Should the US revoke citizenships of illegal immigration supporters?

[Deluge]

Should the US revoke citizenships of illegal immigration supporters?

[Nationalist]

None of the above. Free speech and thought comes with the desirable and undesirable. 

[impartialobserver]

none of the above. Besides, legally it would not work due to the subjectivity of being a supporter or not. Free speech allows for all opinions not just those that a certain group supports. 

[Rebound]

40 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Should the US revoke citizenships of illegal immigration supporters?

I think the US should revoke the citizenship of fascists. 

[Deluge]

43 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

None of the above. Free speech and thought comes with the desirable and undesirable. 

Wrong. Free speech does not green light criminal behavior. 

The correct answer is A) Yes. It's an act of treason. 

[Deluge]

33 minutes ago, Rebound said:

I think the US should revoke the citizenship of fascists. 

Agreed. 

All democrats with their DEI bullshit need to have their citizenships revoked. 

1 hour ago, impartialobserver said:

none of the above. Besides, legally it would not work due to the subjectivity of being a supporter or not. Free speech allows for all opinions not just those that a certain group supports. 

Free Speech does not green light criminal behavior. 

[impartialobserver]

Not in my dept but getting ready to hire another non-white. This would really bother Deluge. The candidate has a masters degree in mathematics from University of New Mexico and has done similar work in the past.. 

[Nationalist]

29 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Wrong. Free speech does not green light criminal behavior. 

The correct answer is A) Yes. It's an act of treason. 

Wait...what is criminal about saying...oh let's say...men can become women?

I don't agree with the idea, but I can't impose my beliefs on such icky people. They can say what they want...and so can I.

Hence Madona could do this...

unfortunately...it's apparent the Libbies don't feel the same. Just ask Alex Jones.

 

Edited October 9, 2024 by Nationalist

[Deluge]

Just now, impartialobserver said:

Not in my dept but getting ready to hire another non-white. This would really bother Deluge. The candidate has a masters degree in mathematics from University of New Mexico and has done similar work in the past.. 

No problem here, unless he's hired illegally in the US. 

Was he hired illegally in the US, comradeobserver? 

 

[impartialobserver]

15 minutes ago, Deluge said:

No problem here, unless he's hired illegally in the US. 

Was he hired illegally in the US, comradeobserver? 

 

Nope.. originally from Honduras but became a citizen in 2019. But I know that if you worked here.. it would bother you that a non-white (seven of them and counting) was selected. You would complain about him and the others being diversity hires others despite them being citizens and their superior qualifications and as of yet, superior results. 

Edited October 9, 2024 by impartialobserver

[Deluge]

7 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Nope.. originally from Honduras but became a citizen in 2019. But I know that if you worked here.. it would bother you that a non-white (seven of them and counting) was selected. You would complain about him and the others being diversity hires others despite them being citizens and their superior qualifications and as of yet, superior results. 

Comradeobserver likes to treat his non-white employees like adorable m*rons and wave them in normal people's faces. 

I'm sure most of them resent this kind of jackassery, but they don't want to make any waves. 

[Deluge]

27 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Wait...what is criminal about saying...oh let's say...men can become women?

I don't agree with the idea, but I can't impose my beliefs on such icky people. They can say what they want...and so can I.

Hence Madona could do this...

unfortunately...it's apparent the Libbies don't feel the same. Just ask Alex Jones.

 

Facilitating illegal immigration is not protected by the 1st Amendment. Supporting it may be, but it depends on HOW the support is given. 

[gatomontes99]

As fun as this sounds, that's not a solution. The better solution is to let the majority opinion rule, rather then the minority opinion that has ruled for almost 4 years.

[impartialobserver]

33 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Comradeobserver likes to treat his non-white employees like adorable m*rons and wave them in normal people's faces. 

I'm sure most of them resent this kind of jackassery, but they don't want to make any waves. 

Not m*rons.. they have as of yet, been superior to their past counterparts. However, I know that you view them as diversity hires whereas I see a resume and then results.. 

[Deluge]

6 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Not m*rons.. they have as of yet, been superior to their past counterparts. However, I know that you view them as diversity hires whereas I see a resume and then results.. 

Excessive fawning, virtue signaling - hallmark behavior from a left-wing sociopath.

I wonder if they view you as a plantation owner. 

