Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Mark Zuckerberg admits censorship and vows to curb election donations

Quote

Zuckerberg said in his most explicit criticisms yet of the Biden White House that senior officials "repeatedly pressured" the tech billionaire's company to suppress content related to COVID-19 on its Facebook platform in 2021.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/mark-zuckerberg-admits-censorship-and-vows-to-curb-election-donations/ar-AA1ptB2a

 

Biden-Harris administration pressured Meta to censor Covid content, Zuckerberg tells House Committee

Quote

“I believe the government pressure was wrong, and I regret that we were not more outspoken about it. I also think we made some choices that, with the benefit of hindsight and new information, we wouldn’t make today. Like I said to our teams at the time, I feel strongly that we should not compromise our content standards due to pressure from any Administration in either direction and we’re ready to push back if something like this happens again,” he added.

“Mark Zuckerberg just admitted three things: 1. Biden-Harris Admin “pressured” Facebook to censor Americans. 2. Facebook censored Americans. 3. Facebook throttled the Hunter Biden laptop story. Big win for free speech.,” the post read.

https://theprint.in/world/biden-harris-administration-pressured-meta-to-censor-covid-content-zuckerberg-tells-house-committee/2239820/

Edited by CouchPotato
  • Like 1
Posted

I only have MySpace.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
42 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said:

Twitter is worse.

 

Facebook sucks niw.

 

The glory days of Facebook ended around 2015.

Hilarious...

And once again we see that Libbies have no solid position or principals. A sliderule of morality, honor, and "opinions".

The Hypocrite Scale.

  • Haha 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
6 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Hilarious...

And once again we see that Libbies have no solid position or principals. A sliderule of morality, honor, and "opinions".

The Hypocrite Scale.

What those who aren't blind (like you) see, is that government EXPERTS worked to suppress UNHEALTHY DANGEROUS disinformation that was spread by grifters to make a huge profit selling cheap drugs that did NOTHING to cure COVID.

See Alex Jones and America's Frontline Doctors.

May 15, 2023  The public-health emergency expired May 11. But the U.S. remains awash in tragedies linked to doctors who prescribed dubious treatments.
 
Aug 26, 2021  How 'America's Frontline Doctors' Sold Access to Bogus COVID-19 Treatments—and Left Patients in the Lurch. 20 minute read. Ivermectin Drug For ...
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, robosmith said:

What those who aren't blind (like you) see, is that government EXPERTS worked to suppress UNHEALTHY DANGEROUS disinformation that was spread by grifters to make a huge profit selling cheap drugs that did NOTHING to cure COVID.

See Alex Jones and America's Frontline Doctors.

May 15, 2023  The public-health emergency expired May 11. But the U.S. remains awash in tragedies linked to doctors who prescribed dubious treatments.
 
Aug 26, 2021  How 'America's Frontline Doctors' Sold Access to Bogus COVID-19 Treatments—and Left Patients in the Lurch. 20 minute read. Ivermectin Drug For ...

Ahem...

"Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin in COVID-19 have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance. Furthermore, results from numerous controlled prophylaxis trials report significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19 with the regular use of ivermectin. Finally, the many examples of ivermectin distribution campaigns leading to rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality indicate that an oral agent effective in all phases of COVID-19 has been identified"

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088823/

Ya know, when your stupidity only makes you look...stupid...it's comical. But when your stupidity produces threats to life and health, it's well beyond comical and becomes destructive. 

You Libbies are destructive. From treatments for The Rona, to economics and security, you Libbies are a walking disaster.

Edited by Nationalist
  • Thanks 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted (edited)

I like how the left tries to make this out to be just about covid when there were threats to suppress the Hunter laptop story and information that disproved the Steele dossier.

Edited by gatomontes99
  • Like 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted

They are scum. And at the risk on venturing into @myata-town...

We all knew it was all lies. Yet the Libbies gleefully perpetuate them to this day.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, robosmith said:

America's Frontline Doctors.

