Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I wonder if part of the reason the firefighters' union didn't endorse Kamala was her support of all the arson from 2014-Aug 2020.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Downvote 1

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
3 hours ago, robosmith said:

I wonder if you'll ever stop LYING about Harris.

What did he lie about?

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted

I guess when your guy tries to burn down the Capitol on his way out, you make up all sorts of things to make yourself look like less of a POS for supporting him.

 

Cue: "But he only tried to overthrow democracy and kill Pence, and we only killed a few cops! We didn't burn down the Capitol! We only just tried to!"

  • Thanks 3
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Rebound said:

Kamala Harris didn’t support arson.

Kamala absolutely did support arson, as well as looting and assault.

Who do you think she was promoting the Minnesota bail fund for? Just rapists and murderers?

I'll grant you that she's as bad as any Soros-funded DA in the US right now, but she could be getting run-of-the-mill rapists and murderers out of jail right now if she wanted to. She could have helped raise bail for the guy who attacked Pelosi with a hammer, but she didn't.

She only supported a bail fund for Minnesota arsonists and looters, and the rioters who assaulted people. 

Who do you honestly think that Kamala was raising bail for, Rebound?

Your non-answer will be damning. 

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
9 hours ago, robosmith said:

I wonder if you'll ever stop LYING about Harris.

Do you deny that she pimped a bail fund for Minnesota rioters?

If she wasn't promoting that fund for rioters then whom? Rapists and murderers? 

OK, I'll admit it, the bail fund was partly for rapists and murderers too. Like this guy:

https://www.foxnews.com/us/minnesota-man-kamala-harris-bail-fund-charged-murder

Minnesota man freed by Kamala Harris-supported bail fund now charged with murder

A bail fund once backed by Vice President Kamala Harris helped free an alleged domestic abuser who is now accused of murder.

George Howard, 48, allegedly became involved in a road rage altercation on an Interstate 94 entrance ramp before he shot another driver, according to Minneapolis police – weeks after bailing out on domestic assault charges.

  • "We are aware of reports of the tragic and fatal shooting in Minneapolis earlier this week allegedly involving George Howard, an individual the Minnesota Freedom Fund had previously provided with bail support," the group wrote. "MFF believes that every individual who has been arrested by the law enforcement is innocent until proven guilty, and if a judge deems them eligible for bail, they should not have to wait in jail simply because they don’t have the same income or access to resources as others."

ScreenShot2024-10-06at9_24_18AM.thumb.png.2b90ad94fdb6922c735bb44b49808fbf.png

OMG, I see it now. You actually believe that she didn't pimp this bail fund for arsonists and looters... She fooled you by calling them "protesters". 

You thought she actually meant "protesters". You thought that the police in Minnesota were arresting people for protesting peacefully. "Cuz cops iz just so racist an' al that".

This is all a misunderstanding then. I thought that you were lying, you're just really unlucky when it comes to thinking. Like, o-fer a billion.

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
3 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

I guess when your guy tries to burn down the Capitol on his way out, you make up all sorts of things to make yourself look like less of a POS for supporting him.

 

Cue: "But he only tried to overthrow democracy and kill Pence, and we only killed a few cops! We didn't burn down the Capitol! We only just tried to!"

Dems: Riots are generally awesome. We saw thousands of riots that we absolutely adored over the past 10 years, as well as some peaceful protests at some SCJs' homes, but 3 hrs of mostly peaceful protesting at the capitol was as bad as Pearl Harbor or 9/11, because it affected us personally.

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted

@Rebound @robosmith

HEY! You got called out, kids. 

You made accusations, you were corrected, now what do you have to say for yourselves? 

The silence is very telling. 

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
8 hours ago, Nationalist said:

What did he lie about?

Thanks for admitting you're just as big an lDIOT as WCM.

"her support of all the arson..." 

Neither of you can prove she supported ANY arson. Duh

At most she supported raising funds for bail for unconvicted being HELD.

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

Kamala absolutely did support arson, as well as looting and assault.

Who do you think she was promoting the Minnesota bail fund for? Just rapists and murderers?

I'll grant you that she's as bad as any Soros-funded DA in the US right now, but she could be getting run-of-the-mill rapists and murderers out of jail right now if she wanted to. She could have helped raise bail for the guy who attacked Pelosi with a hammer, but she didn't.

She only supported a bail fund for Minnesota arsonists and looters, and the rioters who assaulted people. 

Who do you honestly think that Kamala was raising bail for, Rebound?

Your non-answer will be damning. 

