Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
59 minutes ago, Rebound said:

IMG_0058.thumb.jpeg.cded0ea701651c4f7934f390d987309a.jpeg

So if the references had not been removed there would not have been a hurricane?

  • Like 1
Posted
51 minutes ago, Legato said:

So if the references had not been removed there would not have been a hurricane?

No, but people considering living in Florida, would know the kind of future they would face.

On the bright side, there are plenty of bridges there for you to live under. They are the first to go underwater. 💡

Posted
2 hours ago, Rebound said:

IMG_0058.thumb.jpeg.cded0ea701651c4f7934f390d987309a.jpeg

As shocking as it may appear, ceasing to talk about massively increasing covid deaths and hospitalizations in Canada despite our high vaccination rate somehow ended the pandemic. 

  • Confused 1

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

As shocking as it may appear, ceasing to talk about massively increasing covid deaths and hospitalizations in Canada despite our high vaccination rate somehow ended the pandemic. 

How do you KNOW it was "despite" and not "because of"?

LOGIC dictates that increased immunity to a NOVEL VIRUS will work to quell a pandemic.

As evidenced by continued cases at a lower and less deadly rate.

Posted
9 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You have no idea what you're ^BULLSHITTING about, as usual. Not even a REASON for your lDIOTIC conclusion.

REASON and DEMOCRATS fight each other at every turn. 

Give it up, meathead; nobody believes you moonbats. 

Posted

So global warming just happened this year? Because they haven't had a hurricane for ten years a-hole!

 

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
15 minutes ago, Deluge said:

REASON and DEMOCRATS fight each other at every turn. 

You're not making ANY sense.

15 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Give it up, meathead; nobody believes you moonbats. 

ONLY YOU MAGA CULT.

Posted

Florida getting Hurricanes is nothing new in 2004 4 Hurricanes hit them in one year. It has nothing to do with Climate change and everything to do with being where Florida is. It is just the reality of living in Florida and they seem to deal with them just fine.

Posted
14 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

So global warming just happened this year? Because they haven't had a hurricane for ten years a-hole!

 

IF you bothered to try to find evidence for ^this, you would know it's NOT CLOSE TO TRUE.

Hurricanes happen EVERY year. Rare is the year that one doesn't make landfall in the US.

Here are just the hurricanes that hit Florida, a-hole:

god, you are stupid.

Quote

 

Dennis

Category 3 hurricane
July 10, 2005

Katrina

Category 1 hurricane
August 25, 2005
 
Category 1 hurricane

[notes 2]

September 20, 2005
Category 3 hurricane
October 24, 2005

Hermine

Category 1 hurricane
September 2, 2016

Matthew

Category 2 hurricane

[notes 2] October 7, 2016

Irma

Category 4 hurricane
September 10, 2017

Michael

Category 5 hurricane
October 10, 2018

Sally

Category 2 hurricane
September 16, 2020

Ian

Category 4 hurricane
September 28, 2022

Nicole

Category 1 hurricane
November 10, 2022

Idalia

Category 3 hurricane
August 30, 2023

Debby

Category 1 hurricane
August 5, 2024

Helene

Category 4 hurricane
September 27, 2024

Milton

Category 3 hurricane

[6]

October 10, 2024

2024Source: Chronological List of All Hurricanes which Affected the Continental United States: 1851–2012[1]

 

 

 

2 minutes ago, Fluffypants said:

Florida getting Hurricanes is nothing new in 2004 4 Hurricanes hit them in one year. It has nothing to do with Climate change and everything to do with being where Florida is. It is just the reality of living in Florida and they seem to deal with them just fine.

It is clear you are NOT tracking the water temps at all and just spouting BULLSHIT.

Do you even know why water temps matter?

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, robosmith said:

IF you bothered to try to find evidence for ^this, you would know it's NOT CLOSE TO TRUE.

Hurricanes happen EVERY year. Rare is the year that one doesn't make landfall in the US.

Here are just the hurricanes that hit Florida, a-hole:

god, you are stupid.

 

 

It is clear you are NOT tracking the water temps at all and just spouting BULLSHIT.

 

And, you proved my point. They went a decade, in Florida, without a hurricane. Hermine broke that drought:

Quote

Hurricane Hermine (/hɛrˈmiːn/, her-MEEN)[1] was the first hurricane to make landfall in Florida since Hurricane Wilma in 2005, and the first to develop in the Gulf of Mexico since Hurricane Ingrid in 2013. The ninth tropical depression, eighth named storm, and fourth hurricane of the 2016 Atlantic hurricane season, Hermine developed in the Florida Straits on August 28 from a long-tracked tropical wave.

(ibid)

 

Edited by gatomontes99

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
8 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

And, you proved my point. They went a decade, in Florida, without a hurricane. Hermine broke that drought:

(ibid)

Hurricanes hitting Florida is NOT the metric for measuring Global Warming nor Climate Change. Duh

Two hurricanes hit NC during that 10 years, and many others hit different states.

IOW, you cherry picking statistics is disingenuous at best.

Posted
3 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Hurricanes hitting Florida is NOT the metric for measuring Global Warming nor Climate Change. Duh

Two hurricanes hit NC during that 10 years, and many others hit different states.

IOW, you cherry picking statistics is disingenuous at best.

Because your side is saying that 2 hurricanes hitting Florida in a month is all of a sudden a sign that agw is real.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
20 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Because your side is saying that 2 hurricanes hitting Florida in a month is all of a sudden a sign that agw is real.

Who said it's "a sign"?

It is NOT "all of a sudden," it is definitely FURTHER EVIDENCE of the destructive REALITY AND POTENTIAL.

Thanks for continually revealing your IGNORANCE and BIAS.