This group sued the FDA over their MISINFORMATION about ivermectin and......won.

Rather than take a money settlement, the group asked only that the FDA remove the misinformation from their website and the tweets. 

Biden’s FDA Concedes Defeat In Ivermectin Lawsuit, Will Remove Snarky Social Media Posts (msn.com)

Try to keep up.  I know it's hard to adjust your brain after you've believed lies, but you gotta do it.

If you have the capacity and critical thinking to do so, maybe ask yourself WHY the FDA would lie to the public about Ivermectin and how many people died because of the lies.....

Edited by Goddess

"There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe."

~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~

Posted
3 hours ago, Nationalist said:

They are scum. And at the risk on venturing into @myata-town...

We all knew it was all lies. Yet the Libbies gleefully perpetuate them to this day.

Their throne of lies is crumbling. 

The COVID lies they told us continue to warp our lives | National Post

Quote

We’re still learning how institutions and officials politicized science during the pandemic to justify economic lockdowns, border closures, school shutdowns and other measures that lacked supportive evidence but carried grave consequences. Vanessa Dylyn is the award-winning director of the new documentary Covid Collateral, which shows how real scientific methods and debate were sidelined, even banished, as governments faked expertise during COVID-19 with the help of compliant doctors and journalists.

Got that?  FAKE experts.

  • Like 1

"There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe."

~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~

Posted
3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

I like how the left tries to make this out to be just about covid when there were threats to suppress the Hunter laptop story and information that disproved the Steele dossier.

Show us "information that disproved the Steele dossier." YOU'VE CITED NOTHING to support your bogus CLAIM.

Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Ahem...

"Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin in COVID-19 have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance. Furthermore, results from numerous controlled prophylaxis trials report significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19 with the regular use of ivermectin. Finally, the many examples of ivermectin distribution campaigns leading to rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality indicate that an oral agent effective in all phases of COVID-19 has been identified"

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088823/

Ya know, when your stupidity only makes you look...stupid...it's comical. But when your stupidity produces threats to life and health, it's well beyond comical and becomes destructive. 

You Libbies are destructive. From treatments for The Rona, to economics and security, you Libbies are a walking disaster.

Authors:

Quote
image.jpeg.d4ab85abb33060e863657d400b93859d.jpeg
Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance
 

Description

The Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance is a group of physicians and former journalists, formed in April 2020, that has advocated for various unapproved, dubious, and ineffective treatments for COVID-19. Wikipedia
Abbreviation: FLCCC
Formation: March 2020
Presidents: Pierre Kory, Paul E. Marik

 

The FDA has not authorized or approved ivermectin for use in preventing or treating COVID-19 in humans or animals. The FDA has determined that currently available clinical trial data do not demonstrate that ivermectin is effective against COVID 19 in humans.Apr 5, 2024
 
 
 
Feedback
 
by K Bibbins-Domingo · 2023 · Cited by 8  At a Higher Dose and Longer Duration, Ivermectin Still Not Effective Against COVID-19. A Cochrane meta-analysis of 11 eligible trials examining ...
Quote

Areas of Uncertainty:

The majority of trialed agents have failed to provide reproducible, definitive proof of efficacy in reducing the mortality of COVID-19 with the exception of corticosteroids in moderate to severe disease. Recently, evidence has emerged that the oral antiparasitic agent ivermectin exhibits numerous antiviral and anti-inflammatory mechanisms with trial results reporting significant outcome benefits. Given some have not passed peer review, several expert groups including Unitaid/World Health Organization have undertaken a systematic global effort to contact all active trial investigators to rapidly gather the data needed to grade and perform meta-analyses.

Quote

Disclaimer

This disclaimer relates to PubMed, PubMed Central (PMC), and Bookshelf. These three resources are scientific literature databases offered to the public by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM). NLM is not a publisher, but rather collects, indexes, and archives scientific literature published by other organizations. The presence of any article, book, or document in these databases does not imply an endorsement of, or concurrence with, the contents by NLM, the National Institutes of Health (NIH), or the U.S. Federal Government.