Bailing out UNCONVICTED being HELD is NOT support for the ALLEGED crimes. Duh

Posted
1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

Do you deny that she pimped a bail fund for Minnesota rioters?

If she wasn't promoting that fund for rioters then whom? Rapists and murderers? 

OK, I'll admit it, the bail fund was partly for rapists and murderers too. Like this guy:

https://www.foxnews.com/us/minnesota-man-kamala-harris-bail-fund-charged-murder

Minnesota man freed by Kamala Harris-supported bail fund now charged with murder

A bail fund once backed by Vice President Kamala Harris helped free an alleged domestic abuser who is now accused of murder.

George Howard, 48, allegedly became involved in a road rage altercation on an Interstate 94 entrance ramp before he shot another driver, according to Minneapolis police – weeks after bailing out on domestic assault charges.

  • "We are aware of reports of the tragic and fatal shooting in Minneapolis earlier this week allegedly involving George Howard, an individual the Minnesota Freedom Fund had previously provided with bail support," the group wrote. "MFF believes that every individual who has been arrested by the law enforcement is innocent until proven guilty, and if a judge deems them eligible for bail, they should not have to wait in jail simply because they don’t have the same income or access to resources as others."

ScreenShot2024-10-06at9_24_18AM.thumb.png.2b90ad94fdb6922c735bb44b49808fbf.png

OMG, I see it now. You actually believe that she didn't pimp this bail fund for arsonists and looters... She fooled you by calling them "protesters". 

You thought she actually meant "protesters". You thought that the police in Minnesota were arresting people for protesting peacefully. "Cuz cops iz just so racist an' al that".

This is all a misunderstanding then. I thought that you were lying, you're just really unlucky when it comes to thinking. Like, o-fer a billion.

IDK about Canada, but BAIL is A RIGHT HERE for the UNCONVICTED. Duh

57 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Dems: Riots are generally awesome. We saw thousands of riots that we absolutely adored over the past 10 years, as well as some peaceful protests at some SCJs' homes, but 3 hrs of mostly peaceful protesting at the capitol was as bad as Pearl Harbor or 9/11, because it affected us personally.

^LYING AGAIN.

Posted
44 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Bailing out UNCONVICTED being HELD is NOT support for the ALLEGED crimes. Duh

Would she bail out a school shooter? We know Walz would now lol

Would she bail out a pedophile? DOH! They need those guys for BLM protests

Would she bail out a wife-beater? DOH! They also need wife-beaters for the BLM protests, and when they get bailed out by Kamala's favourite bail fund they sometimes kill people, so she definitely wants them out...

Would she bail out drug gangs? DOH! She even imports foreigners to sell drugs.

 

Ok, you kinda got me on this one. Kamala wants everyone out of jail, not just arsonists, looters, and wife-beaters. Only those deadly (dark-skinned) marijuana gangsters have to go to Kamala's jails. 

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
5 hours ago, Rebound said:

Kamala Harris didn’t support arson. And there are many firefighters unions. 
 

This firefighters union endorsed Harris:

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/minnesota/news/minnesota-firefighters-union-endorses-harris-walz/

I'm Minnesota...these twits elected Tampon Tim to office..

Not impressive...

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
50 minutes ago, robosmith said:

IDK about Canada, but BAIL is A RIGHT HERE for the UNCONVICTED. Duh

When did Kamala care about the rights of the unconvicted in 49 other states, or in any other year in Minnesota, sleazebag?

Of course she wanted that money to get rioters out of jail. She even specifically mentioned that the fund would get "protesters" out of jail. 

Now, how many BLM "protesters" were ever put in jail? Roughly zero. No one went to jail for peacefully protesting as far as I know. 

KAMALA WAS PIMPING THAT MINNESOTA BAIL FUND EXCLUSIVELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF GETTING RIOTERS AND ARSONISTS BACK ON THE STREET. 100%. KAMALA WANTED RIOTERS AND ARSONISTS BACK ON THE STREET. 100%.

  • Downvote 1

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
13 hours ago, robosmith said:

I wonder if you'll ever stop LYING about Harris.

What on earth do you think Harris is referring to in this clip?

"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell

Posted
4 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Kamala absolutely did support arson, as well as looting and assault.

Who do you think she was promoting the Minnesota bail fund for? Just rapists and murderers?

I'll grant you that she's as bad as any Soros-funded DA in the US right now, but she could be getting run-of-the-mill rapists and murderers out of jail right now if she wanted to. She could have helped raise bail for the guy who attacked Pelosi with a hammer, but she didn't.

She only supported a bail fund for Minnesota arsonists and looters, and the rioters who assaulted people. 

