Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This is a brutal gauntlet throw down.

He is literally taking questions in front of AF2 while Harris and Walz drove off with the press at arms length. This guy is bad a$$.

 

Side note, the woman next to him might be the woman at the rally where a lwnj tried to assassinate Trump and she couldn't holster her gun and wouldn't go up on stage to be in the line of fire.

  • Thanks 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted

He's a bulldog with a bone.

 

  • Thanks 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
7 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

This thread is going to be so funny to revisit when Trump drops JD from the ticket.

Lol...yeah...that's going to happen.

Hate to tell you this, but Walz and Vance are a lock because a few states are already closed for registering to be on the ballot. One of the candidates would have to be incapable of serving (like they died or are in a comma),for those states to consider changing the ballot. Vance ain't going no where. Plus, he's bad a$$.

  • Like 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
4 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Lol...yeah...that's going to happen.

Hate to tell you this, but Walz and Vance are a lock because a few states are already closed for registering to be on the ballot. One of the candidates would have to be incapable of serving (like they died or are in a comma),for those states to consider changing the ballot. Vance ain't going no where. Plus, he's bad a$$.

LOL he looks like a youth pastor who had to step down for trying to finger the babysitter.

  • Haha 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

LOL he looks like a youth pastor who had to step down for trying to finger the babysitter.

Did your emotional support teddy tell you to say that? So pathetic.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

He is literally taking questions in front of AF2 while Harris and Walz drove off with the press at arms length. This guy is bad a$$.

 

Side note, the woman next to him might be the woman at the rally where a lwnj tried to assassinate Trump and she couldn't holster her gun and wouldn't go up on stage to be in the line of fire.

He's just a WEIRD TROLL.

Edited by robosmith
Posted
1 minute ago, robosmith said:

He's just a WEIRD TROLL.

Dude, that WEIRD meme is going to go down as the greatest failure in political history. Ducaucus is dancing in the street because his tank ride just got bumped to #2. The WEIRD meme has been confiscated by the right and used to brutally and savagely attack the left.

Do you really think the average American thinks that the guy that grew up in poverty, found a way to go to an ivy league school, served in the Marines, built a business and now is running for VP is weird, but the gov that put tampons in boys rooms and the cackling VP are the normal ones? Because if you do, you should keep doing that.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
9 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Did your emotional support teddy tell you to say that? So pathetic.

Not as pathetic as you going back to this same extremely dull and unfunny bit over and over again.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Not as pathetic as you going back to this same extremely dull and unfunny bit over and over again.

So you admit you are pathetic and followed that up with more equivocating.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
Just now, gatomontes99 said:

Dude, that WEIRD meme is going to go down as the greatest failure in political history. Ducaucus is dancing in the street because his tank ride just got bumped to #2. The WEIRD meme has been confiscated by the right and used to brutally and savagely attack the left.

The great thing about the "weird" thing is the louder and shriller you freaks get when people call you weird, the weirder you come off.

Quote

 

Do you really think the average American thinks that the guy that grew up in poverty, found a way to go to an ivy league school, served in the Marines, built a business and now is running for VP is weird, but the gov that put tampons in boys rooms and the cackling VP are the normal ones? Because if you do, you should keep doing that.

 

You mean the guy who calls people who don't have kids "childless cat ladies," who thinks parents should have more voting power than people without kids, who supports tracking women's periods, who is on friendly terms with holocaust deniers, who blurbed a book that praised fascists and called liberals "unhumans?" Yeah he's a creepy weirdo.

Posted
31 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

The great thing about the "weird" thing is the louder and shriller you freaks get when people call you weird, the weirder you come off.

You mean the guy who calls people who don't have kids "childless cat ladies," who thinks parents should have more voting power than people without kids, who supports tracking women's periods, who is on friendly terms with holocaust deniers, who blurbed a book that praised fascists and called liberals "unhumans?" Yeah he's a creepy weirdo.

image-3271589440.thumb.jpg.69253f6e8e3d0cfa73b306b4b5cbf411.jpg

And we are the weird ones?

Find anyone in America that hasn't talked about childless cat ladies! For gawd's sake, it was a running skit on the Simpsons.

 

 

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
5 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

image-3271589440.thumb.jpg.69253f6e8e3d0cfa73b306b4b5cbf411.jpg

And we are the weird ones?

Yes, you are the weirdos who call in bomb threats to public libraries over this stuff.

Quote

Find anyone in America that hasn't talked about childless cat ladies! For gawd's sake, it was a running skit on the Simpsons.