Desperation abounds. 🤮

image.png

image.png

Edited by robosmith
Posted

I think the saddest thing I saw because of the censorship was the groups of vax injured people on Facebook getting deleted.  Some of these groups were 300,000 people.  

This was when anyone who got Guillian-Barre, Bell's Palsy, myocarditis, pericarditis, neuro disorders, tremors, vertigo, tinnitus, miscarriages, menstrual issues, etc, after the jabs - it was all being denied.

They were called "anti-vaxxers" and they had TAKEN the jabs!!

These people were just trying to get help, being ignored and slandered by the gov't, the media, the health care providers, told they were crazy or just "stressed".

Many were close to suicide.

Now, we know, of course, that these are all documented adverse events from the jabs and that governments and Big Pharma collaborated with the media to hush up adverse events so that other people would continue taking the jabs.

This can never happen again.

  • Thanks 1

"There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe."

~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~

Posted
45 minutes ago, Goddess said:

I think the saddest thing I saw because of the censorship was the groups of vax injured people on Facebook getting deleted.  Some of these groups were 300,000 people.  

This was when anyone who got Guillian-Barre, Bell's Palsy, myocarditis, pericarditis, neuro disorders, tremors, vertigo, tinnitus, miscarriages, menstrual issues, etc, after the jabs - it was all being denied.

They were called "anti-vaxxers" and they had TAKEN the jabs!!

These people were just trying to get help, being ignored and slandered by the gov't, the media, the health care providers, told they were crazy or just "stressed".

Many were close to suicide.

Now, we know, of course, that these are all documented adverse events from the jabs and that governments and Big Pharma collaborated with the media to hush up adverse events so that other people would continue taking the jabs.

This can never happen again.

Just cause they suffered from disease, does NOT conclusively demonstrate the vaccine was the CAUSE. People get sick all the time for many DIFFERENT reasons, so until there is a valid statistical analysis saying the result was greater than trend, it CAN BE just a coincidence.

AFAIK, the only disease which has met that criteria is myocarditis with the J&J vaccine. AKA, NOT mRNA.

Posted
10 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Just cause they suffered from disease, does NOT conclusively demonstrate the vaccine was the CAUSE. People get sick all the time for many DIFFERENT reasons, so until there is a valid statistical analysis saying the result was greater than trend, it CAN BE just a coincidence.

AFAIK, the only disease which has met that criteria is myocarditis with the J&J vaccine. AKA, NOT mRNA.

Lot of "coincidences" out there that Pharma is not interested in investigating.

In my city, there were 2 people in one week who dropped dead immediately after getting getting the booster, one in Shopper's Drug Mart (lady in her early 60's) and one in WalMart (man in his mid 30's).

I'm sure they were just "coincidences".

 

 

"There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe."

~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~

Posted
14 minutes ago, robosmith said:

until there is a valid statistical analysis saying the result was greater than trend

There is.

"There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe."

~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Goddess said:

This group sued the FDA over their MISINFORMATION about ivermectin and......won.

Rather than take a money settlement, the group asked only that the FDA remove the misinformation from their website and the tweets. 

Biden’s FDA Concedes Defeat In Ivermectin Lawsuit, Will Remove Snarky Social Media Posts (msn.com)

Try to keep up.  I know it's hard to adjust your brain after you've believed lies, but you gotta do it.

If you have the capacity and critical thinking to do so, maybe ask yourself WHY the FDA would lie to the public about Ivermectin and how many people died because of the lies.....

Noooope. Your post is dishonest. Read the article you linked.

The FDA did not lose the suit because ivermectin is demonstrably effective in treating COVID, but rather because an appeals court ruled that the FDA is not a physician and should not post to social media directives that might constitute medical advice. The FDA chose not to invest resources in defending years-old social media posts with an appeal. 