Posted
40 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

While I empathize and feel bad for those who were in the path of destruction.. no chance that I ever move to Florida (this is one of many reasons) and very little chance I ever visit there. 

Plus you probably have strip malls in your own area. Save the trip.

Posted
5 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Who said it's "a sign"?

It is NOT "all of a sudden," it is definitely FURTHER EVIDENCE of the destructive REALITY AND POTENTIAL.

Thanks for continually revealing your IGNORANCE and BIAS.

If it is evidence of agw, then what do you call 10 year gaps with no hurricanes? Which is better evidence, one year with two events or 10 years with no events?

If you are going to use anecdotal evidence, at least use more than one incident to make your case. These sky is falling arguments need more.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
20 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

If it is evidence of agw, then what do you call 10 year gaps with no hurricanes? Which is better evidence, one year with two events or 10 years with no events?

If you are going to use anecdotal evidence, at least use more than one incident to make your case. These sky is falling arguments need more.

There WAS NOT "10 years with no events." Plenty of hurricanes hit the US in those 10 years and many more didn't make landfall here.

You're using the WRONG metric.

Posted
1 minute ago, robosmith said:

There WAS NOT "10 years with no events." Plenty of hurricanes hit the US in those 10 years and many more didn't make landfall here.

You're using the WRONG metric.

Yeah, you keep changing the parameters to suit you. I'm talking about flow-ride-a. Your side is saying two hitting flow-ride-a is proof of agw, you even said it. I'm saying, y'all are ignoring the 10 year gap in flow-ride-a because you only see the evidence that supports your fantasy.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
Just now, gatomontes99 said:

Yeah, you keep changing the parameters to suit you. I'm talking about flow-ride-a. Your side is saying two hitting flow-ride-a is proof of agw, you even said it. I'm saying, y'all are ignoring the 10 year gap in flow-ride-a because you only see the evidence that supports your fantasy.

No, it is YOU who is IGNORING ALL the OTHER EVIDENCE. As I SAID hurricanes hitting Florida is the wrong metric.

Seems you STILL don't understand that water temps are KEY.

You've COMPLETELY MISSED that the latest hurricanes have SET RECORDS for destruction.

Have you seen the map of the record number of tornadoes spawned by Milton?

Posted
40 minutes ago, robosmith said:

No, it is YOU who is IGNORING ALL the OTHER EVIDENCE. As I SAID hurricanes hitting Florida is the wrong metric.

Seems you STILL don't understand that water temps are KEY.

You've COMPLETELY MISSED that the latest hurricanes have SET RECORDS for destruction.

Have you seen the map of the record number of tornadoes spawned by Milton?

You are back to anecdotal evidence. How many tornadoes where there in hurricanes in the early 1900s? We don't know. How many where there in hurricanes before that? No fn clue. There is no way to know. We don't even know how many where in Katrina. Advancements in radar tech and computer analysis is making detecting tornados far more reliable than even 5 years ago. Saying that we saw a record number of tornadoes in one storm means we are better at detecting tornadoes.

You brought up water temperature and you are going to wish you hadn't. What you don't understand is that climate change is driven by the water, not the other way around. I'm going to 30,000 foot view this explanation because I don't have time to hit all the key points.

As the Earth spins around the sun and the sun around the milkyway and the milky way around the universe, our orbit varies from closer to the sun for longer periods and farther from the song for longer periods. This causes tectonic plate shifts. Plate shifts cause magma release. Magma release warms the ocean floor. Ocean floor warming causes methane hydrate to release. Methane rises into the atmosphere and helps hold radiation (and thus heat) in the atmosphere.

So, your observation that the seas are warming is a sign that agw is b.s. Because the magma warmed the bottom of the ocean and the methane hydrate melted to become methane and the warm water rose, we have a warmer climate. And what does a warmer climate do? It produces more CO2.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
6 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

You are back to anecdotal evidence. How many tornadoes where there in hurricanes in the early 1900s? We don't know. How many where there in hurricanes before that? No fn clue. There is no way to know. We don't even know how many where in Katrina. Advancements in radar tech and computer analysis is making detecting tornados far more reliable than even 5 years ago. Saying that we saw a record number of tornadoes in one storm means we are better at detecting tornadoes.

You brought up water temperature and you are going to wish you hadn't. What you don't understand is that climate change is driven by the water, not the other way around. I'm going to 30,000 foot view this explanation because I don't have time to hit all the key points.

As the Earth spins around the sun and the sun around the milkyway and the milky way around the universe, our orbit varies from closer to the sun for longer periods and farther from the song for longer periods. This causes tectonic plate shifts. Plate shifts cause magma release. Magma release warms the ocean floor. Ocean floor warming causes methane hydrate to release. Methane rises into the atmosphere and helps hold radiation (and thus heat) in the atmosphere.

So, your observation that the seas are warming is a sign that agw is b.s. Because the magma warmed the bottom of the ocean and the methane hydrate melted to become methane and the warm water rose, we have a warmer climate. And what does a warmer climate do? It produces more CO2.

What you're talking about is a MUCH LONGER TIME FRAME than the warming which has occured in the LAST 100 years.

And you HAVE NO DATA which shows "MAGMA" has increased in that short time frame. You don't even know what the current distance to the sun is in the cycle nor how long that cycle takes.

Meanwhile we KNOW that man is releasing GIGA-TONS of fossil fuel CO2 into the atmosphere EVERY YEAR.

And the gulf water is several degrees above the 100 year average RIGHT NOW causing STRONGER HURRICANES. 

There's a REASON you've cited NOTHING for YOUR FANTASY.

㊙️ Its not supported by the majority of real climate scientists.

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,912
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    AlembicoEMR
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...