Rebound Posted September 30, 2024 Report Posted September 30, 2024 A Fox News Host has analyzed the economic plans set forth by Trump and Harris, concluding that, while Harris’ plans will add an estimated $1.2 Trillion to the National Debt, Trump’s plans are clearly more inflationary and will add $5.8 Trillion to the National Debt. And, as I’ve pointed out many times, this Fox News Host has pointed out that Trump’s proposed 10-20% across the board tariffs will devastate the U.S. economy. Imagine going into a Wal-Mart store and finding that all Chinese made products now cost 60% more and all other goods cost 20% more. How is that not inflationary? And Trump’s tariffs also hit American production hard, particularly farmers, who were hit with over $26 billion in tariffs on food they shipped to China, making them non-competitive in China. 2 Quote @reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”
Legato Posted September 30, 2024 Report Posted September 30, 2024 Nice cherry pick. Jessica Tarlov is the mandatory bat-shut crazy Democrat on The Five. 2 1 Quote
Nationalist Posted September 30, 2024 Report Posted September 30, 2024 9 minutes ago, Legato said: Nice cherry pick. Jessica Tarlov is the mandatory bat-shut crazy Democrat on The Five. Yup. And she looks like a dope everytime she's on the show. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Old Guy Posted October 1, 2024 Report Posted October 1, 2024 7 hours ago, Legato said: Nice cherry pick. Jessica Tarlov is the mandatory bat-shut crazy Democrat on The Five. I suppose you have source, perhaps one of the other 4, who will refute her claims with facts. Here is an article that supports her analysis. 2 Quote
Legato Posted October 1, 2024 Report Posted October 1, 2024 1 hour ago, Old Guy said: I suppose you have source, perhaps one of the other 4, who will refute her claims with facts. Here is an article that supports her analysis. Analysis of possibilities, estimations and depends, not a drop of concrete in sight. None of which disproves she is bat-shit crazy. Quote
Rebound Posted October 1, 2024 Author Report Posted October 1, 2024 3 hours ago, Legato said: Analysis of possibilities, estimations and depends, not a drop of concrete in sight. None of which disproves she is bat-shit crazy. Plenty of concrete. Republicans have cut taxes again and again and treasury revenues fall each time. The Laffler Curve is proven false. Quote @reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”
Aristides Posted October 1, 2024 Report Posted October 1, 2024 (edited) It concentrates more wealth among fewer people. The top 1% in the US now have 16 times more wealth than the bottom 50%. https://www.cbpp.org/research/federal-tax/the-2017-trump-tax-law-was-skewed-to-the-rich-expensive-and-failed-to-deliver Edited October 1, 2024 by Aristides 2 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted October 1, 2024 Report Posted October 1, 2024 6 hours ago, Rebound said: Plenty of concrete. Republicans have cut taxes again and again and treasury revenues fall each time. The Laffler Curve is proven false. Too bad reality doesn't align with your fantasy. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FYFRGDA188S https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/W006RC1Q027SBEA In 1981 and 1986 Reagan issued massive tax cuts and the real revenue climbed. In 2018 the Trump tax cuts took effect and the revenue skyrocketed. But you believe your fantasy. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Aristides Posted October 2, 2024 Report Posted October 2, 2024 (edited) 18 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Too bad reality doesn't align with your fantasy. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FYFRGDA188S https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/W006RC1Q027SBEA In 1981 and 1986 Reagan issued massive tax cuts and the real revenue climbed. In 2018 the Trump tax cuts took effect and the revenue skyrocketed. But you believe your fantasy. Revenue to who, the devide between the wealthy and the rest just keeps growing. Deficits and debt also ballooned under Regan. Revenues didn’t increase nearly enough to offset the cuts. Edited October 2, 2024 by Aristides 3 Quote
Rebound Posted October 2, 2024 Author Report Posted October 2, 2024 22 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Too bad reality doesn't align with your fantasy. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FYFRGDA188S https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/W006RC1Q027SBEA In 1981 and 1986 Reagan issued massive tax cuts and the real revenue climbed. In 2018 the Trump tax cuts took effect and the revenue skyrocketed. But you believe your fantasy. Excellent source: “The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 applies to taxes starting in 2018, and the first quarterly data on tax revenue are in. This graph compares current tax revenue categories with categories for the previous year. Most noticeable are a major drop in corporate tax income and the increase in taxes from production and imports. (In the latter case, both excise tax income and import duty income increased.) These changes are actually quite impressive: -35% for corporate tax income, +16% for production and import tax income. Personal income taxes are slightly down ” https://fredblog.stlouisfed.org/2018/06/movement-of-the-federal-tax-receipt-front/?utm_source=series_page&utm_medium=related_content&utm_term=related_resources&utm_campaign=fredblog 1 Quote @reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”