Who do you honestly think that Kamala was raising bail for, Rebound?

Your non-answer will be damning. 

Had the rioters committed arson at that point?

  • Haha 1

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted (edited)

This proves how in the tank unions are for Democrats, all they need is a simple majority of their members to endorse Democrats but they need 100% of support for Republicans to endorse them.

I guarantee you the internal votes from the Firefighters union was probably the same for the Teamsters union where a majority of their members were supporting Trump but they just couldn't respect the will of their members to endorse Trump so they endorsed nobody. Just more Democrat democracy in action.

They only love democracy when it gets them what they want. I remember when gay marriage was on the ballot in California and the gay marriage advocates were like its on the ballot and said we must respect the will of the people until they got demolished and they immediately sued in the courts.

Edited by Fluffypants
Posted
2 hours ago, ironstone said:

What on earth do you think Harris is referring to in this clip?

Protesting cops killing UNARMED black men. Duh

Of course, you Canucks KNOW NOTHING about how cops treat black men, esp in the South.

Did you ever see the video of the cop demanding to see a black driver's license while parked in a gas station?

The black guy ran over to his car to retrieve the license and before he even reached his car, the cop pulled out his gun and started SHOOTING at him. Luckily the cop was not a good shot. 

Posted
1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Protesting cops killing UNARMED black men. Duh

Of course, you Canucks KNOW NOTHING about how cops treat black men, esp in the South.

Did you ever see the video of the cop demanding to see a black driver's license while parked in a gas station?

The black guy ran over to his car to retrieve the license and before he even reached his car, the cop pulled out his gun and started SHOOTING at him. Luckily the cop was not a good shot. 

Statistically, the numbers are very small.

And blacks have more interactions with police because they commit more crimes.

 

"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell

Posted
1 hour ago, ironstone said:

Statistically, the numbers are very small.

No one who is UNARMED should ever be shot by a cop.

1 hour ago, ironstone said:

And blacks have more interactions with police because they commit more crimes.

^Has nothing to do with shooting an UNARMED person.

Posted
9 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

She could have helped raise bail for the guy who attacked Pelosi with a hammer, but she didn't.

Why would Harris have given bail to a man who broke into a politicians home, and tried to kill her husband, all captured on video? 

Posted (edited)
33 minutes ago, robosmith said:

No one who is UNARMED should ever be shot by a cop.

^Has nothing to do with shooting an UNARMED person.

How do they know if they are unarmed? Also you know what would be better "LISTEN TO POLICE AND DO WHAT THEY SAY." In almost every case like this the person DIDN'T FOLLOW SIMPLE INSTRUCTIONS. Here is the simple truth, whether you think they are violating your rights or not if you run, start wrestling with the cops or if you reach in your pocket, it isn't going to end well for you. Also arguing with them and yelling at them and calling them names isn't going to help your case. Its over you are going to jail, now once in jail you can complain and call your local race baiting lawyer who loves getting their mug in front of a camera to sue the police and the city.

Policing is a very dangerous job and they don't have the luxury of assuming they are just reaching for their ID or they are just going back to their car to get something.

Edited by Fluffypants
Posted
1 hour ago, Fluffypants said:

How do they know if they are unarmed? Also you know what would be better "LISTEN TO POLICE AND DO WHAT THEY SAY." In almost every case like this the person DIDN'T FOLLOW SIMPLE INSTRUCTIONS. Here is the simple truth, whether you think they are violating your rights or not if you run, start wrestling with the cops or if you reach in your pocket, it isn't going to end well for you. Also arguing with them and yelling at them and calling them names isn't going to help your case. Its over you are going to jail, now once in jail you can complain and call your local race baiting lawyer who loves getting their mug in front of a camera to sue the police and the city.

Policing is a very dangerous job and they don't have the luxury of assuming they are just reaching for their ID or they are just going back to their car to get something.

They need to assume they don't have a gun UNTIL YOU SEE ONE. 

Problem is, when you're black, they're ASSUMING YOU DO HAVE ONE.

They're wearing a vest, and the random black probably IS NOT.

Sorry but YOU don't get to set the rules to give cops leeway to KILL UNARMED PEOPLE.

The rules are changing so you better get used to that, like Chauvin and other recently jailed cops are.

Posted
12 hours ago, robosmith said:

No one who is UNARMED should ever be shot by a cop.

^Has nothing to do with shooting an UNARMED person.

There are instances where the police just can't tell if the suspect is not armed because of his behavior.

There is no epidemic of police officers knowingly shooting unarmed black suspects.

"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,912
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    AlembicoEMR
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...