Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

World news Tonight is Muir's opinion show. It supported Harris 100% of the time and was against Trp over 90% of the time. It is masked as a news show but it is just infotainment.

Tell us ONE EXAMPLE of Muir doing what YOU CLAIM and quote it or recording.

7 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

This is why I say the left lives in a fantasy world.

 

You're the one in the fantasy world which is why you never cite EVIDENCE for your claims HERE.

Posted
5 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

I proved all the NBC fact checks were wrong. But some how every lefty ignored them. Yet, Harris got away with the bloodbath lie, the Charlottesville lie, the jobs lie, the Inflation lie and so much more.

Quote them here. In reality Trump said the two things you claim she lied about.

"Very fine people ON BOTH SIDES"

https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4811891/user-clip-trumps-very-fine-people-quote

Trump warns: "If I don't get elected, it's going to be a bloodbath"

 

 

3 hours ago, Deluge said:

With the Communist News Network? I wouldn't. 

It's Fox or F*CK off. 

You need to stop pretending your OPINION means ANYTHING.

Posted
7 hours ago, Deluge said:

With the Communist News Network? I wouldn't. 

It's Fox or F*CK off. 

That's negotiable. Both fox and cnn are able to host a fair debate. The cnn offer is what's on the table. Donnys the one who looked like a complete know-nothing airhead in the last one. But if I were him I wouldn't do it.  Everyone knows he's not capable of doing better.

Posted (edited)

 

7 hours ago, robosmith said:

In reality Trump said the two things you claim she lied about.

"Very fine people ON BOTH SIDES"

Where has context gone?

As I recall, this press conference was about infrastructure renewal. I see little in what he said to disagree with. 

As always, the fist casualty is the truth... people who quote Trump as saying "Neo-Nazis are very fine people" are either deliberately lying or they're parroting propaganda they heard in the media, and they're doing it for partisan reasons. They don't care if it's true or not, it's not about truth for them it's about scoring points.

I'm not sure which is worse.. 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Venandi
Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, robosmith said:

Quote them here. In reality Trump said the two things you claim she lied about.

"Very fine people ON BOTH SIDES"

https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4811891/user-clip-trumps-very-fine-people-quote

Trump warns: "If I don't get elected, it's going to be a bloodbath"

 

See...fantasy world.

Quote

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-very-fine-people/

Excuse me, they didn't put themselves down as neo-Nazis, and you had some very bad people in that group. But you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides. You had people in that group — excuse me, excuse me, I saw the same pictures as you did — you had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name. George Washington was a slave owner. Was George Washington a slave owner? So will George Washington now lose his status, are we gonna take down — excuse me — are we gonna take down statues of George Washington? How about Thomas Jefferson? What do you think of Thomas Jefferson? You like him? Okay good. Are we gonna take down the statue? Cause he was a major slaveowner. Now are we gonna take down his statue? So you know what? It's fine. You're changing history, you're changing culture, and you had people — and I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists, okay?

I know you've seen this before. You've been shown it several times. But you continue to lie. Why? It's disgraceful.

Next lie:

Quote

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-bloodbath-for-country/

Let me tell you something, to China, if you're listening, President Xi — and you and I are friends, but he understands the way I deal — those big, monster car-manufacturing plants that you're building in Mexico right now, and you think you're going to get that, you're going to not hire Americans, and you're going to sell the cars to us?

No, we're going to put a 100% tariff on every single car that comes across the line, and you're not going to be able to sell those cars if I get elected. Now, if I don't get elected, it's going to be a bloodbath for the whole — that's going to be the least of it, it's going to be a bloodbath for the country, that'll be the least of it. But they're not going to sell those cars, they're building massive factories.

As for fact checking the fact checking, I did it here:

Just like your lies, their lies were easily debunked.

Edited by gatomontes99

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
56 minutes ago, Matthew said:

At least you understand trump is too dumb to compete in a fair debate.

Actually, I want a tit for tat. If yall are going to cheat, we should to.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
12 hours ago, Matthew said:

That's lazy and sloppy thinking.

Nope.  Common knowledge doesn't require a cite. 

What's "lazy and sloppy' is not doing your own homework on the subject and expecting others to do it,  especailly considering we both know your only reason for doing so is to try to find fault with the source :) 

Gotcha kiddo.  Go read a book

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
12 hours ago, Matthew said:

I don't watch tv news. But if we did a side-by-side of literally any network's evening news broadcast vs the hyperpartisan dumb shit hannity does, the difference would be extreme and obvious.

Yes, the primary difference being fox doesn't pretend to be non bias

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
23 hours ago, Matthew said:

An October 23 CNN invite has been accepted by Harris. Will Trump put himself through that again?

Trump offered Harris several debates, including one on Fox. She refused. 

I guess she should have accepted before if she wanted to debate so badly. 

 

  • Like 1

 

 

Posted
17 hours ago, robosmith said:

You need to stop pretending your OPINION means ANYTHING.

No I don't. My opinions beat the shit out of everything you've got. 

You want to win? Then pull your head out of the left's ass. ;) 

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, Matthew said:

That's negotiable. Both fox and cnn are able to host a fair debate. The cnn offer is what's on the table. Donnys the one who looked like a complete know-nothing airhead in the last one. But if I were him I wouldn't do it.  Everyone knows he's not capable of doing better.

No it isn't. CNN is a propaganda arm of the democrat party - no debates hosted by those shills. 

And Kamelface got the answers to her softball questions beforehand from ABC, so Fox is the only other option. 

Trump does suck, but Harris is a f*cking trainwreck without help from her media comrades - she may even be worse than Biden. lol

Edited by Deluge
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
51 minutes ago, myata said:

Six letters explain it all: "c-o-w-a-r-d".

That's the entire left, but the REAL explanation is also on your side, and it's 15 letters: "f-*-c-k-i-n-g c-h-e-a-t-e-r-s"

Edited by Deluge
Posted
20 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Common knowledge doesn't require a cite. 

If someone claims that David Muir openly supports a candidate on his show then all you have to do is show him doing that even once. Retorting that he obviously does is lazy. The guy is famously private about his personal political opinions.

Posted
1 hour ago, Deluge said:

That's the entire left,

You can throw up all kind of angry words, but it is factual. He said so himself. He isn't interested in the debates, truth in general, law, justice, anything unless they work for him, can be spread on his sandwich. This is obvious and right in plain sight. What didn't we know here?

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted
2 minutes ago, myata said:

You can throw up all kind of angry words, but it is factual. He said so himself. He isn't interested in the debates, truth in general, law, justice, anything unless they work for him, can be spread on his sandwich. This is obvious and right in plain sight. What didn't we know here?

You just don't get to say this kind of shit without having it thrown back in your face, myata. 

Whatever bad Trump might be, the democrats are 10 times worse. Just name ANY NEGATIVE about Trump that you can think of, and the democrats clearly outdo him. 

Trump is the best choice for President by miles and miles. It isn't even a discussion. 

 

Posted
9 minutes ago, myata said:

You can throw up all kind of angry words, but it is factual. He said so himself. He isn't interested in the debates, truth in general, law, justice, anything unless they work for him, can be spread on his sandwich. This is obvious and right in plain sight. What didn't we know here?

He offered to debate her several times, she refused. 

 

 

 

Posted (edited)
On 9/22/2024 at 5:51 AM, Matthew said:

At least you understand trump is too dumb to compete in a fair debate.

That's a load of shit. 

What we do know is that Harris is the real ldiot, and on a fair network like Fox, Trump would tear her a fresh new a$$hole just like he did for Biden on CNN. 

Edited by Deluge

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,912
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    AlembicoEMR
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...