gatomontes99 Posted October 2, 2024 Report Posted October 2, 2024 5 hours ago, Aristides said: Revenue to who, the devide between the wealthy and the rest just keeps growing. Deficits and debt also ballooned under Regan. Revenues didn’t increase nearly enough to offset the cuts. That's a spending issue, not a revenue issue. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Rebound Posted October 2, 2024 Author Report Posted October 2, 2024 1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said: That's a spending issue, not a revenue issue. Your mangod Trump outspent every President in history, including Biden. Quote @reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”
Nationalist Posted October 2, 2024 Report Posted October 2, 2024 (edited) 15 minutes ago, Rebound said: Your mangod Trump outspent every President in history, including Biden. And produced a wonderful economy for all Americans. As opposed to your diaper-clad id1ot and his equity hire, who ushered in high inflation and millions of illegal aliens. Meh...the choice is obvious. Edited October 2, 2024 by Nationalist Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
CrakHoBarbie Posted October 2, 2024 Report Posted October 2, 2024 (edited) 52 minutes ago, Rebound said: Your mangod Trump outspent every President in history, including Biden. Well, to be fair, FDR "trumps" them all ( pun intended). But donald definitely spent way more than Biden. https://www.investopedia.com/us-debt-by-president-dollar-and-percentage-7371225 Edited October 2, 2024 by CrakHoBarbie Quote
Aristides Posted October 3, 2024 Report Posted October 3, 2024 (edited) On 10/2/2024 at 4:59 AM, gatomontes99 said: That's a spending issue, not a revenue issue. Regan increased the debt by 186%, by far the greatest increase of any president. Edited October 3, 2024 by Aristides Quote
gatomontes99 Posted October 3, 2024 Report Posted October 3, 2024 2 minutes ago, Aristides said: Regan increased the debt by 186%, by far the greatest increase of any president. That's a spending issue, not a revenue issue. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Aristides Posted October 3, 2024 Report Posted October 3, 2024 1 minute ago, gatomontes99 said: That's a spending issue, not a revenue issue. If you spend more than you earn, it's a revenue issue. The more debt you have, the more revenue you need to service it. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted October 3, 2024 Report Posted October 3, 2024 2 minutes ago, Aristides said: If you spend more than you earn, it's a revenue issue. The more debt you have, the more revenue you need to service it. No. That's a spending issue. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Aristides Posted October 5, 2024 Report Posted October 5, 2024 (edited) On 10/3/2024 at 11:25 AM, gatomontes99 said: No. That's a spending issue. You don’t spend unless you have the revenues to cover it. You can’t isolate the two, they go hand in hand. The more revenues you need to service debt, the less you have to spend on things you need. The US federal government now needs over a trillion in revenues a year, just to pay interest on its debt. Edited October 5, 2024 by Aristides 1 Quote
Michael Hardner Posted October 5, 2024 Report Posted October 5, 2024 1 hour ago, Aristides said: You don’t spend unless you have the revenues to cover it. You can’t isolate the two, they go hand in hand. That's the game though, you cut taxes and then wait until the other government comes into power, then complain about the deficit so that services need to be cut. Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
Old Guy Posted October 5, 2024 Report Posted October 5, 2024 1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said: That's the game though, you cut taxes and then wait until the other government comes into power, then complain about the deficit so that services need to be cut. A well honed practice that has been going on for far too long. 2 1 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted October 5, 2024 Report Posted October 5, 2024 3 hours ago, Aristides said: You don’t spend unless you have the revenues to cover it. You can’t isolate the two, they go hand in hand. The more revenues you need to service debt, the less you have to spend on things you need. The US federal government now needs over a trillion in revenues a year, just to pay interest on its debt. You should tell Congress that. They spend regardless. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Old Guy Posted October 6, 2024 Report Posted October 6, 2024 18 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: You should tell Congress that. They spend regardless. Just out of curiosity what would the budget items in your budget? Quote
Rebound Posted October 6, 2024 Author Report Posted October 6, 2024 On 10/1/2024 at 8:29 AM, gatomontes99 said: Too bad reality doesn't align with your fantasy. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FYFRGDA188S https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/W006RC1Q027SBEA In 1981 and 1986 Reagan issued massive tax cuts and the real revenue climbed. In 2018 the Trump tax cuts took effect and the revenue skyrocketed. But you believe your fantasy. You mean… taxes were cut and DEFICITS skyrocketed. 1 1 Quote @reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”
robosmith Posted October 7, 2024 Report Posted October 7, 2024 On 10/2/2024 at 4:59 AM, gatomontes99 said: That's a spending issue, not a revenue issue. ^Typical right wing BULLSHIT 🤮 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.