Edited October 9, 2024 by Deluge

[impartialobserver]

3 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Excessive fawning, virtue signaling - hallmark behavior from a left-wing sociopath.

I wonder if they view you as a plantation owner. 

I am not the supervisor to any of them... another assumption of yours just went up in smoke. 

I have been on the interview panel for 4 of the 7. 3 of them pre-date my time here. When I have been on the panel. I have voted for them 3 of the 4 times.. Based on what? Superior resumes and skills.. I know that you would view this a diversity hire and could not be bothered to read resumes/applications. 

[Deluge]

14 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

I am not the supervisor to any of them... another assumption of yours just went up in smoke. 

I have been on the interview panel for 4 of the 7. 3 of them pre-date my time here. When I have been on the panel. I have voted for them 3 of the 4 times.. Based on what? Superior resumes and skills.. I know that you would view this a diversity hire and could not be bothered to read resumes/applications. 

You said "Not in my dept but getting ready to hire another non-white". That could imply that it's your own company but you've chosen to directly run a specific department of it, or that you are some kind of divisional guy who sits in on interviews (probably to get a better look at non-white applicants), or that you're just some jealous woketard who wishes that it was your department that was hiring the non-whites. 

Which one is it? 

Edited October 9, 2024 by Deluge

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, Deluge said:

Should the US revoke citizenships of illegal immigration supporters?

so just to be clear, you're wondering if it's a good idea to establish the precedent that if someone expresses an opinion you don't agree with they should lose their citizenship? And then leave that for the dems when they get in again?

umm...  no.  No don't do that. 

Now go glue your brain back in place, it' must be loose  

[impartialobserver]

9 minutes ago, Deluge said:

You said "Not in my dept but getting ready to hire another non-white". That could imply that it's your own company but you've chosen to directly run a specific department of it, or that you are some kind of divisional guy who sits in on interviews (probably to get a better look at non-white applicants), or that you're just some jealous woketard who wishes that it was your department that was hiring the non-whites. 

Which one is it? 

its a state government office with 5 distinct sub-units. I am the supervisor in one of them. As of yet, only have 3 employees in it (myself and 2 others). State law says that you have to have 3 supervisors on the interview panel when you hire someone new. It just happens that my unit does not have any non-whites in it. It could in the future. If and when I hire a fourth person (no guarantee as to if that will ever happen).. it will depend on who applies and gets through the screening process. 

[Deluge]

12 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

so just to be clear, you're wondering if it's a good idea to establish the precedent that if someone expresses an opinion you don't agree with they should lose their citizenship? And then leave that for the dems when they get in again?

umm...  no.  No don't do that. 

Now go glue your brain back in place, it' must be loose  

I'm saying there should be stiff penalties for citizens who support or facilitate illegal immigration. 

Are you saying you're cool with illegal immigration? 

[robosmith]

3 hours ago, Deluge said:

Should the US revoke citizenships of illegal immigration supporters?

AGAIN ^advocating violating the Constitution.

There is NOTHING in the Constitution that allows revoking citizenship for "supporting" anything.

Not even Trump for "supporting" the overturn of elections with VIOLENCE. AKA treason.

[BeaverFever]

2 hours ago, Deluge said:

Wrong. Free speech does not green light criminal behavior. 

The correct answer is A) Yes. It's an act of treason. 

Loss of citizenship for people who express opinions you don’t like, or who appear to express opinions you don’t like.

 

Fascist is as fascist does. 
 

Edited October 9, 2024 by BeaverFever

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

As fun as this sounds, that's not a solution. The better solution is to let the majority opinion rule, rather then the minority opinion that has ruled for almost 4 years.

Trump LOST the election by 7M votes, making you MAGA CULT supporters the MINORITY. Duh

 

Quote

Former Vice President Joe Biden (D) won the presidential election on November 3, 2020. Biden received 306 electoral votes and President Donald Trump (R) received 232 electoral votes. In the national popular vote, Biden received 81.2 million votes and Trump received 74.2 million votes.^[1]

 

[Deluge]

35 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

Loss of citizenship for people who express opinions you don’t like, or who appear to express opinions you don’t like.

 

Fascist is as fascist does. 
 

Another open borders slut. 

You a$$holes must grow on trees. lol

 

 

[Deluge]

This must turn you degenerates on: