate behavior' (whatever that is) is also irrelevant to trump.

If you have a great accountant, and he helps you with your taxes and does a good job, and it later turns out he raped someone at some point.... how the heck does that reflect on you? 

But i do notice this kind of stuff comes up about trump all the time but the media is pretty quiet about harris's husband.  The double standard is pretty shocking. 

[gatomontes99]

4 hours ago, Hodad said:

No, I mean exactly what I said. 

In ass-backward Texas the bible thumpers will force citizens to show verifiable (and therefore trackable) ID to look at naked people online.

But you can buy a pile of guns out of the trunk of some guy's car without so much as a library card. 

Like the people of Uvalde surely say, pictures of naked people pose a real threat to children. 

 

--Here's an idea. How about instead of hassling everyone over free speech (for the sake of the children!) you could try being a parent. If you don't want your horny son to see boobies, block his access and leave your adult neighbor alone.  

You cannot biy a pile of guns out of the trunk of a car. Not legally. Do you want to try to make something else up?

 

[SkyHigh]

58 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

But in fairness Harris's husband got the babysitter pregnant and beat a woman fairly badly apparently

Citation please, not saying this is false I'm just unaware.

 

[SkyHigh]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

If you have a great accountant, and he helps you with your taxes and does a good job, and it later turns out he raped someone at some point.... how the heck does that reflect on you? 

Ones choice of account doesn't reflect on their moral values the same way your spiritual advisor does, I'm sure you'd agree 

Edited October 14, 2024 by SkyHigh

[Hodad]

1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

You cannot biy a pile of guns out of the trunk of a car. Not legally. Do you want to try to make something else up?

 

Of course you can. Private sales are unregulated in Texas. No ID? No problem. And there is no set limit to the number you can buy or sell before you "become" a dealer. Just a massive, unregulated, untraced grey market. 

You can indeed legally and anonymously buy a pile of guns from the trunk of a car. And if you want to dispute that you'd need to present a law that would prohibit such behavior. 

Edited October 14, 2024 by Hodad

[robosmith]

16 hours ago, West said:

1. Trump has already said on multiple occasions he doesn't endorse nor has he had anything to do with project 2025.

IF Trump gets re-elected, you will see how close he is to P2025 when he rehires the people who wrote it.

16 hours ago, West said:

2. If the biggest beef you all have with it is that it keeps aggressive pornography out of the hands of minors and opposes perverts holding women hostage to make sex tapes to upload onto the internet then there's something legitimately wrong with the moral compass of the Democrat party 

if ifs and ands were pots and pans, there'd be no work for tinkers' hands

[robosmith]

4 hours ago, Deluge said:

Project 2025 isn't Trump's thing, but I don't see anything wrong with it. Democrats hate America, so of course they see lots of thing wrong with it. But for normal Americans? There's nothing to worry about.  

Of course YOU don't see anything wrong with it, because you're wearing partisan blinders while SLEEPING.

4 hours ago, SkyHigh said:

Dude, Trump's spiritual advisor, take that in for a second Trump's Spiritual Advisor recently admitted to inappropriate behavior with a minor. 

Not some random person with no actual ties to any party, but Trump's Spiritual Advisor.

Do you not see how empty your silly accusations are?

You talkin about that Mega Church pastor who denied it for years?

[SkyHigh]

4 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Of course YOU don't see anything wrong with it, because you're wearing partisan blinders while SLEEPING.

You talkin about that Mega Church pastor who denied it for years?

I would assume, though there may be more than one. Hahahaha 

I just googled it Robert Morris is his name 

[gatomontes99]

37 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Of course you can. Private sales are unregulated in Texas. No ID? No problem. And there is no set limit to the number you can buy or sell before you "become" a dealer. Just a massive, unregulated, untraced grey market. 

You can indeed legally and anonymously buy a pile of guns from the trunk of a car. And if you want to dispute that you'd need to present a law that would prohibit such behavior. 

By definition, what you described is not a private gun sale.

https://www.sll.texas.gov/faqs/private-gun-sales/

 

[robosmith]

30 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

By definition, what you described is not a private gun sale.

https://www.sll.texas.gov/faqs/private-gun-sales/

 

You forgot to quote the section of that law which disputes what Hodad said.

Meanwhile, no records are required, making any enforcement almost impossible. From your cite:

Quote

Neither federal law nor Texas law requires private sellers to keep a record when they sell a firearm. Licensed dealers are required to keep records of their sales, but these requirements do not apply to private sellers.

 

[gatomontes99]

11 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You forgot to quote the section of that law which disputes what Hodad said.

Meanwhile, no records are required, making any enforcement almost impossible. From your cite:

 

Again, it doesn't meet the definition of a private sale.

[robosmith]

5 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Again, it doesn't meet the definition of a private sale.

Again, you forgot to quote the section of that law which disputes what Hodad said.

You can say it a thousand times, but without the quote, it's just your OPINION.

Plus not having to keep records, suggests no one cares about ENFORCEMENT.

[reason10]

23 hours ago, robosmith said:

Tell it to all the Trump CRONIES who wrote that in Project 2025. 

You'll understand when those people are re-hired to work in Trump's WH IF he's re-elected.

Until then, it is perfectly logical to hang Project 2025 on Trump AND his CRONIES.

 

Homework: READ PROJECT  2025.

Here it is.

https://www.project2025.org/policy/

Each heading is a PDF download. They have different authors.

The PDFs are very long, and almost Masters Degree dense, so you might not get very far with your blue state second grade edumacation.

I guarantee you LEGALLY ELECTED PRESIDENT TRUMP has not read it. He just doesn't have the time.

Anyway, do your homework and QUIT LYING ABOUT THINGS YOUR UNEDUCATED ASS KNOWS NOTHING ABOUT.

On 10/13/2024 at 2:24 PM, West said:

Tells swing state voters that Donnie will ban porn in her new latest bizarre attack. Internal polling must be really bad. 

 

[West]

3 hours ago, robosmith said:

IF Trump gets re-elected, you will see how close he is to P2025 when he rehires the people who wrote it.

if ifs and ands were pots and pans, there'd be no work for tinkers' hands

If he bans porn for minors and stops perverts from locking women in a hotel room to have sex with them while filming then posting all over the internet, I'd be totally fine with it. 

But he's not gonna ban porn 

7 hours ago, SkyHigh said:

Dude, Trump's spiritual advisor, take that in for a second Trump's Spiritual Advisor recently admitted to inappropriate behavior with a minor. 

Not some random person with no actual ties to any party, but Trump's Spiritual Advisor.

Do you not see how empty your silly accusations are?

Who's that? 

 

Edited October 14, 2024 by West

[Hodad]

3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

By definition, what you described is not a private gun sale.

https://www.sll.texas.gov/faqs/private-gun-sales/

 

False. That's why you gave us a naked link instead of quoting some relevant passage. Nice try.🙄

A private sale simply means between parties who are not FFLs or participating in a gun show. 

If you want to throw your whole collection on Craigslist and conduct an undocumented sale in the parking lot of the local dive bar, that's fine and dandy in Texas.

But the state forces you to show your papers to consume free speech media. Freedumb!

 

Edited October 14, 2024 by Hodad

[CdnFox]

4 hours ago, SkyHigh said:

Citation please, not saying this is false I'm just unaware.

 

There's many. Usually i only provide cites when the info is going to be hard to find but in the spirit of cooperation i'll provide a few this time

Kamala Harris's husband had affair with children's nanny - The Jerusalem Post (jpost.com)

and for the girl beating

Everything We Know About The Allegations Against Kamala Harris' Husband Doug Emhoff (thelist.com)

Now, as I said I really don't think this kind of thing is relevant to the presidential race. This is hardly the first case of someone cheating on a spouse. Kamala herself was the other woman for a number of years and got massive benefits from it so how is this worse? I just don't think this should be part of the dialogue.

But I think I would say the same thing about a lot of the stuff that has been brought up about trump where someone that worked for him had an affair or is accused of something sexual and somehow that makes him a bad person and it's reported in every major media source. There's a number of examples including the one in this thread.

So my question is why is it front page news if it involves trump, but it's radio silence when it involves harris?

[West]

26 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

There's many. Usually i only provide cites when the info is going to be hard to find but in the spirit of cooperation i'll provide a few this time

Kamala Harris's husband had affair with children's nanny - The Jerusalem Post (jpost.com)

and for the girl beating

Everything We Know About The Allegations Against Kamala Harris' Husband Doug Emhoff (thelist.com)

Now, as I said I really don't think this kind of thing is relevant to the presidential race. This is hardly the first case of someone cheating on a spouse. Kamala herself was the other woman for a number of years and got massive benefits from it so how is this worse? I just don't think this should be part of the dialogue.

But I think I would say the same thing about a lot of the stuff that has been brought up about trump where someone that worked for him had an affair or is accused of something sexual and somehow that makes him a bad person and it's reported in every major media source. There's a number of examples including the one in this thread.

So my question is why is it front page news if it involves trump, but it's radio silence when it involves harris?

A good book for you to pick up would be this one

https://www.amazon.ca/Shepherds-Sale-Evangelical-Leaders-Leftist/dp/0063413442

Evangelicals make up roughly 30% of the voter block in the United States. There's big money involved in targeting that group from leftists whether that be to infiltrate the Southern Baptist Convention, seminarian, National Association of Evangelicals, paying off influencers like Billy Graham's grandkids at Christianity Today, and the use of "astroturf campaigns" (which are groups meant to seem grassroots for leftists causes in the churches but are really heavily funded by outside influence). 

The American Evangelical church is being run through by the Marxists much the same way that the media or academia has been. 

It's really eye opening when you see how much cash is floating in all aspects of society to brainwash the masses.