Holy shit it's like you're missing the point on purpose. The issue isn't with his choice of phrase, it's his expressed belief that that people who don't have children don't have a direct stake in the country and are “more sociopathic” than those with kids. That's weird shit!

Posted

If I am not mistaken, wasn't he originally referring to specific women in the Democrat party. They don't have kids and therefore do not have the same kinds of concerns about the future that parents do. I mean, it's still not a great comment, but whatever... no worse than "a basket of deplorables" or Obama's views on rural voters.

Posted
33 minutes ago, CouchPotato said:

If I am not mistaken, wasn't he originally referring to specific women in the Democrat party. They don't have kids and therefore do not have the same kinds of concerns about the future that parents do. I mean, it's still not a great comment, but whatever... no worse than "a basket of deplorables" or Obama's views on rural voters.

I mean denigrating people who don't have kids is a long running thing for him, it's not just one gaffe.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Black Dog said:

Yes, you are the weirdos who call in bomb threats to public libraries over this stuff.

Holy shit it's like you're missing the point on purpose. The issue isn't with his choice of phrase, it's his expressed belief that that people who don't have children don't have a direct stake in the country and are “more sociopathic” than those with kids. That's weird shit!

Well, the truth is in opposition to what you claim.

NPR: "It's just a basic fact — you look at Kamala Harris, Pete Buttigieg, AOC — the entire future of the Democrats is controlled by people without children,” Vance continued. “And how does it make any sense that we've turned our country over to people who don't really have a direct stake in it?"

Is it not fair to say that people with no stake in the future shouldn't plan our future? It isn't a disqualifying factor from a constitutional aspect. As a voter, though, shouldn't we consider whether or not people with no stake in the future are concerned about the future?

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted (edited)
16 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Well, the truth is in opposition to what you claim.

No it's not, he's kinda obsessed with people having kids.

Quote

Kamala Harris has kids. Pete Buttegieg has kids.

Quote

Is it not fair to say that people with no stake in the future shouldn't plan our future? It isn't a disqualifying factor from a constitutional aspect. As a voter, though, shouldn't we consider whether or not people with no stake in the future are concerned about the future?

The idea that people with no kids have no stake in the future is absurd and off-putting and i encourage you weirdos to keep it up.

Edited by Black Dog
  • Thanks 1
Posted
20 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

This is a brutal gauntlet throw down.

He is literally taking questions in front of AF2 while Harris and Walz drove off with the press at arms length. This guy is bad a$$.

 

Side note, the woman next to him might be the woman at the rally where a lwnj tried to assassinate Trump and she couldn't holster her gun and wouldn't go up on stage to be in the line of fire.

Yup. The two little rodentcrats were huddled up in their plane waiting for him to leave. lol

  • Like 1
Posted
19 hours ago, Black Dog said:

This thread is going to be so funny to revisit when Trump drops JD from the ticket.

But not nearly as funny as watching your two little diapercrats flee the tarmac in terror. LOL!!

  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, Deluge said:

But not nearly as funny as watching your two little diapercrats flee the tarmac in terror. LOL!!

Hate to break the news but no one is scared of Dollar Tree Haley Joel Osment. Posing in front of AF2 is a massive loser energy, like getting your picture snapped with a Porsche that isn't yours. These guys have no juice.

Posted
13 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Hate to break the news but no one is scared of Dollar Tree Haley Joel Osment. Posing in front of AF2 is a massive loser energy, like getting your picture snapped with a Porsche that isn't yours. These guys have no juice.

Haley Joel Osment is a communist p*ssy, just like you. We really need to revoke your citizenships and ship your a$$es to Cuba. ;) 

Posted
20 hours ago, Black Dog said:

LOL he looks like a youth pastor who had to step down for trying to finger the babysitter.

Again with the gross sexual preoccupation. Man go get laid. Maybe you'll calm down then.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
20 hours ago, Black Dog said:

LOL he looks like a youth pastor who had to step down for trying to finger the babysitter.

On Fox they're saying that Walz isn't officially on the ticket until the end of the DNC clownshow. That means that anti-veteran Tim could still be dropped from the ticket, which could be really bad for the GOP.

Josh Shapiro is a far more capable candidate, the only problems with putting him on the ticket are:

  1. being Kamala's underling will damage his brand, and lower his chances of becoming president
  2. he's too strong to be stood beside Kamala because the contrast will emphasize how weak and foolish she is.

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
8 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Again with the gross sexual preoccupation. Man go get laid. Maybe you'll calm down then.

If you take the shit-eating and pedophilia out of his posts there's almost nothing left. 

If you saw his browser history you'd get PTSD. 

  • Like 1

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,911
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    AlembicoEMR
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...