Edited by Hodad
  • Thanks 1
Posted

France extends detention of Telegram chief Pavel Durov – POLITICO

Over the weekend, Telegram founder Pavel Durov was nabbed by French police. Yet to be charged, media articles all suggest Pavel’s detention is related to Telegram’s failure to cooperate in stopping ‘criminal activity’ on the social media platform.

 

Telegram advertises itself as a protected free speech platform with over 900 million users. It was created and is owned by Pavel Durov. Pavel was born in Russia, but fled to Dubai in 2014 after Russian efforts to control his first social media platform, described as a Russian ‘Facebook.’ 

Anyway, most people view Pavel’s detention (not arrest) as a kind of hostage scenario. If Telegram plays ball, Pavel’s problems will magically disappear! All the platform need do is build a few government backdoors into the Telegram system, for safety, not for monitoring and censoring citizens, no, never.

It’s unusual for a corporation’s CEO to be arrested for crimes committed by others. Media calls it “unprecedented.” We can compare Pavel’s predicament with Mark Zuckerberg’s. Zuckerberg learned how to play ball in 2020, generously donated to Democrats, and, despite originally warning employees not to take the jabs, hired a battalion of security-state drones and built the government its own misinformation portal page during the pandemic.

Zuckerberg has never been detained, not even for the child pornography rings running rampant on Facebook. Nor detained for anything else, since he’s a good little deep-state doggie.

Other corporate bigwigs evade prosecution even for crimes they commit themselves. Take the pharmaceutical industry, for example, whose executives escaped detention even AFTER pleading guilty to literally killing people through fraud, like opioid maker Purdue Pharma.

Maybe Telegram should hire pharma lawyers.

"There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe."

~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~

Posted
Just now, Hodad said:

Noooope. Your post is district l dishonest. Read the article you linked.

The FDA did not lose the suit because ivermectin is demonstrably effective in treating COVID, but rather because an appeals court ruled that the FDA is not a physician and should not post to social media directives that might constitute medical advice. The FDA chose not to invest resources in defending years-old social media posts with an appeal. 

Look up the case and read about it.  Part of the case was because of them labeling it "horsepaste."  I've read the transcripts and the lawyers' breakdowns.

"There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe."

~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~

Posted
4 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Look up the case and read about it.  Part of the case was because of them labeling it "horsepaste."  I've read the transcripts and the lawyers' breakdowns.

Again, you are attempting to use the decision in this case, which in no way addresses claims of efficacy in treating COVID, to imply that the doctors bringing the suit were vindicated in their claims of efficacy by this decision. 

What you're doing is completely dishonest. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, robosmith said:

Show us "information that disproved the Steele dossier." YOU'VE CITED NOTHING to support your bogus CLAIM.

We arent relitigating that. It has been fully discredited. If you don't knownthat by now, it is willful ignorance.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
7 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Again, you are attempting to use the decision in this case, which in no way addresses claims of efficacy in treating COVID, to imply that the doctors bringing the suit were vindicated in their claims of efficacy by this decision. 

What you're doing is completely dishonest. 

Again, I've read everything about the case - you have not.

Dishonest?  Like telling the public IVM is "horsepaste"?  You don't have a problem with that dishonesty, though, do ya?

"There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe."

~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~

Posted
31 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Lot of "coincidences" out there that Pharma is not interested in investigating.

In my city, there were 2 people in one week who dropped dead immediately after getting getting the booster, one in Shopper's Drug Mart (lady in her early 60's) and one in WalMart (man in his mid 30's).

I'm sure they were just "coincidences".

And how many drop dead without getting a booster? What was the determined cause of death? Heart attack? Stroke?

Anecdotal evidence does not prove cause.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,908
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    miawilliams3232
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Benz earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Videospirit earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Barquentine earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • stindles earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stindles earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...