Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Here is what Routh wrote about the assasination attempt before the attempt.

20240923_095544.thumb.jpg.4f2d8975fe5dac2a1b50b275ab61d80d.jpg

He claims he was going to give $150k to whomever can finish the job. My question is, did he have that much money and, if he did, where did he get it?

 

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Here is what Routh wrote about the assasination attempt before the attempt.

20240923_095544.thumb.jpg.4f2d8975fe5dac2a1b50b275ab61d80d.jpg

He claims he was going to give $150k to whomever can finish the job. My question is, did he have that much money and, if he did, where did he get it?

 

It probably came from the Kamelface/Tampon Tim fund - you know those scumbags are always up to something completely destructive. 

Edited by Deluge
Posted
1 minute ago, Deluge said:

It probably came from the Kamelface/Tampon Tim fund - you know those scumbags are always up to something completely destructive. 

I doubt it. They wouldn't be that careless.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
7 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

I doubt it. They wouldn't be that careless.

It depends on how they funnel it to him. I can see it happening. 

If it's not that, then it's from the global scumbag complex. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Here is what Routh wrote about the assasination attempt before the attempt.

20240923_095544.thumb.jpg.4f2d8975fe5dac2a1b50b275ab61d80d.jpg

He claims he was going to give $150k to whomever can finish the job. My question is, did he have that much money and, if he did, where did he get it?

 

Really? He KNEW he failed BEFORE the attempt. LMAO

You MAGA lDIOTS are SO NAIVE you'll believe ANY  pile of CRAP you see on the Interwebz that helps Trump's campaign, and shit it out here. 🤮 

 

Posted
34 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Really? He KNEW he failed BEFORE the attempt. LMAO

You MAGA lDIOTS are SO NAIVE you'll believe ANY  pile of CRAP you see on the Interwebz that helps Trump's campaign, and shit it out here. 🤮 

 

You are such a more-on.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/ryan-routh-trump-assassination-attempt-letter_n_66f168a7e4b0af9094c4f1ad

Feds released the letter.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Really? He KNEW he failed BEFORE the attempt. LMAO

You MAGA lDIOTS are SO NAIVE you'll believe ANY  pile of CRAP you see on the Interwebz that helps Trump's campaign, and shit it out here. 🤮 

 

Its called a contingency you loser, because if you fail, 9 times out of 10 you are dead. So he wrote the letter in case he failed.

3 minutes ago, West said:

Pretty gross that the DOJ published a bounty. Terrorists in the US government 

Yeah I would of thought they would of redacted that part now more crazies are going to think they will get paid to kill Trump.

Posted
1 hour ago, Fluffypants said:

Its called a contingency you loser, because if you fail, 9 times out of 10 you are dead. So he wrote the letter in case he failed.

Yeah I would of thought they would of redacted that part now more crazies are going to think they will get paid to kill Trump.

Sorry, but that doesn't make  any sense. If he expected to be dead, how would he pay anyone to finish the job?

  • Thanks 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Sorry, but that doesn't make  any sense. If he expected to be dead, how would he pay anyone to finish the job?

The ONLY way it makes sense, is if the guy who paid Routh to do the pretend assassination ATTEMPT, is in on the deal.

I mean sticking the gun through the fence with no target in sight is OBVIOUS EVIDENCE he wanted to be caught BEFORE the shot.

Posted
2 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

At least we'll always get to remember the times they staged assassination attempts for victimhood sympathy and no one cared. 😂 

I'm pretty sure the families of the dead in the first case care a fair bit. But as we have seen, you never miss a chance to make fun of those poor people. I suppose in your world is hilarious to lose a husband or father. Got to say they're pretty dedicated to the cause to allow themselves to be killed over a staged attempt

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
4 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I'm pretty sure the families of the dead in the first case care a fair bit. But as we have seen, you never miss a chance to make fun of those poor people. I suppose in your world is hilarious to lose a husband or father. Got to say they're pretty dedicated to the cause to allow themselves to be killed over a staged attempt

Obviously the first one wasn't "staged." Duh

Is your misunderstanding real obtuseness of just staged? LMAO

Posted
9 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Obviously the first one wasn't "staged." Duh

Is your misunderstanding real obtuseness of just staged? LMAO

Obviously neither were.  But Chrissy says staged, she's said it before with regards to the first one specifically.  

And once again no cites or proof of your opinions. FAIL!!!

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
16 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I'm pretty sure the families of the dead in the first case care a fair bit. But as we have seen, you never miss a chance to make fun of those poor people. I suppose in your world is hilarious to lose a husband or father. Got to say they're pretty dedicated to the cause to allow themselves to be killed over a staged attempt

I just love to watch you mew like a weak, self-righteous victim. 😂 

Posted
57 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

I just love to watch you mew like a weak, self-righteous victim. 😂 

Well you are a democrat so it's only natural you would revel in people suffering. I mean as a group that's kind of what you're all about, hatred and division right?

  • Like 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Hodad said:

Sorry, but that doesn't make  any sense. If he expected to be dead, how would he pay anyone to finish the job?

Maybe someone else is in on the deal, perhaps Iran. We all know they are trying to kill him.

No matter what you believe it is pretty messed up they left it in the letter they are almost inviting someone to kill Trump. They will redact stupid crap in their documents but not the "I will pay you 150k to kill Trump"

Edited by Fluffypants
Posted
7 minutes ago, Fluffypants said:

Maybe someone else is in on the deal, perhaps Iran. We all know they are trying to kill him.

No matter what you believe it is pretty messed up they left it in the letter they are almost inviting someone to kill Trump. They will redact stupid crap in their documents but not the "I will pay you 150k to kill Trump"

Or he didn't expect to be dead but expected to be caught. And he would still be alive to make the arrangements

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Or he didn't expect to be dead but expected to be caught. And he would still be alive to make the arrangements

More I think about it, I think it was the dude who Roush sent the box to and when he got caught he was afraid the cops would come calling and find the box because Roush would rat him out. Come on who doesn't open a box for a entire month and only does it once something bad happens, that is because he knew what was in it. He came forward with it because he got cold feet and he was afraid Roush would tell the cops about him helping.

If Roush had died this would of been sent out to a Newspaper or News Network anonymously because they knew they would gleefully report on it.

Edited by Fluffypants
  • Like 1
Posted
58 minutes ago, Fluffypants said:

Maybe someone else is in on the deal, perhaps Iran. We all know they are trying to kill him.

No matter what you believe it is pretty messed up they left it in the letter they are almost inviting someone to kill Trump. They will redact stupid crap in their documents but not the "I will pay you 150k to kill Trump"

Iran is going to have to get in line behind the fast food industry. 

Posted
1 minute ago, herbie said:

Maybe these guys were completely sane and trying to end the mass psychosis that sees so many actually supporting a fraudulent. rapist criminal, compulsive liar as a candidate.

Not to mention insane. Who tweets that they hate Taylor Swift because they didn't get her endorsement? That's unhinged and pathetic.

Posted
10 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Not to mention insane. Who tweets that they hate Taylor Swift because they didn't get her endorsement? That's unhinged and pathetic.

It's intended as humor. Most people would have found it funny. As a liberal female we know that you are more prone to mental health issues so it probably wouldn't seem that way to you. But to most people it would. I'll see if I can get a sarcasm sign for you  :) 

  • Haha 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,914
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    MDP
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • MDP went up a rank
      Rookie
    • MDP earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • derek848 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • MDP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • LinkSoul60 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...